Re: [vchkpw] [NOTSPAM] valias line that pipes into vdelivermail again breaks delivery valias documentation lax

2012-08-06 Thread Remo Mattei
I would not answer if not I do have SQL and virtual as the info below I guess 
mine still works as I needed 

:) but have a good day 

Inviato da iPhone ()


Il giorno 06/ago/2012, alle ore 08:22, Luke  ha 
scritto:

> On 08/06/2012 06:53 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Funny enough I have it on aliases for years and still works great :) 
>> 
>> Inviato da iPhone ()
>> 
>> 
>> Il giorno 05/ago/2012, alle ore 11:28, Tom Collins  ha 
>> scritto:
> Remo,
> if you read the email you would see this applies to valias & mysql.
> Without mysql/ldap/oracle or whatever you just use dot-qmail files under
> the /var/vpopmail/domains/domain/ directory.
> 
> The whole point of this post is not everything that works in .qmail
> files works in SQL vpopmail valiases.
> 
> Do you have | pipe characters in your SQL valiases? I doubt it.
> Did you have virtualmin setup your vpopmail aliases?
> 
> If neither of those apply to you, then you didn't get the point of my
> last email.
> Cheers,
> 
> Luke
> 
> 
>>> Haven't read your whole email, so I apologize if I'm off base. 
>>> 
>>> vdelivermail should only go in .qmail-default. It should not go in 
>>> .qmail-alias files. If you're using it there, you will have problems. 
>>> 
>>> -Tom
>>> (Sent from my phone; forgive my brevity)
>>> 
>>> On Aug 5, 2012, at 1:13 PM, Luke vpopmail  
>>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

!DSPAM:501fc38c34211811814691!



Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] anti-OSX [was: qmail+vpopmail upgrade questions]

2012-08-06 Thread Kurt Bigler
I guess you weren't kidding about using FreeBSD.

But I realize my idea of applying more standard patches to see if my problem
goes away is perhaps a little indirect given the amount of effort involve.
So I guess I will go ahead and post a qmail troubleshooting question here,
separately.

And then at a later day I'll look into the toaster.  From other comments
here perhaps running it in a VM on the mac may not be such a bad thing for
as long as I continue to use qmail+vpopmail, and I really haven't found an
alternative that satisfies my usage.

-Kurt


On 8/3/12 6:25 AM, "Rick Romero"  wrote:

> 
> I don't disagree with any of your points :)
> I use FreeBSD, I don't know why anyone would run Linux for any real
> server load - I'M JUST KIDDING! :))
> 
> Have you taken a look at Matt Simerson's toaster script?  It's
> targeted at FreeBSD, but I'm fairly confident the instructions are OSX
> friendly.  At least in the past they were.
> 
> http://www.tnpi.net/internet/mail/toaster/
> 
> Rick
> 
> Quoting Kurt Bigler :
> 
> 
>> ***
>> 
>> I would consider running QMT in a VM, but would rather avoid a VM.  I've
>> never touched CentOS.  My "distro" of choice still would be Mac-native.  I
>> suppose I would try building from sources and see what happens.  I really
>> don't want my *entire* server in a VM (just qmail+vpopmail if really
>> necessary) and also really don't want multiple IP's, and suspect sharing a
>> single IP with host and mail VM would be problematic.  I already have native
>> Apache, SQL, PHP, etc. and figure it is a good thing to leave it that way if
>> I want to "try" Mac for whatever it may be worth.
>> 
>> But if the whole idea doesn't work maybe I will just install some linux on
>> my Mac mini.  But in that case I suppose I could put the whole thing in a
>> linux VM under MacOSX and run SoftRAID in the Mac host.  It is just not
>> stuff I'd thought through since I naively didn't expect Mac to be such a
>> problem.  If it really is such a problem, then I guess the "why Mac"
>> questions may be sensible.  It just surprises me.
>> 
> 
>> 
>> -Kurt
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/2/12 8:13 PM, "Eric Shubert"  wrote:
>> 
>>> I wonder too, why OSX? The only thing I can think of is perhaps you have
>>> an older MacMini laying around that you'd like to use. That's certainly
>>> usable for something such as this, but I wouldn't recommend running a
>>> server w/out some sort of raid (I prefer the SW variety).
>>> 
>>> Disclaimer: I've recently taken charge of the QMail-Toaster.com project,
>>> so I'm a bit biased. ;)
>>> 
>>> If you're really bent on OSX, you could run a QMT mail server as a VM
>>> under whichever virtualization platform you prefer. Migrating your
>>> existing setup to QMT should be fairly easy, depending on your vpopmail
>>> settings. QMT has a slew of qmail patches applied, and I'm presently
>>> upgrading vpopmail to 5.4.33 (long awaited), which will bring all of the
>>> QMT packages current with upstream releases. There is a large community
>>> behind QMT, so you won't need to look far for helpful support.
>>> 
>>> QMT is presently only available on CentOS/RHEL, so that might be a
>>> drawback to you. If you're familiar with packaging though, you might
>>> want to roll your own for whatever distro you choose. We hope to have
>>> the sources available on GitHub by the end of the year, and will be
>>> using OBS to build the packages.
>>> 
>>> You're welcome to join us in our endeavors.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



!DSPAM:50208c4f34211260758337!



[vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] anti-OSX [was: qmail+vpopmail upgrade questions]

2012-08-06 Thread Kurt Bigler
I had a chance to buy a used pdp-8e from the physics department for "cheap".
I guess it was still a little too big for my tastes and the Apple II came
out about that time.  ;)

I guess we get away with such OT remarks 'cause there's so many of us
old-timers.  But really computers were more fun when they didn't do
everything so easily.  The crisply explicit does not engage the imagination.
Multi-user space wars (written by a friend) on a text terminal on a HP
realtime mini with 4 other players was, well, better than anything in gaming
that has happenned since.

-Kurt



On 8/3/12 5:37 AM, "Postmaster"  wrote:

> WHAT! - no pdp-8  :)
> 
> On 08/03/12 06:52, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> * After the UNIVAC 1108, the IBM 360, the PDP-11, and the Apple II, the Mac
>> was my next computer
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



!DSPAM:50208d2034211484845289!