[6lo] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration

Hello Eric: Committed to github and published as -10. Please see Diff: draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration-09.txt - draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration-10.txt

[6lo] Re: Call for adoption of draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928

Hello Adnan, Thank you for the update, no problem is the authors want to keep section 2. It also seem that you do not agree with citing ‘this RFC’ in addition to RFC 8928 in the IANA considerations, again up to the authors. Section, I did not see the definition of the P-field in -00, but it is

[6lo] Re: Call for adoption of draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928

Hi Eric, Thanks for comments again. I spoke with Pascal to handle further comments. He will upload the updated draft. I might not be available until next week. Have a nice long weekend. Regards, AR On Thu, Apr 17, 2025, 23:14 Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote: > Hello Adnan, > > > > Thank you for

[6lo] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration-10.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration-10.txt is now available. It is a work item of the IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes (6LO) WG of the IETF. Title: IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Prefix Registration Author: Pascal Thubert Name:draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registrati

[6lo] Re: Call for adoption of draft-ietf-6lo-updating-rfc-8928

Hi Eric, All done except few. My comments are inline >- Section 2: (perhaps extreme also) can be completely removed, i.e., >there is no need to explain what EARO is > > *Adnan: * My suggestion is not to remove the all EARO flags field. Rest I agree. > > > > >- Section 3: add a refe