Re: OS Images(Linux/etc) in ports tree
> This could be the project that you are interested in : > > https://github.com/quickemu-project/quickemu Or perhaps just make netboot.xyz run ontop of PXE in bhyve??? https://netboot.xyz (This is actually rather simple to do, use the PXE built into bhyve ED2K to load a full featured iPXE (already in ports), which then loads the netboot.xyz scripts.) I have had this working in the past... > > In your case,it could be called quick bhyve. So let's get started. I'm also > interested in collaborating. > > Il sab 29 giu 2024, 19:49 Chris Moerz ha scritto: > > > > > > > On Sat, 29 Jun 2024, Mario Marietto wrote: > > > > > I think that it may be possible to put only the VM config files on the > > ports,not necessarily heavy image files. > > > > > > > You're all making a valid point; I second that - I read the original post > > as if we're talking about scripts that download images from somewhere > > else. May have jumped to conclusions. > > > > We can probably all agree: OS images do not belong into the ports tree. > > Porting scripts that handle OS image creation or downloading them from > > some public repository though would certainly be fine. > > > > chris > > > > -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org
Re: OS Images(Linux/etc) in ports tree
It seems nice. On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 5:28 PM Rodney W. Grimes < freebsd-...@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > This could be the project that you are interested in : > > > > https://github.com/quickemu-project/quickemu > > Or perhaps just make netboot.xyz run ontop of PXE in bhyve??? > https://netboot.xyz > > (This is actually rather simple to do, use the PXE built into > bhyve ED2K to load a full featured iPXE (already in ports), > which then loads the netboot.xyz scripts.) I have had this > working in the past... > > > > > In your case,it could be called quick bhyve. So let's get started. I'm > also > > interested in collaborating. > > > > Il sab 29 giu 2024, 19:49 Chris Moerz ha > scritto: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 29 Jun 2024, Mario Marietto wrote: > > > > > > > I think that it may be possible to put only the VM config files on > the > > > ports,not necessarily heavy image files. > > > > > > > > > > You're all making a valid point; I second that - I read the original > post > > > as if we're talking about scripts that download images from somewhere > > > else. May have jumped to conclusions. > > > > > > We can probably all agree: OS images do not belong into the ports tree. > > > Porting scripts that handle OS image creation or downloading them from > > > some public repository though would certainly be fine. > > > > > > chris > > > > > > > > -- > Rod Grimes > rgri...@freebsd.org > -- Mario.
Problem reports for virtualization@FreeBSD.org that need special attention
To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status |Bug Id | Description +---+--- Open|264267 | UEFI Booting on Azure Generation 2 VMs crashes 1 problems total for which you should take action.
