Re: [vdr] VDR ISDB-T support
On 04.08.2015 08:12, Christian Rodriguez wrote: Hello everyone! I'm from Argentina, and up to last month I've been using VDR 1.7.262 with an ISDB-T USB adapter. It works really good, but the last week I've been trying to upgrade to VDR 2.2 and I've found a problem with ISDB-T cards: they are not supported. As I'm really interested in using VDR, I was digging inside the code and found a partial solution for this problem: as ISDBT is the same as DVBT, I've changed the way delivery system is queried. My changes are applied in a cloned repo at github: https://github.com/chrodriguez/vdr/commit/dadbca57c2dc55c1c53b4fa8f68b56728ab72ddd#diff-8fe0655a5feb333a97bf3a2a8b451546R1294 That's the only change I've made. Now I can enjoy my fresh upgraded VDR installation!! I think a better refactor should be made, but for now it's working perfectly deployed as a docker container: https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/chrodriguez/vdr If it works for you this way, I'll adopt this change in the next version. Surely there should be a better implementation, since ISDB-T has several tuning parameters of its own. But since there is no such signal here I can't implement/test this myself. Somebody with the proper hardware/signal/knowledge would have to do that. Klaus ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] VDR ISDB-T support
Hi Christian, thanks for sharing your experience ! Do you know of any good ISDB-T internal cards ? I looked around, but for DVB-T I find many dual receiver cards, for ISDB-T it looks like there are "only" single-receiver USB sticks ? Kind regards from Vienna, Austria Thomas On 08/04/15 08:12, Christian Rodriguez wrote: Hello everyone! I'm from Argentina, and up to last month I've been using VDR 1.7.262 with an ISDB-T USB adapter. It works really good, but the last week I've been trying to upgrade to VDR 2.2 and I've found a problem with ISDB-T cards: they are not supported. As I'm really interested in using VDR, I was digging inside the code and found a partial solution for this problem: as ISDBT is the same as DVBT, I've changed the way delivery system is queried. My changes are applied in a cloned repo at github: https://github.com/chrodriguez/vdr/commit/dadbca57c2dc55c1c53b4fa8f68b56728ab72ddd#diff-8fe0655a5feb333a97bf3a2a8b451546R1294 That's the only change I've made. Now I can enjoy my fresh upgraded VDR installation!! I think a better refactor should be made, but for now it's working perfectly deployed as a docker container: https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/chrodriguez/vdr Thanks for this wonderfull project! -- Lic. Christian A. Rodriguez @car_unlp ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] VDR ISDB-T support (vdr Digest, Vol 127, Issue 1)
El 04/08/15 a las 05:25, Klaus Schmidinger escribió: > On 04.08.2015 08:12, Christian Rodriguez wrote: >> Hello everyone! I'm from Argentina, and up to last month I've been >> using VDR 1.7.262 with an ISDB-T USB adapter. It works really good, >> but the last week I've been trying to upgrade to VDR 2.2 and I've >> found a problem with ISDB-T cards: they are not supported. >> >> As I'm really interested in using VDR, I was digging inside the code >> and found a partial solution for this problem: as ISDBT is the same >> as DVBT, I've changed the way delivery system is queried. My changes >> are applied in a cloned repo at github: >> >> https://github.com/chrodriguez/vdr/commit/dadbca57c2dc55c1c53b4fa8f68b56728ab72ddd#diff-8fe0655a5feb333a97bf3a2a8b451546R1294 >> >> >> That's the only change I've made. Now I can enjoy my fresh upgraded >> VDR installation!! >> >> I think a better refactor should be made, but for now it's working >> perfectly deployed as a docker container: >> https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/chrodriguez/vdr > > If it works for you this way, I'll adopt this change in the next version. > > Surely there should be a better implementation, since ISDB-T has several > tuning parameters of its own. But since there is no such signal here I > can't > implement/test this myself. Somebody with the proper > hardware/signal/knowledge > would have to do that. > I've tried to follow vdr code, and I think I shall add specific code to dvbdevice.c, specially: * GetRequiredDeliverySystem * cDvbTuner::SetFrontend * cDvbDevice::QueryDeliverySystems * cDvbDevice::ProvidesSource Is there any developer guide for VDR so I can read it before trying to understand directly from code? I have the proper HW & signal... Thanks! > Klaus > > > -- Lic. Christian A. Rodriguez @car_unlp ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
