Re: [vchkpw] ps
Isn't it better to make vpopmail leave a pid file instead then? Cause when I chroot my qmail it doesn't have ps, nor does it have /proc - Original Message - From: "Gabriel Ambuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Raboo Treed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 10:36 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] ps > Hi Raboo Treed, > you wrote. > > RT> why does for example vadddomain and vdeldomain require /bin/ps ??? > > So that it can HUP qmail? > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > Gabriel >
RE: [vchkpw] Re: Delete bounced msg to postmaster?
I read that but it still send to the postmaster of the domain... Qmail control file - doublebounceto | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' delete - Please advise -Original Message- From: Peter Palmreuther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 10:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] Re: Delete bounced msg to postmaster? Hello Neo, On Saturday, October 12, 2002 at 2:58:52 PM you wrote: > Anyone knows how to delete off doublebounced email instead of delivering > it to postmaster. man qmail-send /doublebounceto -- Best regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[vchkpw] Re: Delete bounced msg to postmaster?
Hello Neo, On Saturday, October 12, 2002 at 7:30:16 PM you wrote: > I read that but it still send to the postmaster of the domain... $> cat /var/qmail/control/doublebounceto doublebounce $> cat ~alias/.qmail-doublebounceto # $> -- Best regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vchkpw] ps
Hi Raboo Treed, you wrote. RT> why does for example vadddomain and vdeldomain require /bin/ps ??? So that it can HUP qmail? Regards, Gabriel
[vchkpw] ps
why does for example vadddomain and vdeldomain require /bin/ps ???
Re: [vchkpw] ps
At 01:55 PM 10/13/02 +0200, Raboo Treed wrote: >Isn't it better to make vpopmail leave a pid file instead then? No. ps output is always right, an old pid file could point to the wrong process. Rick
Re: [vchkpw] ps
At 13:55 13/10/2002 +0200, Raboo Treed wrote: >Isn't it better to make vpopmail leave a pid file instead then? Sure, if Vpopmail actually had a daemonized process, but it doesn't. "ps" is used to find the pid of whatever Qmail process (qmail-send, qmails-smtpd etc etc) that needs to be restarted in order to reload the configuration. Every time you add/delete a domain, Qmail must be restarted to notice. -- Steve
Re: [vchkpw] ps
sence no one is using an unpatched qmail it shuldn't be hard to do cause how will it do in a chroot enviroment? - Original Message - From: "Steve Fulton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 10:42 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] ps > At 13:55 13/10/2002 +0200, Raboo Treed wrote: > > >Isn't it better to make vpopmail leave a pid file instead then? > > Sure, if Vpopmail actually had a daemonized process, but it doesn't. "ps" > is used to find the pid of whatever Qmail process (qmail-send, qmails-smtpd > etc etc) that needs to be restarted in order to reload the > configuration. Every time you add/delete a domain, Qmail must be restarted > to notice. > > -- Steve > >
Re: [vchkpw] ps
At 00:04 14/10/2002 +0200, Raboo Treed wrote: >sence no one is using an unpatched qmail it shuldn't be hard to do >cause how will it do in a chroot enviroment? Perhaps I misunderstand you, but whether Qmail is patched or not has nothing to do with Vpopmail's use of "ps" to determine a pid of whatever process it needs to restart. As for performing in a chroot'ed environment, as long as that environment has /bin/ps it won't be an issue. -- Steve >- Original Message - >From: "Steve Fulton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 10:42 PM >Subject: Re: [vchkpw] ps > > > > At 13:55 13/10/2002 +0200, Raboo Treed wrote: > > > > >Isn't it better to make vpopmail leave a pid file instead then? > > > > Sure, if Vpopmail actually had a daemonized process, but it doesn't. "ps" > > is used to find the pid of whatever Qmail process (qmail-send, > qmails-smtpd > > etc etc) that needs to be restarted in order to reload the > > configuration. Every time you add/delete a domain, Qmail must be > restarted > > to notice. > > > > -- Steve > > > >
[vchkpw] vqsignup+send_welcome.c
Hi the vqsignup 0.5 have a file send_welcome.c ... the line snprintf(b, 255, "%s/etc/welcome/%s", VPOPMAILDIR, domain); is supposing send a welcome message to the new user sign up ? where does the welcome reside ? in /usr/home/vpopmail/etc thanks sean __ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com
[vchkpw] vconvert problem - ignoring one user
Hi
I'm having a problem running vconvert -c -m to convert our
installation from CDB files to MySQL. Out of 243 users accross 61
domain names only one user is not imported. The domain name has a
hyphin in it ("-") - would this cause the problem perhaps? There is
only one user in this domain. The domain got imported, just not the
user.
We are running on the new server (MySQL):
vpopmail 5.3.8
mysql 3.23.49
freebsd 4.6.2
On the old server (CDB):
vpopmail 5.2.1
freebsd 4.2
Thankyou
Jesse
--
Jesse Reynolds - Virtual Artists Pty Ltd - http://www.va.com.au
Email: jesse (at) va.com.au> Website Development
Phone: +61 (0)8 8223 2288 > Web & Email Hosting
Web: http://jesse.va.com.au > Streaming Media Hosting
> Telehousing / Colocation
[vchkpw] how to return bounce email
hello all i want to know to know how qmail send return back the invalid email. what configuration required. Sqwebmail is working in this pattern fine but i am trying to make a client and i give facility for that thing. so how can i mail bounce back to user who send it. plz guide me.
