> Presumably this is for the console in the host system, not guests.
Even then, it enforces unnecessary restrictions. Surely there's
something more portable than TTYs out there. Although the VNC stuff
doesn't look much better.
++L
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:10:08PM -0500, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:
> Another question: will groups.google.com still have the old 9fans?
comp.os.plan9, and the google groups view of it, was fed by a mail->usenet
gateway. As long as the gateway (maintained at bath.ac.uk) is happy with
the new sender
Another question: will groups.google.com still have the old 9fans?
On Mar 7, 2008, at 6:58 PM, Russ Cox wrote:
We sign up the usual way?
Everyone who was on [EMAIL PROTECTED] is on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's no need to resubscribe.
They're two separate lists at the moment,
but within a matter
> We sign up the usual way?
Everyone who was on [EMAIL PROTECTED] is on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's no need to resubscribe.
They're two separate lists at the moment,
but within a matter of days I expect that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will either stop working
or forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Either way
Friends, the address for this mailing list is going to
be changing. Thanks to Russ, we now have 9fans at 9fans.net
set up, and current subscriptions migrated. Please give
it a try, and bear with us if there are any problems.
Thanks also to the psu computer science department
for hosting us these
> Why would Xen need to get involved in PTY mangling? I can just see
> it: Xen won't run your brand of OS because it does not provide a PTY
> implementation. That surely narrows the choice somewhat...
Presumably this is for the console in the host system, not guests.
Russ
