Re: [Wireshark-dev] Feature: option to open windows as tabs

[Paul Offord]

> I *think* Windows DLLs may also function as shared libraries.

They do.  One instance in RAM mapped into the virtual address space of any 
process referencing the DLL.

-Original Message-
From: Wireshark-dev  On Behalf Of Guy 
Harris
Sent: 05 May 2018 19:25
To: Developer support list for Wireshark 
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Feature: option to open windows as tabs

On May 5, 2018, at 10:04 AM, Peter Wu  wrote:

> Memory usage will probably suck due to exact copies of the process,

On most if not all UN*Xes, the executable image's code and read-only data, and 
libwireshark's/libwiretap's/libwsutil's code and read-only data, should be 
shared between all of the processes.

You won't, however, share the results of reading in configuration files, e.g. 
the new fields added by reading in the RADIUS and DIAMETER dictionaries...

...unless they're read in by the UI process, and handed to the dissector 
processes as (read-only) shared memory.

I *think* Windows DLLs may also function as shared libraries.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

__

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system.

Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not 
necessarily represent those of Advance Seven Ltd. E-mail transmission cannot be 
guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, 
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The 
sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.

Advance Seven Ltd. Registered in England & Wales numbered 2373877 at Endeavour 
House, Coopers End Lane, Stansted, Essex CM24 1SJ

__
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
__
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-dev] How to merge Gerrit accounts created with Github and Google Oauth?

[Jeff Widman]

I've accidentally created two separate Gerrit accounts by signing in with
Google Oauth one time and then Github Oauth a different time because I
forgot which authentication method I'd used previously.

Both use this same email address, so I assumed they would be tied to the
same user, but clearly they are not. Additionally, I tried linking the
accounts, but got a "Forbidden" message

1) Is there any way to merge these two accounts?

2) Failing that, is there any way to delete the newly-created duplicate so
I just have the original account?

Thank!

-- 

*Jeff Widman*
jeffwidman.com  | 740-WIDMAN-J (943-6265)
<><
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to merge Gerrit accounts created with Github and Google Oauth?

[Richard Sharpe]

On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Jeff Widman  wrote:
> I've accidentally created two separate Gerrit accounts by signing in with
> Google Oauth one time and then Github Oauth a different time because I
> forgot which authentication method I'd used previously.
>
> Both use this same email address, so I assumed they would be tied to the
> same user, but clearly they are not. Additionally, I tried linking the
> accounts, but got a "Forbidden" message

Et tu Brute?

> 1) Is there any way to merge these two accounts?

Gerald can fix it, I believe.

> 2) Failing that, is there any way to delete the newly-created duplicate so I
> just have the original account?
>
> Thank!
>
> --
>
> Jeff Widman
> jeffwidman.com | 740-WIDMAN-J (943-6265)
> <><
>
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>  mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe



-- 
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe