Dear Guangpeng,
I'm sorry that the subject is becoming too long to read.
However, the issues are still not resolved, and I do think that answering
them properly requires taking the whole question, with its history.
In any case, I think that at this point it is clear that a
revised document is nec
Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\) wrote:
> I’m not a 6lo chair, but I do not see a consensus to adopt as is.
Thinking about what consensus is (RFC7282) and what adoption means, RFC7221,
I think that the question you need to answer is:
Do I/You have technical objections to this?
Since you don't
