Re: ls question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 20:25 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Hi All, > > Not to ask too stupid a question, but it there a way to > run an ls that only gives me the file name and its size? > > Many thanks, > -T > > -- > ~~ > When you say, "I wrote a program that > crashed Windows," people just stare at > you blankly and say, "Hey, I got those > with the system, for free." > -- Linus Torvalds > ~~ > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Hi, ls -hs --block-size=k May fit you needs. Regards Phil - -- *** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.*** Playing the game for the games sake. Twitter: kathenasorg IRC: kathenas Web: https://kathenas.org Github: https://github.com/kathenas GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas GPG: A0C3 4C6A AC2B B8F4 F1E5 EDF4 333F 60DC B0B9 BB77 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJct/LEAAoJEDM/YNywubt300YP/imiQHlYz2bSi0eeejuctNWh K0mjb0iiakcn7vcU4BthCOz0ybcukiwBTqN+F+NolZ3wSvAfBcBuu8OC8BCZNI2B TA16PJsrSDnPBVhMwn+D73ClTvBY2Ip3Vcw5vjUvh3DVT3kS86ijdiK/g859BxeL YeQmItiROc7gyIM59Pk2lh6jITvo1bViyS32kUsecziqxwYIOet4yMSzB44kF/He 6u2vLaTD3rt4n9BzYBPW3tCcsvZ9d+H5OFPotS5tHOsF+xcjR7EjD9bo64UhGF6M LfOnFAfbF3DWEWQO9q9SoYVWHTQ6ZOucObDTCwsCZNOqx7MT6KCoVGP4nLEMzK9J ILZNXLVhtT9ozTyFZJ5zXi9oPQkKMHIkRb+HDYUTViTVWSJxtiLKz+NsXZqMuTnt UPgtw6bUkmu0w2YhBQR8PE0Q/DmN57NcYa2Cn+dlNu/0ruSUwlJuvAZ56FB5PpIc zZz18CGfQq6/dLbGPzADGGcmkd4gVj6dEPTfw786SaLt/0T5SIt2Pjn5qBzZRxLw qVSXdj33EtRNOijtQh/5LnmQAJ8hZQIFTlmxOcdzdj4ANjj0sM/DLSSWcllICkrE /kmGa4WAkuLl0GZ/sG6Aox1CtYEgs/dljoLbbDD7fAw8YrvBXnI9rCyCVMbGCVFQ JSR0+yQN1Hl7s0Zjq43L =Imug -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: ls question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 04:45 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 20:25 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Not to ask too stupid a question, but it there a way to > > run an ls that only gives me the file name and its size? > > > > Many thanks, > > -T > > > > -- > > ~~ > > When you say, "I wrote a program that > > crashed Windows," people just stare at > > you blankly and say, "Hey, I got those > > with the system, for free." > > -- Linus Torvalds > > ~~ > > ___ > > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > Hi, > > ls -hs --block-size=k > > May fit you needs. > > Regards > > Phil > You can just drop the block-size section also if you wish. Regards Phil - -- *** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.*** Playing the game for the games sake. Twitter: kathenasorg IRC: kathenas Web: https://kathenas.org Github: https://github.com/kathenas GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas GPG: A0C3 4C6A AC2B B8F4 F1E5 EDF4 333F 60DC B0B9 BB77 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJct/RYAAoJEDM/YNywubt31NUQAKR1ajREkJMGAyZT9e9H1ZDw Yvw7lO6vvgSk7ed3x+Ah7ZRaHc91YPZfz7cCI4nbc6CYdmlwnqkfyDw19FC4xIT8 p3e3y5FSg/QmEp9uX7JandilNQ+lBBTsd3IVBFX3zSbrU/B4xK08/nX5r635uIT6 Iz774MsgiquxrfL6pW6mHxxB6gr1U7wlrJ+EFXS2eLgu3wppvUio2mFkYHwMTrM8 kfdrNwr32RjIk5ZMwZcyv9aR4I1gdWYGNBZp+FXcgzAUmWNlHcN2YF7vkB3iySFY siFIqW261YVyCVHocBUDowmR2rrzFyGGBzGo9C13G9/vZmoEbS8aajyfARLCPqEJ kB3uoLecZ89CoVf/snN5sulgchCDGGhQOefEbUIa1Pbk4wxQpHn5yRLtEL+BwC3w LSHCgJH7GM0BsAws5WQTnxxB2uxHR/M+o0W03Rib7S1Kkb95rRC1mfsPyz1PjGvd 0u3dxC6ODVfcC+kk2e4PTpFQi/wVKTwYJfsD+WnsJDh6Rp4t8Auhr4BaRivxeT3k ph07lz1jt+LGxoeTDWRYQskU+Z/pQ+PgTxfZntpN7CCevqb1n6P/BsTIFbx+Ju0T w3d9AfkN+wrxm5+T1CNkRs0kYRvMpe9W2u65N1hLtaiODRJQ3pV4bdKBVX/XBgAc 7dWTBhQQ46NcfIn9cTDr =jhuB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: why dnf wants to reinstall to same version ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 13:09 -0400, sean darcy wrote: > FC29. I have a server for video encoding. I use x264, which I keep > updated to the most recent git packaaged in an rpm. > > rpm -q x264-libs > x264-libs-0.157-0.20190331.fc29.x86_64 > > I then rebuild all the packages that depend on x264, including > avidemux-libs. I just rebuild on my machine, without chaging the > version, since the version hasn't changed, it's just linked to the new > x264 version. > > rpm -q avidemux-libs > avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.fc29.x86_64 > > But dnf want to replace my rebuild version, with the version for the repo: > > dnf upgrade --refresh > .. > Problem 1: package avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.fc29.x86_64 requires > libx264.so.155()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed >- cannot install both > x264-libs-0.155-2.20180806git0a84d98.fc29.x86_64 and > x264-libs-0.157-0.20190331.fc29.x86_64 > > I don't want to bump the avidemux-libs version, since I want to know > when a new one is available. I don't want to keep adding "-x avidemux.." > > Why does dnf want to replace the installed package ? How does it even > know it's not the same package as the repo ? > > sean > Hi, You do need to bump in some way. You can... Original: avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1 Your rebuild: avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.1 Any new version from repo i.e. will be -2 or above and update as normal if/when released. Regards Phil - -- *** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.*** Playing the game for the games sake. Twitter: kathenasorg IRC: kathenas Web: https://kathenas.org Github: https://github.com/kathenas GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas GPG: A0C3 4C6A AC2B B8F4 F1E5 EDF4 333F 60DC B0B9 BB77 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJcugfYAAoJEDM/YNywubt3Q8sP/07rgiBy9TpPyeRthht5tEV1 LEuxSpVKmtOFXsabjT2Y+YBvz0n9tdB+Z4JMjfz2a7W1gOpyvnsqyhoXXqCeqy1i agiOblYwYCopgpt6oPeVw1jMDEaW1GN2M+evC6EZaATHztH1u40UpwkJYpTsZUz4 MjuLHsY6F6B9ah58pJzH6y3fsAAuMd3BAmj+DNiSdJqImC3YhLcxCZ1EqrQ80fJt /DBgkOFk1Z73T9WdZBMV+qfuLU+g3mit73fxe6NCTUnfjF+gQfXyA3lEgZHBF4j0 Int5+8bVCXQriAdxVhHErkvlw1FLMiSIyvYjJLsva+WoIxQaOblQT44BHIjf98yr bw6OIMO3iIzsLimegJoeVLK08mD3Kf/CaUqMPL2K/sYS/uM+QCmdJeHncc5fStBi Atsc86dPTMVTVx5qIIGmj6BQ1N5S0XfTovIMSdzXq8NbWPv7yMsF7zAvfjmfv3Sy 17+q29+wu5ZXAbI7IWW2wEEYOhFw1yZwaUJkktbW98nRzQ0aOIJndWGmj58lpB76 g45OIZ5gecSHwkmbSOboR1IVq/id5Trh32jiyUlNiOwiEtDjSMYbTDuNrp2DVsNf WeeSiW5/BARS2v9PLRPrjMSV+2nChTqAKQL5Spk/zwKU/xl13HNuASEI8fYYzFaH GZAKHoCkKDTvEtDAhgw7 =Sg/q -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: RPM specfile error with F30
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 13:24 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Fri, 31 May 2019 19:58:04 +0200 Franta Hanzlík > wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 May 2019 18:06:19 -0500 > > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have the following specfile which compiled fine in F29 but is > > > not able to find references to standard functions in X11, etc > > > even though the compilation happens without error (outside the > > > rpmbuild environment). So I am wondering if anyone has some > > > suggestions on what has changed/is going wrong. > > > > > > Here is the spec file: > > > > > > $ fpaste thaali.spec > > > Uploading (1.4KiB)... > > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/3sHHnOdGoM4YHmdzzJRzgQ > > > > > > > > > And here are the messages that I get when I try to build: > > > > ... > > > > Just an idea - once I had a problem building a program when the > > make > > '-j' switch was greater than one. Specifying '-j1' solved it. > > Unfortunately, I don't even remember the cause or how it manifested > > itself... > > > > Thanks! So, I use: > > %make_build > > I replaced this with "make -j1" or also with "make -j" or -j or -j1 > appended to %make_build. > > I don't really understand this, but all of them gave errors. > > Thanks again for your help! > > Best wishes, > Ranjan > ___ > Hi Ranjan, This is an upstream configure issue. 1. I took the pastebin spec file. 2. Added to spec file: BuildRequires: gcc 3. Saw spec file does a reconfigure and looked at upstream configure.ac 4. Saw it is not correct. Substitute upstream configure.ac for below. // Start AC_INIT(thaali, 0.4.0) AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(src/thaali.c) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) AC_PROG_CC AC_PATH_X AC_PATH_XTRA dnl Are we going to enable the debugging output ?? AC_ARG_ENABLE(debug, AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-debug], [Enable runtime debugging (default: no)]), debug=$enableval, debug=no) if test "$debug" = yes; then AC_DEFINE(DEBUG,,[Enable verbose debugging output]) fi dnl Let's do some X testing for... ;-) if test -n "$x_includes" && test "x$x_includes" != xNONE ; then CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -I$x_includes" fi if test -n "$x_libraries" && test "x$x_libraries" != xNONE ; then LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -L$x_libraries" fi AC_CHECK_LIB([ICE],[IceOpenConnection],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Can't find libICE]),) AC_CHECK_LIB([SM],[SmcOpenConnection],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Can't find libSM]),) AC_CHECK_LIB([X11],[XOpenDisplay],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Can't find libX11]), -L$x_libraries $X_PRE_LIBS) AC_SUBST(x_includes) AC_SUBST(x_libraries) AC_OUTPUT([ Makefile src/Makefile ]) // End Now the RPM builds fine on F30. Note this was just a hack to get it to build and show it as an upstream issue. You can diff my changes against original configure.ac. To be honest you have some work ahead as this is all very old and out of date both upstream side and how the spec file is constructed. You will need to research to fix. Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games sake. *** IRC: kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg Website: https://kathenas.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: RPM specfile error with F30
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 20:32 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 13:24 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > On Fri, 31 May 2019 19:58:04 +0200 Franta Hanzlík < > > fra...@hanzlici.cz > > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 May 2019 18:06:19 -0500 > > > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have the following specfile which compiled fine in F29 but is > > > > not able to find references to standard functions in X11, etc > > > > even though the compilation happens without error (outside the > > > > rpmbuild environment). So I am wondering if anyone has some > > > > suggestions on what has changed/is going wrong. > > > > > > > > Here is the spec file: > > > > > > > > $ fpaste thaali.spec > > > > Uploading (1.4KiB)... > > > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/3sHHnOdGoM4YHmdzzJRzgQ > > > > > > > > > > > > And here are the messages that I get when I try to build: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > Just an idea - once I had a problem building a program when the > > > make > > > '-j' switch was greater than one. Specifying '-j1' solved it. > > > Unfortunately, I don't even remember the cause or how it > > > manifested > > > itself... > > > > > > > Thanks! So, I use: > > > > %make_build > > > > I replaced this with "make -j1" or also with "make -j" or -j or -j1 > > appended to %make_build. > > > > I don't really understand this, but all of them gave errors. > > > > Thanks again for your help! > > > > Best wishes, > > Ranjan > > ___ > > > > Hi Ranjan, > > This is an upstream configure issue. > > 1. I took the pastebin spec file. > 2. Added to spec file: BuildRequires: gcc > 3. Saw spec file does a reconfigure and looked at upstream > configure.ac > 4. Saw it is not correct. Substitute upstream configure.ac for below. > > // Start > > AC_INIT(thaali, 0.4.0) > AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(src/thaali.c) > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE > > AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) > > AC_PROG_CC > AC_PATH_X > AC_PATH_XTRA > > dnl Are we going to enable the debugging output ?? > AC_ARG_ENABLE(debug, > AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-debug], [Enable runtime debugging (default: > no)]), > debug=$enableval, debug=no) > > if test "$debug" = yes; then > AC_DEFINE(DEBUG,,[Enable verbose debugging output]) > fi > > dnl Let's do some X testing for... ;-) > if test -n "$x_includes" && test "x$x_includes" != xNONE ; then > CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -I$x_includes" > fi > if test -n "$x_libraries" && test "x$x_libraries" != xNONE ; then > LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -L$x_libraries" > fi > > AC_CHECK_LIB([ICE],[IceOpenConnection],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Can't find > libICE]),) > AC_CHECK_LIB([SM],[SmcOpenConnection],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Can't find > libSM]),) > AC_CHECK_LIB([X11],[XOpenDisplay],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Can't find libX11]), > -L$x_libraries $X_PRE_LIBS) > > AC_SUBST(x_includes) > AC_SUBST(x_libraries) > > AC_OUTPUT([ > Makefile > src/Makefile > ]) > > // End > > Now the RPM builds fine on F30. > > Note this was just a hack to get it to build and show it as an > upstream > issue. You can diff my changes against original configure.ac. To be > honest you have some work ahead as this is all very old and out of > date > both upstream side and how the spec file is constructed. You will > need > to research to fix. > > Regards > > Phil > > Hi, For such a small application, you would vastly simplify things with a build system like meson. Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games sake. *** IRC: kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg Website: https://kathenas.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: RPM specfile error with F30
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 22:48 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Fri, 31 May 2019 20:32:24 +0100 Phil Wyett > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 13:24 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > On Fri, 31 May 2019 19:58:04 +0200 Franta Hanzlík < > > > fra...@hanzlici.cz > > > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 29 May 2019 18:06:19 -0500 > > > > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I have the following specfile which compiled fine in F29 but > > > > > is > > > > > not able to find references to standard functions in X11, etc > > > > > even though the compilation happens without error (outside > > > > > the > > > > > rpmbuild environment). So I am wondering if anyone has some > > > > > suggestions on what has changed/is going wrong. > > > > > > > > > > Here is the spec file: > > > > > > > > > > $ fpaste thaali.spec > > > > > Uploading (1.4KiB)... > > > > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/3sHHnOdGoM4YHmdzzJRzgQ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And here are the messages that I get when I try to build: > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > Just an idea - once I had a problem building a program when the > > > > make > > > > '-j' switch was greater than one. Specifying '-j1' solved it. > > > > Unfortunately, I don't even remember the cause or how it > > > > manifested > > > > itself... > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! So, I use: > > > > > > %make_build > > > > > > I replaced this with "make -j1" or also with "make -j" or -j or > > > -j1 > > > appended to %make_build. > > > > > > I don't really understand this, but all of them gave errors. > > > > > > Thanks again for your help! > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > Ranjan > > > ___ > > > > > > > Hi Ranjan, > > > > This is an upstream configure issue. > > > > 1. I took the pastebin spec file. > > 2. Added to spec file: BuildRequires: gcc > > 3. Saw spec file does a reconfigure and looked at upstream > > configure.ac > > 4. Saw it is not correct. Substitute upstream configure.ac for > > below. > > > > // Start > > > > AC_INIT(thaali, 0.4.0) > > AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(src/thaali.c) > > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE > > > > AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) > > > > AC_PROG_CC > > AC_PATH_X > > AC_PATH_XTRA > > > > dnl Are we going to enable the debugging output ?? > > AC_ARG_ENABLE(debug, > > AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-debug], [Enable runtime debugging > > (default: > > no)]), > > debug=$enableval, debug=no) > > > > if test "$debug" = yes; then > > AC_DEFINE(DEBUG,,[Enable verbose debugging output]) > > fi > > > > dnl Let's do some X testing for... ;-) > > if test -n "$x_includes" && test "x$x_includes" != xNONE ; then > > CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -I$x_includes" > > fi > > if test -n "$x_libraries" && test "x$x_libraries" != xNONE ; then > > LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -L$x_libraries" > > fi > > > > AC_CHECK_LIB([ICE],[IceOpenConnection],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Can't find > > libICE]),) > > AC_CHECK_LIB([SM],[SmcOpenConnection],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Can't find > > libSM]),) > > AC_CHECK_LIB([X11],[XOpenDisplay],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Can't find > > libX11]), > > -L$x_libraries $X_PRE_LIBS) > > > > AC_SUBST(x_includes) > > AC_SUBST(x_libraries) > > > > AC_OUTPUT([ > > Makefile > > src/Makefile > > ]) > > > > // End > > > > Now the RPM builds fine on F30. > > > > Note this was just a hack to get it to build and show it as an > > upstream > > issue. You can diff my changes against original configure.ac. To be > > honest you have some work ahead as this is all very old and out of > > date > > both upstream side and how the spec file is constructed. You will > > need > > to research to fix. > > > > Regards > > > > Phil > > Phil, > > Thanks very much! I am also "upstream" so I can fix this. But I was &g
Re: Rhythmbox: Removing old podcasts
On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 12:26 -0700, Mike Wright wrote: > On 8/2/19 8:04 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > I've been downloading podcasts to Rhythmbox for a while and have > > now > > accumulated about 88 Gbytes of them. I would like to delete the > > old > > ones, say older then 4 months, while preserving the feeds. What's > > the > > easy way to do this? A while searching the web has produced no > > help, not > > even the location of a Rhythmbox mailing list. > > There may be something usable on this thread: > > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/102752/remove-all-files-created-before-a-certain-date > Hi, In rhythmbox. * Select podcast you want to delete old file(s) from. * Like in file manager select all the files you wish to delete. [1] * Right click and select "Delete". * A dialog will appear. Select "Delete episode and File". Wash, rinse and repeat. ;-) [1] Holding down CTRL and clicking on each episode you want to delete or hold down SHIFT then click on the first podcast episode you wish to delete in a continuous group and then the last one. Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games sake. *** IRC: kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg Website: https://kathenas.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
