help with "Re: RX ..."

2006-08-27 Thread D Ivago
Hello,I'm running Red Hat EL4 with SA 3.1.4 and postfix/procmail.Since yesterday I moved the mailserver to a new datacenter, and I'm  not sure if it's related, but but now I get more spam then ever. The server is connected with 1 NIC on a private subnet and routed via the firewall to the internet, I allready denied access from one local IP with iptables that sended ALOT of spam to my users.
Alot of spam still gets properly filtered by SA but some spam manages to get in the inboxes. Mostely messages containing a subject wich starts like Re:RXWhat is the best way to block these kind of spams? My score is 3,0 atm but these spammails hardly get a core higher then 1
I have pasted some more detailed info below from the headers (my IP's and adressess are scrambled for privacy purposes).Thanks for all suggestions!IvagoHeader info+
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on SOKAHO2.studioo.be
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
	HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.1.4
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from kcg-inc.com (ALagny-152-1-35-110.w83-112.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.112.228.110
])
	by mail.studioo.be (Postfix) with SMTP id D55B4103FDC
	for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:57:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by 192.168.xxx.64 with SMTP id QTRtOfzW;
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:59:10 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Hagen Mckechnie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Hagen Mckechnie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RXnyhe
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:59:10 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="=_NextPart_000_0001_01C6C9D8.96D1AB40"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Status: RO
X-UID: 12839
Content-Length: 2363
X-Keywords:   



problem with RX subjects

2006-08-28 Thread D Ivago
Hello,I'm running RH EL4 with SA 3.1.4 and postfix/procmail.Last week I moved that mailserver to a datacenter and I'm  not sure if it's related, but since then I get more spam then ever. The server is now connected with 1 NIC on a 
192.168.*.* subnet and routed via a h/w firewall to the internet, but I don't think SA cares about the local IP's anyway?Alot of spam still gets properly filtered by SA but some spam manages to get in the inboxes. Mostely messages containing a subject wich starts like Re:RX and other subjects containint capital RX
What is the best way to block these kind of spams? My score is 3,0 atm but these spammails hardly get a core higher then 1I have pasted some more detailed info below from the headers (my IP's and adressess are scrambled for privacy purposes).
Thanks for all suggestions!IvagoHeader info+Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on SOKAHO2.removed.beX-Spam-Level:X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,FORGED_RCVD_HELO, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.1.4
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Received: from kcg-inc.com (
ALagny-152-1-35-110.w83-112.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.112.228.110 ]) by mail.removed.be (Postfix) with SMTP id D55B4103FDC for <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:57:30 +0200 (CEST)Received: by 192.168.xxx.64 with SMTP id QTRtOfzW; for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:59:10 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Reply-To: "Hagen Mckechnie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>From: "Hagen Mckechnie" <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: RXnyheDate: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:59:10 -0700MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0001_01C6C9D8.96D1AB40"
X-Priority: 3X-MSMail-Priority: NormalX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106Status: ROX-UID: 12839Content-Length: 2363X-Keywords:


procmailrc question

2007-01-10 Thread D Ivago

Hi all,

i''ve been using spamassassin for over a year now and I'm really happy with
this solution.

At he moment my maximum SA score is 3.0 and this seems to stop 99% of spam
without marking wanted mail as spam.

Now I get like +200 mails in my spam folder marked as [SPAM] but would like
to delete these mails instead of filtering them in a folder, so I poked
around with my .procmailrc but it doesn't seem to work OK.

This is spam delete option would be only for me and not for other people
using the mailserver so I have this in my /home/ivago/.procmailrc file:

MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
LOGFILE=$HOME/Mail/log

:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
Spam
:0:
* ^Subject:.*\<[SPAM]\>
/dev/null

I just added the 3 last lines as seen on a webpage but it doesn't work, any
suggestions what I exactely need to put in there?

kind regards,

ivago


blacklisting

2007-01-18 Thread D Ivago

Hi,

I'm trying to blacklist some domians who sent me spam, I added following
lines in local.cf like I do to whitelist a domain.

whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] vsko.be
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] vlhorb.be
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] omcdgent.be
blacklist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]


but I keep getting spam from those 2 blacklisted domains.

Any suggestions for the syntax?

kind regards,

ivago


Re: blacklisting

2007-01-19 Thread D Ivago


*EVERY* time you edit your config files, run spamassassin --lint. It
should run quietly and just exit if all is well. If there's a problem
parsing your config, it will print a message to that effect.



so I added
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to my local.cf and ran  'spamassassin  -lint' but I got following warning
and killed the program with CTRL-C after 10' cause nothing else happened. Is
this normal behaviour?

[11325] warn: The -l option has been deprecated and is no longer supported,
ignoring.

so I just did a
'spamassassin]# /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart'
wich also adapts the changes made in local.cf

kind regards,

ivago

PS My spamassassin version is 3.1.7


block subject + subdomain

2007-01-29 Thread D Ivago

Hello,

I have 2 kinds of spam that still gets through with a 3.0 score setup.

- the first kind of spam is with subject that contain RX and is mostly like
a reply so 'Re:blahblahRXblah'
It does come from different smtp servers so denying the host is not an
option.

- the second kind of spam that still gets through is mail from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So the SUBdomain changes but the main domain is emv1.net , I allready
blaclisted those subdomains in my rc.local but can I also use a wildcard?
Now I just blacklist each subdomain like:

blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

thanks in advance for all suggestions!

ivago


Re: Drug spam, some caught some not - none caught by drug rules

2007-01-29 Thread D Ivago

On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Jim Maul wrote:

> Those are the DEFAULT rules.  Do not add/remove/modify anything in this
> folder.
>
> custom rules go in /etc/mail/spamassassin/



So basicly you just need to 'cd /etc/mail/spamassissin'
and 'wget http://www.peregrinehw.com/downloads/SpamAssassin/contrib/KAM.cf'
into this folder and restart spamassissin? or do I need to refer to his
KAM.cf file in local.cf or something so SA knows it's there?

kind regards,

ivago


Re: An lot of these messages getting through

2007-03-30 Thread D Ivago

2007/3/30, Bill Randle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:



Yes, I created them by hand.

-Bill



Bill, do we need to add these lines in local.cf?

at the moment I just add every domainname of  every stock mail that gets in
my inbox but that's not really working great 

blacklist_from *altimawebsystems.com
blacklist_from *ngt.net
blacklist_from *ntertops.com
blacklist_from *orientalimage.com
blacklist_from *quipusbolivia.org
blacklist_from *capitalmonitor.com
blacklist_from *cbmpos.com
blacklist_from *gloverstamp.com
blacklist_from *netearth.net
blacklist_from *hanryu.com

grtz, divago

ps I was wondering if these spammers are also subscribed to this list? cuz
it's quite easy like this for them to see wich methods are the most
efficient ... at least for some time :)