[vdr] Crystalhd support and help

2012-01-02 Thread Lists
Hi all, I have a main frontend box running yaVDR 1.7.21 vdr and I have a 
version 1 AppleTV with a broadcom crystalhd module installed.  I'm 
running Ubuntu and have loaded from source the crystalhd kernel module 
and the libraries.


I have xbmc-pvr branch from yaVDR running on the appletv and it works 
most of the time but cannot keep up with 1080 most of the time (can for 
720p).  Does anyone know if this branch has crystalhd support and how do 
I know if its using it?


Second, I would prefer to use vdr-xineliboutput and have installed 
vdr-sxfe and vdr-fbfe.  I don't need, nor want all the overhead of 
xbmc.  I'm thinking if I can one of these to work then it would be 
perfect - I could use the vdr OSD, etc.  However, I can't find a video 
module that will work properly.


vdr-sxfe shows me:
Available video drivers: vdpau aadxr3 dxr3 xv vaapi raw opengl xshm caca 
aa none xxmc sdl vidixfb vidix fb xvmc

Available audio drivers: pulseaudio alsa oss jack none file

I understand to 'use' crystalhd you have to invoke the vaapi video 
driver?  Is this correct?  When I try it, however, it says

libva: libva version 0.31.1
Xlib:  extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0".
libva: va_getDriverName() returns 0
libva: Trying to open /usr/lib/dri/nvidia_drv_video.so
libva: va_openDriver() returns -1

How can I get around this or is it possible with my setup?  Anyone got 
this going?


Thanks for any help.

Norm



___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


[vdr] Renaming of all *.c files in *.cpp or equivalent

2012-01-02 Thread Denis Loh

Hi,

I have a big wish for future development: Please rename all c++ files 
with *.c extensions into *.cpp or equivalent. Many IDEs may cope with 
*.c and treat them as c++ files. However, if not, you must force the IDE 
to do that, which is sometimes hard work to do. I think it is lesser 
work to rename them and edit the makefile to work with cpp for instance.


I am using cpp as default extension for c++ files for long time now.

What do you think about that?

Denis

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Renaming of all *.c files in *.cpp or equivalent

2012-01-02 Thread Klaus Schmidinger

On 02.01.2012 17:44, Denis Loh wrote:

Hi,

I have a big wish for future development: Please rename all c++ files with *.c 
extensions into *.cpp or equivalent. Many IDEs may cope with *.c and treat them 
as c++ files. However, if not, you must force the IDE to do that, which is 
sometimes hard work to do. I think it is lesser work to rename
them and edit the makefile to work with cpp for instance.

I am using cpp as default extension for c++ files for long time now.

What do you think about that?


I like *.c and will stay with it.

If you really need to access the files as *.cpp, you could do

  for i in *.c; do echo ln -sf $i ${i}pp; done

Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Renaming of all *.c files in *.cpp or equivalent

2012-01-02 Thread Denis Loh
Well, it was just a thought, because there are many many naming 
conventions which suggests to use another extension than *.c like *.cc 
or *.cpp respectively. Mainly, it is only for better readability and to 
distinguish what type of code resided in the file. IDEs rely on this 
convention to decide which compiler it has to use.


But I can live with it, because there is no real technical reason for 
renaming.


Am 02.01.2012 18:07, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:

On 02.01.2012 17:44, Denis Loh wrote:

Hi,

I have a big wish for future development: Please rename all c++ files 
with *.c extensions into *.cpp or equivalent. Many IDEs may cope with 
*.c and treat them as c++ files. However, if not, you must force the 
IDE to do that, which is sometimes hard work to do. I think it is 
lesser work to rename

them and edit the makefile to work with cpp for instance.

I am using cpp as default extension for c++ files for long time now.

What do you think about that?


I like *.c and will stay with it.

If you really need to access the files as *.cpp, you could do

  for i in *.c; do echo ln -sf $i ${i}pp; done

Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr



___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Updated patch for vdr 1.7.22 in gentoo

2012-01-02 Thread René

On 02.01.2012 19:11 , Marc wrote:

The patch applies, portage try several levels with patch and it
succeeded at p1 (log start at 255).

The modifications I've made work but you have more files that fail than
me. Perhaps you use more use flags. I don't know if the extension
patches are applied all the time or only when you set the use flag for
them. You could try to build vdr without any use flag and see if it
compiles.


I got this patch installed without any errors, but it does not work 
(pressing rewind does not do anything).. In the setup-menu i see the 
LiveBuffer settings, but i can't enter the settings.


I just started a "vdrplugin-rebuild -se rebuild", so let's see if it's 
some other plugin that's screwing things up..



To add this patch to the overlay, have you tried to contact the
maintainer ? It could be interested, its address is in the changelog.


If i get this to work, then i'll do my best to persuade him to add this 
back to the overlay!! :-)



Regards,

René

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Updated patch for vdr 1.7.22 in gentoo

2012-01-02 Thread René

On 02.01.2012 23:44 , René wrote:

On 02.01.2012 19:11 , Marc wrote:

The patch applies, portage try several levels with patch and it
succeeded at p1 (log start at 255).

The modifications I've made work but you have more files that fail than
me. Perhaps you use more use flags. I don't know if the extension
patches are applied all the time or only when you set the use flag for
them. You could try to build vdr without any use flag and see if it
compiles.


I got this patch installed without any errors, but it does not work
(pressing rewind does not do anything).. In the setup-menu i see the
LiveBuffer settings, but i can't enter the settings.

I just started a "vdrplugin-rebuild -se rebuild", so let's see if it's
some other plugin that's screwing things up..


To add this patch to the overlay, have you tried to contact the
maintainer ? It could be interested, its address is in the changelog.


If i get this to work, then i'll do my best to persuade him to add this
back to the overlay!! :-)


A quick update.. Pressing the LiveBUffer menu-item in the setupmenu 
gives me the following in my logfile:


Jan  3 00:42:27 vdr vdr: [16766] ERROR: Gentoo-VDR-Setup: System=LiveBuffer> not known


Does anyone know what this error means?

if someone knows what's messed up in the previous error-message, then i 
get the same error for BigPatch


Jan  3 00:42:29 vdr vdr: [16766] ERROR: Gentoo-VDR-Setup: System=BigPatch> not known


Regards,

René

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Updated patch for vdr 1.7.22 in gentoo

2012-01-02 Thread Marc

On 02/01/2012 23:44, René wrote:

On 02.01.2012 23:44 , René wrote:

On 02.01.2012 19:11 , Marc wrote:

The patch applies, portage try several levels with patch and it
succeeded at p1 (log start at 255).

The modifications I've made work but you have more files that fail than
me. Perhaps you use more use flags. I don't know if the extension
patches are applied all the time or only when you set the use flag for
them. You could try to build vdr without any use flag and see if it
compiles.


I got this patch installed without any errors, but it does not work
(pressing rewind does not do anything).. In the setup-menu i see the
LiveBuffer settings, but i can't enter the settings.

I just started a "vdrplugin-rebuild -se rebuild", so let's see if it's
some other plugin that's screwing things up..


To add this patch to the overlay, have you tried to contact the
maintainer ? It could be interested, its address is in the changelog.


If i get this to work, then i'll do my best to persuade him to add this
back to the overlay!! :-)


A quick update.. Pressing the LiveBUffer menu-item in the setupmenu 
gives me the following in my logfile:


Jan  3 00:42:27 vdr vdr: [16766] ERROR: Gentoo-VDR-Setup: System=LiveBuffer> not known


Does anyone know what this error means?

if someone knows what's messed up in the previous error-message, then 
i get the same error for BigPatch


Jan  3 00:42:29 vdr vdr: [16766] ERROR: Gentoo-VDR-Setup: System=BigPatch> not known


Regards,

René

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
I don't have livebuffer in the menu. I activated the livebuffer by 
setting 'Pause key handling' to 'Timeshit'.


Regards,

Marc.

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Updated patch for vdr 1.7.22 in gentoo

2012-01-02 Thread René

On 03.01.2012 1:00 , Marc wrote:

I don't have livebuffer in the menu. I activated the livebuffer by
setting 'Pause key handling' to 'Timeshit'.


Ok, is this something you have to manually edit in setup.conf? I don't 
have this option in the setup for recording.. Here i have only "pause 
live video", "do not pause live video" and "confirm pause live video"..


Do you btw have to press pause to activate livebuffer, or can you just 
press rewind in the middle of playback? In the 1.6.x patch i don't have 
to press pause, i just press rewind..



Regards,

René

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr