I guess you win this one :-) If it were up to me, I would say that the
documents should be experimental. It has all the properties that drive
experimental RFCs. However, I notice that RPL, and other RFCs for the
space this is aimed at, were published directly as PS. So I guess this
can go P
Thank you Joel.
Coming back to the intended status of the document…
In you last mail you stated: Given the pervasiveness of multi-connectivity, it
seems that if you want (as stated above) standards track for this document, the
document really needs to say how it works in such environments.
Wit
