Re: [6lo] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Thanks for the -20. As you have seen by now, I have cleared my previous blocking DISCUSS as the points have been addressed. Regards -éric From: Eric Vyncke Date: Thursday, 5 January 2023 at 07:59 To: "y...@etri.re.kr" Cc: The IESG , "draft-ietf-6lo-...@ietf.org" , "6lo-cha...@ietf.org" <6lo

Re: [6lo] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Dear Éric Vyncke, I appreciate for your DISCUSS and COMMENT points. I believe my draft, IPv6-over-NFC has been much more mature thanks to all of the IESG review. I am going to update the draft as soon as the last review from TSVART is finished.  I guess it will be done at the beginning of the n

Re: [6lo] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

It seems that all your newly proposed changes will address my DISCUSS and COMMENT points. I will clear my DISCUSS ballot as soon as a revised I-D with the changes is uploaded. Regards and thanks again for your work, -éric From: "y...@etri.re.kr" Date: Thursday, 5 January 2023 at 06:07 To: Er

Re: [6lo] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Dear all, I will fix on of my answers like follow: >>> >>> ### Section 3.4 >>> >>> As far as I understand the document and its relationship with NFC standards, >>> then it is not up to the IETF to use normative language around MIUX >>> (specified >>> by NFC), so, the "MUST" below should rathe

Re: [6lo] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Dear Éric Vyncke, Many thanks for you quick response. Please find my answers bellow: Best regards, Younghwan Choi > On Jan 4, 2023, at 6:38 PM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote: > > Dear Younghwan Choi, > > Thank you for your reply. > > Please see inline for EV> for additional comments. The abs

Re: [6lo] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Dear Younghwan Choi, Thank you for your reply. Please see inline for EV> for additional comments. The absence of replies means that I agree with the proposed change. You will notice that parts of my DISCUSS ballot are not addressed completely. Regards -éric From: "y...@etri.re.kr" Date: We

Re: [6lo] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Dear Éric Vyncke and all, I am not sure what is going on my answers. Anyway, my last answer has been cut in the middle. The whole answer was as like follow: > > ### Section 4.3 > > Please use RFC 5952 for IPv6 address format. Do you mean change the Figure 5 like following? OLD: 0

Re: [6lo] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Dear Éric Vyncke, Thanks for your comments. Please see responses inline bellows. Cheers, Younghwan Choi --- YOUNGHWAN CHOI, Ph.D. Principal Researcher, PEC, ETRI Tel +82-42-860-1429 Fax +82-42-860-5404 Email y...@etri.re.kr

[6lo] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-19: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ie