OT: this Ubuntu wear the last Facebook in addition this is from a backup but unfortunately Ubuntu happens error disk.c:258:no such partition. Entering rescue mode fornulately two storages from three s

2023-02-05 Thread Dorian ROSSE
Hello everybody,


OT: this Ubuntu wear the last Facebook in addition this is from a backup but 
unfortunately Ubuntu happens error disk.c:258:no such partition. Entering 
rescue mode fornulately two storages from three storage is able to run in the 
mode RAID thus I think happen this error for be able to use the third storage 
too in the mode RAID so I was read on this list e-mail meta the enterprise 
behind Facebook... Messenger... E.g. use fedora although for whole the disks i 
have set up the same space of storage (/ and /home) I can't do the same for the 
swap however this time whole the server with the modem e.g are behind a UPC 
finally I wait yours works for repair my Ubuntu.

Thanks you in advance for your work,

Regards.


Dorian Rosse.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Adobe Acrobat Can't Find the pdf File When Trying to Display an Email Attachment in Thunderbird Daily

2023-02-05 Thread stan via users
On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 11:26:03 +1100
Stephen Morris  wrote:

> Hi,
>      I have Adobe Acrobat Reader DC installed in F37 via Snap. When I 
> click on a pdf attachment in Thunderbird Daily I get a prompt asking
> if I want to view it in the Ocular default or save the attachment. If
> I click "OK" to display it in Ocular it displays fine.
>      When I click on the Drop Down in the prompt and select "Other"
> to display the pdf in something other than Ocular I am not shown
> Acrobat in the list, but if I look at "KDE System
> Settings->Applications->File Associations->application->pdf" Adobe
> Acrobat is shown as the third entry in the list of applications. If I
> move Adobe Acrobat to the top then the prompt from Thunderbird shows
> Adobe Acrobat as the default as expected.
>      With the prompt now asking if I want to view the pdf in Acrobat,
> if I click on "OK" Acrobat is launched but produced the error "There
> was an error opening this document. This file cannot be found".  If I
> edit the pdf association entry for Acrobat and add "%U" into the
> empty Arguments text box, in the same way it is specified for the
> Ocular entry, Acrobat still produces the error message that it can't
> find the file. Has the snap process not installed Acrobat correctly,
> or is the file argument for Acrobat not "%U", or is there something
> else at play here?

This seems like it is more a question that should be asked of snap or
adobe.  Unless someone else has this snap installed, and it is working
for them, or snap in general is failing on fedora.  I don't use snap
so I don't know.  Is there any way to get more debugging information?
Like, what is the filename it is looking for?  Is it looking in the
wrong place? Maybe it is nelinux context missing. Have you tried
running with selinux in permissive mode?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?

2023-02-05 Thread stan via users
On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:42:28 -0500
Jeffrey Walton  wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 11:33 PM Tim 
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2023-02-04 at 13:55 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:  
> > > I think the use of multiple excludepkgs is intuitive. Each time
> > > you want to pin a package, you add an excludepkgs.  
> >
> > I don't.  It flies in the face of many other configuration files
> > that I've adjusted.  If I do something like the following in one
> > file:  
> 
> I hope multiple configuration files in config.d/ directories don't
> offend your delicate sensibilities.

That isn't the same thing.  Config.d directories are designated as
places where multiple configuration files are placed.  Tim is talking
about historical convention for a single configuration file.

And the way you phrased your response comes across as sarcastic and
demeaning, almost as a personal attack.  Maybe you didn't mean it that
way, but that's how I would interpret it.  You could have said something
like,
"What about multiple configuration files in config.d directories?
Doesn't that contradict what you are saying?"
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?

2023-02-05 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 11:08 AM stan  wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:42:28 -0500
> Jeffrey Walton  wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 11:33 PM Tim 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2023-02-04 at 13:55 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > > I think the use of multiple excludepkgs is intuitive. Each time
> > > > you want to pin a package, you add an excludepkgs.
> > >
> > > I don't.  It flies in the face of many other configuration files
> > > that I've adjusted.  If I do something like the following in one
> > > file:
> >
> > I hope multiple configuration files in config.d/ directories don't
> > offend your delicate sensibilities.
>
> That isn't the same thing.  Config.d directories are designated as
> places where multiple configuration files are placed.  Tim is talking
> about historical convention for a single configuration file.
>
> And the way you phrased your response comes across as sarcastic and
> demeaning, almost as a personal attack.  Maybe you didn't mean it that
> way, but that's how I would interpret it.  You could have said something
> like,
> "What about multiple configuration files in config.d directories?
> Doesn't that contradict what you are saying?"

No, I did.

I don't feel like engaging in another endless debate the same folks
seem to engage in on this list.

The thrust of my post was the documentation bug, not his personal
opinion of me being incorrect.

Jeff
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: OT: this Ubuntu wear the last Facebook in addition this is from a backup but unfortunately Ubuntu happens error disk.c:258:no such partition. Entering rescue mode fornulately two storages from thr

2023-02-05 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 2/5/23 07:19, Dorian ROSSE wrote:
OT: this Ubuntu wear the last Facebook in addition this is from a backup 
but unfortunately Ubuntu happens error disk.c:258:no such partition. 
Entering rescue mode fornulately two storages from three storage is able 
to run in the mode RAID thus I think happen this error for be able to 
use the third storage too in the mode RAID so I was read on this list 
e-mail meta the enterprise behind Facebook... Messenger... E.g. use 
fedora although for whole the disks i have set up the same space of 
storage (/ and /home) I can't do the same for the swap however this time 
whole the server with the modem e.g are behind a UPC finally I wait 
yours works for repair my Ubuntu.


That is basically incomprehensible...

Also, this is the Fedora mailing list.  If you want help fixing Ubuntu, 
you should go to their forums or whatever they use for support.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?

2023-02-05 Thread ToddAndMargo via users

On 2/4/23 08:59, Todd Zullinger wrote:

ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

On 2/4/23 00:39, Barry wrote:


I always understood that each tag can only appear once.


Seems I got away with it a lot


Multiple excludepkgs entries in dnf.conf don't work in f36
either.  Only the last one is used.

# rpm -q dnf
dnf-4.14.0-1.fc36.noarch
# printf 'excludepkgs=%s\n' 'wine*' 'git*' >>/etc/dnf/dnf.conf
# dnf -qq list wine | cat
Available Packages
wine.i686  8.0-1.fc36   updates
wine.x86_648.0-1.fc36   updates
# sed -i '/^excludepkgs=/d' /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
# printf 'excludepkgs=%s\n' 'git*' 'wine*' >>/etc/dnf/dnf.conf
# dnf -qq list wine
Error: No matching Packages to list
# dnf -qq list git | cat
Available Packages
git.x86_64 2.39.1-1.fc36updates

I'm not sure you got away with anything.  You may not have
noticed it wasn't working as you had hoped. :)


Oh I would have noticed instantly.  Wine 7 was
a total DISASTER and did a number on my business!

I wonder if it was a dnf update I had yet to
install.   Hm...
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?

2023-02-05 Thread ToddAndMargo via users

On 2/4/23 08:59, Todd Zullinger wrote:

Multiple excludepkgs entries in dnf.conf don't work in f36
either.  Only the last one is used.




I wonder if they are reading in dnf.conf file
with a bash script.

# Source network variables
. /etc/sysconfig/network

Would certainly over write all but the last one.


And if so, my memory of it working in
FC36 must be really bad.  On the other hand
if dnf had upgraded wine to 7 on me, I would
have know instantly and had been furious.


When I write programs (Raku), I read the whole
thing in and parse through what I want.  If
I did not realize that their were multiple
instances, then on the first one would be
be the only one read.

But, then again, I print out the .conf file
in another shell and examine what is in it
before starting coding
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?

2023-02-05 Thread Todd Zullinger
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 2/4/23 08:59, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> I'm not sure you got away with anything.  You may not have
>> noticed it wasn't working as you had hoped. :)
> 
> Oh I would have noticed instantly.
[...]
> 
> I wonder if it was a dnf update I had yet to
> install.   Hm...

The last dnf update in f36 was 5 months ago.  The one before
that was 9 months ago.  It's unlikely.

-- 
Todd


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Nvidia again..

2023-02-05 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Feb 3, 2023, at 08:53, Jeffrey Walton  wrote:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901406

Which is liked to a bug a couple years old:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896648

It appears something is causing abrt to collect info on a crash, and part of 
the process is analyzing the backtrack, which runs gdb and selinux is 
preventing it from touching /dev/nvidiactl. It looks like this isn’t limited to 
nvidia cards either. 

There’s an selinux boolean to try in the bug above, see if that helps. 

But the story behind the bug is that something *else* is crashing, the error 
you are seeing is an selinux alert generated by abrt trying to collect info 
about the program crash. 
--
Jonathan Billings___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?

2023-02-05 Thread Jonathan Billings


> On Feb 5, 2023, at 18:38, Todd Zullinger  wrote:
> 
> ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>>> On 2/4/23 08:59, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>>> I'm not sure you got away with anything.  You may not have
>>> noticed it wasn't working as you had hoped. :)
>> 
>> Oh I would have noticed instantly.
> [...]
>> 
>> I wonder if it was a dnf update I had yet to
>> install.   Hm...
> 
> The last dnf update in f36 was 5 months ago.  The one before
> that was 9 months ago.   

I poked around the source for dnf on GitHub, and I do see a commit from 2021 
which kinda backs up the multiple lines argument:

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1779

However, best I understand it was so you could append excludes in a *repo* 
file, not multiple appending lines in the main dnf.conf. 

Trying to read the code on my phone is giving me a headache so I will leave it 
up to smarter people here. 

--
Jonathan Billings

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Nvidia again..

2023-02-05 Thread Tim via users
On Sun, 2023-02-05 at 21:39 -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> But the story behind the bug is that something *else* is crashing,
> the error you are seeing is an selinux alert generated by abrt trying
> to collect info about the program crash. 

It's almost like they're trying to prove the old joke:

"A system so secure, nobody can use it"

LOL
 
-- 
 
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.83.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jan 25 16:41:43 UTC 2023 x86_64
 
Boilerplate:  All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: OT: this Ubuntu wear the last Facebook in addition this is from a backup but unfortunately Ubuntu happens error disk.c:258:no such partition. Entering rescue mode fornulately two storages from thr

2023-02-05 Thread Dorian ROSSE
Dear Samuel,


My part of backup can use Ubuntu but it cannot use fedora thus the help too is 
from fedora finally the problems is maybe just to wait the support RAID of the 
thirdly storage so if the e-mail is very aside the community fedora yes you can 
close this line of discussing,

Regards.


Dorian Rosse.

From: Samuel Sieb 
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2023 11:35:39 PM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org 
Subject: Re: OT: this Ubuntu wear the last Facebook in addition this is from a 
backup but unfortunately Ubuntu happens error disk.c:258:no such partition. 
Entering rescue mode fornulately two storages from three storage is able to run 
in the mode RAID thus I th...

On 2/5/23 07:19, Dorian ROSSE wrote:
> OT: this Ubuntu wear the last Facebook in addition this is from a backup
> but unfortunately Ubuntu happens error disk.c:258:no such partition.
> Entering rescue mode fornulately two storages from three storage is able
> to run in the mode RAID thus I think happen this error for be able to
> use the third storage too in the mode RAID so I was read on this list
> e-mail meta the enterprise behind Facebook... Messenger... E.g. use
> fedora although for whole the disks i have set up the same space of
> storage (/ and /home) I can't do the same for the swap however this time
> whole the server with the modem e.g are behind a UPC finally I wait
> yours works for repair my Ubuntu.

That is basically incomprehensible...

Also, this is the Fedora mailing list.  If you want help fixing Ubuntu,
you should go to their forums or whatever they use for support.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue