Re: Will Firefox 3.6 be pushed?
Chris Smart spake thusly: > 2010/1/22 Gilboa Davara : >> >> Previous major Firefox updates only landed in current+1. I doubt that >> F12 will be any different. (Read: FF 3.6 will only land in F13) > > Exactly the type of response I was looking for. Thanks! > > -c If your not otherwise using sqlite you can grab Firefox 3.6 from Rawhide. I'm running it now. yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox You'll get an update for firefox, xulrunner and sqlite. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Will Firefox 3.6 be pushed?
Siddhesh Poyarekar spake thusly: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Scott Beamer > wrote: >> If your not otherwise using sqlite you can grab Firefox 3.6 from >> Rawhide. I'm running it now. >> >> yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox >> >> You'll get an update for firefox, xulrunner and sqlite. >> >> > Don't do it if you need to print web pages. There's an unfixed bug in > the rawhide which causes firefox to crash whenever you try to print a > web page. I have no idea when I last printed a web page. Other than a long long long time ago. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F8: CPAN problem
Dan Thurman spake thusly: > To make a long story short, I was trying to get procmail support added > to my sendmail base in order to get maildir (instead of mbox) IS that "F8" as in "Fedora 8"? Fedora 8 is no longer supported.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How to Install Nvidia and not Nouveau at New Install
Matthew Saltzman spake thusly: > On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 22:27 -0500, Jim wrote: >> FC12-X86_64/KDE >> >> How do I prevent Nouveau driver from installing at New install , so I >> can install >> Nvidia ? > > No reason not to install nouveau. Just complete the installation, > enable the rpmfusion repo and yum install akmod-nvidia from there. > > The akmod-nvidia package should do everything necessary to run > correctly, although you might need to add "rdblacklist=nouveau" to the > kernel line in /etc/grub.conf by hand. That will prevent the nouveau > module from loading and setting the graphics mode at boot. > I'd stick with kmod-nvidia vs. akmod-nvidia And there are a few options for disabling Noveau and there are some SELinux issues as well. See http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia for the info and howtos. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Two screwey things about wwthe Firefox on my F12 machine
Aaron Konstam spake thusly: > > http://www.tiaa-cref.org > > When I try to open the above site begins to load and then Firefox > crashes. Opening the site in konqueror works. Any thoughts. I just opened it in Firefox and it loaded just fine. No crashes. Perhaps you're you've got addons installed that are causing the problem? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Update Dependancies broken for the past few days.
Greetings all, I'm running KDE on Fedora 19 X64 For the past 2-3 days I've had problems updating a number of packages because of failed dependencies. For a while I figured it was a problem that would resolve itself once the mirrors were updated, but so far, the problem persists. II've done 'yum clean all' numerous times to no avail. Is this a problem on my end or Fedora's end? Here is the the output of 'yum update': $ sudo yum update Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package kcm_colors.x86_64 0:4.10.5-3.fc19 will be updated ---> Package kcm_colors.x86_64 0:4.11.1-2.fc19 will be an update ---> Package kde-workspace.x86_64 0:4.10.5-3.fc19 will be updated ---> Package kde-workspace.x86_64 0:4.11.1-2.fc19 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: libxcb-keysyms.so.1()(64bit) for package: kde-workspace-4.11.1-2.fc19.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libxcb-image.so.0()(64bit) for package: kde-workspace-4.11.1-2.fc19.x86_64 ---> Package kde-workspace-libs.x86_64 0:4.10.5-3.fc19 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: libsolidcontrol.so.4()(64bit) for package: contour-0.3-2.fc19.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libsolidcontrolifaces.so.4()(64bit) for package: contour-0.3-2.fc19.x86_64 ---> Package kde-workspace-libs.x86_64 0:4.11.1-2.fc19 will be an update ---> Package kdeartwork.x86_64 0:4.10.5-1.fc19 will be updated ---> Package kdeartwork.x86_64 0:4.11.1-1.fc19 will be an update ---> Package kdeartwork-kxs.x86_64 0:4.10.5-1.fc19 will be updated ---> Package kdeartwork-kxs.x86_64 0:4.11.1-1.fc19 will be an update ---> Package kdeartwork-screensavers.x86_64 0:4.10.5-1.fc19 will be updated ---> Package kdeartwork-screensavers.x86_64 0:4.11.1-1.fc19 will be an update ---> Package kdm.x86_64 0:4.10.5-3.fc19 will be updated ---> Package kdm.x86_64 0:4.11.1-2.fc19 will be an update ---> Package kgreeter-plugins.x86_64 0:4.10.5-3.fc19 will be updated ---> Package kgreeter-plugins.x86_64 0:4.11.1-2.fc19 will be an update ---> Package konsole.x86_64 0:4.10.5-1.fc19 will be updated ---> Package konsole.x86_64 0:4.11.1-1.fc19 will be an update ---> Package konsole-part.x86_64 0:4.10.5-1.fc19 will be updated ---> Package konsole-part.x86_64 0:4.11.1-1.fc19 will be an update ---> Package libkworkspace.x86_64 0:4.10.5-3.fc19 will be updated ---> Package libkworkspace.x86_64 0:4.11.1-2.fc19 will be an update ---> Package mesa-libwayland-egl.x86_64 0:9.2-1.20130902.fc19 will be updated ---> Package mesa-libwayland-egl.x86_64 0:9.2-1.20130919.fc19 will be an update ---> Package plasma-scriptengine-python.x86_64 0:4.10.5-3.fc19 will be updated ---> Package plasma-scriptengine-python.x86_64 0:4.11.1-2.fc19 will be an update --> Running transaction check ---> Package kde-workspace-libs.x86_64 0:4.10.5-3.fc19 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: libsolidcontrol.so.4()(64bit) for package: contour-0.3-2.fc19.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libsolidcontrolifaces.so.4()(64bit) for package: contour-0.3-2.fc19.x86_64 ---> Package xcb-util-image.x86_64 0:0.3.9-2.fc19 will be installed ---> Package xcb-util-keysyms.x86_64 0:0.3.9-2.fc19 will be installed --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: contour-0.3-2.fc19.x86_64 (@fedora) Requires: libsolidcontrolifaces.so.4()(64bit) Removing: kde-workspace-libs-4.10.5-3.fc19.x86_64 (@updates) libsolidcontrolifaces.so.4()(64bit) Updated By: kde-workspace-libs-4.11.1-2.fc19.x86_64 (updates) Not found Available: kde-workspace-libs-4.10.4-1.fc19.x86_64 (fedora) libsolidcontrolifaces.so.4()(64bit) Error: Package: contour-0.3-2.fc19.x86_64 (@fedora) Requires: libsolidcontrol.so.4()(64bit) Removing: kde-workspace-libs-4.10.5-3.fc19.x86_64 (@updates) libsolidcontrol.so.4()(64bit) Updated By: kde-workspace-libs-4.11.1-2.fc19.x86_64 (updates) Not found Available: kde-workspace-libs-4.10.4-1.fc19.x86_64 (fedora) libsolidcontrol.so.4()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Thanks. Scott -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Update Dependancies broken for the past few days.
On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 14:17:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: [.] > > Looks like a broken dependency with contour, I'll look into it. > > In the meantime, you could > > yum remove contour > > temporarily, until it is fixed. > Thanks! That did the trick! Scott -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Update Dependancies broken for the past few days.
On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 20:04:12 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: [] > Fix on the way, > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/contour-0.3-4.fc19 Thanks again! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Workaround for openjdk misconfiguration?
Greetings all, When updating openjdk and openjdk-devel the following happens... [...] Cleanup: 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk- devel-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.4.fc19.x86_64 21/29 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.4.fc19.x86_64/bin/javac has not been configured as an alternative for javac /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.4.fc19.x86_64 has not been configured as an alternative for java_sdk_openjdk /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.4.fc19.x86_64 has not been configured as an alternative for java_sdk_1.7.0 [...] Cleanup: 1:java-1.7.0- openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.4.fc19.x86_6427/29 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.4.fc19.x86_64/jre/bin/java has not been configured as an alternative for java /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.4.fc19.x86_64/jre has not been configured as an alternative for jre_openjdk /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.4.fc19.x86_64/jre has not been configured as an alternative for jre_1.7.0 [...] A bug report has been filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi? id=991762 In the meantime, what is the workaround for this? Thanks. Scott -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
How does one request a new RPM package group?
Greetings, I'd like to see an RPM package group added that would include all the KDE-specific games. Something like the way the Debian/Ubuntu "kdegames" packages depends on all the official KDE games. They're not included with either of the current KDE package groups and it's a pain to add them install them individually. How would one go about requesting the addition of a package group to Fedora? Is this done through Bugzilla, or is there anther way of going about this? TIA. Scott ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: How does one request a new RPM package group?
On 5/17/22 8:08 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:01 AM Scott Beamer wrote: I'd like to see an RPM package group added that would include all the KDE-specific games. Something like the way the Debian/Ubuntu "kdegames" packages depends on all the official KDE games. They're not included with either of the current KDE package groups and it's a pain to add them install them individually. How would one go about requesting the addition of a package group to Fedora? Is this done through Bugzilla, or is there anther way of going about this? In this case, filing an issue with the KDE SIG is probably the best approach: https://pagure.io/fedora-kde/SIG/ In general, the groups are defined by fedora-comps. You can submit an issue or pull request at: https://pagure.io/fedora-comps Thanks. Should I file an issue in both places? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: How does one request a new RPM package group?
> On May 17, 2022, at 10:20 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 12:36 PM Scott Beamer > wrote: >> >> Thanks. Should I file an issue in both places? > > I'd take it to the KDE SIG. They can make the necessary comps changes. > Great. Thank you. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
New error message when selecting Windows Boot Loader from the GRUB menu
Greetings, After a recent Fedora 36 update, I'm getting an error message when selecting "Windows Boot Manager" from the GRUB menu. Instead of booting like it had previously, it gives me an almost blank screen with the following text in the upper left: /EndEntire And all I can do at that point is shut down and restart my computer, go to it's boot menu, and sekect Windows Boot Manager, in order to boot into Windows. I've been dual-booting Fedora 36 and Windows for weeks prior to this one without issue. Google hasn't been of much help. Any suggestions? TIA Scott ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: New error message when selecting Windows Boot Loader from the GRUB menu
On 8/4/22 7:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Thu, Aug 4, 2022, at 6:39 PM, Scott Beamer wrote: Greetings, After a recent Fedora 36 update, I'm getting an error message when selecting "Windows Boot Manager" from the GRUB menu. Instead of booting like it had previously, it gives me an almost blank screen with the following text in the upper left: /EndEntire And all I can do at that point is shut down and restart my computer, go to it's boot menu, and sekect Windows Boot Manager, in order to boot into Windows. I've been dual-booting Fedora 36 and Windows for weeks prior to this one without issue. What version? Current is 2.06-45.fc36 and there are a few complaints. That version. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8ffd58c713#comment-2667330 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115202 I commented on the bug. Thanks for the link. dnf downgrade will get you the -29 version which is a ways back, but also easy and will get you working. But to avoid it getting updated and breaking again in the near future you'll need to add an exclude in the dnf.conf (man dnf.conf) for "grub2-*" Set a reminder though, you'll eventually want to update it and it might even prevent a system upgrade from getting a new version (or even failing, I'm not really sure). Thanks. I went with that and added the exclude ti dnf.conf An alternative is to: rpm -qa | grep grub2 That'll get you a list of all the grub2 packages you'lll need to download from here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1977609 That's the -42 version which should work. Then you have the packages locally and you can just put them in a directory and if you do an update that steps on this version again, you can just cd to that dir and do "dnf downgrade *rpm" and it'll use the local rpm files. I'm too lazy for that ish. I'll just hold on to the -29 version for a while and follow up in a week. If you have a Fedora account or RGBZ account you can add yourself to the bug. I'm too lazy for that ish. I'll just hold on to the -29 version for a while and follow up in a week. I do and I did. Thanks for your help. Much appreciated! :) Scott ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
I've managed to mess up GNOME Boses & I don't know how to fix it.
Greetings, A few weeks back, I uninstalled GNOME Boxes via DNF and then installed the Flatpak version (because I wanted to run GNOME OS and that’s only possible with the Flatpak version of GNOME Boxes). Well GNOME OS was just too unstable to play around with, so I deleted it. Then I tried installing an Ubuntu guest and ran into problems (J don’t recall what they were anymore). So I started over from scratch. I deleted both OS images and uninstalled the GNOME Boxes Flatpak, then I reinstalled the rpm version via DNF. Well, my headaches have still continued since then. Now my problem is, that any guest defaults to a ridiculously high resolution making everything microscopic. It’s challenging, but I can usually go into the display settings in the guest and change the resolution to something sane (1920 x 1080 – same as the host). The thing is, I have to do this every time I boot into any guest in GNOME Boxes and it’s beyond annoying. Is there a configuration file I need to tweak somewhere? I’m assuming it’s a wonky QEMU setting, as there are limited options in GNOME Boxes. Thanks in advance. Scott ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Firefox - how to lose top bar / title bar - ?
On 8/13/22 6:37 AM, lejeczek via users wrote: On 13/08/2022 11:49, Greg wrote: Sorry I am not sure why the option is missing. Can you right click the title bar, under more options and select no border? Kind regards from Greg. ___ Nope, no such thing. Anybody could try another user, from within the GUI session you normally log in? -> $ xhost + -> $ sudo -u onlyoogle -i -> $ firefox &> /dev/null & I wonder if Firefox "sees" that sudo and acts - for whatever reason - differently. firefox-103.0.1-2.fc36.x86_64 ___ Create a new Firefox profile and try the previous suggestion for removing the title bar. Open a terminal and type "firefox -P" (without the quotes). There you can create a new profile with the default settings. Then right-click on the toolbar, then select "Customize toolbar" . In bottom the left corner it says "Title Bar". Uncheck that box and click "done" (bottom right corner), If that doesn't work, then I dunno. Scott ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Firefox - how to lose top bar / title bar - ?
On 8/13/22 6:37 AM, lejeczek via users wrote: On 13/08/2022 11:49, Greg wrote: Sorry I am not sure why the option is missing. Can you right click the title bar, under more options and select no border? Kind regards from Greg. ___ Nope, no such thing. Anybody could try another user, from within the GUI session you normally log in? -> $ xhost + -> $ sudo -u onlyoogle -i -> $ firefox &> /dev/null & I wonder if Firefox "sees" that sudo and acts - for whatever reason - differently. firefox-103.0.1-2.fc36.x86_64 Create a new Firefox profile and try the previous suggestion for removing the title bar. Open a terminal and type "firefox -P" (without the quotes). There you can create a new profile with the default settings. Then right-click on the toolbar, then select "Customize toolbar" . In bottom the left corner it says "Title Bar". Uncheck that box and click "done" (bottom right corner), If that doesn't work, then I dunno. Scott ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fix failed DNF upgrade?
Greetings, I recently read somewhere that there is a dnf command to finish upgrading when an upgrade crashes during an upgrade. I tried Googling to find it just now and have come up empty. Does anyone know what it is? Thanks. Scott ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fix failed DNF upgrade?
On 11/8/22 8:09 AM, Doug Herr wrote: On Tue, Nov 8, 2022, at 8:03 AM, Scott Beamer wrote: Greetings, I recently read somewhere that there is a dnf command to finish upgrading when an upgrade crashes during an upgrade. I tried Googling to find it just now and have come up empty. Does anyone know what it is? Not sure if this is what you are refering to, but one option that saves a bunch of time in that situation is to add "--setopt=keepcache=1" to the dnf command to make sure it does not have to re-download stuff. Nope, thanks, but that's not it. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Unable to login after fedora re-install
On 2/22/23 3:50 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: That would surely be foolish, no? Not at all, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#If_You_Are_Replying_to_a_Message ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: CentOS8 VM
On 2/24/23 9:18 PM, Tim via users wrote: On Fri, 2023-02-24 at 23:33 -0500, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Installed CentOS8 on a VM from CentOS-8.1.1911-x86_64-dvd1.iso Trying to update it gives Failed to download metadata for repo 'appstream' Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'appstream' You're really posting on the wrong list for CentOS, but CentOS 8 went end-of-life in December 2022. They'll probably remove various CentOS 8 files from their servers. If you want to use a CentOS that is still being updated, you can use CentOS 7 until mid 2024 (it goes end-of-life in June). And there's CentOS Stream which is not going end-of-life, but I don't use it, and don't know anything further about it. I've yet to decide what to do about it, I run a server on it because Fedora's life cycle is way too short for my liking. I really don't want such rapid major upheavals to a server. There are several newer distros that picked up where CentOS 8 left off. Take a look at AlmaLinux (https://almalinux.org/) or Rocky Linux (https://rockylinux.org/) -- both sourced from upstream RHEL and are 100% binary/bug-for-bug compatible with RHEL. They even provide easy migration tools from CentOS. Scott ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
DNF upgrade. Not sure what's up here.
Greetings. I just ran "sudo dnf upgrade", and among the items that flew by, was this: [...] Cleanup : gtk-update-icon-cache-3.24.36-1.fc37.x86_64 41/42 Cleanup : gnome-software-43.4-1.fc37.x86_64 42/42 Running scriptlet: systemd-resolved-251.13-3.fc37.x86_64 42/42 Running scriptlet: gnome-software-43.4-1.fc37.x86_64 42/42 /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/sddm.conf:6: Line references path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/sddm → /run/sddm; please update the tmpfiles.d/ drop-in file accordingly. Verifying: cups-1:2.4.2-10.fc37.x86_64 1/42 Verifying: cups-1:2.4.2-5.fc37.x86_64 [...] So what exactly does "/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/sddm.conf:6: Line references path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/sddm → /run/sddm; please update the tmpfiles.d/ drop-in file accordingly." mean, and how do I fix it? TIA Scott ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
DNF update failures
Greetings, I'm having problems with DNF tonight. Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'updates-testing' e.g. Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. and Curl error (23): Failed writing received data to disk/application for https://... Any suggestions? Pastebin: https://pastebin.com/GwXy3jUj Thanks. Regards, Scott ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: DNF update failures
On 5/22/21 7:49 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 5/22/21 8:40 PM, Scott Beamer wrote: I'm having problems with DNF tonight. Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'updates-testing' e.g. Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. and Curl error (23): Failed writing received data to disk/application for https://... Any suggestions? --disablerepo=updates-testing Right after I posted, the problem seems to have resolved itself. Never mind. :) Scott ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
