itcl i686 and x86_64 conflict
I need the i686 and x86_64 versions of itcl. When I install the i686 version with yum it conflicts with the existing x86_64 version: Transaction Check Error: package itcl-3.4-6.fc12.x86_64 (which is newer than itcl-3.4-5.fc12.i686) is already installed I think the comparison is messed up since it is comparing files of different architectures which shouldn't matter since they need to co-exist, it seems to me. -gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
tftp from home dir running under xinetd
I can manually run a tftp server that allows access to files in a directory under ~ with no problem. But when I try to run the server under xinetd using the /etc/xinetd.d/tftp configuration file a "permission denied" error shows up in /var/log/message with no indication it is selinux related. But if I make selinux permissive for tftpd it then works. Is there a quick way to configure selinux to allow this type of tftp access (just read-only) w/o resorting to a "permissive" setting? Thanks, -gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: tftp from home dir running under xinetd
Marcos Ortiz wrote, On 07/04/2011 02:02 AM: > Can you show here the error in the log? > Do you have SELinux enabled in enforcing mode? > Try to do this: getsetbool -a | grep tftpd to see all boolean related to > this service. > > Regards $ getsebool -a | grep tftp tftp_anon_write --> off I have set this bool to "on" via the selinux gui and it made no difference. (Also, I am not not trying to write via tftp, just read.) This is the error I see running with in full enforcing mode and it occurs each time the remote host (a bdi2000 jtag emulator) attempts to read its configuration file using tftp from the fedora box. Jul 4 00:36:33 wally xinetd[6013]: START: tftp pid=6706 from=192.168.1.21 Jul 4 00:36:33 wally in.tftpd[6706]: /home/gene/my_dir: Permission denied Jul 4 00:36:33 wally xinetd[6013]: EXIT: tftp status=66 pid=6706 duration=0(sec) When I change just the tftpd process to "permissive" using the selinux gui it fixes the problem. Note: If I put the files read by the emulator in the "standard" location, /var/lib/tftpd, it works OK in full enforcing mode. -gene > > On 07/04/2011 12:50 AM, Gene Smith wrote: >> I can manually run a tftp server that allows access to files in a >> directory under ~ with no problem. But when I try to run the server >> under xinetd using the /etc/xinetd.d/tftp configuration file a >> "permission denied" error shows up in /var/log/message with no >> indication it is selinux related. But if I make selinux permissive for >> tftpd it then works. >> >> Is there a quick way to configure selinux to allow this type of tftp >> access (just read-only) w/o resorting to a "permissive" setting? >> >> Thanks, >> -gene >> > > -- > Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda > Software Engineer (UCI) > http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com > http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: tftp from home dir running under xinetd
Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda wrote, On 07/04/2011 01:44 PM:
> We need the /varlog/messages or the /var/log/audit/audit.log to see what
> happens on the system.
>
> CC to selinux list too
>
> Try to do this:
> 1- setenforce 0 to change to "permissive" mode
>
> 2- stop tftpd daemon:
> # service tftpd stop
Thanks, I will try all this later when I have more time. However, does
it matter that I don't have a running tftpd but only xinetd that
activates tftdp on demand?
>
> 3- unload any rules that silently deny access
> # semodule -DB
>
> 4- check the time:
> # date
>
> 5- start the tftpd service:
> # service tftpd start
>
> 6- Then, collect all the Access Vector Cache (ACV) denials that occured since
> you noted the system time. For example
>
> # ausearch -m avc -ts 15:00
>
> 7- Filter the log and try to generate a policy module using audit2allow:
> # grep "tftpd" /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M tftpd
>
> 8- Check the tftpd.{te,.fc} files, and if you have enough with it, you can
> install the policy module:
>
># semodule -i tftpd.pp
>
> 9- Then, check if the avc denials persists
>
> Regards
>
>
> - Mensaje original -
> De: "Gene Smith"
> Para: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Enviados: Lunes, 4 de Julio 2011 18:11:51 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlín /
> Berna / Roma / Estocolmo / Viena
> Asunto: Re: tftp from home dir running under xinetd
>
> Marcos Ortiz wrote, On 07/04/2011 02:02 AM:
>> Can you show here the error in the log?
>> Do you have SELinux enabled in enforcing mode?
>> Try to do this: getsetbool -a | grep tftpd to see all boolean related to
>> this service.
>>
>> Regards
>
> $ getsebool -a | grep tftp
> tftp_anon_write --> off
>
> I have set this bool to "on" via the selinux gui and it made no
> difference. (Also, I am not not trying to write via tftp, just read.)
>
> This is the error I see running with in full enforcing mode and it
> occurs each time the remote host (a bdi2000 jtag emulator) attempts to
> read its configuration file using tftp from the fedora box.
>
> Jul 4 00:36:33 wally xinetd[6013]: START: tftp pid=6706 from=192.168.1.21
> Jul 4 00:36:33 wally in.tftpd[6706]: /home/gene/my_dir: Permission denied
> Jul 4 00:36:33 wally xinetd[6013]: EXIT: tftp status=66 pid=6706
> duration=0(sec)
>
> When I change just the tftpd process to "permissive" using the selinux
> gui it fixes the problem.
>
> Note: If I put the files read by the emulator in the "standard"
> location, /var/lib/tftpd, it works OK in full enforcing mode.
>
> -gene
>
>>
>> On 07/04/2011 12:50 AM, Gene Smith wrote:
>>> I can manually run a tftp server that allows access to files in a
>>> directory under ~ with no problem. But when I try to run the server
>>> under xinetd using the /etc/xinetd.d/tftp configuration file a
>>> "permission denied" error shows up in /var/log/message with no
>>> indication it is selinux related. But if I make selinux permissive for
>>> tftpd it then works.
>>>
>>> Is there a quick way to configure selinux to allow this type of tftp
>>> access (just read-only) w/o resorting to a "permissive" setting?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -gene
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda
>>Software Engineer (UCI)
>>http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com
>>http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186
>>
>
>
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: tftp from home dir running under xinetd
Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda wrote, On 07/04/2011 01:57 PM:
> For that reason, you have to see the avc denials; where you can check which
> is the process and system calls that are been denied (xinetd or tftpd)
>
> Which is the SELinux policy version in your machine?
> Regards
> - Mensaje original -
> De: "Gene Smith"
> Para: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> CC: seli...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Enviados: Lunes, 4 de Julio 2011 19:49:37 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlín /
> Berna / Roma / Estocolmo / Viena
> Asunto: Re: tftp from home dir running under xinetd
>
> Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda wrote, On 07/04/2011 01:44 PM:
>> We need the /varlog/messages or the /var/log/audit/audit.log to see what
>> happens on the system.
>>
>> CC to selinux list too
>>
>> Try to do this:
>> 1- setenforce 0 to change to "permissive" mode
>>
>> 2- stop tftpd daemon:
>> # service tftpd stop
>
> Thanks, I will try all this later when I have more time. However, does
> it matter that I don't have a running tftpd but only xinetd that
> activates tftdp on demand?
I'll answer this myself: tftpd may or may not be running since xinetd
keeps it running for a minimum of 900 sec by default.
>
>>
>> 3- unload any rules that silently deny access
>> # semodule -DB
>>
>> 4- check the time:
>> # date
>>
>> 5- start the tftpd service:
>> # service tftpd start
Actually, here I just run "tftp localhost" and do "get" command to
retrieve a file. This causes inetd to run the tftpd for a minimum of 900
second time period. The files in my ~ area is now accessible with tftp.
>>
>> 6- Then, collect all the Access Vector Cache (ACV) denials that occured
>> since you noted the system time. For example
>>
>> # ausearch -m avc -ts 15:00
This seems to just show the log with timestamps. The raw log text seems
to have unreadable timestamps.
>>
>> 7- Filter the log and try to generate a policy module using audit2allow:
>> # grep "tftpd" /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M tftpd
>>
>> 8- Check the tftpd.{te,.fc} files, and if you have enough with it, you can
>> install the policy module:
>>
>> # semodule -i tftpd.pp
>>
>> 9- Then, check if the avc denials persists
>>
>> Regards
>>
Thanks! This procedure fixed the problem. Actually, I think I did
something similar to this as directed by the gui "troubleshooter" but it
didn't seem to work or else I just did something wrong. (One other note:
all commands above have to be run as root or use sudo.) Also, checked to
make sure the new "policy" survives a reboot and it does.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
No wireless (waiting for authorization) after awake from suspend
F15 on new HP dv7-6195 (i7/sandy bridge) cannot regain wireless connection after awake from suspend. In KDE, I see notification "waiting for authorization" and then a "key" icon appears over the wireless icon in tray. In gnome, a dialog pops up with my wireless key (correctly filled in) for me to confirm. After confirming, it keeps popping back up every 30 seconds or so. Never asks for my password, just wireless key. It is set to be stored in encrypted file. Wired ethernet connection works fine before and after suspend and wireless works fine only before suspend. I have tried rmmod / modprobe to remove / add back the wireless driver. Also, set selinux to permissive thinking it might be that type of problem. Only reboot, so far, brings wireless back. Any ideas? -gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: No wireless (waiting for authorization) after awake from suspend
Gene Smith wrote, On 09/05/2011 11:08 PM: > F15 on new HP dv7-6195 (i7/sandy bridge) cannot regain wireless > connection after awake from suspend. In KDE, I see notification "waiting > for authorization" and then a "key" icon appears over the wireless icon > in tray. In gnome, a dialog pops up with my wireless key (correctly > filled in) for me to confirm. After confirming, it keeps popping back up > every 30 seconds or so. Never asks for my password, just wireless key. > It is set to be stored in encrypted file. > > Wired ethernet connection works fine before and after suspend and > wireless works fine only before suspend. > > I have tried rmmod / modprobe to remove / add back the wireless driver. > Also, set selinux to permissive thinking it might be that type of problem. > > Only reboot, so far, brings wireless back. > > Any ideas? > > -gene > Added to this bug report which sounds very similar to what I see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735633 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
fetchmail [FAILED] need more info
When I start service fetchmail all I see if [FAILED] in the startup messages. I see nothing in the log messages, syslog or dmesg. Is there a way to get more info on this? I can manually start my fetchmail using "service fetchmail start" after system is up and running and it works fine. -gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: fetchmail [FAILED] need more info
Clint Dilks wrote, On 01/10/2010 08:36 PM: > Gene Smith wrote: >> When I start service fetchmail all I see if [FAILED] in the startup >> messages. I see nothing in the log messages, syslog or dmesg. Is there a >> way to get more info on this? >> >> I can manually start my fetchmail using "service fetchmail start" after >> system is up and running and it works fine. >> >> -gene >> >> > Hi in this case its most probably the timing of when fetchmail is trying > to start. So first check the obvious is fetchmail trying to start > before Networking is up for example. You can modify when the service is > starting by modifying the chkconfig line in your init script. > > Eg > chkconfig: 35 99 95 means start in runlevels 3 and 5 S99 and K95 > > Yes, I had already moved it to a priority so fetchmail started after everything else and it still fails. E.g., # chkconfig 345 96 30 was: # chkconfig 345 80 30 Tried # chkconfig 35 96 30 and also fails. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: fetchmail [FAILED] need more info [SOLVED]
Gene Smith wrote, On 01/10/2010 08:26 PM: > When I start service fetchmail all I see if [FAILED] in the startup > messages. I see nothing in the log messages, syslog or dmesg. Is there a > way to get more info on this? > > I can manually start my fetchmail using "service fetchmail start" after > system is up and running and it works fine. > > -gene > Apparently a SELinux problem. Although fetchmail running as normal user it is forbidden from accessing files in user's ~ according to this bugzilla entry: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520765 . So in /etc/init.d/fetchmail script I had to run fetchmail as runcon -t unconfined_t fetchmail ... So now it starts automatically on bootup. I didn't expect this to be SELinux since I didn't see the "starfish". fetchmail init script was sending error message to dev/null and when I removed that I saw in /var/log/boot.log that there were permission problem on fetchmail accessing the ~/.fetchmailrc files, which didn't make sense since fetchmail runs as user. This same script worked fine circa fc3 or 4. -gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
vbetool at 100% after un-suspend from RAM
When I suspend to ram and power back on "vbetool" is running at 100% on one CPU of 3 and it continues running indefinitely. Killing it destroys the display. This is not a laptop but an ATI based motherboard. Subsequent logout or suspend cause a reboot. I am running with kernel param "nomodeset" as generally required for ATI video. This happens with kde (w/ and wo/ powerdevil) and gnome. -gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Extremely slow LXR indexing with mysql after last update
Don't see any errors but indexing a fairly large set of LXR versions of various programs with genxref program now taking extreme time. Previously only took a few minutes to zip though lots of projects/versions. See alternating 100% cpu on cores and what looks like constant disk usage and processing now just crawls. Still on 1st project after about an hour (previously took maybe a minute per project). Top and system monitor don't show extreme processing on mysqld or genxref or any other process (except cores usages rotates and remains 100%). Recent f16 update included mysqld I think, so my guess is something has change or broken with it. No errors reported in /var/log/messages or /var/log/mysql.log -gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Amarok hangs with recursive search enabled
On Friday before applying a f16 update I was using Amarok. I don't use it often but it seemed to be working OK. Then after the upgrade, on restarting amarok, it asked my location (US) for Amazon store which I entered (don't remember being asked that before). Anyhow, after the upgrade, Amarok would run for a short time and then hang with lots of disk activity going on but continue play a song. After killing it I noticed a amarokcollection indexer running in the background which I also killed. After starting it a back a few more times with the same result (Amarok hangs with the collection program running hard) I found that I had to disable recursive directory searches to prevent this in Amarok preferences. I think maybe amarok uses mysql but not sure. After this same upgrade that I applied on Friday, indexing a large LXR database with mysql took a *very* long time, as I mentioned in an previous post. Both of these problems seems to start after the Friday update that included a mysql update and possibly an amarok upgrade too. (LXR is a add-on sourceforge program that consists of perl scripts and is not part of Fedora.) -gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Amarok hangs with recursive search enabled
On 02/05/2012 05:41 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:20:39 -0500, GS (Gene) wrote: I think maybe amarok uses mysql but not sure. After this same upgrade that I applied on Friday, indexing a large LXR database with mysql took a *very* long time, as I mentioned in an previous post. Both of these problems seems to start after the Friday update that included a mysql update Which version-release is it? Please don't let readers guess. Currently installed versions: mysql-5.5.19-1.fc16.x86_64 mysql-embedded-5.5.19-1.fc16.x86_64 <--amarok uses this by default amarok-2.5.0-1.fc16.x86_64 Well, maybe I accused/spoke too soon. It appears, based on contents of /var/log/yum.log that these versions, which are currently installed, have been on f16 from the beginning (amarok) or updated early Jan (mysql). So whatever is causing my LXR and/or amarok slowness/lockup is not due to new versions of these. and possibly an amarok upgrade too. (LXR is a add-on sourceforge program that consists of perl scripts and is not part of Fedora.) https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/mysql By now, all Fedora users ought to have heard about the Fedora Updates System. Use it frequently. Comment on Test Updates early. Can you reproduce with the current Test Update for MySQL? I've used the testing repos in the past but prefer to usually just stay with stable. There are also convenient web page such as: http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/amarok http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/mysql You can skim over those pages to search for existing issues and use the convenience link to report problems. None of these seems to relate to the problem(s) I see. Thanks. Tried to revert back to previous update before Fri. using yum history rollback xxx but errors earlier this week with "libvpx" caused it to fail and --skip-broken didn't help. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
yumbackend.py running every few minutes...?
Since today's f16 update, yumBackend.py seem to being running 100% cpu every few minutes. I think this also happened a few months ago but got OK but now it seems to be back. OK, here's where it's described: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752564 I had set my kde apper check for update interval to "weekly" and that "fixed" it. But now it doesn't care and just does the check every 5 minutes regardless. -gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
yum update fails - python 2.6 -> 2.7
Apparently, some items still want python 2.6 instead of new python 2.7. From today's failed yum update: Running Transaction Check ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve: python(abi) = 2.6 is needed by (installed) alchemist-1.0.37-8.fc12.x86_64 python(abi) = 2.6 is needed by (installed) system-config-display-2.2-1.fc12.x86_64 python-abi = 2.6 is needed by (installed) alchemist-1.0.37-8.fc12.x86_64 python(abi) = 2.6 is needed by (installed) alchemist-1.0.37-8.fc12.x86_64 python(abi) = 2.6 is needed by (installed) system-config-display-2.2-1.fc12.x86_64 python-abi = 2.6 is needed by (installed) alchemist-1.0.37-8.fc12.x86_64 -gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: yum update fails - python 2.6 -> 2.7
Ed Greshko wrote, On 05/08/2012 12:41 AM: On 05/08/2012 12:24 PM, Gene Smith wrote: Apparently, some items still want python 2.6 instead of new python 2.7. From today's failed yum update: Running Transaction Check ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve: python(abi) = 2.6 is needed by (installed) alchemist-1.0.37-8.fc12.x86_64 python(abi) = 2.6 is needed by (installed) system-config-display-2.2-1.fc12.x86_64 python-abi = 2.6 is needed by (installed) alchemist-1.0.37-8.fc12.x86_64 python(abi) = 2.6 is needed by (installed) alchemist-1.0.37-8.fc12.x86_64 python(abi) = 2.6 is needed by (installed) system-config-display-2.2-1.fc12.x86_64 python-abi = 2.6 is needed by (installed) alchemist-1.0.37-8.fc12.x86_64 -gene What version of Fedora are you running? Those packages appear to be from F12? Running f16. Didn't notice these were marked as fc12. Obviously stuff hanging around from previous upgrade. Removing them fixes the problem. Thanks! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: No wireless (waiting for authorization) after awake from suspend
On 09/05/2011 11:08 PM, Gene Smith wrote: F15 on new HP dv7-6195 (i7/sandy bridge) cannot regain wireless connection after awake from suspend. In KDE, I see notification "waiting for authorization" and then a "key" icon appears over the wireless icon in tray. In gnome, a dialog pops up with my wireless key (correctly filled in) for me to confirm. After confirming, it keeps popping back up every 30 seconds or so. Never asks for my password, just wireless key. It is set to be stored in encrypted file. Wired ethernet connection works fine before and after suspend and wireless works fine only before suspend. I have tried rmmod / modprobe to remove / add back the wireless driver. Also, set selinux to permissive thinking it might be that type of problem. Only reboot, so far, brings wireless back. Any ideas? -gene Same problem on f16 (and ubuntu latest). However, this fix works for me: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/12/256 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Replace libreoffice with openoffice rpms
I have had a problem with libreoffice properly rendering graphics in documents (vertical and hoizontal lines do not display). Never had this problem with OO.org in <=f14. Therefore I removed libreoffice and installed OO from rpms from OO.org site. I am now able to read the documents OK. However, after a while an update for package libreoffice-ure appears that won't install. It conflicts with openoffice.org-ure for reasons that are beyond me. This is with Libreoffice completely removed. I tried reinstalling libreoffice but it requires that OO be removed. I then removed OO and re-installed libreoffice and tried to re-install OO and it indicates conflicts regarding the operoffice.org-ure package also. So OO.org and libreOffice can't coexist. Therefore, I need to go back to just OO.org. Is there a way to cause f16 to not try to update libreoffice-ure when libreO is removed and replaced with OO? -gene -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Replace libreoffice with openoffice rpms
On 12/15/2011 10:49 PM, Craig White wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 22:42 -0500, Gene Smith wrote: I have had a problem with libreoffice properly rendering graphics in documents (vertical and hoizontal lines do not display). Never had this problem with OO.org in<=f14. Therefore I removed libreoffice and installed OO from rpms from OO.org site. I am now able to read the documents OK. However, after a while an update for package libreoffice-ure appears that won't install. It conflicts with openoffice.org-ure for reasons that are beyond me. This is with Libreoffice completely removed. I tried reinstalling libreoffice but it requires that OO be removed. I then removed OO and re-installed libreoffice and tried to re-install OO and it indicates conflicts regarding the operoffice.org-ure package also. So OO.org and libreOffice can't coexist. Therefore, I need to go back to just OO.org. Is there a way to cause f16 to not try to update libreoffice-ure when libreO is removed and replaced with OO? does anything show up when you execute... rpm -q --whatrequires libreoffice-ure This is with only OO installed: [gene@hplt ~]$ rpm -q --whatrequires libreoffice-ure no package requires libreoffice-ure [gene@hplt ~]$ rpm -q --whatrequires openoffice.org-ure ooobasis3.3-core01-3.3.0-9567.x86_64 openoffice.org3-3.3.0-9567.x86_64 openoffice.org3-dict-en-3.3.0-9567.x86_64 openoffice.org3-dict-fr-3.3.0-9567.x86_64 openoffice.org3-dict-es-3.3.0-9567.x86_64 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Replace libreoffice with openoffice rpms
On 12/15/2011 10:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 16.12.2011 04:42, schrieb Gene Smith: Therefore, I need to go back to just OO.org. Is there a way to cause f16 to not try to update libreoffice-ure when libreO is removed and replaced with OO? [root@buildserver:~]$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo [fedora] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/$releasever/Everything/$basearch/os/ mirrorlist=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-$releasever&arch=$basearch enabled=1 metadata_expire=1d gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$basearch exclude=dbmail*,php,php-cli,httpd,mysql,mysql-server,postfix*,dovecot*,mod_security,php-suhosin,php-pecl*,apr,apr-devel,GeoIP*,gmime22*,lame*,ffmpeg,x264,x264-libs,x264-devel,openssl*,smokeping,vnstat,netatalk [root@buildserver:~]$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo [updates] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Updates failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/$releasever/$basearch/ mirrorlist=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-f$releasever&arch=$basearch enabled=1 metadata_expire=1d gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$basearch exclude=dbmail*,php,php-cli,httpd,mysql,mysql-server,postfix*,dovecot*,mod_security,php-suhosin,php-pecl*,apr,apr-devel,GeoIP*,gmime22*,lame*,ffmpeg,x264,x264-libs,x264-devel,openssl*,smokeping,vnstat,netatalk Added: exclude=libreoffice* fixed it. Thank! However, this seems to point to some kind of packaging problem...? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: No wireless (waiting for authorization) after awake from suspend
On 12/15/2011 12:17 AM, Gene Smith wrote: On 09/05/2011 11:08 PM, Gene Smith wrote: F15 on new HP dv7-6195 (i7/sandy bridge) cannot regain wireless connection after awake from suspend. In KDE, I see notification "waiting for authorization" and then a "key" icon appears over the wireless icon in tray. In gnome, a dialog pops up with my wireless key (correctly filled in) for me to confirm. After confirming, it keeps popping back up every 30 seconds or so. Never asks for my password, just wireless key. It is set to be stored in encrypted file. Wired ethernet connection works fine before and after suspend and wireless works fine only before suspend. I have tried rmmod / modprobe to remove / add back the wireless driver. Also, set selinux to permissive thinking it might be that type of problem. Only reboot, so far, brings wireless back. Any ideas? -gene Same problem on f16 (and ubuntu latest). However, this fix works for me: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/12/256 Unfortunately, latest kernel 3.1.6-1.fc16.x86_64, breaks it again. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
