[vchkpw] OOT:cannot find authlib
Hi list, i try to install sqwebmail on my machine, but it failed because there's no authlib on my system File not found: /usr/local/share/sqwebmail/libexec/authlib # ls /usr/local/share/sqwebmail3/ authdaemonrc authdaemonrc.dist man/ share/ var/ i've install vpopmail and courier imap and running well where can i find this file ? what tarball contain this file thankyou -- "Wish not to seem, but to be, the best." -- Aeschylus
Re: [vchkpw] inbox mails aren´t deletet after pop and reading mails
Hello list, wenn I want to send an email by sqwebmail, I got the following error-message: qmail-inject: fatal: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0) How can I govern that? Oliver Etzel flatrate serverhousing www.flathousing.com
[vchkpw] qmail-inject Error
Hello all, wenn I want to send an email by sqwebmail, I got the following error-message: qmail-inject: fatal: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0) How can I govern that? Oliver Etzel flatrate serverhousing www.flathousing.com
[vchkpw] Vpopmail Issues
Hi: I am so thankful to your Vpopmail, it is great. But after the installation and configuration with the guide of VpopInstallGuide, I can't let the roaming user to use my qmail-smtp service to relay. The following are the background of it. OS Kernel version: Linux 2.2.14-5.0 Vpopmail Version: 5.2.1 qmail version: 1.03 Start script of qmail smtp and pop3: /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -D -H -R -u 504 -g 504 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3 & /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -H -R 0 pop-3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup welcome /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir & My steps for compiling the Vpopmail (they are the commands I typed in the console) 1. ./configure --enable-roaming-users=y 2. make 3.make install-strip 4./home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain virtualdomain.com 5. /home/vpopmail/bin/vadduser [EMAIL PROTECTED] password Then I configure the MUA (Outlook Express 6) with the new account.Then I can use it to receive the mail sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I can't send any E-mail with it. I am so puzzled!!! Please Help!!! Best Regards! Marine Yin ChinaLOOP Information Service Co.Ltd E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: (86-21) 24028355-327 http://www.chinaloop.com ChinaLOOP is the leader in customer relationship management providing a complete Data Marketing Network in China. ChinaLOOP brings together a powerful interactive platform, IntegraLOOP and access to a behavioral database of Chinese consumers to communicate with. The business is founded on a simple principle - to link companies and their consumers.
[vchkpw] rcpthosts
Hey, I have a question regarding rcpthosts. I'm using Qmail with Vpopmail. I put my domain, "domain.com" in there, also put it into "locals". Whenever I try to send an email it says that the recipient ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) was denied, cause it's not in rcpthosts. Maybe I got the whole concept wrong. When I allow everything in rcpthosts (wildcard-like) it's just like an open relay, which is not acceptable due to spammers. :-/ Appreciate any help, Till
Re: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:01:52 +0200 "GoodnGo.de \(R\) Zentrale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wenn I want to send an email by sqwebmail, I got the following > error-message: > > qmail-inject: fatal: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0) Are you using qmail-scanner or any other program with a patched qmail (QMAILQUEUE patch)? Make sure the program you set with ENV-variable 'QMAILQUEUE' is executable and does not crash. -- Regards Peter
Re: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error
Hello Peter, hello all, > . ? Make sure the program you set with ENV-variable > 'QMAILQUEUE' is executable and does not crash. My Question: How and where can I set the ENV variable? Regs. Oliver Etzel flatrate serverhousing www.flathousing.com
Re: [vchkpw] OOT:cannot find authlib
At 15:42 18/09/2002 +0700, Mantus wrote: This is more appropriate for the Sqwebmail list, ask there. -- Steve >Hi list, >i try to install sqwebmail on my machine, but it failed because there's no >authlib on my system > File not found: /usr/local/share/sqwebmail/libexec/authlib > ># ls /usr/local/share/sqwebmail3/ >authdaemonrc authdaemonrc.dist man/ share/ var/ > >i've install vpopmail and courier imap and running well >where can i find this file ? what tarball contain this file > >thankyou > > >-- >"Wish not to seem, but to be, the best." >-- Aeschylus
Re: [vchkpw] rcpthosts
At 12:22 18/09/2002 +0200, Till Klampaeckel wrote: This is a question more suited to the Qmail list, try asking there. -- Steve >Hey, >I have a question regarding rcpthosts. I'm using Qmail with Vpopmail. > >I put my domain, "domain.com" in there, also put it into "locals". Whenever >I try to send an email it says that the recipient ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) was >denied, cause it's not in rcpthosts. Maybe I got the whole concept wrong. >When I allow everything in rcpthosts (wildcard-like) it's just like an open >relay, which is not acceptable due to spammers. :-/ > >Appreciate any help, >Till
Re: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error
At 13:37 18/09/2002 +0200, Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM \(R\) wrote: It appears you have very little idea of how a unix-like OS works. I suggest you start educating yourself regarding the OS you are using. Once you have a clue about what exactly this "ENV variable" is, then learn about how Qmail works at http://cr.yp.to and www.lifewithqmail.org .. even better, join the Qmail mailing list at cr.yp.to and ask there. My final comment is directed at those who insist: 1. We teach the them basics of unix systems administration (or even the basic syntax). 2. We read the documentation or list archives for them. 3. We solve their problems as they are unwilling to make the attempt. 4. Or who fail to repeatedly provide a minimum explaination of what the problem is, or do so poorly. A lot of people spend their precious time assisting others on this list, and usually do so without resorting to arrogant and rude tactics. Just because we are *nice* enough to assist does not give anyone carte blanche approval to use us. If you can't figure out the basics, consider hiring one of the many talented consultants on this list to solve your problems for you -- Your customers will be satisfied and you'll probably find your job is more secure because of it. -- Steve >Hello Peter, hello all, > > > . ? Make sure the program you set with ENV-variable > > 'QMAILQUEUE' is executable and does not crash. > >My Question: How and where can I set the ENV variable? > >Regs. > >Oliver Etzel > >flatrate serverhousing www.flathousing.com
Re: [vchkpw] OOT:cannot find authlib [T2002091801XF]
At 11:55 18/09/2002 +, you wrote: I'm still getting these .. perhaps someone has there mail forwarded to the abuse@verizon address. One radical solution may be to force everyone to resubscribe, or at least respond to a keep-alive style message. -- Steve >Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. We are sorry for >any inconvenience it has caused you. Because we receive a large >number of complaints each day at [EMAIL PROTECTED], regretfully, a >personalized response to each message is not possible. > >Please be assured that Verizon investigates each reported occurrence >of unsolicited e-mail or spamming. We maintain a zero-tolerance >policy in regard to spamming and will take the appropriate action as >permitted by Verizon's Acceptable Use Policy. To view our policy, >please refer to one of the two following links: > >Former Bell Atlantic users: >http://www.bellatlantic.net/help/faqs/#faqpolicies > >Former GTE users: >http://www.gte.net/hotlinks/policies/agreement.html > >To better understand the problems with unsolicited e-mail, we have >provided information about filtering Spam with your e-mail software, >answers to several frequently asked questions and links to some useful >online information about Spam at the following link: > >http://www.gte.net/announcements/spam.html > >You may also link directly to our page about unsolicited e-mail: > >http://www.gte.net/contact/spam.html > >If you are reporting an issue of hacking or other security issues not >related to e-mail abuse, please submit your report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >for investigation. > >Sincerely, >Verizon Internet Services >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vchkpw] Help with Root Messages
Peter, Thanks, Eric. on 9/18/02 3:03 AM, Peter Palmreuther at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello Eric, > > no need to post to the list _and_ to me privately, I'm reading the > list. > >> OK. I understand your explanation, but don't see the solution. What >> would you do get qmail to forward the local messages going to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? > > echo '&[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > ~alias/.qmail-root > --
Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail +Ldap
Hi Koji, My slapd.conf include is: include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/qmailUser.schema But my ldap don't know attribute sn. What's happen??? My OpenLDAP version is 2.0.25 and my vpopmail 5.2.1 Thanks Marcos Dutra Em Ter 17 Set 2002 21:17, Sunagawa Koji / ?? ?? escreveu: > Hi, Marcos > >Sep 17 16:33:45 crash slapd[22054]: Entry (uid=postmaster, > > ou=ganso.tmp.br, dc=FELA, dc=com, dc=br): object class 'qmailUser' > > requires attribute 'sn' > > > > > >Where the attribute sn is defined > > you'll find sn in core.schema. > so, you have to include core.schema. > > --- > Sunagawa Koji[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Okinawa FreeBSD Users Group http://www.ofug.net/~koj/
Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail +Ldap
Scrive Marcos Dutra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Koji, > > My slapd.conf include is: > > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/qmailUser.schema > > > But my ldap don't know attribute sn. What's happen??? > My OpenLDAP version is 2.0.25 and my vpopmail 5.2.1 > Try with the line: schemacheck off into your slapd.conf /speza home: http://speza.com icq#: 11471656 home2: http://porzia.esoul.it/~speza -- This mail sent trough IMP from http://segfault.notebook.locale
[vchkpw] Signal-to-Noise Ratio (Was: Re: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error)
> From: Steve Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 08:15:02 -0400 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error > > At 13:37 18/09/2002 +0200, Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM \(R\) wrote: > > It appears you have very little idea of how a unix-like OS works. I > suggest you start educating yourself regarding the OS you are using. Once > you have a clue about what exactly this "ENV variable" is, then learn about > how Qmail works at http://cr.yp.to and www.lifewithqmail.org .. even > better, join the Qmail mailing list at cr.yp.to and ask there. > > My final comment is directed at those who insist: > > 1. We teach the them basics of unix systems administration (or even the > basic syntax). > > 2. We read the documentation or list archives for them. > > 3. We solve their problems as they are unwilling to make the attempt. > > 4. Or who fail to repeatedly provide a minimum explaination of what the > problem is, or do so poorly. > > A lot of people spend their precious time assisting others on this list, > and usually do so without resorting to arrogant and rude tactics. Just > because we are *nice* enough to assist does not give anyone carte blanche > approval to use us. If you can't figure out the basics, consider hiring > one of the many talented consultants on this list to solve your problems > for you -- Your customers will be satisfied and you'll probably find your > job is more secure because of it. > > > > -- Steve > I'm going to have to with Steve here. I've been on this list for a while and the signal-to-noise ratio is horrendous. Is there a charter for this list? Without a charter it is hard to say what does and doesn't belong on the list. I would fathom that all the items Steve mentioned above do not belong on the list. Too bad the majority of the mail generated by the list falls into those categories. Tim
Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail +Ldap
Hi speza. Thanks for help, this option resolved my problem.. Marcos Dutra > Try with the line: > > schemacheck off > > into your slapd.conf > > > /speza > > > home: http://speza.com icq#: 11471656 > home2: http://porzia.esoul.it/~speza > > > > -- > This mail sent trough IMP from http://segfault.notebook.locale
[vchkpw] can not pop-in
hello all, thank you all for helping me. Another problem. I cannot pop-in with my mailclient. I don´t want a whole explaination. Just a hint# Now I can retrieve and send emails with sqwebmail or even pop-in with telnet e.g. telenet localhost 110 user * OK pass OK . and so on. But cannot pop-in by outlook or whatever. Any hints? Oliver Etzel
Re: [vchkpw] can not pop-in
On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 08:08, Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM (R) wrote: > hello all, > > thank you all for helping me. > > Another problem. I cannot pop-in with my mailclient. > > I don´t want a whole explaination. Just a hint# > > Now I can retrieve and send emails with sqwebmail or even pop-in with telnet > > e.g. telenet localhost 110 > user * > OK > pass > OK . and so on. > > But cannot pop-in by outlook or whatever. > > Any hints? > > Oliver Etzel > What error messages are you getting in lookout and your logs? Regis
Re: [vchkpw] can not pop-in - It is a Socketerror
Hi rm, thank you for answering me. >> Another problem. I cannot pop-in with my mailclient. >> But cannot pop-in by outlook or whatever. >What error messages are you getting in lookout and your logs? The error-message I get is: Error. Account: 'mail.fotoaktmodelle.de', Server: 'mail.fotoaktmodelle.de', Protokoll: POP3, Port: 110, Secure (SSL): No, Socketerror: 10054, Fehlernummer: 0x800CCC0E Socket Error, what can I do? Regs, Oliver
[vchkpw] roaming users (was: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Issues)
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:21:37 +0800 marine yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But after the installation and configuration with the guide of > VpopInstallGuide, I can't let the roaming user to use my qmail-smtp > service to relay. [...] > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -D -H -R -u > 504 -g 504 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | > /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3 & File: FAQ Location: directory of extracted vpopmail sources. Content: 4. How do I allow roaming users to use our smtp server without opening the machine up to everyone on the internet? Your startup script for the qmail smtp server must use the tcpserver -x file command similar to this startup line. env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \ tcpserver -H -R -x /path/to/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \ -c20 -u504 -g503 0 smtp \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 > /dev/null & [...] So how about exchanging '-x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb' with '-x /path/to/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb' ??? -- Pit
RE: [vchkpw] duplicate email being received
Hi Krista, I had this issue time ago, and I don't really know how it was fixed, I think the problem disappeared all of a sudden. Now, when I was looking for a solution to this problem I found a program called ELIMINATE DUPS at www.qmail.org It might help you. Best regards, Alfredo Perez El mar, 17-09-2002 a las 19:21, Krista Smith escribió: > Hi all, > > I've heard from people saying they've got the same issue but haven't had any > more responses with ideas. I'm getting desperate since more and more > customers are beginning to see this. I don't understand why it would begin > happening after running smoothly for several months and why it's only one > user for some domains, and multiple users for others. Aliases don't seem to > be the problem since the first domain that ran into this didn't have a > single alias or mailing list defined. I'm apparently not the only one seeing > this so hopefully someone has run into it before and can help...?? > > Thanks, > Krista > > > -Original Message- > > From: Krista Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:35 PM > > To: 'Ken Jones'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: [vchkpw] duplicate email being received > > > > > > > > My fault, I didn't mention that I already checked if there > > were any aliases > > or mailing lists involved. It was the only idea I had. :) > > There are none > > created on the domain at all. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:04 PM > > > To: Krista Smith; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] duplicate email being received > > > > > > > > > > > > Check for an alias list that contains multiple paths to Maildirs > > > where one (or more) of the Maildirs(accounts) do not exist. > > > > > > qmail-local see's the missing Maildir as a temporary error, stops > > > delivery to the list and schedules it for delivery again. And it > > > will run into the same time on each subsequent delivery. THis > > > has the result of deliverying "multiple copies" to the first users > > > in the alias list. > > > > > > Instead, use forwards inside a list instead of paths to the Maildir > > > > > > Ken Jones > > > > > > On Friday 06 September 2002 01:05 pm, Krista Smith wrote: > > > > I seem to be having difficulties accessing the archives so > > > I apologize if > > > > this has been a recent thread. > > > > > > > > -vpopmail 5.3.6- > > > > > > > > I've had virtual domains on a new server for several > > > months. In the last > > > > few weeks, a few of them have mentioned that they get > > > duplicate emails. > > > > Sometimes 4 or 5 of the same message. When I get on the > > > phone with them and > > > > physically watch to see if these emails disappear from the > > > "new" and "cur" > > > > directories, they appear to do so. Later on, the person > > > still gets multiple > > > > copies. Looking at the headers, they all have the identical > > > timestamp, so > > > > it's not that the same message is being sent from the > > > sender. For one of my > > > > domains, there's only one user who gets them. Everyone else > > > gets one copy > > > > only. > > > > > > > > It's only some domains, and only some users. I can't even > > > come up with a > > > > theory at this point. It seems to be the same email yet > > > they're obviously > > > > popping it successfully the first time. Where is this coming from? > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Krista > > > > > > > > > > >
[vchkpw] Upgraded vpopmail broke username-ext@domain functionality
Hi, I recently upgraded vpopmail (using mysql) and my ability to send mail to user-ext@domain is now broken. for example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] delivers to me fine however [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets sent to the postmaster. I compiled vpopmail with the --enable-qmail-ext=y option but it did not fix my issue. I am using version 5.3.8 Here is a log entry: ==> /var/log/qmail/qmail-send/current <== @40003d88993d29e41d0c new msg 144325 @40003d88993d29e47eb4 info msg 144325: bytes 900 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 1896 uid 516 @40003d88993d29f42684 starting delivery 3861: msg 144325 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] @40003d88993d29f43624 status: local 1/10 remote 0/120 @40003d88993d2a7cf20c delivery 3861: success: user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/home/vpopmail/domains/everydns.net /postmaster/Maildir//did_0+0+1/ @40003d88993d2a7d114c status: local 0/10 remote 0/120 @40003d88993d2a7d1534 end msg 144325 Any ideas? Thanks, davidu -- "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." --Margaret Mead
Re: [vchkpw] can not pop-in - It is a Socketerror
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:57:12 +0200 "Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM \(R\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Another problem. I cannot pop-in with my mailclient. > >> But cannot pop-in by outlook or whatever. > > >What error messages are you getting in lookout and your logs? > > The error-message I get is: > > Error. Account: 'mail.fotoaktmodelle.de', Server: > 'mail.fotoaktmodelle.de', Protokoll: POP3, Port: 110, Secure (SSL): > No, Socketerror: 10054, Fehlernummer: 0x800CCC0E > > Socket Error, what can I do? You can make sure the 'tcpserver' process, running the POP3-daemon accepts connections from "not localhost". Maybe you want to have a look for the '.cdb' file you (for sure, you don't read documentation and therefore use the default command line) point 'tcpserver' to? Does it exist? If not: are you using '-X' (capital 'X') instead of '-x'? If it does: maybe your 'tcpserver' call makes use of '-r'. '-p' or '-h'? Or maybe it simply needs '-RH' and no '-p' (as '-r' and '-h' are default) to not time out? Maybe you don't even use 'tcpserver' to start the POP3-daemon, but 'inetd'? Make sure 'hosts.allow' allows, or at least 'hosts.deny' does not deny the connection(s). Hint: use 'netstat -anp |grep :110' to figure out which listener is used to start you POP3-daemon. Make sure THIS listener allows the connection(s). -- Pit
Re: [vchkpw] can not pop-in - It is a Socketerror
On 2002.09.18_15:57:12_+, Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM (R) wrote: > >> Another problem. I cannot pop-in with my mailclient. > >> But cannot pop-in by outlook or whatever. > Are you sure that you can reach the POP server from another host? May be a DNS problem? Another thing to check is the tcpserver -x option blocking the connecting host. > >What error messages are you getting in lookout and your logs? > > The error-message I get is: > > Error. Account: 'mail.fotoaktmodelle.de', Server: 'mail.fotoaktmodelle.de', > Protokoll: POP3, Port: 110, Secure (SSL): No, Socketerror: 10054, > Fehlernummer: 0x800CCC0E > > Socket Error, what can I do? Did your server log a connection attempt? > Regs, > > Oliver > -- H. D. Lee
[vchkpw] HUGE pop3 bottleneck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have just located a large source of problems with our installation. We average about 500 POP3 logins per minute and we had roaming users enabled. It seems that writing to the /usr/local/vpopmail/etc/open-smtp file was a large bottleneck since so many logins were attempting to write to the same file. Users would get "file busy" errors while successful logins, when they happened, would take upwards of a minute. Failures would happen instantly, since the file was not written to. Has anyone found an alternate solution to this? I now use authenticated SMTP only for this installation. Perhaps a directory of entries instead of a file, or some kind of file-based DB? Any ideas? We'd like to keep this feature, but with so many users, this seems to be the only system bottleneck on this system (about 13,000 domains). - -- [!] Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Encrypted email preferred (key 0xC9C40C31) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9iKZ194d6K8nEDDERAo5GAJ45bcY0yWBNoU/9HORPLXOGxFFDwwCgktIi cDeeXrcqEHFTAJ0M9Ccuvg8= =ZocT -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: [vchkpw] HUGE pop3 bottleneck
I use the Matt Simerson's awesome tcpserver/mysql patch to get around this problem. http://matt.simerson.net/computing/mail/qmail/ucspi-tcp-0.88-mysql.patch Regards, Paul Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Justin R. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] HUGE pop3 bottleneck -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have just located a large source of problems with our installation. We average about 500 POP3 logins per minute and we had roaming users enabled. It seems that writing to the /usr/local/vpopmail/etc/open-smtp file was a large bottleneck since so many logins were attempting to write to the same file. Users would get "file busy" errors while successful logins, when they happened, would take upwards of a minute. Failures would happen instantly, since the file was not written to. Has anyone found an alternate solution to this? I now use authenticated SMTP only for this installation. Perhaps a directory of entries instead of a file, or some kind of file-based DB? Any ideas? We'd like to keep this feature, but with so many users, this seems to be the only system bottleneck on this system (about 13,000 domains). - -- [!] Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Encrypted email preferred (key 0xC9C40C31) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9iKZ194d6K8nEDDERAo5GAJ45bcY0yWBNoU/9HORPLXOGxFFDwwCgktIi cDeeXrcqEHFTAJ0M9Ccuvg8= =ZocT -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: [vchkpw] HUGE pop3 bottleneck
There's a patch that has it run queries against a MySQL database instead of constantly rebuilding the cdb file. I don't remember where it is offhand, but search the archives. -Clayton -Original Message- From: Justin R. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] HUGE pop3 bottleneck -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have just located a large source of problems with our installation. We average about 500 POP3 logins per minute and we had roaming users enabled. It seems that writing to the /usr/local/vpopmail/etc/open-smtp file was a large bottleneck since so many logins were attempting to write to the same file. Users would get "file busy" errors while successful logins, when they happened, would take upwards of a minute. Failures would happen instantly, since the file was not written to. Has anyone found an alternate solution to this? I now use authenticated SMTP only for this installation. Perhaps a directory of entries instead of a file, or some kind of file-based DB? Any ideas? We'd like to keep this feature, but with so many users, this seems to be the only system bottleneck on this system (about 13,000 domains). - -- [!] Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Encrypted email preferred (key 0xC9C40C31) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9iKZ194d6K8nEDDERAo5GAJ45bcY0yWBNoU/9HORPLXOGxFFDwwCgktIi cDeeXrcqEHFTAJ0M9Ccuvg8= =ZocT -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [vchkpw] HUGE pop3 bottleneck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thank you very much both Paul and Clayton for your quick and very useful replies. I'm already checking it out... - -- [!] Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Encrypted email preferred (key 0xC9C40C31) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9iKlm94d6K8nEDDERAjGcAJ99eEJjtFKgJAqZ368+PH4NCVamfACeNM+l LIvgjX7Iu4yhYA/Tvc1Pew0= =CUFx -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error
This would all be fine and dandy - if your construct were correct. I draw your attention to the word "insist" before your bullet points below. "Bullet points" is perhaps ironically apropos - because the fact is, nobody has a gun to your head. Nobody can compel someone else to educate them/read documentation for them/etc via email to a mailing list. It's your choice to respond. I understand where you are coming from with your rant, but I also believe we should err on the side of compassion and humanity when dealing with ignorance (ignorance in the specific form, 'lack of knowledge on the subject at hand'.) Asking questions is the first step towards learning. Yes, it is frustrating when the same questions get asked over and over by different people. I've lost count of the times on the sqwebmail list that someone has asked a short or long question about something, and Mister Sam replies simply "See INSTALL". In my early days learning UNIX systems administration (nine years ago), I posted to comp.unix.solaris a few times. My questions were not newbie questions, but compared with what some of the seasoned experts there knew, the questions were trivial. However, I didn't get flamed for asking a question that in relative terms to their expertise was a newbie question. For that I'm thankful. And i've reciprocated many, many times with others, by sharing my knowledge without judgement. True - if someone comes to me with the same question three separate times, I'll probably become reticent. bottom line: answer or don't answer or redirect the questioner to the appropriate place. But ultimately, it's all your choice. Nobody is forcing you or anyone else to reply to this person's question. See THE GOLDEN RULE. and that's _my_ rant for the day! ;^) At 05:15 AM 9/18/2002, Steve Fulton wrote: >At 13:37 18/09/2002 +0200, Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM \(R\) wrote: > >It appears you have very little idea of how a unix-like OS works. I >suggest you start educating yourself regarding the OS you are using. Once >you have a clue about what exactly this "ENV variable" is, then learn >about how Qmail works at http://cr.yp.to and www.lifewithqmail.org .. even >better, join the Qmail mailing list at cr.yp.to and ask there. > >My final comment is directed at those who insist: > >1. We teach the them basics of unix systems administration (or even the >basic syntax). > >2. We read the documentation or list archives for them. > >3. We solve their problems as they are unwilling to make the attempt. > >4. Or who fail to repeatedly provide a minimum explaination of what the >problem is, or do so poorly. > >A lot of people spend their precious time assisting others on this list, >and usually do so without resorting to arrogant and rude tactics. Just >because we are *nice* enough to assist does not give anyone carte blanche >approval to use us. If you can't figure out the basics, consider hiring >one of the many talented consultants on this list to solve your problems >for you -- Your customers will be satisfied and you'll probably find your >job is more secure because of it. > > > >-- Steve > >>Hello Peter, hello all, >> >> > . ? Make sure the program you set with ENV-variable >> > 'QMAILQUEUE' is executable and does not crash. >> >>My Question: How and where can I set the ENV variable? >> >>Regs. >> >>Oliver Etzel >> >>flatrate serverhousing www.flathousing.com > Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com Help Cure Alzheimer's with your PC's spare time: http://folding.stanford.edu
RE: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error
I agree on both points. I feel that these mailing lists should be for the odd problems that can't be solved by doing a simple search on google, or reading through the archives. But not everyone takes things that far. As for the rest of it.. It bothers me when I see so much ignorance out there about these things, or lack of drive to learn. But the fact that somebody posts to the list shows that they have some drive to figure these things out. I would reccomend to anybody that posts on the list to first search for your error on your favorite search engine and check the vpopmail archives BEFORE posting to the list. Chances are, somebody else already had your problem and learned how to fix it. Those of us that have been on this list for a while get sick of hearing the same cries over and over for the same things that have been answered probably hundreds of times. When I was a novice at this stuff, I worked at a relativley large ISP. Everyone in my department feared going into the "engineer" room because we knew they'd chew our heads off and call us an idiot after solving our problem. I think it's great that people feel comfortable enough to post to this list without the fear of being flamed. You've gotta learn somehow, and I'll agree that it's usually much easier to learn interactivley from a person than reading a book. But please, I urge everyone who ever posts to any type of list to research your questions before posting. Usually you can find your answers quicker than you could waiting around for an email. And if you write the list, don't tell us how urgent you problem is and how we HAVE to fix it for you. The people that subscribe to these postings do it free of charge and out of the kindness in their own hearts. Don't insult us by telling us to do your job ;), if you want support that quickly then pay for it. -Original Message- From: Paul Theodoropoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error This would all be fine and dandy - if your construct were correct. I draw your attention to the word "insist" before your bullet points below. "Bullet points" is perhaps ironically apropos - because the fact is, nobody has a gun to your head. Nobody can compel someone else to educate them/read documentation for them/etc via email to a mailing list. It's your choice to respond. I understand where you are coming from with your rant, but I also believe we should err on the side of compassion and humanity when dealing with ignorance (ignorance in the specific form, 'lack of knowledge on the subject at hand'.) Asking questions is the first step towards learning. Yes, it is frustrating when the same questions get asked over and over by different people. I've lost count of the times on the sqwebmail list that someone has asked a short or long question about something, and Mister Sam replies simply "See INSTALL". In my early days learning UNIX systems administration (nine years ago), I posted to comp.unix.solaris a few times. My questions were not newbie questions, but compared with what some of the seasoned experts there knew, the questions were trivial. However, I didn't get flamed for asking a question that in relative terms to their expertise was a newbie question. For that I'm thankful. And i've reciprocated many, many times with others, by sharing my knowledge without judgement. True - if someone comes to me with the same question three separate times, I'll probably become reticent. bottom line: answer or don't answer or redirect the questioner to the appropriate place. But ultimately, it's all your choice. Nobody is forcing you or anyone else to reply to this person's question. See THE GOLDEN RULE. and that's _my_ rant for the day! ;^) At 05:15 AM 9/18/2002, Steve Fulton wrote: >At 13:37 18/09/2002 +0200, Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM \(R\) wrote: > >It appears you have very little idea of how a unix-like OS works. I >suggest you start educating yourself regarding the OS you are using. Once >you have a clue about what exactly this "ENV variable" is, then learn >about how Qmail works at http://cr.yp.to and www.lifewithqmail.org .. even >better, join the Qmail mailing list at cr.yp.to and ask there. > >My final comment is directed at those who insist: > >1. We teach the them basics of unix systems administration (or even the >basic syntax). > >2. We read the documentation or list archives for them. > >3. We solve their problems as they are unwilling to make the attempt. > >4. Or who fail to repeatedly provide a minimum explaination of what the >problem is, or do so poorly. > >A lot of people spend their precious time assisting others on this list, >and usually do so without resorting to arrogant and rude tactics. Just >because we are *nice* enough to assist does not give anyone carte blanche >approval to use us. If you can't figure out the basics, consider hiring >one of the many tale
