[Wireshark-dev] Why does Telephony|ANSI have a Lua submenu?

2016-06-11 Thread Jaap Keuter 
See Subject.

True for both Qt and GTK build.

Thanks,
Jaap
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-dev] Why does the SCTP submenu appeat twice?

2016-06-11 Thread Jaap Keuter 
See subject.

Only in the Qt version, in both Analyze and Telephony menu.
Also where's the Chunk count gone?

Thanks,
Jaap
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why does Telephony|ANSI have a Lua submenu?

2016-06-11 Thread Pascal Quantin 
Hi Jaap,

2016-06-11 16:12 GMT-07:00 Jaap Keuter :

> See Subject.
>
> True for both Qt and GTK build.
>

Which version are you using? I cannot see it running v2.1.1rc0-3-gd907fc2
on Windows.
Do you have any Lua plugin adding menu entries?


Cheers,
Pascal.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why does Telephony|ANSI have a Lua submenu?

2016-06-11 Thread Jaap Keuter 
Hi,

Version 2.1.1-git (v2.1.1rc0-21-gc755c88 from master)

On Debian Testing.

Tried moving the (old) existing init.lua from my settings
(~/.wireshark/init.lua) aside, and placing the current version from the repo
there. Now it's goneto double entries in the Lua menu.
So, something changed, I'm not sure what.

Also, the GTK version still complains on startup in the console:

(lt-wireshark-gtk:23241): Gtk-WARNING **: Refusing to add non-unique action
'/Console' to action group 'MenuActionGroup'

(lt-wireshark-gtk:23241): Gtk-WARNING **: Refusing to add non-unique action
'/Evaluate' to action group 'MenuActionGroup'

(lt-wireshark-gtk:23241): Gtk-WARNING **: Refusing to add non-unique action
'/Manual' to action group 'MenuActionGroup'

(lt-wireshark-gtk:23241): Gtk-WARNING **: Refusing to add non-unique action
'/Wiki' to action group 'MenuActionGroup'


Thanks,
Jaap


On 12-06-16 01:29, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> Hi Jaap,
> 
> 2016-06-11 16:12 GMT-07:00 Jaap Keuter  >:
> 
> See Subject.
> 
> True for both Qt and GTK build.
> 
> 
> Which version are you using? I cannot see it running v2.1.1rc0-3-gd907fc2 on
> Windows.
> Do you have any Lua plugin adding menu entries?
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Pascal.
> 
> 
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>  mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
> 

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why does the SCTP submenu appeat twice?

2016-06-11 Thread Pascal Quantin 
2016-06-11 16:18 GMT-07:00 Jaap Keuter :

> See subject.
>
> Only in the Qt version, in both Analyze and Telephony menu.
>

Presumably it has nothing to do with Telephony :)


> Also where's the Chunk count gone?
>
> Thanks,
> Jaap
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>  mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why does the SCTP submenu appeat twice?

2016-06-11 Thread Jaap Keuter 
Well it does, it's the main protocol of SIGTRAN.

On 12-06-16 01:43, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> 
> 
> 2016-06-11 16:18 GMT-07:00 Jaap Keuter  >:
> 
> See subject.
> 
> Only in the Qt version, in both Analyze and Telephony menu.
> 
> 
> Presumably it has nothing to do with Telephony :)
>  
> 
> Also where's the Chunk count gone?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jaap

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why does the SCTP submenu appeat twice?

2016-06-11 Thread Pascal Quantin 
2016-06-11 16:55 GMT-07:00 Jaap Keuter :

> Well it does, it's the main protocol of SIGTRAN.
>

Good to know. Then I guess that's why, even if it is a bit surprising.


>
> On 12-06-16 01:43, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2016-06-11 16:18 GMT-07:00 Jaap Keuter  > >:
> >
> > See subject.
> >
> > Only in the Qt version, in both Analyze and Telephony menu.
> >
> >
> > Presumably it has nothing to do with Telephony :)
> >
> >
> > Also where's the Chunk count gone?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jaap
>
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>  mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why does the SCTP submenu appeat twice?

2016-06-11 Thread Jaap Keuter 

Well, it's surprising it was added (again) the analyze.

Historically all items in Telephony were in Analyze, which became too long to be
practical. Therefore all Telephony related items were grouped in their own menu.
This included SCTP.

Thanks,
Jaap

On 12-06-16 01:56, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> 
> 
> 2016-06-11 16:55 GMT-07:00 Jaap Keuter  >:
> 
> Well it does, it's the main protocol of SIGTRAN.
> 
> 
> Good to know. Then I guess that's why, even if it is a bit surprising.
>  
> 
> 
> On 12-06-16 01:43, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2016-06-11 16:18 GMT-07:00 Jaap Keuter  
> > >>:
> >
> > See subject.
> >
> > Only in the Qt version, in both Analyze and Telephony menu.
> >
> >
> > Presumably it has nothing to do with Telephony :)
> >
> >
> > Also where's the Chunk count gone?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jaap
> 

___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why does the SCTP submenu appeat twice?

2016-06-11 Thread Guy Harris 
On Jun 11, 2016, at 5:03 PM, Jaap Keuter  wrote:

> Well, it's surprising it was added (again) the analyze.
> 
> Historically all items in Telephony were in Analyze, which became too long to 
> be
> practical. Therefore all Telephony related items were grouped in their own 
> menu.
> This included SCTP.

So is SCTP a telephony protocol, or is it a protocol intended for general use 
that's currently primarily used for telephony?

If the former, I'd put it under Telephony.

If the latter, however, I'd put it under Analyze.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Why does the SCTP submenu appeat twice?

2016-06-11 Thread Jeff Morriss 
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Guy Harris  wrote:

> On Jun 11, 2016, at 5:03 PM, Jaap Keuter  wrote:
>
> > Well, it's surprising it was added (again) the analyze.
> >
> > Historically all items in Telephony were in Analyze, which became too
> long to be
> > practical. Therefore all Telephony related items were grouped in their
> own menu.
> > This included SCTP.
>
> So is SCTP a telephony protocol, or is it a protocol intended for general
> use that's currently primarily used for telephony?
>
> If the former, I'd put it under Telephony.
>
> If the latter, however, I'd put it under Analyze.
>

The latter.  It was initially developed in the SIGTRAN working group but
then moved over to the transport working group (I believe that happened
when it was realized that it really was a general-purpose protocol).

I'd /guess/ it's still in the Telephony menu for people expecting to find
it there.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe