Re: [vchkpw] autoresponder question
Ok, I think you can work around it if you put in .qmail-info the line for the autoresponder as first line and substitute the mail adresses you have left with the path of the relative Maildir. I think it should work :) Let me know Regards At 10.44 19/01/2003 -0300, Abel Lucano wrote: Hi all, Could you help me with the following Briefly: if the file /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com.ar/.qmail-info looks like: &[EMAIL PROTECTED] &[EMAIL PROTECTED] &[EMAIL PROTECTED] &[EMAIL PROTECTED] &[EMAIL PROTECTED] AND each of these accounts have active vacation messages If I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I receive five vacation messages, one from of each different final recipient; Is there any tip to avoid this behaviour?: I would receive one vacation message just when i send a mail directly to an address, not from the forwarded or aliased email address. BTW, if i set a vacation message for the "main" address [EMAIL PROTECTED], when one message is sent to this address the effect now is receive 6 vacation messages, one from [EMAIL PROTECTED] plus the 5 above ones. thanks in advance for your help best regards, Abel Lucano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [vchkpw] disk quota per domain
I read in the past of someone who made a coomon pool and give the code, but I can't find who made it. I remember he did this: the postmaster quota is the pool from which all users' quotas are added/subtracted. So, postmaster may modify single quotas, having the common pool limit in his postmaster's quota. This solution would permit to make very few modifications to qmailadmin, and give postmaster a reasonable way to handle quotas. There should be a line like "enablequotapool postmaster" in .qmailadminlimits che could enable this option, setting the user whose quota must be the domain pool to use in qmailadmin. Then, each single add/delete/modify user should check the pool quota and modify it. I'ld like to have both the possibility, "global quota" (all users have the same global quota) and "pooled quota" (all single quotas are derived from a master pool quota), on a domain base, and I think the base code of qmailadmin now may changed easily to support both these options. Tonino At 29/01/03 29/01/03 -0800, Lu wrote: That actually sounds like it may work. Another solution may be this: Since qmailadmin now allows postmaster to allocate quota per user, what if we introduce a limit that restricts how much quota the postmaster has to distribute. This would give us the flexibility to allocate quota per domain and the postmaster for that domain can re-allocate to the user. So we can still see how much each user is using whereas your solution will not. What do you say Ken/Bill ? Regards, Lu > -Original Message- > From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [vchkpw] disk quota per domain > > > I'm thinking to a new solution, modifying qmailadmin as follows. > > A unique ".qmailmaildirsize" should be created in the domain, > and every > user should have his own "maildirsize" linked by an "ln -sf" to the > domain's ".qmailmaildirsize". > > \domain > \domain\.qmailmaildirsize > [global] > \domain\user1\Maildir\maildirsize --> > ..\..\.maildirsize[-> global] > \domain\user2\Maildir\maildirsize --> > ..\..\.maildirsize[-> global] > \domain\user3\Maildir\maildirsize --> > ..\..\.maildirsize[-> global] > \domain\user4\Maildir\maildirsize > [alone] > \domain\user5\Maildir\maildirsize > [alone] > > Each user using the domain quota should have the same quota > (equal to the > domain quota itself). > > Users with own quota don't use this mechanism and have their private > "maildirsize". > > The only major add should be a routine to recheck the > "domain's global > usage" when domain's ".qmailmaildirsize" is created (or > recreated after > deletion), counting only users working with global "maildirsize". > > Main problem I see could be the lock on the global > ".maildirsize", domains > (with global quota) with thousands of very active users could > slow down on > receiving messages. > > All that should work with a very few modifications (none in vdeliver, > vpopmail, etc., only a few in qmailadmin). > > Tonino > > At 28/01/03 28/01/03 -0800, Lu wrote: > >Unfortunately adding a unique user per domain is not a > viable solution > >for a lot of people especially when there are thousands of domains. > > > >I have implemented domain quota by tweaking old vpopmail code before > >maildirquota was implemented. Basically disabling user quota and > >recalculate quota for the entire domain when new mail arrives. Then > >comparing this number to the value MaxQuota inside > .qmailadmin-limits > >to determine whether the entire domain is over quota or not. It is > >rather inefficient but it mostly works. > > > >Now I want to do the same with new vpopmail but I don't understand > >enough about the new way in which it calculates quota. > > > >If someone is more well verse and willing to do this, let me > know and I > >can help. Otherwise, I will still attempt it but it will > take a looong > >time to study the code. > > > >Thanks. > > > >Lu > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Claudio Nieder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:53 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] disk quota per domain > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Please give the workable answer... > > > > > > Use vaddoains -u option to assign to each domain a different user > > > and use your OS quota facility to assign each user the desired > > > quota. > > > > > > claudio > > > -- > > > Claudio Nieder, Kanalweg 1, CH-8610 Uster, Tel +41 79 357 > 6743 yahoo > > > messenger: claudionieder aim: claudionieder icq:42315212 > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.claudio.ch > > > > > > > Inter@zioniInterazioni di Antonio Nati > http://www.interazioni.it [
[vchkpw] feature request qmail-smtpd-chkusr
Hello, I want to know your opinion about including this patch like an option (selecting in configure) on vpopmail code. Spammers generate a lot of traffic of emails to unknown users and server could stop it with this. Performance seems to be normal. Opinions? http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/
[vchkpw] restrict postmaster to a domain in vqadmin
How can I restrict postmaster to a domain in vqadmin. After loging in the vqadmin.cgi any user can enter in to any domain/user profile. How to restrict a user to a particular domain. -- MANISH JAIN Electronics Research & Development Center of India "Anusandhan Bhawan" C-56/1, Sector - 62, Noida - 201307 (U.P.) Ph. - 0120-2402551 to 60 (Ext. - 803/718)
Re: [vchkpw] reg sqwebmail
Hi! Send the error u r getting.. On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 22:06, Mahesh wrote: > > hi > > i installl sqwebmail it work first time and when i rebooted , i am unable to browse >the sqwebmail and the apache running fine please guide how i can solve my prob > > Mahesh > > > > - > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now -- MANISH JAIN Electronics Research & Development Center of India "Anusandhan Bhawan" C-56/1, Sector - 62, Noida - 201307 (U.P.) Ph. - 0120-2402551 to 60 (Ext. - 803/718)
[vchkpw] Can't open file: 'horde_prefs.MYD'. (errno: 145)
please help... when i try to open database : horde on table : horde_prefs, i get error message: Can't open file : 'horde_prefs.MYD'. (errno: 145) here are the horde_prefs_MYD spesification : -rw-rw 1 mysqlmysql 3833856 Jan 29 15:20 horde_prefs.MYD i use redhat 7.3 + qmail + vpopmail 5.2 anyone can help ? thanks B4, regards, Abd.Latief *beginner ---
[vchkpw] Re: feature request qmail-smtpd-chkusr
Hi Eduardo, my patch basically modifies qmail-smtpd.c code, using vpopmail libraries. So, it may be seen practically in the category "qmail patch", not "vpopmail patch". As any patch, it may not work if someone applied other patches before, so I don't think it may be right to include it in vpopmail package. vpopmail configure must work 100%, and cannot rely on already patched qmail code. No problem if someone wants to make it, or Inter7 decides to include it in vpopmail, but I see it troublesome (not because of my patch, but because all the patches that are usually applied on qmail). All could be competely different if inter7 decides to distribute an extended qmail+vpopmail package. That could help a lot of people, and a lot of patches could be added easily. Let me know what you think. Ciao, Tonino P.S. Actually, the installation of the patch is extremely easy, and you may install it also on patched version of qmail (a lot of people asked me and did it). If you have a plain qmail installation, the patch will work in a few minutes. The patch has been written in a easy and compact way (with a semplified version for Bill's megapatch or other complicated patches) just to help people that use a deeply patched qmail. At 30/01/03 30/01/03 +0100, Eduardo wrote: Hello, I want to know your opinion about including this patch like an option (selecting in configure) on vpopmail code. Spammers generate a lot of traffic of emails to unknown users and server could stop it with this. Performance seems to be normal. Opinions? http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/ Inter@zioniInterazioni di Antonio Nati http://www.interazioni.it [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vchkpw] Re: feature request qmail-smtpd-chkusr
Hi, Its definitely a qmail patch, not vpopmail. You should contact the qmail list or homepage to have it listed there instead. I see from your page that it checks vpopmail users, but what about regular shell accounts? Also, does it do the .qmail file processing for normal accounts, maillists, aliases, etc. for ~user/.qmail and such? (This is obviously a basic requirement for almost anyone to be able to use it, but I figured I'd make sure its in there before trying it). I also assume that you're just filling in the VRFY SMTP command, which would be correct place to put this code. Thanks, Brian > Hi Eduardo, > > my patch basically modifies qmail-smtpd.c code, using vpopmail libraries. > So, it may be seen practically in the category "qmail patch", not "vpopmail > patch". > > As any patch, it may not work if someone applied other patches before, so I > don't think it may be right to include it in vpopmail package. vpopmail > configure must work 100%, and cannot rely on already patched qmail code. > > No problem if someone wants to make it, or Inter7 decides to include it in > vpopmail, but I see it troublesome (not because of my patch, but because > all the patches that are usually applied on qmail). > > All could be competely different if inter7 decides to distribute an > extended qmail+vpopmail package. That could help a lot of people, and a lot > of patches could be added easily. > > Let me know what you think. > > Ciao, > > Tonino > > P.S. Actually, the installation of the patch is extremely easy, and you may > install it also on patched version of qmail (a lot of people asked me and > did it). If you have a plain qmail installation, the patch will work in a > few minutes. > The patch has been written in a easy and compact way (with a semplified > version for Bill's megapatch or other complicated patches) just to help > people that use a deeply patched qmail. > > > At 30/01/03 30/01/03 +0100, Eduardo wrote: > >Hello, > >I want to know your opinion about including this patch like an option > >(selecting in configure) on vpopmail code. Spammers generate a lot of traffic > >of emails to unknown users and server could stop it with this. Performance > >seems to be normal. Opinions? > >http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/ > > > > Inter@zioniInterazioni di Antonio Nati > http://www.interazioni.it [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
Re: [vchkpw] restrict postmaster to a domain in vqadmin
On Thursday 30 January 2003 06:52, Manish Jain wrote: > How can I restrict postmaster to a domain in vqadmin. > After loging in the vqadmin.cgi any user can enter in to any domain/user > profile. > How to restrict a user to a particular domain. I believe that this is what qmailadmin is designed to do. VQadmin is meant to be a more general system wide administrator tool. qmailadmin is meant for individual postmasters. -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long distance faxing and want to cut their long distance bill by up to 50%. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info.
Re: [vchkpw] Re: feature request qmail-smtpd-chkusr
Hi Brian, the versions you see on my website are tailored for vpopmail, so they handle every kind of user vpopmail handles, valias and .qmail aliases, ezmlm mailing lists. It may be easily customized for other handlers. A lot of people asked me, and they realized the same control out of vpopmail simply cutting vpopmail calls and putting specific calls. Code is very structured and easy to modify. I use vpopmail, so, while I tried to make a general framework reausable from others, I manage and support it directly with vpopmail. Ciao, Tonino At 30/01/03 30/01/03 -0500, Brian Kolaci wrote: Hi, Its definitely a qmail patch, not vpopmail. You should contact the qmail list or homepage to have it listed there instead. I see from your page that it checks vpopmail users, but what about regular shell accounts? Also, does it do the .qmail file processing for normal accounts, maillists, aliases, etc. for ~user/.qmail and such? (This is obviously a basic requirement for almost anyone to be able to use it, but I figured I'd make sure its in there before trying it). I also assume that you're just filling in the VRFY SMTP command, which would be correct place to put this code. Thanks, Brian > Hi Eduardo, > > my patch basically modifies qmail-smtpd.c code, using vpopmail libraries. > So, it may be seen practically in the category "qmail patch", not "vpopmail > patch". > > As any patch, it may not work if someone applied other patches before, so I > don't think it may be right to include it in vpopmail package. vpopmail > configure must work 100%, and cannot rely on already patched qmail code. > > No problem if someone wants to make it, or Inter7 decides to include it in > vpopmail, but I see it troublesome (not because of my patch, but because > all the patches that are usually applied on qmail). > > All could be competely different if inter7 decides to distribute an > extended qmail+vpopmail package. That could help a lot of people, and a lot > of patches could be added easily. > > Let me know what you think. > > Ciao, > > Tonino > > P.S. Actually, the installation of the patch is extremely easy, and you may > install it also on patched version of qmail (a lot of people asked me and > did it). If you have a plain qmail installation, the patch will work in a > few minutes. > The patch has been written in a easy and compact way (with a semplified > version for Bill's megapatch or other complicated patches) just to help > people that use a deeply patched qmail. > > > At 30/01/03 30/01/03 +0100, Eduardo wrote: > >Hello, > >I want to know your opinion about including this patch like an option > >(selecting in configure) on vpopmail code. Spammers generate a lot of traffic > >of emails to unknown users and server could stop it with this. Performance > >seems to be normal. Opinions? > >http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/ > > > > Inter@zioniInterazioni di Antonio Nati > http://www.interazioni.it [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Inter@zioniInterazioni di Antonio Nati http://www.interazioni.it [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[vchkpw] Postmater for domains
I would like to be able to forward postmaster mail for each domain I am hosting under vpopmail to send its mail notices to a designated user for each domain. ie: [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. Right now any postmaster messages get sent to the default domain postmaster. I tired setting up a forward in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] but they have not been receiving the messages, I still am in the main domain.
Re: [vchkpw] Postmater for domains
On Thursday 30 January 2003 10:20, Dale Herring wrote: > I would like to be able to forward postmaster mail for each domain I am > hosting under vpopmail to send its mail notices to a designated user for > each domain. ie: [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. > > Right now any postmaster messages get sent to the default domain > postmaster. > > > I tired setting up a forward in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] but they have > not been receiving the messages, I still am in the main domain. Well, forwarding *does* work. Are you getting error messages? Does the mail remain in the postmaster account? Check for errors in your log. That should always be the first you do when something doesn't work the way you expect. That's what they're there for. -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long distance faxing and want to cut their long distance bill by up to 50%. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info.
RE: [vchkpw] Can't open file: 'horde_prefs.MYD'. (errno: 145)
This isn't for vpopmail. Try the horde or the mysql mailing list. -Original Message- From: Abdul Latief [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] Can't open file: 'horde_prefs.MYD'. (errno: 145) please help... when i try to open database : horde on table : horde_prefs, i get error message: Can't open file : 'horde_prefs.MYD'. (errno: 145) here are the horde_prefs_MYD spesification : -rw-rw 1 mysqlmysql 3833856 Jan 29 15:20 horde_prefs.MYD i use redhat 7.3 + qmail + vpopmail 5.2 anyone can help ? thanks B4, regards, Abd.Latief *beginner ---
[vchkpw] Autoresponder compile problem
I tried serarching the Archive for this and have not found any solutions. I have a FreeBSD machine and when I type make in the autoresponder 2.0.2 directory I get this error right away. gcc -Wall -o autorespond autorespond.c autorespond.c:381: conflicting types for `strcasestr' /usr/include/string.h:86: previous declaration of `strcasestr' What is the the correct solution for this problem so that I can complete the compile process and install it. Thanks Frank
Re: [vchkpw] Postmater for domains
I'm not sure if it is all Postmaster mail per domain. Its the notice of a user being over quota that I want to go to someone else. And they keep getting sent to me because I receive mail for the default domain postmaster. On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:37:12 -0500, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > >Well, forwarding *does* work. Are you getting error messages? Does the mail >remain in the postmaster account? > >Check for errors in your log. That should always be the first you do when >something doesn't work the way you expect. That's what they're there for. > >-- >Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator >WingNET Internet Services, >P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 >423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) >http://www.wingnet.net > >We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long >distance faxing and want to cut their long distance bill by >up to 50%. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info. > > > > Thank You, Dale Herring Internet Kansas Inc. System Administrator Want to go faster.. Get Wireless
Re: [vchkpw] Autoresponder compile problem
On Thursday 30 January 2003 15:31, Frank A wrote: > I tried serarching the Archive for this and have not found any solutions. > > I have a FreeBSD machine and when I type make in the autoresponder 2.0.2 > directory I get this error right away. > > gcc -Wall -o autorespond autorespond.c > autorespond.c:381: conflicting types for `strcasestr' > /usr/include/string.h:86: previous declaration of `strcasestr' > > What is the the correct solution for this problem so that I can complete > the compile process and install it. Here's a patch: ftp.wingnet.net/pub/MAIL/inter7-related/autorespond-2.0.2-patch/autorespond.patch The problem is that FreeBSD already has a 'strcasestr' function, and the autoresponder code is trying to redefine it. My patch simply comments the autoresponder 'strcasestr' function out. HTH, Jesse > > Thanks > > Frank -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long distance faxing and want to cut their long distance bill by up to 50%. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info.
