Re: Personal file share (Bluetooth) folder elimination howto -Permantently?

2010-05-30 Thread H. Willstrand 
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Darr  wrote:
> On Saturday, 29 May, 2010 @ 19:44 zulu, KC8LDO scribed:
>
>> I keep getting the Bluetooth file sharing folder reappearing and
>> I want to eliminate it - permanently. I'm not using Bluetooth or
>> the personal file sharing feature. I erase the folder but it always
>> seems to come back. How do I get rid of it once and for all?
>
>
> If you're not using bluetooth, did you try uninstalling whatever
> bluetooth app might be (re)creating the subdirectory?
>
> $ rpm -qa | grep blue
>
> should show you what bluetooth apps are installed. (It might also
> show some non-bluetooth items, such as the bluecurve theme, et
> al, so you could check them with
>
> $ yum info [blue-package-name]
>
> and not simply uninstall everything the rpm query turns up.)
>
> Seven 3s from another 8-lander.
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>

Alternatively disable the service (System -> Administration ->
Services -> Bluetooth)

//HW
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: selinux file permissions

2010-03-06 Thread H. Willstrand 
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Suvayu Ali  wrote:
> On 06/03/10 07:09 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>> Is there a way to be able to do a list command like ls -alt to see the
>> selinux permissions of the file.
>
> ls -Z will give the selinux contexts. I can't point you to a tutorial
> however, sorry.
>

Redhat have one here:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/Deployment_Guide-en-US/ch-selinux.html

//HW

>>
>> Greg Ennis
>>
>
>
> --
> Suvayu
>
> Open source is the future. It sets us free.
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: firefox question

2011-06-18 Thread H. Willstrand 
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:23 PM, bruce  wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Sorry this is off topic, but can't find a soln any other way.
>
> Got FF v.4 running, and I'm trying to figure out how to simply type
> something like "sdfsdfv" in the Url/Address bar, and not have FF
> append a ".com" to it!
>
> I changed the browser.URL to stop FF from using a search engine when
> "stuff" is typed in the browser...
>
> Pointers/Links would be useful.
>
>
Type about:config in the URL-bar.
Look for browser.fixup.alternate.suffix and change to your preferred domain.

//HW


> Thanks
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Brasero headache

2010-01-17 Thread H. Willstrand 
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Les  wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
>        Brasero seems to have taken over all the shortcuts on my system.  I
> don't often use the cd or dvd roms, but generally use the nautilus built
> in cd writer to create the disk images.  Now Brasero has consumed all
> the shortcuts, and I cannot get it to play nice with my DVD (it never
> has).  How do I get back to the original Nautilus default cd/dvd writer
> to create my image.  I don't seem to be able to locate it as "cd/dvd
> writer" or "dvd*".
>

System->Preferences->File management->Media
Change the settings.

//HW

> regards,
> Les H
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Multihoming confusion

2010-01-31 Thread H. Willstrand 
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:05 PM,   wrote:
> Hi every
>
> I am changing the ISP from aaa.bbb.243.160/27 to ccc.ddd.206.128/27.
> In order to provide seamless service to our customers I made the hosts
> concerned multihomed, i.e. I added them a logical interface on the new
> subnet. I did not introduce a additional NIC into the hosts.
> Then, I changed the default route on the hosts to the new network.
>
> e.g in one host concerned you will see
>
> myhost:~ # ifconfig
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:80:AD:B8:39:C3
>          inet addr:ccc.ddd.206.132  Bcast:aaa.bbb.243.191
> Mask:255.255.255.224
>          inet6 addr: fe80::80:adb8:39c3/10 Scope:Link
>          inet6 addr: fe80::280:adff:feb8:39c3/10 Scope:Link
>          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>          RX packets:2733080 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>          TX packets:2494806 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>          collisions:119322 txqueuelen:100
>          RX bytes:791914000 (755.2 Mb)  TX bytes:579375282 (552.5 Mb)
>          Interrupt:9 Base address:0xf000
>
> eth0:1    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:80:AD:B8:39:C3
>          inet addr:192.168.97.164  Bcast:192.168.97.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>          Interrupt:9 Base address:0xf000
>
> eth0:2    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:80:AD:B8:39:C3
>          inet addr:aaa.bbb.243.164  Bcast:ccc.ddd.206.159
> Mask:255.255.255.224
>          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>          Interrupt:9 Base address:0xf000
>
> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>          RX packets:372918 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>          TX packets:372918 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>          RX bytes:92340116 (88.0 Mb)  TX bytes:92340116 (88.0 Mb)
>
> myhost:~ #
>
> and
>
> myhost:~ # route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
> aaa.bbb.243.160 0.0.0.0         255.255.255.224 U     0      0        0 eth0
> ccc.ddd.206.128  0.0.0.0         255.255.255.224 U     0      0        0 eth0
> 192.168.97.0    0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
> 0.0.0.0         ccc.ddd.206.129  0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
> myhost:~ #
>
> NOTE: this multihoming  has nothing to do with additional security or
> performance.
>
> I did not install something with iproute2 or other routing enhancements.
>
> PROBLEM: the multihoming works only partially.
>
> if I invoke e.g. ping on http://iptools.com/ the ping reply does not come
> back to its origin. The echo request reaches my server, my server sends an
> echo reply, which never reaches the originator.
>
>
> myhost:~ # tcpdump -n ip proto \\icmp
> Kernel filter, protocol ALL, datagram packet socket
> tcpdump: listening on eth0
> 10:58:35.508765 74.52.9.36 > aaa.bbb.243.164: icmp: echo request (DF)
> 10:58:35.508765 aaa.bbb.243.164 > 74.52.9.36: icmp: echo reply (DF)
> 10:58:36.508765 74.52.9.36 > aaa.bbb.243.164: icmp: echo request (DF)
> 10:58:36.508765 aaa.bbb.243.164 > 74.52.9.36: icmp: echo reply (DF)
> 10:58:37.508765 74.52.9.36 > aaa.bbb.243.164: icmp: echo request (DF)
> 10:58:37.508765 aaa.bbb.243.164 > 74.52.9.36: icmp: echo reply (DF)
> 10:58:38.508765 74.52.9.36 > aaa.bbb.243.164: icmp: echo request (DF)
> 10:58:38.508765 aaa.bbb.243.164 > 74.52.9.36: icmp: echo reply (DF)
> 10:58:39.508765 74.52.9.36 > aaa.bbb.243.164: icmp: echo request (DF)
> 10:58:39.508765 aaa.bbb.243.164 > 74.52.9.36: icmp: echo reply (DF)
> ...
>
> on http://iptools.com/ :
> PING aaa.bbb.243.164 (aaa.bbb.243.164) 56(84) bytes of data.
>
> --- aaa.bbb.243.164 ping statistics ---
> 5 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 3999ms
>
>
>
> If, however, I ping the Host on the other (the new) network address from
> http://iptools.com/, the ping gets through:
>
>
> myhost:~ # tcpdump -n ip proto \\icmp
> Kernel filter, protocol ALL, datagram packet socket
> tcpdump: listening on eth0
> 11:23:04.117248 74.52.9.36 > ccc.ddd.206.132: icmp: echo request (DF)
> 11:23:04.117248 ccc.ddd.206.132 > 74.52.9.36: icmp: echo reply (DF)
> 11:23:05.117248 74.52.9.36 > ccc.ddd.206.132: icmp: echo request (DF)
> 11:23:05.117248 ccc.ddd.206.132 > 74.52.9.36: icmp: echo reply (DF)
> 11:23:06.117248 74.52.9.36 > ccc.ddd.206.132: icmp: echo request (DF)
> 11:23:06.117248 ccc.ddd.206.132 > 74.52.9.36: icmp: echo reply (DF)
> 11:23:07.117248 74.52.9.36 > ccc.ddd.206.132: icmp: echo request (DF)
> 11:23:07.117248 ccc.ddd.206.132 > 74.52.9.36: icmp: echo reply (DF)
> 11:23:08.117248 74.52.9.36 > ccc.ddd.206.132: icmp: echo request (DF)
> 11:23:08.117248 ccc.ddd.206.132 > 74.52.9.36: icmp: echo reply (DF)
>
> on http://iptools.com/
>
> PING ccc.ddd.206.132 (ccc.ddd.206.132) 56(84) byt