yum --downloadonly question

2012-09-27 Thread Trutwin, Joshua
Hi,

I upgraded a number of lab computers from Fedora 14 to Fedora 17 this summer 
and a process I used to push patches out to them en mass no longer works.

What I used to do was:

yum --downloadonly --security update

Then I would copy /var/cache/yum to a shared NFS drive and from each client run 
an update script that would include:

rm -rf /var/cache/yum
cp -pR /nfs/yum-cache /var/cache/yum
yum -C -y --security update

In fedora 14 this would run the update from the local cache (-C option) without 
prompting via -y so I could script/push security patches to all my clients.  I 
use this method as occasionally some of the clients are offline and need to be 
manually started up - this way I can be sure each client has the exact same 
patches.

In fedora 17 when I do this I get the following error message when running the 
yum -C command on the client:

[Error -1] Check uncompressed DB failed

I ran with -v -e 10 -d 10 and it's failing after printing: "Setting up Package 
Sacks".

The following yum plugins are enabled: downloadonly, presto, security, tsflags, 
verify, versionlock

Is this process simply not allowed anymore?  If not is there an alternate way 
to do what I'm attempting?

Thank you!

Josh




-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Chrome + nVidia insta crash

2012-10-24 Thread Trutwin, Joshua
Hi,

I have a problem on my current systems running Fedora 17 x86_64 where the 
latest release of google-chrome-stable 
(google-chrome-stable-22.0.1229.94-161065.x86_64) crashes X and logs the user 
out.  This used to happen on previous versions sporadically on flash sites due 
to Chrome's built in pepper flash player and the NSAPI one installed for 
firefox being both recognized and enabled, but now it's completely unusable so 
I'm reverting to an older version.  Trying to isolate this I discovered that if 
I pulled my nVidia cards that we use and use the onboard video it doesn't 
crash.  I also applied all available yum patches including kernel/nv driver but 
still happens.

My questions:


1.   Anyone else having similar problems?

2.   If I file a bug on Fedora's bugzilla for this will it even see any 
attention since chrome/nVidia are not officially supported?

Thanks,

Josh
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


SPOT Repo: Chromium Update Dependancy Issue

2011-10-06 Thread Trutwin, Joshua
Just an FYI for the spot repo owner (not sure how to contact directly),

Today I ran the following yum command:

yum update chromium

It installed updates for chromium and v8 - but NOT libjingle.

I previously had chromium 13.0.782.215 and libjingle 0.5.8.  After running the 
update chromium-browser command had a nasty undefined symbol error: 
/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/chromium-browser: symbol lookup error: 
/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/chromium-browser: undefined symbol: 
_ZNK4buzz10XmppClient8GetStateEv

I had to run "yum update libjingle" to fix.

Think need a dependency check for libjingle >= 0.6.0 for chromium package.

Thanks!

Josh
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


RE: heads up: Adobe now has full 64-bit Flash support

2011-10-06 Thread Trutwin, Joshua
> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:06 +0200, Raphael Groner wrote:
> > So, I don't see any needs for Adobe closed source binaries any more in
> > a distribution that claims to be completely open and free.
> 
> Flash is not "in" Fedora. The fact that Adobe provides a repo means nothing.
> The official Fedora repos continue to be completely open and free, as you
> put it.

I just subscribed so not sure if someone's already mentioned it but this wiki 
page could use some love with these new developments:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash

Josh
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


lxdm theme

2012-08-09 Thread Trutwin, Joshua
Anyone have any lxdm theme's they care to share - google isn't coming up with 
much.  I'd like to change the default theme as the huge "Login:" looks odd and 
also add some custom text.  Not familiar with glade3 so any examples others 
have would be helpful.

Thank you,

Josh
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org