date:20130220

[yocto] FW: Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

2013-02-20 Thread Barros Pena, Belen

Hi Amit,

If you want to have a chat about any of the Hobs (GTK or Web), get in touch. We 
have also set up a mailing list for web hob: you might be interested in 
subscribing

https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/webhob

All the best,

Belen

From: , Song mailto:song@intel.com>>
Date: Wednesday, 20 February 2013 07:56
To: "Belen Barros Pena (Intel)" 
mailto:belen.barros.p...@intel.com>>, "Bodke, 
Kishore K" mailto:kishore.k.bo...@intel.com>>, 
"Erway, Tracey M" mailto:tracey.m.er...@intel.com>>, 
"Flanagan, Elizabeth" 
mailto:elizabeth.flana...@intel.com>>, "Hart, 
Darren" mailto:darren.h...@intel.com>>, "Lock, Joshua" 
mailto:joshua.l...@intel.com>>, "Moeller, Thorsten" 
mailto:thorsten.moel...@intel.com>>, "Osier-mixon, 
Jeffrey" mailto:jeffrey.osier-mi...@intel.com>>, 
"Purdie, Richard" mailto:richard.pur...@intel.com>>, 
"Saxena, Rahul" mailto:rahul.sax...@intel.com>>, 
"Stewart, David C" 
mailto:david.c.stew...@intel.com>>, "Wold, Saul" 
mailto:saul.w...@intel.com>>, "Zanussi, Tom" 
mailto:tom.zanu...@intel.com>>, "Zhang, Jessica" 
mailto:jessica.zh...@intel.com>>, "Rifenbark, Scott M" 
mailto:scott.m.rifenb...@intel.com>>, "Serban, 
Laurentiu" mailto:laurentiu.ser...@intel.com>>, 
"Petrisor, Ileana" 
mailto:ileana.petri...@intel.com>>, "Damian, 
Alexandru" mailto:alexandru.dam...@intel.com>>, 
"Burton, Ross" mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com>>, "Mueller, 
Robert" mailto:robert.muel...@intel.com>>, "Arce 
Moreno, Abraham" 
mailto:abraham.arce.mor...@intel.com>>, "Santana 
Lopez, Mario A" 
mailto:mario.a.santana.lo...@intel.com>>, 
"Calles Palacios, Osvaldo" 
mailto:osvaldo.calles.palac...@intel.com>>, 
"Patel, Keyur R" mailto:keyur.r.pa...@intel.com>>, 
'Anders Darander' mailto:and...@chargestorm.se>>, 'Bruce 
Ashfield' mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>>, 
'Daniel Cauchy' mailto:dcau...@mvista.com>>, "'deVries, 
Alex'" mailto:alex.devr...@windriver.com>>, 
"'Dixon, Brad'" mailto:brad_di...@mentor.com>>, 
"Dmytriyenko, Denys" mailto:de...@ti.com>>, "'Hatle, Mark'" 
mailto:mark.ha...@windriver.com>>, 'Jeremy Puhlman' 
mailto:jpuhl...@gmail.com>>, "Kridner, Jason" 
mailto:j...@ti.com>>, 
"'lieu...@windriver.com'" 
<'lieu...@windriver.com'>, "'McCombe, Kevin'" 
mailto:kevin.mcco...@windriver.com>>, 'Sanjay 
Raina' mailto:sra...@mvista.com>>, "'Polk, Jeffrey'" 
mailto:jeff.p...@windriver.com>>, "'Ranslam, Rob'" 
mailto:rob.rans...@windriver.com>>, "'Hudson, Sean'" 
mailto:sean_hud...@mentor.com>>, 'Ravi Vompolu' 
mailto:ravi.vomp...@mathworks.com>>, "'Sadiq, 
Irfan'" mailto:irfan_sa...@mentor.com>>, 
"'achau...@mvista.com'" 
mailto:achau...@mvista.com>>
Cc: "Popa, Valentin" mailto:valentin.p...@intel.com>>, 
"Moses, Fred" mailto:fred.mo...@intel.com>>, "Iorga, 
Cristian" mailto:cristian.io...@intel.com>>, SSD-OTC 
Romania Yocto QA 
mailto:ssd-otc.romania.yocto...@intel.com>>,
 "Palalau, AlexandruX" 
mailto:alexandrux.pala...@intel.com>>, "Mirea, 
Viorel" mailto:viorel.mi...@intel.com>>, "Kamble, Nitin 
A" mailto:nitin.a.kam...@intel.com>>, "Szankin, 
Maciej" mailto:maciej.szan...@intel.com>>, "Moisan, 
Radu" mailto:radu.moi...@intel.com>>, "Grigoropol, 
IoanaX" mailto:ioanax.grigoro...@intel.com>>, 
"'Butler, Paul'" mailto:paul.but...@windriver.com>>, 
Olivia Salisbury 
mailto:olivia.salisb...@tobias.tv>>, 'Chris 
Kaminski' mailto:chris.kamin...@tobias.tv>>, 
"'Maupin, Chase'" mailto:chase.mau...@ti.com>>, 
"Georgescu, Alexandru C" 
mailto:alexandru.c.george...@intel.com>>
Subject: Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, February 19, 
2013 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

Attendees:
AlexD, Cidy, Nitin, PaulE, KevinS, Belen, BjörnS, Amit, Corneliu, Song

Notes:

Song: many of our team members are at ELC this week. They may not be able to 
attend this meeting.

* Opens collection - 5 min (Song)
* Yocto Project 1.3.1 status - 10 min (Ross)
  - The build is ready, waiting for QA
* Yocto 1.4 status - 10 min (Song/team)
  https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.4_Status
  - QA started weekly last week, will see result soon.
  - Thanks to RP and others in ELC, we can still kick off M4 RC1 this week and 
QA will start testing.
* SWAT team rotation: Beth -> Paul.
* Opens - 10 min
* Team Sharing - 20 min
  - AlexD: headsup on implementation of wayland on qemu and real hardware. 
There are some problems and we are working on them, If you run into any 
problems, likely we already know them. Multiple bugs opened for this.
  - Amit: tried something on HOB. It is good work. Interested in the Web based 
interface. Like the idea. Song/Belen: We have a design firm working on web hob 
UI. Belen could use some help in the design process. Please let her know if you 
would like to be involved.
  - Nitin: Some of us are at ELC, if you are here, we would like to meet.
  - Corneliu: Real time status of the QA wiki: 
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/1.4_QA_Status Would like to have feedback. 
In the future we may have many more testcases. This work automates reporting 
an

[yocto] [PATCH] meta: Fix error print

2013-02-20 Thread Jukka Rissanen

Instead of printing
ERROR: %s does not appear in package list, please add it package-systemd
print
ERROR: package-systemd does not appear in package list, please add it
instead.

Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen 
---
 meta/classes/systemd.bbclass | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass b/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
index 00865ed..564cd72 100644
--- a/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ python systemd_populate_packages() {
 def systemd_check_package(pkg_systemd):
 packages = d.getVar('PACKAGES', True)
 if not pkg_systemd in packages.split():
-bb.error('%s does not appear in package list, please add it', " " 
+ pkg_systemd)
+bb.error('%s does not appear in package list, please add it' % 
pkg_systemd)
 
 
 # Add a runtime dependency on systemd to pkg
-- 
1.7.11.4

___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/7] rpi-default-providers: Remove virtual/libgl provider

2013-02-20 Thread Andrei Gherzan

Thank you. You hint is OK and will apply patches with your suggestion.

Thanks.


On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Philipp Wagner wrote:

> Hi Andrei,
>
> I applied and tested all 7 patches and they work as the binary firmware
> did before. Maybe in a later patch a pkgconfig file can be added (I think
> it was there before, but I'm not using it yet, so I'm not really sure).
>
> I don't like the name "userland" (it's not really describing that we're
> actually talking about graphics libraries), but that's just a nitpick.
> Maybe it can be renamed to rpi-graphics-userland or something more
> descriptive like that?
>
> Philipp
>
> Am 09.02.2013 23:11, schrieb Andrei Gherzan:
>
>  There are no libgl binary shipped in raspberrypi firmware repo.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan 
>> ---
>>   conf/machine/include/rpi-**default-providers.inc |1 -
>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/conf/machine/include/rpi-**default-providers.inc
>> b/conf/machine/include/rpi-**default-providers.inc
>> index ce963b3..6abab60 100644
>> --- a/conf/machine/include/rpi-**default-providers.inc
>> +++ b/conf/machine/include/rpi-**default-providers.inc
>> @@ -4,5 +4,4 @@ PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/**kernel = "linux-raspberrypi"
>>   PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/**xserver = "xserver-xorg"
>>   PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/egl ?= "vc-graphics-hardfp"
>>   PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/**libgles2 ?= "vc-graphics-hardfp"
>> -PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/**libgl ?= "vc-graphics-hardfp"
>>   PREFERRED_PROVIDER_linux-libc-**headers ?= "linux-libc-headers-**
>> raspberrypi"
>>
>>


-- 
*Andrei Gherzan*
m: +40.744.478.414 |  f: +40.31.816.28.12
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/1] rpi-first-run-wizard: Fix RDEPENDS warning

2013-02-20 Thread Andrei Gherzan

Thanks.


On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Philipp Wagner wrote:

> Am 10.02.2013 18:55, schrieb Andrei Gherzan:
>
>  WARNING: QA Issue: [...]/rpi-first-run-wizard.bb:
>> Variable RDEPENDS is set as not being package specific, please fix this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan 
>> ---
>>   
>> recipes-extra/startup/rpi-**first-run-wizard.bb|
>> 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git 
>> a/recipes-extra/startup/rpi-**first-run-wizard.bbb/recipes-extra/startup/
>> rpi-**first-run-wizard.bb 
>> index c5cef7c..6ede56e 100644
>> --- 
>> a/recipes-extra/startup/rpi-**first-run-wizard.bb
>> +++ 
>> b/recipes-extra/startup/rpi-**first-run-wizard.bb
>> @@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ LICENSE = "GPLV2"
>>   LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${WORKDIR}/LICENSE;**md5=**
>> b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a42**63"
>>
>>   DEPENDS = "zenity dbus"
>> -RDEPENDS = "slim sudo zenity dbus"
>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "slim sudo zenity dbus"
>>
>>   COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "raspberrypi"
>>
>> -PR = "r1"
>> +PR = "r2"
>>
>>   SRC_URI = " \
>> file://LICENSE \
>>
>>
> I've applied this patch and it works as expected.
>
> Philipp
>



-- 
*Andrei Gherzan*
m: +40.744.478.414 |  f: +40.31.816.28.12
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] meta: Fix error print

2013-02-20 Thread Burton, Ross

On 20 February 2013 11:15, Jukka Rissanen
 wrote:
> -bb.error('%s does not appear in package list, please add it', " 
> " + pkg_systemd)
> +bb.error('%s does not appear in package list, please add it' % 
> pkg_systemd)

Whoops.  Acked-by: Ross Burton 

Ross
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] [PATCH] meta: Search also FILESEXTRAPATHS for systemd service files

2013-02-20 Thread Jukka Rissanen


Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen 
---
 meta/classes/systemd.bbclass | 8 
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass b/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
index 564cd72..b807d4e 100644
--- a/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+inherit utils
+
 # The list of packages that should have systemd packaging scripts added.  For
 # each entry, optionally have a SYSTEMD_SERVICE_[package] that lists the 
service
 # files in this package.  If this variable isn't set, [package].service is 
used.
@@ -137,6 +139,7 @@ python systemd_populate_packages() {
 # single service gets also the /dev/null dummies
 keys = 'Also Conflicts'
 # scan for all in SYSTEMD_SERVICE[]
+extrapaths = base_set_filespath([],d).split(":")
 for pkg_systemd in systemd_packages.split():
 for service in get_package_var(d, 'SYSTEMD_SERVICE', 
pkg_systemd).split():
 path_found = ''
@@ -144,6 +147,11 @@ python systemd_populate_packages() {
 if os.path.exists(oe.path.join(d.getVar("D", True), path, 
service)):
 path_found = path
 break
+if path_found == '':
+for path in extrapaths:
+if os.path.exists(oe.path.join(path, service)):
+path_found = path
+break
 if path_found != '':
 systemd_add_files_and_parse(pkg_systemd, path_found, 
service, keys)
 else:
-- 
1.7.11.4

___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] meta: Search also FILESEXTRAPATHS for systemd service files

2013-02-20 Thread Burton, Ross

Hi,

First, mails that patch oe-core should be sent to the oe-core list,
not yocto@ (which is more of a support channel).

Second this patch won't do what you expect - when you find a file in
FILESEXTRAPATHS it isn't being installed, so it won't be in the
package.

I intentionally removed code that did something similar from the
original systemd.bbclass as generally a service file will have to be
processed in some way to put the right paths in: hardcoding
/usr/sbin/some-daemon isn't sufficient when the distribution can
change the value of $sbindir.

Ross
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Weekly build

2013-02-20 Thread Richard Purdie

On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 21:01 -0800, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> I'm currently at ELC and am going to be a little slow with email.
> However, tonight I will be building M4 rc1. We are looking pretty
> green and had been hoping to use the last build for rc1, but we want
> to get it a little closer as to have it all green. I will be building
> it from current master head and will branch/tag in the morning. If you
> maintain a layer that I don't have branch access for, please create
> the milestone branch for it from the git hashes I send out in the
> morning. Thanks.

We continued to have a build issue which I traced back to the recent
bitbake fetcher changes. I've reverted a part of that and rebuilt master
and its looking even better than the previous build, lots of green. I
think we'll therefore be going with that revision
(7d22ef28e64de06b6238d0ef9b664c0bee6efa46) for M4-rc1, assuming the rest
builds out ok.

Cheers,

Richard

___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Avionic Tamonten Board - Uboot problem

2013-02-20 Thread Gary Thomas


On 2013-02-20 00:21, Satya Swaroop Damarla wrote:

Hi Gary,

I think you are right that we need may be the new uboot version but it is not 
available in the uboot directory of the poky and i get the follwoing warning 
and the simulation is
ending like previously

NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
NOTE: preferred version v2013.01% of u-boot not available (for item u-boot)
NOTE: versions of u-boot available: 
v2011.03+git26+19b54a701811220221fc4d5089a2bb18892018ca 
v2011.06+git27+b1af6f532e0d348b153d5c148369229d24af361a
v2012.04.01+git25+415d386877df49eb051b85ef74fa59a16dc17c7d
NOTE: preferred version v2013.01% of u-boot not available (for item u-boot)
NOTE: versions of u-boot available: 
v2011.03+git26+19b54a701811220221fc4d5089a2bb18892018ca 
v2011.06+git27+b1af6f532e0d348b153d5c148369229d24af361a
v2012.04.01+git25+415d386877df49eb051b85ef74fa59a16dc17c7d
NOTE: preferred version v2013.01% of u-boot not available (for item u-boot-dev)
NOTE: versions of u-boot available: 
v2011.03+git26+19b54a701811220221fc4d5089a2bb18892018ca 
v2011.06+git27+b1af6f532e0d348b153d5c148369229d24af361a
v2012.04.01+git25+415d386877df49eb051b85ef74fa59a16dc17c7d

May be you can tell me how to add the new uboot file


The easiest way is to just add the meta-ti layer - they have
a recipe for 2013.01.

n.b. It's common courtesy to keep such discussions on the mailing list so
that everyone benefits from the answers.



On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Gary Thomas mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com>> wrote:

On 2013-02-19 09:02, Satya Swaroop Damarla wrote:

Unfortunately "tec_config" didnot work. Here is the error message


I think you need a newer U-Boot to get the support for this board.
Try
   PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= "v2012.10%"
or even
   PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= "v2013.01%"

Log data follows:
| DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile
| NOTE: make -j 8 CROSS_COMPILE=arm-poky-linux-__gnueabi- 
CC=arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-gcc  
--sysroot=/home/build/yocto/__poky/buildTamonten/tmp/__sysroots/skidata-tamonten
tec_config
| make: *** No rule to make target `tec_config'.  Stop.
| make: *** [tec_config] Error 1
| ERROR: oe_runmake failed
| ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (see

/home/build/yocto/poky/__buildTamonten/tmp/work/__skidata_tamonten-poky-linux-__gnueabi/u-boot-v2012.04.01+__git3+__415d386877df49eb051b85ef74fa59__a16dc17c7d-r2/temp/log.do___compile.21665
for
further information)
ERROR: Task 69 
(/home/build/yocto/poky/meta/__recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot___2012.04.01.bb 
 , do_compile) failed 
with
exit code '1'

NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 3421 tasks of which 319 didn't need to 
be rerun and 1 failed.




On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Gary Thomas mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com> >> 
wrote:

 On 2013-02-19 06:28, Satya Swaroop Damarla wrote:

 Hi,

 I want to build a basic image for the Avionic Tamonten board 
using Yocto. SO, I created a skidata-tamonten.conf in the list of machines 
based on the
beagleboard.conf but I dont
 know what to add for the UBOOT_MACHINE= . I tried my best to use the 
same "omap_beagle_conf" but it doesnot boot properly. Here is the 
skidata-tamonten.conf file
description


 Try 'tec_config'

 #@TYPE: Machine
 #@NAME: skidata-tamonten machine
 #@DESCRIPTION: Machine configuration for the Tamonten board

 PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/xserver ?= "xserver-xorg"

 XSERVER ?= "xserver-xorg \
  xf86-input-evdev \
  xf86-input-mouse \
  xf86-video-omapfb \
  xf86-input-keyboard"

 # Ship all kernel modules by default
 MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS = " kernel-modules"

 # Allow for MMC booting ()
 EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS += "u-boot"

 # Uncomment the following line to enable the hard floating 
point abi. Note that
 # this breaks some binary libraries and 3D (neither of which 
ship with
 # meta-yocto). For maximum compatibility, leave this disabled.
 DEFAULTTUNE ?= "cortexa9thf"
 include conf/machine/include/tune-cortexa9.inc


 IMAGE_FSTYPES += "tar.bz2 ext2 ext3"

 SERIAL_CONSOLE = "115200 ttyO2"

 PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ?= "linux-yocto"

 PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ?= "3.2%"

 KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "uImage"

 PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= "v2012.04%"

 UBOOT_MACHINE = "???"

[yocto] Updating uboot to v2013.01

2013-02-20 Thread Satya Swaroop Damarla

Hi Guys,

I need support for uboot on Tamonten board but the version on it is
v2012.04 but I came to know that v2012.10 or v2013.01 supports the
Tamontenboard through some guys here..

It would be great if you can tell me how can I accomplish v2013.01 or
v2012.10 into the build system and make it available so that I can compile
the and get uImage

(Tamonten board is a derivative of harmony board with some changes and has
arm cortexa9 processor without neon extentions )

I am kind of new to add new .bb files and help is really appreciated as I
am not able to figure out how to add

Greetings & Regards,
Swaroop
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Updating uboot to v2013.01

2013-02-20 Thread Rudolf Streif

Satya,

Simply look at the u-boot recipes in meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot such as
u-boot_2012.04.01.bb. You can simply copy it and name it
u-boot_2013.01.bband then modify SRCREV to the revision that
corresponds to the tag 2013.01
or 2013.01.01 in git.denx.de:

for 2013.01: 
3a9d879f6f64585b819af728b53be0a05037fe0d
for 2013.01.01:
e8ae0fa5edd152b2b29c470b88429be4cdcd2c46

Do the same for u-boot-mkimage and include the u-boot version with your bsp.

Rudi


On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Satya Swaroop Damarla <
swaroop.dama...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> I need support for uboot on Tamonten board but the version on it is
> v2012.04 but I came to know that v2012.10 or v2013.01 supports the
> Tamontenboard through some guys here..
>
> It would be great if you can tell me how can I accomplish v2013.01 or
> v2012.10 into the build system and make it available so that I can compile
> the and get uImage
>
> (Tamonten board is a derivative of harmony board with some changes and has
> arm cortexa9 processor without neon extentions )
>
> I am kind of new to add new .bb files and help is really appreciated as I
> am not able to figure out how to add
>
> Greetings & Regards,
> Swaroop
>
> ___
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>
>


-- 
-- 
*Rudolf J. Streif*
Director of Embedded Solutions
The Linux Foundation

rudolf.str...@linux.com
Phone: +1.619.631.5383
Skype: rudolfstreif
PGP: RSA 2048/2048 D6E7D28B

Linux Foundation Events Schedule:  events.linuxfoundation.org
Linux Foundation Training Schedule: training.linuxfoundation.org
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Trying to compile mono on target for machine crownbay

2013-02-20 Thread Evgheni Antropov

In my case I have resolved it in another way: 

correct in Makefile for "eglib" folder SUBDIRS variables and excluded "test" 
from them values:

-
egrep "SUBDIRS =" ./mono-2.10.2/build/eglib/Makefile
DIST_SUBDIRS = src test
SUBDIRS = src test
#SUBDIRS = src
#SUBDIRS = src
#SUBDIRS = src

+
egrep "SUBDIRS =" ./mono-2.10.2/build/eglib/Makefile
DIST_SUBDIRS = src
SUBDIRS = src
#SUBDIRS = src
#SUBDIRS = src
#SUBDIRS = src

"build" is my own directory where I'm compiling mono.






___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Updating uboot to v2013.01

2013-02-20 Thread Hans Beckérus

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Rudolf Streif
 wrote:
> Satya,
>
> Simply look at the u-boot recipes in meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot such as
> u-boot_2012.04.01.bb. You can simply copy it and name it u-boot_2013.01.bb
> and then modify SRCREV to the revision that corresponds to the tag 2013.01
> or 2013.01.01 in git.denx.de:
>
> for 2013.01: 3a9d879f6f64585b819af728b53be0a05037fe0d
> for 2013.01.01: e8ae0fa5edd152b2b29c470b88429be4cdcd2c46
>
> Do the same for u-boot-mkimage and include the u-boot version with your bsp.
>
> Rudi
>
>
Hi Rudi, sorry to chime in , but I have a similar problem but do not
really get the last thing you said.
What do you mean by including the u-boot version in the bsp? Also is
it a must to also copy the mkimage .bb or will the system find a
suitable one automatically?
The thing is that I only copied/edited the u-boot .bb but never the
mkimage. Still my kernel successfully builds the kernel uImage!?
Some magic that I have missed :)

Hans


> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Satya Swaroop Damarla
>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I need support for uboot on Tamonten board but the version on it is
>> v2012.04 but I came to know that v2012.10 or v2013.01 supports the
>> Tamontenboard through some guys here..
>>
>> It would be great if you can tell me how can I accomplish v2013.01 or
>> v2012.10 into the build system and make it available so that I can compile
>> the and get uImage
>>
>> (Tamonten board is a derivative of harmony board with some changes and has
>> arm cortexa9 processor without neon extentions )
>>
>> I am kind of new to add new .bb files and help is really appreciated as I
>> am not able to figure out how to add
>>
>> Greetings & Regards,
>> Swaroop
>>
>> ___
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Rudolf J. Streif
> Director of Embedded Solutions
> The Linux Foundation
>
> rudolf.str...@linux.com
> Phone: +1.619.631.5383
> Skype: rudolfstreif
> PGP: RSA 2048/2048 D6E7D28B
>
> Linux Foundation Events Schedule:  events.linuxfoundation.org
> Linux Foundation Training Schedule: training.linuxfoundation.org
>
>
> ___
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Updating uboot to v2013.01

2013-02-20 Thread Satya Swaroop Damarla

Hey hans, this is what he meant,

In the machine config file add the following

PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= "v2013.01%"  or PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?=
"v2013.01.01%"

By the way did you already complete the first part... There is also other
file called "u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb" ... I think we should do the
same...

Hans bytheway,  are you also working on the same board or diffferent board
with same problem?






On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Hans Beckérus wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Rudolf Streif
>  wrote:
> > Satya,
> >
> > Simply look at the u-boot recipes in meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot such as
> > u-boot_2012.04.01.bb. You can simply copy it and name it
> u-boot_2013.01.bb
> > and then modify SRCREV to the revision that corresponds to the tag
> 2013.01
> > or 2013.01.01 in git.denx.de:
> >
> > for 2013.01: 3a9d879f6f64585b819af728b53be0a05037fe0d
> > for 2013.01.01: e8ae0fa5edd152b2b29c470b88429be4cdcd2c46
> >
> > Do the same for u-boot-mkimage and include the u-boot version with your
> bsp.
> >
> > Rudi
> >
> >
> Hi Rudi, sorry to chime in , but I have a similar problem but do not
> really get the last thing you said.
> What do you mean by including the u-boot version in the bsp? Also is
> it a must to also copy the mkimage .bb or will the system find a
> suitable one automatically?
> The thing is that I only copied/edited the u-boot .bb but never the
> mkimage. Still my kernel successfully builds the kernel uImage!?
> Some magic that I have missed :)
>
> Hans
>
>
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Satya Swaroop Damarla
> >  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> I need support for uboot on Tamonten board but the version on it is
> >> v2012.04 but I came to know that v2012.10 or v2013.01 supports the
> >> Tamontenboard through some guys here..
> >>
> >> It would be great if you can tell me how can I accomplish v2013.01 or
> >> v2012.10 into the build system and make it available so that I can
> compile
> >> the and get uImage
> >>
> >> (Tamonten board is a derivative of harmony board with some changes and
> has
> >> arm cortexa9 processor without neon extentions )
> >>
> >> I am kind of new to add new .bb files and help is really appreciated as
> I
> >> am not able to figure out how to add
> >>
> >> Greetings & Regards,
> >> Swaroop
> >>
> >> ___
> >> yocto mailing list
> >> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Rudolf J. Streif
> > Director of Embedded Solutions
> > The Linux Foundation
> >
> > rudolf.str...@linux.com
> > Phone: +1.619.631.5383
> > Skype: rudolfstreif
> > PGP: RSA 2048/2048 D6E7D28B
> >
> > Linux Foundation Events Schedule:  events.linuxfoundation.org
> > Linux Foundation Training Schedule: training.linuxfoundation.org
> >
> >
> > ___
> > yocto mailing list
> > yocto@yoctoproject.org
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> >
>
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Updating uboot to v2013.01

2013-02-20 Thread Hans Beckérus

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Satya Swaroop Damarla
 wrote:
> Hey hans, this is what he meant,
>
> In the machine config file add the following
>
> PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= "v2013.01%"  or PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?=
> "v2013.01.01%"
>
> By the way did you already complete the first part... There is also other
> file called "u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb" ... I think we should do the
> same...
>
> Hans bytheway,  are you also working on the same board or diffferent board
> with same problem?
>

Different board, same core, similar problem ;)
Now I get it. Thanks. But still question remains how in earth I
managed to build the kernel if not also having copied/renamed the
mkimage .bb?
Is the PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot used to determine what mkimage and fw
utils it picks up?
Then it might be that since I/we build u-boot as a separate package,
but kernel lifts in the mkimage stuff, it works but the wrong package
was used.
In my case obviously compatible, but not recommended I guess. Also, I
agree that the fw utils should probably be in sync similar to mkimage.

Hans

>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Hans Beckérus 
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Rudolf Streif
>>  wrote:
>> > Satya,
>> >
>> > Simply look at the u-boot recipes in meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot such as
>> > u-boot_2012.04.01.bb. You can simply copy it and name it
>> > u-boot_2013.01.bb
>> > and then modify SRCREV to the revision that corresponds to the tag
>> > 2013.01
>> > or 2013.01.01 in git.denx.de:
>> >
>> > for 2013.01: 3a9d879f6f64585b819af728b53be0a05037fe0d
>> > for 2013.01.01: e8ae0fa5edd152b2b29c470b88429be4cdcd2c46
>> >
>> > Do the same for u-boot-mkimage and include the u-boot version with your
>> > bsp.
>> >
>> > Rudi
>> >
>> >
>> Hi Rudi, sorry to chime in , but I have a similar problem but do not
>> really get the last thing you said.
>> What do you mean by including the u-boot version in the bsp? Also is
>> it a must to also copy the mkimage .bb or will the system find a
>> suitable one automatically?
>> The thing is that I only copied/edited the u-boot .bb but never the
>> mkimage. Still my kernel successfully builds the kernel uImage!?
>> Some magic that I have missed :)
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Satya Swaroop Damarla
>> >  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Guys,
>> >>
>> >> I need support for uboot on Tamonten board but the version on it is
>> >> v2012.04 but I came to know that v2012.10 or v2013.01 supports the
>> >> Tamontenboard through some guys here..
>> >>
>> >> It would be great if you can tell me how can I accomplish v2013.01 or
>> >> v2012.10 into the build system and make it available so that I can
>> >> compile
>> >> the and get uImage
>> >>
>> >> (Tamonten board is a derivative of harmony board with some changes and
>> >> has
>> >> arm cortexa9 processor without neon extentions )
>> >>
>> >> I am kind of new to add new .bb files and help is really appreciated as
>> >> I
>> >> am not able to figure out how to add
>> >>
>> >> Greetings & Regards,
>> >> Swaroop
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> yocto mailing list
>> >> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > --
>> > Rudolf J. Streif
>> > Director of Embedded Solutions
>> > The Linux Foundation
>> >
>> > rudolf.str...@linux.com
>> > Phone: +1.619.631.5383
>> > Skype: rudolfstreif
>> > PGP: RSA 2048/2048 D6E7D28B
>> >
>> > Linux Foundation Events Schedule:  events.linuxfoundation.org
>> > Linux Foundation Training Schedule: training.linuxfoundation.org
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > yocto mailing list
>> > yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>> >
>
>
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] bitbake: how to resolve a dependency to kernel-devicetree when building rootfs

2013-02-20 Thread Hans Beckérus

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks
 wrote:
> Is there a kernel-devicetree package in you tmp/deploy ?
>
> I'm using ipk and I have:
> tmp/deploy/ipk/syrcxx/kernel-devicetree_2.6.38-r4_syrcxx.ipk
>
> If it is not there that is your problem.
> You may also want to nuke your tmp dir and rebuild (with sstate it should
> not take excessively long)
>
> Frans
>

Thanks for the pointer. That was indeed the problem. There was no
kernel-devicetree in my deploy/ipk folder.
But now it works :) I actually did two things, I moved from using .ipk
to .rpm and changed to using a bare danny 8.0.
I do not know which of these fixed it. Before that I also tried to
nuke the tmp dir but that was fruitless :(

Hans


>
> 2013/2/19 Hans Beckérus 
>>
>> First of all, I am a total noob when it comes to bitbake, but I am
>> struggling and slowly getting there ( I think).
>> So, I am sorry if my questions seems stupid, but this one I just can
>> not seem to figure out on my own.
>> What I am trying to do is to build a custom ARM based rootfs image
>> using the ELDK toolchain that should include all the modules from my
>> kernel build. But the rootfs build stage fails! If I exclude the
>> kernel modules everything work just fine.
>>
>> The bitbake error I get is
>>
>> | Collected errors:
>> |  * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following
>> dependencies for kernel-modules:
>> |  *kernel-devicetree *
>> |  * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package kernel-modules.
>>
>>
>> My simple rootfs.bb looks like this
>>
>> require recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal.bb
>>
>> # The list of packages used to build images.
>> IMAGE_INSTALL += "kernel-modules"
>>
>> # Formats of root filesystem images that you want to have created.
>> IMAGE_FSTYPES = "jffs2"
>>
>>
>> The device tree blob was built successfully and is located in the
>> kernel deploy image folder.
>> I can see that I have the following files under the kernel work path
>>
>> ./packages-split/kernel-devicetree
>> ./pkgdata/runtime/kernel-devicetree
>> ./pkgdata/runtime-reverse/kernel-devicetree
>>
>> Any advice on what I have missed?
>>
>> Hans
>> ___
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>
>
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Updated Yocto Hands-on Kernel Lab available

2013-02-20 Thread Tom Zanussi

On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 22:34 -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> Following up on a hunch, after reading Pierre Ficheux's email from
> earlier today, I realized that by default I always switch my build's
> PACKAGE_CLASSES to ipk simply because this packaging takes the least
> amount of build time. Sure enough, when working on lab3 I had switched
> to ipk and it didn't work. Switching PACKAGE_CLASSES to rpm and doing
> nothing else but rebuilding, everything worked. I tried twice more
> switching between ipk and rpm and anytime ipk is used the module is
> not automatically installed, but with rpm it is.

Interesting - I wouldn't have thought of looking at that as a source of
the problem.  I'll try it out myself and file a bug if it turns out to
be the problem.  Thanks for that info!

Tom

___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Weekly build

2013-02-20 Thread Flanagan, Elizabeth

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Richard Purdie
 wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 21:01 -0800, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
>> I'm currently at ELC and am going to be a little slow with email.
>> However, tonight I will be building M4 rc1. We are looking pretty
>> green and had been hoping to use the last build for rc1, but we want
>> to get it a little closer as to have it all green. I will be building
>> it from current master head and will branch/tag in the morning. If you
>> maintain a layer that I don't have branch access for, please create
>> the milestone branch for it from the git hashes I send out in the
>> morning. Thanks.
>
> We continued to have a build issue which I traced back to the recent
> bitbake fetcher changes. I've reverted a part of that and rebuilt master
> and its looking even better than the previous build, lots of green. I
> think we'll therefore be going with that revision
> (7d22ef28e64de06b6238d0ef9b664c0bee6efa46) for M4-rc1, assuming the rest
> builds out ok.

It looks like we have a good buildout. I'll get branches
prepared/tagged and pushed later today. Please begin testing
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/nightly/20130220-2.

-b

>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>



-- 
Elizabeth Flanagan
Yocto Project
Build and Release
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] FW: Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

[yocto] [PATCH] meta: Fix error print

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/7] rpi-default-providers: Remove virtual/libgl provider

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/1] rpi-first-run-wizard: Fix RDEPENDS warning

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] meta: Fix error print

[yocto] [PATCH] meta: Search also FILESEXTRAPATHS for systemd service files

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] meta: Search also FILESEXTRAPATHS for systemd service files

Re: [yocto] Weekly build

Re: [yocto] Avionic Tamonten Board - Uboot problem

[yocto] Updating uboot to v2013.01

Re: [yocto] Updating uboot to v2013.01

Re: [yocto] Trying to compile mono on target for machine crownbay

Re: [yocto] Updating uboot to v2013.01

Re: [yocto] Updating uboot to v2013.01

Re: [yocto] Updating uboot to v2013.01

Re: [yocto] bitbake: how to resolve a dependency to kernel-devicetree when building rootfs

Re: [yocto] Updated Yocto Hands-on Kernel Lab available

Re: [yocto] Weekly build

18 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information