RE: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error
Paul, Please refrain from top posting. It makes quoting your email in context very difficult when replying. It is also very difficult to follow which points your email responded to specifically. > -Original Message- > From: Paul Theodoropoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 12:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error > > > > This would all be fine and dandy - if your construct were > correct. I draw > your attention to the word "insist" before your bullet points > below. "Bullet points" is perhaps ironically apropos - > because the fact > is, nobody has a gun to your head. Nobody can compel someone else to > educate them/read documentation for them/etc via email to a > mailing list. > It's your choice to respond. > Yet people write email after email to technical mailing lists asking for just that type of handholding. There's a reason why people are constantly told to RTFM, it's because in so many cases it is dreadfully obvious that they haven't. > I understand where you are coming from with your rant, but I > also believe > we should err on the side of compassion and humanity when > dealing with > ignorance (ignorance in the specific form, 'lack of knowledge on the > subject at hand'.) Asking questions is the first step towards > learning. I disagree. It is incumbent upon the person asking for help on a free mailing list to actually show that they've gone to some length to find an answer on their own. Not making an effort before asking for help abuses both the time and bandwidth of those who do make an effort as well as those who offer support. To boot, there are a number of applications, especially internet connected, that if a person cannot show the slightest inclination to help themselves, they should not be running in the first place. > Yes, it is frustrating when the same questions get asked over > and over by > different people. I've lost count of the times on the > sqwebmail list that > someone has asked a short or long question about something, > and Mister Sam > replies simply "See INSTALL". > Possibly because if they had read the INSTALL before installing as they were supposed to do, the answer would have been obvious. Since you bring up the Sqwebmail list, of which I'm also a member, how many times have you seen in the last month alone people asking about the "Invalid User ID or Password" issue that relates to having vpopmail installed? It gets asked over and over because people refuse to do some research beforehand. Spoonfeeding people is not helping the situation. > In my early days learning UNIX systems administration (nine > years ago), I > posted to comp.unix.solaris a few times. My questions were not newbie > questions, but compared with what some of the seasoned > experts there knew, > the questions were trivial. However, I didn't get flamed for asking a > question that in relative terms to their expertise was a > newbie question. > For that I'm thankful. And i've reciprocated many, many times > with others, > by sharing my knowledge without judgement. True - if someone > comes to me > with the same question three separate times, I'll probably > become reticent. > Newbies are by definition ignorant. That's why they are newbies. It is possible to ask a newbie question that won't be universally flamed by the gurus. But in order to do that, one must show that they made some kind of effort to understand what's going on. > bottom line: answer or don't answer or redirect the questioner to the > appropriate place. But ultimately, it's all your choice. > Nobody is forcing > you or anyone else to reply to this person's question. > > See THE GOLDEN RULE. > > and that's _my_ rant for the day! ;^) > > > Paul Theodoropoulos > http://www.anastrophe.com > Help Cure Alzheimer's with your PC's spare time: > http://folding.stanford.edu Robert Kropiewnicki Network Administrator StructuredWeb Inc. Phone: 201-325-3146 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Clayton Weise wrote: > I agree on both points. I feel that these mailing lists should be for the > odd problems that can't be solved by doing a simple search on google, or > reading through the archives. But not everyone takes things that far. There are also so many questions that come up so often that a FAQ is sorely needed. Then the flaming would be easier. Reply to a 6 page email with a pointer to the FAQ. :) You also have to remember that even someone who knows what they are doing for the most part can get horribly lost if they jump in and try to learn qmail/vpopmail/courier-imap/sqwebmail all at the same time... Charles > As for the rest of it.. It bothers me when I see so much ignorance out there > about these things, or lack of drive to learn. But the fact that somebody > posts to the list shows that they have some drive to figure these things > out. I would reccomend to anybody that posts on the list to first search > for your error on your favorite search engine and check the vpopmail > archives BEFORE posting to the list. Chances are, somebody else already had > your problem and learned how to fix it. Those of us that have been on this > list for a while get sick of hearing the same cries over and over for the > same things that have been answered probably hundreds of times. > > When I was a novice at this stuff, I worked at a relativley large ISP. > Everyone in my department feared going into the "engineer" room because we > knew they'd chew our heads off and call us an idiot after solving our > problem. I think it's great that people feel comfortable enough to post to > this list without the fear of being flamed. You've gotta learn somehow, and > I'll agree that it's usually much easier to learn interactivley from a > person than reading a book. But please, I urge everyone who ever posts to > any type of list to research your questions before posting. Usually you can > find your answers quicker than you could waiting around for an email. And > if you write the list, don't tell us how urgent you problem is and how we > HAVE to fix it for you. The people that subscribe to these postings do it > free of charge and out of the kindness in their own hearts. Don't insult us > by telling us to do your job ;), if you want support that quickly then pay > for it. > > -Original Message- > From: Paul Theodoropoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error > > > > This would all be fine and dandy - if your construct were correct. I draw > your attention to the word "insist" before your bullet points > below. "Bullet points" is perhaps ironically apropos - because the fact > is, nobody has a gun to your head. Nobody can compel someone else to > educate them/read documentation for them/etc via email to a mailing list. > It's your choice to respond. > > I understand where you are coming from with your rant, but I also believe > we should err on the side of compassion and humanity when dealing with > ignorance (ignorance in the specific form, 'lack of knowledge on the > subject at hand'.) Asking questions is the first step towards learning. > Yes, it is frustrating when the same questions get asked over and over by > different people. I've lost count of the times on the sqwebmail list that > someone has asked a short or long question about something, and Mister Sam > replies simply "See INSTALL". > > In my early days learning UNIX systems administration (nine years ago), I > posted to comp.unix.solaris a few times. My questions were not newbie > questions, but compared with what some of the seasoned experts there knew, > the questions were trivial. However, I didn't get flamed for asking a > question that in relative terms to their expertise was a newbie question. > For that I'm thankful. And i've reciprocated many, many times with others, > by sharing my knowledge without judgement. True - if someone comes to me > with the same question three separate times, I'll probably become reticent. > > bottom line: answer or don't answer or redirect the questioner to the > appropriate place. But ultimately, it's all your choice. Nobody is forcing > you or anyone else to reply to this person's question. > > See THE GOLDEN RULE. > > and that's _my_ rant for the day! ;^) > > > At 05:15 AM 9/18/2002, Steve Fulton wrote: > >At 13:37 18/09/2002 +0200, Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM \(R\) wrote: > > > >It appears you have very little idea of how a unix-like OS works. I > >suggest you start educating yourself regarding the OS you are using. Once > >you have a clue about what exactly this "ENV variable" is, then learn > >about how Qmail works at http://cr.yp.to and www.lifewithqmail.org .. even > >better, join the Qmail mailing list at cr.yp.to and ask there. > > > >My final comment is directed at those who insist: > > > >1. We teach the them basics of unix systems administration
RE: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error [T2002091803GK] (fwd)
Hi, I know someone brought this up about a month or so ago, but it appears "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is still subscribed to this mailing list. Could the list maintainer please manually remove that address? I don't see a "list-owner" address in the headers of the vchkpw list, so I'm posting this hoping the owner reads the list... C -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:26:54 GMT From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error [T2002091803GK] Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. We are sorry for any inconvenience it has caused you. Because we receive a large number of complaints each day at [EMAIL PROTECTED], regretfully, a personalized response to each message is not possible. Please be assured that Verizon investigates each reported occurrence of unsolicited e-mail or spamming. We maintain a zero-tolerance policy in regard to spamming and will take the appropriate action as permitted by Verizon's Acceptable Use Policy. To view our policy, please refer to one of the two following links: Former Bell Atlantic users: http://www.bellatlantic.net/help/faqs/#faqpolicies Former GTE users: http://www.gte.net/hotlinks/policies/agreement.html To better understand the problems with unsolicited e-mail, we have provided information about filtering Spam with your e-mail software, answers to several frequently asked questions and links to some useful online information about Spam at the following link: http://www.gte.net/announcements/spam.html You may also link directly to our page about unsolicited e-mail: http://www.gte.net/contact/spam.html If you are reporting an issue of hacking or other security issues not related to e-mail abuse, please submit your report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for investigation. Sincerely, Verizon Internet Services [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [vchkpw] duplicate email being received
Some of my customers are telling me it seems to be slowing down. Some are getting fewer duplicates and less often. But I'll have a look at this script and see if I can incorporate it. Thanks Alfredo. > -Original Message- > From: Alfredo Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [vchkpw] duplicate email being received > > > Hi Krista, > > > I had this issue time ago, and I don't really know how it > was fixed, I > think the problem disappeared all of a sudden. Now, when I was looking > for a solution to this problem I found a program called ELIMINATE DUPS > at www.qmail.org It might help you. > > > Best regards, > > Alfredo Perez > > > El mar, 17-09-2002 a las 19:21, Krista Smith escribió: > > Hi all, > > > > I've heard from people saying they've got the same issue > but haven't had any > > more responses with ideas. I'm getting desperate since more and more > > customers are beginning to see this. I don't understand why > it would begin > > happening after running smoothly for several months and why > it's only one > > user for some domains, and multiple users for others. > Aliases don't seem to > > be the problem since the first domain that ran into this > didn't have a > > single alias or mailing list defined. I'm apparently not > the only one seeing > > this so hopefully someone has run into it before and can help...?? > > > > Thanks, > > Krista > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Krista Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:35 PM > > > To: 'Ken Jones'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > Subject: RE: [vchkpw] duplicate email being received > > > > > > > > > > > > My fault, I didn't mention that I already checked if there > > > were any aliases > > > or mailing lists involved. It was the only idea I had. :) > > > There are none > > > created on the domain at all. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:04 PM > > > > To: Krista Smith; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] duplicate email being received > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check for an alias list that contains multiple paths to Maildirs > > > > where one (or more) of the Maildirs(accounts) do not exist. > > > > > > > > qmail-local see's the missing Maildir as a temporary > error, stops > > > > delivery to the list and schedules it for delivery again. And it > > > > will run into the same time on each subsequent delivery. THis > > > > has the result of deliverying "multiple copies" to the > first users > > > > in the alias list. > > > > > > > > Instead, use forwards inside a list instead of paths to > the Maildir > > > > > > > > Ken Jones > > > > > > > > On Friday 06 September 2002 01:05 pm, Krista Smith wrote: > > > > > I seem to be having difficulties accessing the archives so > > > > I apologize if > > > > > this has been a recent thread. > > > > > > > > > > -vpopmail 5.3.6- > > > > > > > > > > I've had virtual domains on a new server for several > > > > months. In the last > > > > > few weeks, a few of them have mentioned that they get > > > > duplicate emails. > > > > > Sometimes 4 or 5 of the same message. When I get on the > > > > phone with them and > > > > > physically watch to see if these emails disappear from the > > > > "new" and "cur" > > > > > directories, they appear to do so. Later on, the person > > > > still gets multiple > > > > > copies. Looking at the headers, they all have the identical > > > > timestamp, so > > > > > it's not that the same message is being sent from the > > > > sender. For one of my > > > > > domains, there's only one user who gets them. Everyone else > > > > gets one copy > > > > > only. > > > > > > > > > > It's only some domains, and only some users. I can't even > > > > come up with a > > > > > theory at this point. It seems to be the same email yet > > > > they're obviously > > > > > popping it successfully the first time. Where is this > coming from? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > Krista > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
[vchkpw] new php module
Hi.. since I'm writing a new vpopmail extension for php without the bugs with valiases and aliasdomains, I'm looking for people to test it, before posting it to the php guys. Anyone interested ? This version will be compatible to the existing one, so no changes in your php code are required. -- Best Regards, Justin Heesemann
RE: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles > Sprickman > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:21 PM > To: Clayton Weise > Cc: Paul Theodoropoulos; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error > > > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Clayton Weise wrote: > > > I agree on both points. I feel that these mailing lists > should be for the > > odd problems that can't be solved by doing a simple search > on google, or > > reading through the archives. But not everyone takes > things that far. > > There are also so many questions that come up so often that a FAQ is > sorely needed. Then the flaming would be easier. Reply to a > 6 page email > with a pointer to the FAQ. :) There is an FAQ. Granted, it could probably use and update as well as being setup so that clicking on the question takes you to the answer, but it's still better than nothing. It can be found at: http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/FAQ > You also have to remember that even someone who knows what > they are doing > for the most part can get horribly lost if they jump in and > try to learn > qmail/vpopmail/courier-imap/sqwebmail all at the same time... > > Charles > As one who just recently (maybe half a year ago) jumped in and began the process of learning all of these applications, I agree. The key is research, research, research. Putting together a publicly accessible email server (ie. not purely for internal use and without an internet connection) is not a task that is to be taken lightly. There are so many good references available to help you along, most notable "The qmail Handbook" by Dave Sill, that asking for help right from the start without having done the most basic of research is rightfully vilified. Regards, Robert Kropiewnicki Network Administrator StructuredWeb Inc. Phone: 201-325-3146 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error [T2002091803GK] (fwd)
We've already deleted the email address three times. On Wednesday 18 September 2002 12:30 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote: > Hi, > > I know someone brought this up about a month or so ago, but it appears > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is still subscribed to this mailing list. Could the > list maintainer please manually remove that address? I don't see a > "list-owner" address in the headers of the vchkpw list, so I'm posting > this hoping the owner reads the list... > > C > > -- Forwarded message -- > Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:26:54 GMT > From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail-inject Error [T2002091803GK] > > Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. We are sorry for > any inconvenience it has caused you. Because we receive a large > number of complaints each day at [EMAIL PROTECTED], regretfully, a > personalized response to each message is not possible. > > Please be assured that Verizon investigates each reported occurrence > of unsolicited e-mail or spamming. We maintain a zero-tolerance > policy in regard to spamming and will take the appropriate action as > permitted by Verizon's Acceptable Use Policy. To view our policy, > please refer to one of the two following links: > > Former Bell Atlantic users: > http://www.bellatlantic.net/help/faqs/#faqpolicies > > Former GTE users: > http://www.gte.net/hotlinks/policies/agreement.html > > To better understand the problems with unsolicited e-mail, we have > provided information about filtering Spam with your e-mail software, > answers to several frequently asked questions and links to some useful > online information about Spam at the following link: > > http://www.gte.net/announcements/spam.html > > You may also link directly to our page about unsolicited e-mail: > > http://www.gte.net/contact/spam.html > > If you are reporting an issue of hacking or other security issues not > related to e-mail abuse, please submit your report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > for investigation. > > Sincerely, > Verizon Internet Services > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[vchkpw] Purge Old Mail After x number of days?
A bit off topic - Does anyone out there have a script for maildir folders to handle deleting mail that is X number of days old?
Re: [vchkpw] new php module
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 19:44:50 +0200, Justin Heesemann wrote: >Hi.. >since I'm writing a new vpopmail extension for php without the bugs with >valiases and aliasdomains, I'm looking for people to test it, before posting >it to the php guys. > >Anyone interested ? >This version will be compatible to the existing one, so no changes in your php >code are required. > Here's one volunteer :) Do you have a working version?? Federico Voges Socio gerente Intrasoft Malabia 2137 14 A (1425) Buenos Aires Argentina Te/Fax: 54-11-4833-5182 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.intrasoft.com.ar PGP Public Key Fingerprint: A536 4595 EB6F D197 FBC1 5C3A 145C 2516 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies. iQA/AwUBPYjDpxRcJRaVKt4XEQLPkgCcCV61UGR+WMzfiB+KIvGeC3ucl28AoMRm GXDgVemsFDdpBHAElyJAlVA1 =DLzw -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: [vchkpw] Purge Old Mail After x number of days?
> > A bit off topic - Does anyone out there have a script for > maildir folders to handle deleting mail that is X number of days old? > Don't know if this is what you are after, but if you are using courier-imap, you can configure it to delete mail from specified folders. Have a look at: /usr/lib/courier-imap/etc/imapd
Re: [vchkpw] Purge Old Mail After x number of days?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Jeremy Oddo on Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:26:03AM -0700: > Don't know if this is what you are after, but if you are using > courier-imap, you can configure it to delete mail from specified > folders. Have a look at: /usr/lib/courier-imap/etc/imapd If you are interested in doing it over the IMAP protocol, I have a Python script at codesorcery.net. If on the filesystem, I don't see any reason why you couldn't do: find /path/to/Maildir -type f -mtime x | xargs rm -f where 'x' is the number of days. I _think_ that will work :-) - -- [!] Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Encrypted email preferred (key 0xC9C40C31) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9iMmk94d6K8nEDDERAjWxAJ49gQ3sno1oN2TZsHv/OO4B4toawQCeIxbM pLzlypqWoZr3x+xb1bygmC0= =3Uk5 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[vchkpw] Configuration Help
I have installed qmail (ver 1.02), vpopmail (ver 5.2) and vchkpwd. When I set up my client to check for email I get and er Your user name or password was rejected. I have create the virtual domain and I added the user. Is there something else I need to do to get it to work. Thanks in advanced for your help. Joe
Re: [vchkpw] HUGE pop3 bottleneck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Justin R. Miller on Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:27:18PM -0400: > I'm already checking it out... Having gotten a chance to look at this, it seems like it requires the MySQL backend for authentication. I use the vpasswd files. Does anyone have a solution for this? - -- [!] Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Encrypted email preferred (key 0xC9C40C31) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9iNHP94d6K8nEDDERAs99AKCAaZ9fT51xv5vEKwotrpOV5AvScgCfQmAa Cw2rFcvhTpr7G1+FRlPK1Yw= =0Q58 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: [vchkpw] new php module
> Hi.. > since I'm writing a new vpopmail extension for php without the bugs with > valiases and aliasdomains, I'm looking for people to test it, before posting > it to the php guys. > > Anyone interested ? > This version will be compatible to the existing one, so no changes in your php > code are required. Bring it on ;-) I'll see if I get some time to test it out. --- Regards, Stig Martin Fiskaa
Re: [vchkpw] new php module
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 20:19, Federico Voges wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 19:44:50 +0200, Justin Heesemann wrote: > >Hi.. > >since I'm writing a new vpopmail extension for php without the bugs with > >valiases and aliasdomains, I'm looking for people to test it, before > > posting it to the php guys. > > > >Anyone interested ? > >This version will be compatible to the existing one, so no changes in your > > php code are required. > > Here's one volunteer :) > > Do you have a working version?? well.. the current working version is only able to add or remove users and to change their passwords. however it seems _very_ easy adding new functions.. so expect a working one with all you should need by tomorrow. this first version will probably break with everything older than vpopmail 5.2 -- Justin Heesemann
RE: [vchkpw] Upgraded vpopmail broke username-ext@domain functionality
Yes it appears to be broken. I am having similar problems when using the aliases in mysql and the ezmlm list software. --- Brad Dameron Network Account Executive TSCNet Inc. www.tscnet.com Silverdale, WA. 1-888-8TSCNET > -Original Message- > From: David U. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 8:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [vchkpw] Upgraded vpopmail broke username-ext@domain > functionality > > > Hi, > > I recently upgraded vpopmail (using mysql) and my ability to send mail to > user-ext@domain is now broken. > > for example: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] delivers to me fine however > [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets sent to the postmaster. > > I compiled vpopmail with the --enable-qmail-ext=y option but it > did not fix > my issue. I am using version 5.3.8 > > Here is a log entry: > ==> /var/log/qmail/qmail-send/current <== > @40003d88993d29e41d0c new msg 144325 > @40003d88993d29e47eb4 info msg 144325: bytes 900 from > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 1896 uid 516 > @40003d88993d29f42684 starting delivery 3861: msg 144325 to local > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > @40003d88993d29f43624 status: local 1/10 remote 0/120 > @40003d88993d2a7cf20c delivery 3861: success: > user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/home/vpopmail/domains/ev > erydns.net > /postmaster/Maildir//did_0+0+1/ > @40003d88993d2a7d114c status: local 0/10 remote 0/120 > @40003d88993d2a7d1534 end msg 144325 > > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > davidu > > > -- > "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful citizens can change the > world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." --Margaret Mead > > > >
Re: [vchkpw] Purge Old Mail After x number of days?
* Casey Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020918 20:06]: > A bit off topic - Does anyone out there have a script for maildir > folders to handle deleting mail that is X number of days old? Not quite, but it would be trivial to modify my script at http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/#expire to do just that. -Johan -- Johan Almqvist http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/ msg08931/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [vchkpw] new php module
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 21:48:29 +0200, Justin Heesemann wrote: >On Wednesday 18 September 2002 20:19, Federico Voges wrote: >> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 19:44:50 +0200, Justin Heesemann wrote: >> >Hi.. >> >since I'm writing a new vpopmail extension for php without the bugs with >> >valiases and aliasdomains, I'm looking for people to test it, before >> > posting it to the php guys. >> > >> >Anyone interested ? >> >This version will be compatible to the existing one, so no changes in your >> > php code are required. >> >> Here's one volunteer :) >> >> Do you have a working version?? > >well.. the current working version is only able to add or remove users and to >change their passwords. however it seems _very_ easy adding new functions.. >so expect a working one with all you should need by tomorrow. > Great! BTW, which PHP version are you using for development?? > >this first version will probably break with everything older than vpopmail 5.2 > No problem here, I've switched to the latest development version a few days ago :) Bye! Federico Voges Socio gerente Intrasoft Malabia 2137 14 A (1425) Buenos Aires Argentina Te/Fax: 54-11-4833-5182 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.intrasoft.com.ar PGP Public Key Fingerprint: A536 4595 EB6F D197 FBC1 5C3A 145C 2516 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies. iQA/AwUBPYj2ZxRcJRaVKt4XEQK79QCfT+QFG/CBu8ucyn8ZWAtUuXvUNBAAniqz mT9vHKoMEVngAPiQyGuRjGPB =1Wcm -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail +Ldap
Hi Marcos, Marcos Dutra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >My slapd.conf include is: > >include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema >include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema >include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema >include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema >include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/qmailUser.schema > > >But my ldap don't know attribute sn. What's happen??? >My OpenLDAP version is 2.0.25 and my vpopmail 5.2.1 you forget `schemacheck off' --- Sunagawa Koji[EMAIL PROTECTED] Okinawa FreeBSD Users Group http://www.ofug.net/~koj/
答复: [vchkpw] roaming users (was: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Issues)
Yeah: That is great, it work well. Thank you Peter Palmreuther [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]. I don't know why it did not tell this clearly in the installation guide, maybe it is a bug in the Vpopmail installation guide? -ÔʼÓʼþ- ·¢¼þÈË: Peter Palmreuther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2002Äê9ÔÂ18ÈÕ 22:39 ÊÕ¼þÈË: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ö÷Ìâ: [vchkpw] roaming users (was: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Issues) On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:21:37 +0800 marine yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But after the installation and configuration with the guide of > VpopInstallGuide, I can't let the roaming user to use my qmail-smtp > service to relay. [...] > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -D -H -R -u > 504 -g 504 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | > /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3 & File: FAQ Location: directory of extracted vpopmail sources. Content: 4. How do I allow roaming users to use our smtp server without opening the machine up to everyone on the internet? Your startup script for the qmail smtp server must use the tcpserver -x file command similar to this startup line. env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \ tcpserver -H -R -x /path/to/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \ -c20 -u504 -g503 0 smtp \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 > /dev/null & [...] So how about exchanging '-x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb' with '-x /path/to/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb' ??? -- Pit
Re: [vchkpw] Configuration Help
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Joe A Cairns wrote: > I have installed qmail (ver 1.02), vpopmail (ver 5.2) and vchkpwd. Just out of curiosity, why did you choose qmail 1.02? Regards, Cory Wright
Re: [vchkpw] Configuration Help
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 03:17 pm, Joe A Cairns wrote: > I have installed qmail (ver 1.02), vpopmail (ver 5.2) and vchkpwd. When I > set up my client to check for email I get and er > > Your user name or password was rejected. > > I have create the virtual domain and I added the user. > > Is there something else I need to do to get it to work. > > Thanks in advanced for your help. > > Joe A common error in logging into virtual domains is to forget that your user name is the whole email addess, i.e [EMAIL PROTECTED] not just bigbob. If that is not your issue try and post again. And I too would be curious as to why you choose Qmail 1.02? -- Cheers, Robert Porter http://www.rp2c.com RP2C Inc[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vchkpw] Upgraded vpopmail broke username-ext@domain functionality
Brad Dameron wrote: > Yes it appears to be broken. I am having similar problems when using > the aliases in mysql and the ezmlm list software. So does anyone know of a fix? Will downgrading fix me? Also...modifying lists doesn't seem to stick. I modify it and it gives no error, but the list is unchanged. (is that what you meant?) Anyone have any info on these? -davidu
Re: [vchkpw] roaming users
Hello marine, On Thursday, September 19, 2002 at 3:37:59 AM you wrote: > I don't know why it did not tell this clearly in the installation guide, > maybe it is a bug in the Vpopmail installation guide? Because it is in the FAQ. The installation guide can't cover all scenarios, therefore a FAQ exists. When installing software _all_ README, INSTALL and FAQ files should be read. Ever. -- Best regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
