Re: Which package to file a bug against for the Live ISO?

[Barry]

> On 2 Feb 2025, at 08:17, Jeffrey Walton  wrote:
> 
> I'd like to file a bug for the missing package, but I don't know which
> package is used for the Live ISO.

The size limit of the ISO limits what packages are included.
To add a new package will required a strong argument.

I think that parted is on the iso and you could have used that.
Also you can install packages on to the live iso at runtime as the need arises 
I believe.

Barry


-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: size of Fedora repos

[Łukasz Posadowski]

On 2025-02-02 at 10:28 +, Will McDonald wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 at 10:21, Łukasz Posadowski
> 
> wrote:
> 
> > Did anyone reposync entire Fedora x86 packages lately, with both
> > release
> > and updates? How much space do I need?
> > 
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Mirroring points to
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/DIRECTORY_SIZES.txt which indicates
> 3.6TB
> for absolutely everything.

That is about... 
cat DIRECTORY_SIZES.txt | grep '/41/' | grep 'x86_64' | grep -Ev '[0-
9]K' | cut -d$'\t' -f1 | grep -Ev 'M$' | cut -d'G' -f1 | awk
'{gigabytes+=$1} END {print gigabytes}'
... below 2,5T for sure. (-: 

-- 
Łukasz Posadowski


-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

size of Fedora repos

[Łukasz Posadowski]

Hi.

Did anyone reposync entire Fedora x86 packages lately, with both release
and updates? How much space do I need? 

For anyone curious, CentOS9+epel+epelnext+modules+crb is 205 gigabytes
and growing slowly.

thanks
-- 
Łukasz Posadowski


-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Which package to file a bug against for the Live ISO?

[Jeffrey Walton]

Hi Everyone,

I screwed up an install on a GPT system. I booted back into the LiveCD
and tried to use gdisk (the GPT equivalent of fdisk). gdisk was
missing from the ISO.

I'd like to file a bug for the missing package, but I don't know which
package is used for the Live ISO.

Which package should I file a bug against for the Live ISO?

Thanks in advance.
-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Which package to file a bug against for the Live ISO?

[Jeffrey Walton]

On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 4:20 AM Barry  wrote:
>
> > On 2 Feb 2025, at 08:17, Jeffrey Walton  wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to file a bug for the missing package, but I don't know which
> > package is used for the Live ISO.
>
> The size limit of the ISO limits what packages are included.
> To add a new package will required a strong argument.

I may be mistaken, but I don't believe the CD size limits are a factor
anymore, assuming you are referring to the roughly 650 MB size limit.
The latest x86_64 Live ISO image is 2.29 GB. See
.

Or are you saying a new limit was hit around 2.2 GB?

> I think that parted is on the iso and you could have used that.
> Also you can install packages on to the live iso at runtime as the need 
> arises I believe.

Jeff
-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: DNF Upgrade Error Messages

[Jeffrey Walton]

On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 5:41 PM Stephen Morris  wrote:
>
> I did a dnf upgrade this morning and received the following messages. 
> Where do I look to determine what the errors are talking about?

`journalctl -f` will probably do the trick.

> >>> Running trigger-install scriptlet: systemd-0:256.11-1.fc41.x86_64
> >>> Finished trigger-install scriptlet: systemd-0:256.11-1.fc41.x86_64
> >>> Scriptlet output:
> >>> Failed to start jobs: Failed to enqueue some jobs, see logs for details: 
> >>> Invalid argument
> >>>
> >>> Running trigger-post-uninstall scriptlet: systemd-0:256.11-1.fc41.x86_64
> >>> Finished trigger-post-uninstall scriptlet: systemd-0:256.11-1.fc41.x86_64
> >>> Scriptlet output:
> >>> Failed to start jobs: Failed to enqueue some jobs, see logs for details: 
> >>> Invalid argument

This may be related:
.

Jeff
-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Update failure in Fedora 40

[Samuel Sieb]

On 2/2/25 2:16 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:

On 28/1/25 09:18, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Tue, 2025-01-28 at 08:47 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
IMHO dnfdragora is compulsory if you are looking for all available 
packages that provide certain functionality.

I've no idea what that means. 'dnf search' and 'dnf info' have always
been good enough for me.
It might be my lack of understanding of how they work, but I have never 
been able to get them to find packages based on the contents of the 
description.


"man dnf-search"

DESCRIPTION
   The search command in DNF5 is used for searching packages by 
matching given keywords from the user against various metadata.


   By default the command searches for all requested keys (AND 
operation) in Name or Summary fields from the RPM package metadata. 
Matching is case-insensitive and globs are supported.


OPTIONS
   --all
  Search patterns also inside Description and URL fields.
  By applying this option the search lists packages that 
match at least one of the keys (OR operation).


--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Update failure in Fedora 40

[Stephen Morris]

On 28/1/25 09:18, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Tue, 2025-01-28 at 08:47 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:

IMHO dnfdragora is compulsory if you are looking for all available packages 
that provide certain functionality.

I've no idea what that means. 'dnf search' and 'dnf info' have always
been good enough for me.
It might be my lack of understanding of how they work, but I have never 
been able to get them to find packages based on the contents of the 
description.


regards,
Steve



poc




OpenPGP_0x1EBE7C07B0F7242C.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

DNF Upgrade Error Messages

[Stephen Morris]

Hi,
    I did a dnf upgrade this morning and received the following 
messages. Where do I look to determine what the errors are talking about?



Running trigger-install scriptlet: systemd-0:256.11-1.fc41.x86_64
Finished trigger-install scriptlet: systemd-0:256.11-1.fc41.x86_64
Scriptlet output:
Failed to start jobs: Failed to enqueue some jobs, see logs for 

details: Invalid argument


Running trigger-post-uninstall scriptlet: systemd-0:256.11-1.fc41.x86_64
Finished trigger-post-uninstall scriptlet: systemd-0:256.11-1.fc41.x86_64
Scriptlet output:
Failed to start jobs: Failed to enqueue some jobs, see logs for 

details: Invalid argument



regards,
Steve



OpenPGP_0x1EBE7C07B0F7242C.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Does Red Hat have any plans for Win 10 EOL ?

[Stephen Morris]

On 28/1/25 09:19, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Tue, 2025-01-28 at 09:13 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:

I don't play any games with anti-cheat systems. AFAIK these are all
multi-player, which doesn't interest me. The Windows anti-cheat systems
require kernel-level modifications, so it's hardly surprising that they
don't work on Linux.

True, but when the files that are documented to run to fix issues with
that system under Windows don't exist under linux, it seems that steam
has done a different install under linux, so I would have expected that
it would have installed linux compatible versions of the files, but that
doesn't seem to have happened.

What files are you talking about?
It looks like the documentation I read on how to fix the EasyAntiCheat 
issue was either rubbish or old as the .bat file the documentation was 
saying to run doesn't exist in the Windows Game installation either.


regards,
Steve



poc




OpenPGP_0x1EBE7C07B0F7242C.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: size of Fedora repos

[Will McDonald]

On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 at 10:21, Łukasz Posadowski 
wrote:

> Did anyone reposync entire Fedora x86 packages lately, with both release
> and updates? How much space do I need?
>

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Mirroring points to
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/DIRECTORY_SIZES.txt which indicates 3.6TB
for absolutely everything.
-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Which package to file a bug against for the Live ISO?

[Barry]

> On 2 Feb 2025, at 09:38, Jeffrey Walton  wrote:
> 
> Or are you saying a new limit was hit around 2.2 GB?

I am not sure of the exact limit that fedora developers work too.
But if you look in the devel mailing list archive you will find discussions 
about exceeding the limit and what will have to be done to fix it.

Barry


-- 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue