Re: Trying to get drupal running

[Tim via users]

On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 07:37 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> One thing that’ll interfere is that the httpd process might not have
> permission to read the files, and that you need to add the right UNIX
> groups to the files and directories. 

Just to add:  The right permission should be owned by the author, world
readable, and only readable (the webserver serves the files reading as
the everyone-else).  You don't want them owned by root or the server
user, nor writable by the server.
 
-- 
 
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.118.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Apr 24 16:01:50 UTC 2024 x86_64
 
Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
 
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: 2 installations on the same PC - Add partition in Ftab

[Tim via users]

Mike Wright wrote:
>> The mount point doesn't exist.  Create it:
>>
>>mkdir -p /run/media/soles_40/desde_fedora_37

Samuel Sieb:
> /run is a tmpfs area.  That mount point will only persist until the next 
> reboot.  It would be better to make a mount point somewhere permanent.


Also, isn't /run/media// where auto-mounting
occurs?

You can get clashes if *you* manually do things where auto-mounting
operates.


-- 
 
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.118.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Apr 24 16:01:50 UTC 2024 x86_64
 
Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
 
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: 2 installations on the same PC - Add partition in Ftab

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/29/24 12:14 AM, Tim via users wrote:

Mike Wright wrote:

The mount point doesn't exist.  Create it:

mkdir -p /run/media/soles_40/desde_fedora_37


Samuel Sieb:

/run is a tmpfs area.  That mount point will only persist until the next
reboot.  It would be better to make a mount point somewhere permanent.



Also, isn't /run/media// where auto-mounting
occurs?

You can get clashes if *you* manually do things where auto-mounting
operates.


Yes, that too.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

size of fedora 40 live

[Patrick Dupre via users]

Hello,

Could somebody tell the size of the iso image of fedora 40 workstation live?
I need to known before download.

Thanks

===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
===
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: size of fedora 40 live

[Jeffrey Walton]

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 4:27 AM Patrick Dupre via users
 wrote:
>
> Could somebody tell the size of the iso image of fedora 40 workstation live?
> I need to known before download.

The amd64 image is 2295853056 bytes.

You can use a browser's Developer Tools to look at the Content-Length
of the response.

Jeff
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: size of fedora 40 live

[George N. White III]

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 5:54 AM Jeffrey Walton  wrote:

> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 4:27 AM Patrick Dupre via users
>  wrote:
> >
> > Could somebody tell the size of the iso image of fedora 40 workstation
> live?
> > I need to known before download.
>
> The amd64 image is 2295853056 bytes.
>
> You can use a browser's Developer Tools to look at the Content-Length
> of the response.
>

Or just copy+paste the link and remove the filename:
 <
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/40/Workstation/x86_64/iso
>
This gets you to a mirror site (each with slightly different formats).

-- 
George N. White III
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: 2 installations on the same PC - Add partition in Ftab

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Wed, 2024-05-29 at 01:24 -0300, soles.g wrote:
> Así se monta cuando lo monto desde Dolphin
> 
> This is how it is set up when I mount it from Dolphin
> 
> > soles_40@garibaldina-40:/run/media/soles_40/desde_fedora_37$
> 
> porque desde la terminal no me deja de ninguna manera:
> 
> because from the terminal it won't let me in any way:
> 
> soles_40@garibaldina-40:~$ sudo mount -n /dev/sda7 
> /run/media/soles_40/desde_fedora_37
> mount: /run/media/soles_40/desde_fedora_37: mount point does not
> exist.
>    dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system
> call.

As others have said, Dolphin is using a temporary mount point (under
/run/media, which is used for removable media). To mount the drive
permanently you should create a permanent mount point somewhere else,
e.g. as /Fedora47, and put that in /etc/fstab.

   Como dicen otras respuestas, Dolphin está creando un punto de
   montaje temporal bajo /run/media (esto lo hace para los medios
   removibles). Para montarlo en forma permanente, es mejor crear un
   punto de montaje en otro sitio, por ejemplo como /Fedora47, y poner
   eso en /etc/fstab.
   
poc
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: size of fedora 40 live

[Andre Robatino]

The corresponding checksum file now has a line giving the size in bytes, just 
before the line with the corresponding checksum.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

SOLVED MOUNT :-) - Re: 2 installations on the same PC - Add partition in Ftab

[soles.g]

El 29/5/24 a las 02:23, Samuel Sieb escribió:

On 5/28/24 9:50 PM, Mike Wright wrote:

The mount point doesn't exist.  Create it:

    mkdir -p /run/media/soles_40/desde_fedora_37


/run is a tmpfs area.  That mount point will only persist until the 
next reboot.  It would be better to make a mount point somewhere 
permanent.



Magic...!!! :-)

I create the mount point in /mnt
mkdir -p /mnt/soles_40/from_fedora_37

then I mount sda7
sudo mount -n /dev/sda7 /mnt/soles_40/from_fedora_37

and /sda7 appears mounted!!! :-)

Thank you to everyone who participated...!!!

Later I will try to write it in fstab...

And more more... go ahead... I told you about my failure with 
"efibootmanager"




¡¡¡Magia...!!! :-)

Creo el punto d montaje en /mnt
mkdir -p /mnt/soles_40/desde_fedora_37

entonces monto sda7
sudo mount -n /dev/sda7 /mnt/soles_40/desde_fedora_37

¡y aparece /sda7 montado!!!

¡¡¡Gracias a todos los que intervinieron...!!!

Mas adelante intentaré escribirlo en fstab...

Y mas mas... adelante... les coment mi fracaso con «efibootmanager»


claudia
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

[Sam Varshavchik]

I updated from F39 to F40. I used to have:

/etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf

Everything got messed up because the update hijacked this symlink again:

lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 39 May 29 09:44 /etc/resolv.conf -> 
../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf

I was confident that F39 did not have systemd-resolved installed, it must've  
been pulled into the update.


I repeated the experiment on two other F39 systems today. I confirmed that  
neither one of them had systemd-resolved installed. F40 pulled it in, and  
the package's scriptlet clobbered /etc/resolv.conf


It would be real nice if someone finally STOPed this repeated hijacking of  
/etc/resolv.conf, and breaking network connectivity, is this too much to ask? 
Although this was fairly simple to fix, this kind of behavior does not  
improve systemd's existing reputation.




pgpNj592SQD4W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: vdagent drag and drop question

[ToddAndMargo via users]

On 5/21/24 17:54, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

Hi All,

Host:
    Fedora 39
    $ rpm -qa spice\*
    spice-server-0.15.1-3.fc39.x86_64
    spice-glib-0.42-3.fc39.x86_64
    spice-gtk3-0.42-3.fc39.x86_64
    spice-vdagent-0.22.1-6.fc39.x86_64

VM:
    Windows 11 23H2
    Virtio-win-driver-installer 0.1.240
    Virtio-win-guest-tools  0.1.240

I can drag and drop a file from my Linux host to a
qemu-kvm Windows 11 virtual machine but I can not
do it in reverse

What am I doing wrong, this time?

-T


The word back from Spice Dev is:

  From Guest to Client, drag-and-drop does
  not work.  From Client to Guest, it should.
  The data of the file is copied by the client
  (e.g: spice-gtk) and provided to the guest
  agent which creates the file with the
  contents.

And is you want directory sharing, use virtiofs
  https://libvirt.org/kbase/virtiofs.html

I am working on getting virtiofs going.  Be
nice to get away from always having to use Samba.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

[Jeffrey Walton]

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 6:55 PM Sam Varshavchik  wrote:
>
> I updated from F39 to F40. I used to have:
>
> /etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf
>
> Everything got messed up because the update hijacked this symlink again:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 39 May 29 09:44 /etc/resolv.conf -> 
> ../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf
>
> I was confident that F39 did not have systemd-resolved installed, it must've
> been pulled into the update.
>
> I repeated the experiment on two other F39 systems today. I confirmed that
> neither one of them had systemd-resolved installed. F40 pulled it in, and
> the package's scriptlet clobbered /etc/resolv.conf
>
> It would be real nice if someone finally STOPed this repeated hijacking of
> /etc/resolv.conf, and breaking network connectivity, is this too much to ask?
> Although this was fairly simple to fix, this kind of behavior does not
> improve systemd's existing reputation.

It sounds like something for .

Jeff
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Can Fedora REPLACE Android on Smart Phones?

[Philip Rhoades via users]

People,

I have messed around with Android ROMs in the past - mostly for fun - 
now I would like Fedora running on my old Pixel2XL, which is currently 
running the last available Lineage ROM available for it.


I have been experimenting with proot and chroot - but these things just 
create Fedora containers - has anyone installed Fedora as the host OS on 
phones other than Pine64|Pinephone|Pine64 PinePhone Pro|Pine64 Pinetab 
(1 and 2)|Purism Librem 5|Oneplus 6 ?


Thanks,

Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades

PO Box 896
Cowra  NSW  2794
Australia
E-mail:  p...@pricom.com.au
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue