[yocto] 3 Failures in RC3

2011-08-06 Thread Saul Wold


Folks,

We currently have 3 failures on the RC3 build for M3. They are all 
related to LSB builds.  If you are on the TO: line please review your 
issues as we need a prompt fix.


1348: Qt3 Fails to build for ARM LSB

1349: Shared State Information gets lost for Mips FSTests
   I am trying to reproduce this on the Autobuilder

1450: ccache directory does not get created correct
   I can reproduce this one very easily by building, saving the 
sstate-cache directory and then building again with a clean tmp 
directory.  The ccache/x86-64-poky-linux directory does not get created 
and the kernel-configme task fail during the HOSTCC execution.


Please take a look or if you know of these issues, please let me know.

Thanks

--
Sau!

Saul Wold
Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel
Yocto Project / Poky Build System

___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


Re: [yocto] 3 Failures in RC3

2011-08-06 Thread Saul Wold

On 08/06/2011 11:23 AM, Saul Wold wrote:


Folks,

We currently have 3 failures on the RC3 build for M3. They are all
related to LSB builds. If you are on the TO: line please review your
issues as we need a prompt fix.

1348: Qt3 Fails to build for ARM LSB

1349: Shared State Information gets lost for Mips FSTests
I am trying to reproduce this on the Autobuilder

I am still working on reproducing this one, might be autobuilder related 
as my local autobuilder build seems to be OK right now.
I have 2 sets of sstate for fstests, which may mean that something is 
different between the poky and poky-lsb builds.


On the autobuilder, the sstate directory was empty, so I can't verify
short of restarting the build again.


1450: ccache directory does not get created correct

oops 1350 is the correct bugid!


I can reproduce this one very easily by building, saving the
sstate-cache directory and then building again with a clean tmp
directory. The ccache/x86-64-poky-linux directory does not get created
and the kernel-configme task fail during the HOSTCC execution.


I have a fix for this one, in MUT and oe-contrib/sgw/stage.


Please take a look or if you know of these issues, please let me know.

Thanks


___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta/pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp

2011-08-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield

On 11-08-05 2:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:

On 11-08-05 01:55 PM, Philip Balister wrote:

On 08/05/2011 01:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:

On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote:

From: Jingdong Lu

Add pandaboard bsp


why not use meta-ti ?


I'm hoping to not repeat all the discussions that we've had
around the beagle board here. Anything that applies to that
applies here.

This is a reference BSP done by the Wind River folks on top
of the linux-yocto kernel. It is not intended to be a replacement
for any existing pandaboard efforts, but is intended to be used
as an example of an integrated board.


Would you mind re-summarizing the discussion? I know there has been a
lot of back and forth, and it seems like a summary would be helpful for
people who stopped following the discussion.


Darren's the right person to give a proper summary, since
he was driving our beagleboard work. But he's out on Jury
duty at the moment, so we'll have to wait. I can attempt
a quick summary here.

The goal of a BSP like this as part of meta-yocto and linux-yocto
are this for any BSP:

Goals:
1)  needs meta- to maintain its role
as the definitive source for  BSPs and drive fragmentation
down.
2) The Yocto Project meta-yocto layer has a goal to provide
stand-alone BSPs that demonstrates the multi-architecture
features of the Yocto Project.

To to this, we have the challenges:

A) Using meta- with the Yocto Project
B) Aligning on kernel versions
C) Kernel policy definition and ownership
D) Not detract from upstream-first efforts
.. and more.

So the meta- issues will be solved going forward with
layer tooling, the kernel version alignment will never
be solved completely but can be addressed via working with
the right upstream and sources with the right process.

So to get that kernel alignment, tooling, common feature set
and have a set of BSPs that can share tests, results, support,
etc, there is a need to do yocto integrations of identified
BSPs. We've (largely) agreed to live with some repeated effort
in the short term and recognize that what you see here is
not intended to replace a community or vendor effort, but
should be considered as a stepping stone and proof of
concept. If the latest and greatest, bleeding edge is what
people want, then the other meta-* layers are the way to go.


I was thinking about this point over the weekend, and I realized
that it may not have been clear that I'm talking largely about
the kernel here. Not all the associated userspace/config, etc
that we'd consider as part of a complete solution. Obviously
any kernel tree can support multiple boards, and what we have
here is an example against the 2.6.37 yocto kernel tree and
kernel feature set.

Cheers,

Bruce



I think that's enough for now, I tried to do the conversations
justice and keep this short, so my apologies to anyone reading
this if I missed something.

Cheers,

Bruce





It is very confusing for many of us to see duplicate and or competing
BSP's.

Philip



Cheers,

Bruce





Jingdong Lu (1): pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp

.../bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-non_hardware.cfg | 30 ++
.../bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-standard.scc | 7 +
.../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard.cfg | 346

.../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard.scc | 5 + 4 files
changed, 388 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-non_hardware.cfg
create mode 100644
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-standard.scc create
mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard.cfg
create mode 100644
meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard.scc

___ yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto



- --
- -Khem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk48KZcACgkQuwUzVZGdMxSjEwCdHLqsMwcYEhAblghgJio7tJPK
Sm8An2Xps8CntGIGV0bFxTJw/dIAL6pV
=PeJ+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto



___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto