Re: Which package to file a bug against for the Live ISO?
On 2/3/25 9:11 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 3:16 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote: I screwed up an install on a GPT system. I booted back into the LiveCD and tried to use gdisk (the GPT equivalent of fdisk). gdisk was missing from the ISO. I'd like to file a bug for the missing package, but I don't know which package is used for the Live ISO. Which package should I file a bug against for the Live ISO? I think I am going to file against Anaconda since that is the Fedora installation program. (Unless someone knows a better package). It's definitely not anaconda. The installer isn't involved with what packages are included on the live image. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Which package to file a bug against for the Live ISO?
On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 3:16 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > I screwed up an install on a GPT system. I booted back into the LiveCD > and tried to use gdisk (the GPT equivalent of fdisk). gdisk was > missing from the ISO. > > I'd like to file a bug for the missing package, but I don't know which > package is used for the Live ISO. > > Which package should I file a bug against for the Live ISO? I think I am going to file against Anaconda since that is the Fedora installation program. (Unless someone knows a better package). Jeff -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Update failure in Fedora 40
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025, 17:01 Stephen Morris wrote: > The issue with qgnomeplatform makes it look like the maintainer hasn't > bothered to produce a qt6 version, or as indicated it doesn't obsolete > the qt5 version. > QGnomePlatform is abandoned now as per the Github page, so there will likely be no updates/qt6 version coming: https://github.com/FedoraQt/QGnomePlatform One of the developers gives background here: https://jgrulich.cz/2023/08/22/qt-theming-in-fedora-workstation/ Its the same for adwaita-qt, which seems to only leave kvantum/qt6conf/qt5conf for anyone wishing for the same look across GTK/Qt apps in a GTK desktop. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
