Re: [yocto] Patchwork users: Help test new version

2016-06-23 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:47:16AM -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> OpenEmbedded is nearly ready to upgrade to a new version of Patchwork.
> The new version offers several new features that will allow OpenEmbedded
> to improve developer workflow and automated checks on incoming patches.
> 
> If you are a Patchwork user please visit
> https://patchwork-next.openembedded.org/ and take a look. If you find
> anything amiss please e-mail me directly and include patchwork in the
> subject line.
> 
> Thank you for your help upgrading this important system!

I was using it to update meta-oe/master-next in last few days and it
seems to work the same as old patchwork for me.

But quite often I've noticed very slow response, is it running on
slower HW while testing or is the new version just a lot slower?

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[yocto] is there a recipe for building a ppc-based installer image?

2016-06-23 Thread Robert P. J. Day

  i've been fighting with this for a few days, so i'm going to
describe what i'm *trying* to do, and if someone has a solution,
terrific; in the meantime, i'm going to ask specific questions about
particular recipe and class files, since i think i see all the
*pieces* i want, i just don't know how to put them together to *get*
what i want.

  the scenario: powerpc target board, for which we already have
working u-boot, kernel and rootfs, and which will have u-boot already
installed as the basis for further adventures.

  as i *see* it, what i want to do is (and i'm willing to be
corrected) build a basic kernel with an integrated initramfs that is
loaded with installation utilities (fdisk, parted, mkfs, etc, etc.),
and whose job it is to then fetch (from somewhere) the installable
contents and load up the hard drive, then maybe use fw_setenv to tweak
the u-boot env variables, and reboot to the full system. make sense
so far?

  also, since it's ppc and u-boot, there's nothing grub or EFI related
i will need, correct?

  finally, i'd love to be able to test this on a qemuppc image first,
so if there's a quick way to build a recipe that does this for
qemuppc, that would be ducky.

  as i see it, there are a number of images under both recipes-core
and recipes-extended (those "testmaster" images) i've been looking at
that seem to be relevant, but i've yet to find a combination that
works.

  so i'm going to leave this very general description of what i'm
after here, and follow up with more specific questions about some of
those recipes, and about qemu sessions. and if someone already has a
pointer to do all this, well, we're done.

rday

p.s. if i can get a general solution to this that is not written up
elsewhere, i will be delighted to write it up for public consumption
so everyone else can take advantage.

-- 


Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:   http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday


-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[yocto] what is "core-image-testmaster.bb" supposed to do?

2016-06-23 Thread Robert P. J. Day

  first question related to building an installer -- how is one
supposed to use the recipe core-image-testmaster.bb?

  i've already noted (i think) that it has a bug in that it uses the
old (obsolete) variable INITRD_IMAGE, whereas the old occurrences of
that were changed to either INITRD_IMAGE_VM or INITRD_IMAGE_LIVE. so
it seems pretty clear that that recipe doesn't work at the moment.

  however, if it *did* work, how would one use it? it appears that it
builds both a simple initramfs, as well as a standard image. so would
it boot to the initramfs, and use the installation tools there to
install using the content from the standard image? is that what is
supposed to be going on there? or am i misreading this?

  in any event, it doesn't appear to work, and i get the feeling it's
probably overkill for my needs, but i'm still curious as to how one
would use it.

rday

-- 


Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:   http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday


-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


Re: [yocto] is there a recipe for building a ppc-based installer image?

2016-06-23 Thread chris simmonds
Robert,
Have you looked at using existing updaters such as meta-swupdate or swupd or rauc? I'm sure one of those would do what you want.
Rgds, Chris 
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[yocto] Regarding backslash in bblayers.conf file

2016-06-23 Thread Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.)
Hello,


We were facing a issue when building 'weston'. The issue is we had included 
meta-renesas & poky in our bblayers.conf file. The weston package is provided 
by both poky(v1.8.0) and meta-renesas(v1.9.0). We want the weston provided by 
the meta-renesas layer as it is the latest and also includes some changes done 
by Renesas.


But for some reason, it was building the weston provided by poky(1.8.0) which 
we don't want. Then we realized the issue to a backslash added by mistake in 
the bblayers.conf file after meta-rcar-gen3 as shown below.


# LAYER_CONF_VERSION is increased each time build/conf/bblayers.conf
# changes incompatibly
LCONF_VERSION = "6"

BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}"
BBFILES ?= ""

BBLAYERS ?= " \
  ${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta \
  ${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta-yocto \
  ${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta-yocto-bsp \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-renesas/meta-rcar-gen3/ \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain/ \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-visteon-monarch \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-browser \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-openembedded/meta-oe \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-openembedded/meta-gnome \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-openembedded/meta-networking \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-openembedded/meta-python \
  "
BBLAYERS_NON_REMOVABLE ?= " \
  ${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta \
  ${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta-yocto \
  "


After removing the character, its now building the weston provided by the 
mera-rcar-gen3 layer(v1.9.0) correctly as we expect. But I am not able to 
understand what was happening when the backslash character was present. Also 
when I was building weston with this unwanred character, I was getting the 
warning shown below which I couldn't understand.


Loading cache...done.
Loaded 4665 entries from dependency cache.
Parsing recipes...done.
Parsing of 2046 .bb files complete (2045 cached, 1 parsed). 4666 targets, 943 
skipped, 2 masked, 0 errors.
WARNING: No bb files matched BBFILE_PATTERN_rcar-gen3 
'^/home/hari/salvator-x-1.1.0/monarch-distribution/build_release/../meta-renesas/meta-rcar-gen3//'
WARNING: No bb files matched BBFILE_PATTERN_linaro-toolchain 
'^/home/hari/salvator-x-1.1.0/monarch-distribution/build_release/../meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain//'
NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
NOTE: selecting pseudo-native to satisfy virtual/fakeroot-native due to 
PREFERRED_PROVIDERS



Thanks & Regards,

Hari Prasath
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


Re: [yocto] Regarding backslash in bblayers.conf file

2016-06-23 Thread Leonardo Sandoval
This looks to be a bug. System should either accept path names with or 
without trailing '/'. Please file a bug on bugzilla.yoctoproject.org



On 06/23/2016 08:45 AM, Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.) wrote:


Hello,


We were facing a issue when building 'weston'. The issue is we had 
included meta-renesas & poky in our bblayers.conf file. The weston 
package is provided by both poky(v1.8.0) and meta-renesas(v1.9.0). We 
want the weston provided by the meta-renesas layer as it is the latest 
and also includes some changes done by Renesas.



But for some reason, it was building the weston provided by 
poky(1.8.0) which we don't want. Then we realized the issue to a 
backslash added by mistake in the bblayers.conf file after 
meta-rcar-gen3 as shown below.






# LAYER_CONF_VERSION is increased each time build/conf/bblayers.conf
# changes incompatibly
LCONF_VERSION = "6"

BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}"
BBFILES ?= ""

BBLAYERS ?= " \
  ${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta \
  ${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta-yocto \
  ${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta-yocto-bsp \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-renesas/meta-rcar-gen3/ \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain/ \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-visteon-monarch \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-browser \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-openembedded/meta-oe \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-openembedded/meta-gnome \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-openembedded/meta-networking \
  ${TOPDIR}/../meta-openembedded/meta-python \
  "
BBLAYERS_NON_REMOVABLE ?= " \
  ${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta \
  ${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta-yocto \
  "


After removing the character, its now building the weston provided by 
the mera-rcar-gen3 layer(v1.9.0) correctly as we expect. But I am not 
able to understand what was happening when the backslash character was 
present. Also when I was building weston with this unwanred character, 
I was getting the warning shown below which I couldn't understand.



Loading cache...done.
Loaded 4665 entries from dependency cache.
Parsing recipes...done.
Parsing of 2046 .bb files complete (2045 cached, 1 parsed). 4666 
targets, 943 skipped, 2 masked, 0 errors.
WARNING: No bb files matched BBFILE_PATTERN_rcar-gen3 
'^/home/hari/salvator-x-1.1.0/monarch-distribution/build_release/../meta-renesas/meta-rcar-gen3//'
WARNING: No bb files matched BBFILE_PATTERN_linaro-toolchain 
'^/home/hari/salvator-x-1.1.0/monarch-distribution/build_release/../meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain//'

NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
NOTE: selecting pseudo-native to satisfy virtual/fakeroot-native due 
to PREFERRED_PROVIDERS



Thanks & Regards,

Hari Prasath





-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


Re: [yocto] is there a recipe for building a ppc-based installer image?

2016-06-23 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, chris simmonds wrote:

> Robert,
>
> Have you looked at using existing updaters such as meta-swupdate or
> swupd or rauc? I'm sure one of those would do what you want.

  huh ... i was unaware of any of those options, will have to check
them out. but i would still like to figure out whether the classes and
recipes that come with OE/poky can still do the job.

rday

-- 


Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:   http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday


-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


Re: [yocto] [[yocto-autobuilder][PATCHv2] 00/15] Add support for generate bitbake/oe-selftest error reports

2016-06-23 Thread Aníbal Limón


On 06/22/2016 03:17 PM, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06/22/2016 02:44 AM, Beth 'pidge' Flanagan wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 18:07 -0500, Aníbal Limón wrote:
>>> This v2 adds support for generate also oe-selftest reports this is
>>> almost
>>> the previous version with changes requested in review [1], the next
>>> patches
>>> starts from patch,
>>>
>>> autobuilder/lib/{ABtools,builsteps}.py: Create
>>> save_error_report func
>>
>> A few comments.
>>
>> - Please rebase the last two commits. They can be merged into prior
>> commits. 
>>
>> Example: 0eb495d93eefa9ead8f4b1242f251f1a2288db68 should be squashed
>> into 83b6707622128436b4ece9d4c2a89311b000c209
>>
>> We shouldn't need rename commits for a pull request that created the
>> original thing we're renaming.
>>
>> - Please fix the title for 83b6707622128436b4ece9d4c2a89311b000c209
>> 's/buiidsets/buildsets/'
> 
> I squashed the changes now at,
> 
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-autobuilder/log/?h=contrib/alimon/devel2
> 
>   alimon

Hi,

The Error report web needed changes are now integrated [1], if you
ack'ed the changes we could proceed to integrate/deploy these changes to
enable send Bitbake/OE-seltest errors to ERW.

[1] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7583#c14

Cheers,
alimon

>>
>>
>> -b
>>
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


Re: [yocto] [[yocto-autobuilder][PATCHv2] 00/15] Add support for generate bitbake/oe-selftest error reports

2016-06-23 Thread Beth 'pidge' Flanagan
On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 10:27 -0500, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> 
> On 06/22/2016 03:17 PM, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 06/22/2016 02:44 AM, Beth 'pidge' Flanagan wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 18:07 -0500, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > This v2 adds support for generate also oe-selftest reports this
> > > > is
> > > > almost
> > > > the previous version with changes requested in review [1], the
> > > > next
> > > > patches
> > > > starts from patch,
> > > > 
> > > > autobuilder/lib/{ABtools,builsteps}.py: Create
> > > > save_error_report func
> > > A few comments.
> > > 
> > > - Please rebase the last two commits. They can be merged into
> > > prior
> > > commits. 
> > > 
> > > Example: 0eb495d93eefa9ead8f4b1242f251f1a2288db68 should be
> > > squashed
> > > into 83b6707622128436b4ece9d4c2a89311b000c209
> > > 
> > > We shouldn't need rename commits for a pull request that created
> > > the
> > > original thing we're renaming.
> > > 
> > > - Please fix the title for
> > > 83b6707622128436b4ece9d4c2a89311b000c209
> > > 's/buiidsets/buildsets/'
> > I squashed the changes now at,
> > 
> > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-autobuilder/log/?h=
> > contrib/alimon/devel2
> > 
> > alimon
> Hi,
> 
> The Error report web needed changes are now integrated [1], if you
> ack'ed the changes we could proceed to integrate/deploy these changes
> to
> enable send Bitbake/OE-seltest errors to ERW.
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7583#c14
> 
> Cheers,
>   alimon

Let me review them tonight and if they're ok, I'll pull them into
master.

-b


> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -b
> > > 
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


Re: [yocto] Regarding backslash in bblayers.conf file

2016-06-23 Thread Christopher Larson
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Leonardo Sandoval <
leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> This looks to be a bug. System should either accept path names with or
> without trailing '/'. Please file a bug on bugzilla.yoctoproject.org
>

Yeah, we likely need to sanitize that path so it aligns with the expected
value of BBFILES.
-- 
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[yocto] [autobuilder][PATCH] CreateAutoConf.py: check for empty env history variables before using

2016-06-23 Thread Bill Randle
I saw this error on a new AB setup:

File 
"/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/CreateAutoConf.py",
 line 181, in start

ta_history_repos=ast.literal_eval(os.environ.get('BUILD_HISTORY_THROWAWAY_WHITELIST').encode('utf-8'))
exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'encode'

Since the code above line 181 checks for either 
BUILD_HISTORY_THROWAWAY_WHITELIST
or BUILD_HISTORY_WHITELIST being set, it's possible one of them could be empty.

Signed-off-by: Bill Randle 
---
 .../site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/CreateAutoConf.py| 8 ++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git 
a/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/CreateAutoConf.py 
b/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/CreateAutoConf.py
index 0845ff1..91607e6 100644
--- a/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/CreateAutoConf.py
+++ b/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/CreateAutoConf.py
@@ -177,9 +177,13 @@ class CreateAutoConf(ShellCommand):
 
 if os.environ.get('BUILD_HISTORY_WHITELIST') is not None or \
os.environ.get('BUILD_HISTORY_THROWAWAY_WHITELIST') is not 
None:
+ta_history_repos={}
+history_repos={}
 fout = fout + 'ERROR_QA_remove = 
"version-going-backwards"\n'
-
ta_history_repos=ast.literal_eval(os.environ.get('BUILD_HISTORY_THROWAWAY_WHITELIST').encode('utf-8'))
-
history_repos=ast.literal_eval(os.environ.get('BUILD_HISTORY_WHITELIST').encode('utf-8'))
+if os.environ.get('BUILD_HISTORY_THROWAWAY_WHITELIST') is 
not None:
+
ta_history_repos=ast.literal_eval(os.environ.get('BUILD_HISTORY_THROWAWAY_WHITELIST').encode('utf-8'))
+if os.environ.get('BUILD_HISTORY_WHITELIST') is not None:
+
history_repos=ast.literal_eval(os.environ.get('BUILD_HISTORY_WHITELIST').encode('utf-8'))
 if repo in history_repos.keys() and \
self.getProperty("branch") in 
history_repos[self.getProperty("repository")]:
 # We keep this build history
-- 
2.5.5

-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/4] userland: Upgrade to latest tip

2016-06-23 Thread Khem Raj
Drop upstream applied patches

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj 
---
 ...applications-to-set-next-resource-handle.patch} |   6 +-
 ...make-generate-and-install-pkgconfig-files.patch | 114 -
 ...yland-Add-support-for-the-Wayland-winsys.patch} |  10 +-
 ...atch => 0003-wayland-Add-Wayland-example.patch} |   6 +-
 ...wayland-egl-Add-bcm_host-to-dependencies.patch} |   6 +-
 ...move-faulty-assert-to-make-weston-happy-.patch} |   8 +-
 ...-zero-out-wl-buffers-in-egl_surface_free.patch} |   6 +-
 ...07-initialize-front-back-wayland-buffers.patch} |   6 +-
 ...RPC_FLUSH.patch => 0008-Remove-RPC_FLUSH.patch} |   6 +-
 patch => 0009-fix-cmake-dependency-race.patch} |   6 +-
 ...tch => 0010-Fix-enum-conversion-warnings.patch} |   6 +-
 ...ix-for-framerate-with-nested-composition.patch} |   6 +-
 ...> 0012-build-shared-library-for-vchostif.patch} |   6 +-
 ...t-buffer-wrapping-interface-for-dispmanx.patch} |  14 ++-
 recipes-graphics/userland/userland_git.bb  |  29 +++---
 15 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)
 rename 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0003-Allow-applications-to-set-next-resource-handle.patch
 => 0001-Allow-applications-to-set-next-resource-handle.patch} (98%)
 delete mode 100644 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/0002-cmake-generate-and-install-pkgconfig-files.patch
 rename 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0004-wayland-Add-support-for-the-Wayland-winsys.patch
 => 0002-wayland-Add-support-for-the-Wayland-winsys.patch} (99%)
 rename 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0005-wayland-Add-Wayland-example.patch => 
0003-wayland-Add-Wayland-example.patch} (99%)
 rename 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0006-wayland-egl-Add-bcm_host-to-dependencies.patch
 => 0004-wayland-egl-Add-bcm_host-to-dependencies.patch} (86%)
 rename 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0007-interface-remove-faulty-assert-to-make-weston-happy-.patch
 => 0005-interface-remove-faulty-assert-to-make-weston-happy-.patch} (86%)
 rename 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0008-zero-out-wl-buffers-in-egl_surface_free.patch
 => 0006-zero-out-wl-buffers-in-egl_surface_free.patch} (87%)
 rename 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0009-initialize-front-back-wayland-buffers.patch
 => 0007-initialize-front-back-wayland-buffers.patch} (88%)
 rename recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0010-Remove-RPC_FLUSH.patch => 
0008-Remove-RPC_FLUSH.patch} (87%)
 rename 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0011-fix-cmake-dependency-race.patch => 
0009-fix-cmake-dependency-race.patch} (95%)
 rename 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0012-Fix-enum-conversion-warnings.patch => 
0010-Fix-enum-conversion-warnings.patch} (97%)
 rename 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0013-Fix-for-framerate-with-nested-composition.patch
 => 0011-Fix-for-framerate-with-nested-composition.patch} (94%)
 rename 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0014-build-shared-library-for-vchostif.patch
 => 0012-build-shared-library-for-vchostif.patch} (84%)
 rename 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/{0015-wl-dispmanx-buffer-wrapping.patch => 
0013-implement-buffer-wrapping-interface-for-dispmanx.patch} (85%)

diff --git 
a/recipes-graphics/userland/userland/0003-Allow-applications-to-set-next-resource-handle.patch
 
b/recipes-graphics/userland/userland/0001-Allow-applications-to-set-next-resource-handle.patch
similarity index 98%
rename from 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/0003-Allow-applications-to-set-next-resource-handle.patch
rename to 
recipes-graphics/userland/userland/0001-Allow-applications-to-set-next-resource-handle.patch
index 4a8b16d..4d026bd 100644
--- 
a/recipes-graphics/userland/userland/0003-Allow-applications-to-set-next-resource-handle.patch
+++ 
b/recipes-graphics/userland/userland/0001-Allow-applications-to-set-next-resource-handle.patch
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-From 1d750c8922cbb4276e4337d2af2776676c0bd224 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 83c5ac5892d0cd29caa8922ff8b639b9a373c3cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Dom Cobley 
 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:26:26 -0400
-Subject: [PATCH 03/13] Allow applications to set next resource handle
+Subject: [PATCH 01/13] Allow applications to set next resource handle
 
 This patch adds provisions in userland to
 let apps callers set the next rendereing dispmanx resource.
@@ -204,5 +204,5 @@ index 8a5734c..51b3580 100644
  
  FN(void, eglIntGetColorData_impl, (EGL_SURFACE_ID_T s, KHRN_IMAGE_FORMAT_T 
format, uint32_t width, uint32_t height, int32_t stride, uint32_t y_offset, 
void *data))
 -- 
-2.7.4
+2.9.0
 
diff --git 
a/recipes-graphics/userland/userland/0002-cmake-generate-and-install-pkgconfig-files.patch
 
b/recipes-graphics/userland/userland/0002-cmake-generate-and-install-pkgconfig-files.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 50ebaa6..000
--- 
a/recipes-graphics/userland/userland/0002-cmake-generate-and-install-pkgconfig-files.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,114 +0,0 @@
-From 9abccc4553b29643eee3c5a7edad641bc83f58f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Khem Raj 
-Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 23:59:32 -070

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 4/4] sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass: Exclude DATETIME from task stamp

2016-06-23 Thread Khem Raj
This helps in fixing occasional error seen quite often

ERROR: wpe-image-1.0-r0 do_image_rpi_sdimg: Taskhash mismatch 
7ea6b505bb7a2cc5ca03552bcffa verses 3be7cdad8c4532430d96368c5ca523d4 for 
/a/builder/home/kraj/work/oe/meta-metrological/recipes-core/images/wp
e-image.bb.do_image_rpi_sdimg
ERROR: Taskhash mismatch 7ea6b505bb7a2cc5ca03552bcffa verses 
3be7cdad8c4532430d96368c5ca523d4 for 
/a/builder/home/kraj/work/oe/meta-metrological/recipes-core/images/wpe-image.bb.do_image_rpi_sdimg

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj 
---
 classes/sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/classes/sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass b/classes/sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass
index 4dfd7a3..e59 100644
--- a/classes/sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass
+++ b/classes/sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ FATPAYLOAD ?= ""
 
 IMAGEDATESTAMP = "${@time.strftime('%Y.%m.%d',time.gmtime())}"
 IMAGE_CMD_rpi-sdimg[vardepsexclude] = "IMAGEDATESTAMP"
+IMAGE_CMD_rpi-sdimg[vardepsexclude] = "DATETIME"
 
 IMAGE_CMD_rpi-sdimg () {
 
-- 
2.9.0

-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 3/4] linux-raspberrypi_4.4: Upgrade to 4.4.13

2016-06-23 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj 
---
 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_4.4.bb | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_4.4.bb 
b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_4.4.bb
index ba47b22..3291ffd 100644
--- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_4.4.bb
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_4.4.bb
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-${PV}:"
 
-LINUX_VERSION ?= "4.4.9"
+LINUX_VERSION ?= "4.4.13"
 
-SRCREV = "3b440738b5c1adc3ec3ee72ceca799d1b8d264df"
+SRCREV = "680be5e27a9593cf26079c6e5744a04cc2809d13"
 SRC_URI = 
"git://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git;protocol=git;branch=rpi-4.4.y \
 "
 require linux-raspberrypi.inc
-- 
2.9.0

-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 2/4] firmware: Upgrade to 20160622

2016-06-23 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj 
---
 recipes-bsp/common/firmware.inc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes-bsp/common/firmware.inc b/recipes-bsp/common/firmware.inc
index bf11e4c..9df6156 100644
--- a/recipes-bsp/common/firmware.inc
+++ b/recipes-bsp/common/firmware.inc
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-RPIFW_SRCREV ?= "3816e1ce1e6ebc6d2bf0596dbd52849e16aa7e94"
-RPIFW_DATE ?= "20160512"
+RPIFW_SRCREV ?= "390f53ed0fd79df274bdcc81d99e09fa262f03ab"
+RPIFW_DATE ?= "20160622"
 RPIFW_SRC_URI ?= 
"git://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware.git;protocol=git;branch=master"
 RPIFW_S ?= "${WORKDIR}/git"
 
-- 
2.9.0

-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


[yocto] question: yocto-bsp tool warnings

2016-06-23 Thread Jake Swensen
I've been looking into setting up my own BSP layer based on the 
standard/beaglebone branch and I've run into some warnings I wasn't familiar
with. I created a test BSP with the yocto-bsp tool and set MACHINE=test,
(which is the name of my meta layer) then ran it. This produced several 
warnings:

WARNING: linux-yocto-4.4.10+gitAUTOINC+870134f4bf_13852755ec-r0.1 do_patch: 
After meta data application, the kernel tree branch is standard/test.
WARNING: linux-yocto-4.4.10+gitAUTOINC+870134f4bf_13852755ec-r0.1 do_patch: The 
SRC_URI specified branch standard/base.
WARNING: linux-yocto-4.4.10+gitAUTOINC+870134f4bf_13852755ec-r0.1 do_patch: 
WARNING: linux-yocto-4.4.10+gitAUTOINC+870134f4bf_13852755ec-r0.1 do_patch: The 
branch will be forced to standard/base, but this means the board meta data
WARNING: linux-yocto-4.4.10+gitAUTOINC+870134f4bf_13852755ec-r0.1 do_patch: 
(.scc files) do not match the SRC_URI specification.
WARNING: linux-yocto-4.4.10+gitAUTOINC+870134f4bf_13852755ec-r0.1 do_patch: 
WARNING: linux-yocto-4.4.10+gitAUTOINC+870134f4bf_13852755ec-r0.1 do_patch: The 
meta data and branch standard/base should be inspected to ensure the proper
WARNING: linux-yocto-4.4.10+gitAUTOINC+870134f4bf_13852755ec-r0.1 do_patch: 
kernel is being built.

I found the patch which enabled this warning, but I'm unsure how to alleviate
it. I do intend to use the standard/test branch, but I'm not sure which
SRC_URI is telling bitbake to build the standard/base. 

Any idea where to start looking?

Patch that enabled the warnings: 
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-April/119808.html



-- 
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto