Hi Pascal,
I hear you.
I just moved the bits to avoid direct conflict with your drafts.
This revision focuses on the security consideration part and I invite folks to
send feedback on that part.
Future revisions will tackle the EARO bits part.
Ciao
L.
> -Original Message-
> From: Pas
Dear all;
We seeing a number of situation (e.g., draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd and
draft-ietf-snac-simple) where there's a need for a node to advertise that it
owns a prefix to neighbor routers, and that packets sourced at (in case of
multihoming) or destinated to (in case of a stub) that prefix
Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\) wrote:
> At the moment there is magic (read proprietary code) that ties, say,
> the DHCP server that delegates a prefix and the routers that install a
> route for the delegated prefix via the delegated node. With this draft,
> the delegated node can adv
Hello Michael:
>
> I agree that we need a specification. But, I think don't think either of the
> documents you cited contain that what we need.
> Or maybe, I have mis-understood.
>
Agreed on all. This is why I'm asking reviews for
draft-thubert-6lo-prefix-registration, which aims at providing
