Hi All,
I support the adoption of the draft.
Regards
Vincent
De : 6lo <6lo-boun...@ietf.org> De la part de longr...@chinamobile.com
Envoyé : mardi 7 février 2023 11:46
À : carles.go...@upc.edu; 6lo@ietf.org
Objet : [6lo] 答复: Call for WG adoption of
draft-li-6lo-path-aware-semantic-addressing-0
Greetings,
I do not support adoption of this draft by the 6lo WG at this time, but
IETF is run by consensus
and I am just a single voice.
My main reason is that the draft has no Security Considerations section,
and I am not sure the
scheme can be made secure. I believe the WG should always consid
Kerry Lynn wrote:
> My main reason is that the draft has no Security Considerations section,
> and I am not sure the
> scheme can be made secure. I believe the WG should always consider the
I don't think that the lack of a SC section is a reason not to adopt.
(They are *drafts* and d
