Hello Murray
Many thanks for your review!
I'd rather keep that SHOULD and explain what happens when that is not done
(network takes time to recover, packets are lost). Rationale: In a very low
power LLN, the 6LN may be sleeping for a long time and will miss the async
messages anyway, so sending t
Will do, Luigi.
that's RFC 6550 and RFC 9010.
all the best,
Pascal
Le mer. 15 mai 2024 à 08:33, Luigi IANNONE a
écrit :
> Hi Pascal,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the reply. It makes sense. Thanks.
>
> As a nit, I would add the reference to the relevant RFC right after
> “processed normally”.
>
>
>
> Th
Hi Pascal,
Yes, this looks much better to me. Thanks!
-MSK
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:16 AM Pascal Thubert
wrote:
> Hello Murray
>
> Many thanks for your review!
>
> I'd rather keep that SHOULD and explain what happens when that is not done
> (network takes time to recover, packets are lost).
Dear 6lo WG,
This concludes the wg adoption call for draft-choi-6lo-owc-02. We received
9 positive responses and none against.
Authors,
Please re-publish it as a 6lo wg draft.
Thanks
Shwetha
On Mon, 6 May 2024, 8:38 pm Laurent Toutain, <
laurent.tout...@telecom-bretagne.eu> wrote:
> +1 that's
