Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
On 2/3/23 21:32, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/3/23 20:10, Go Canes wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 10:11 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: This is not the way I've ever seen excludepkgs used or documented. The man page states: excludepkgs list Exclude packages of this repository, speci‐ fied by a name or a glob and separated by a comma, from all operations. Can be disabled using --disableexcludes command line switch. Defaults to []. Put them all together, not a bunch of different definitions. Note: "separated by a comma" - the commented-out lines were separated by spaces (I assume these were failed attempts). excludepkgs=wine*,resolvconf,systemd-resolved Did work. I missed what Samuel's said. This is a regression from Fedora 36. I updates the bug report. It might be a change, but it's not a regression. It's clearly documented in the man page. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
On 2/4/23 00:05, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2/3/23 21:32, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/3/23 20:10, Go Canes wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 10:11 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: This is not the way I've ever seen excludepkgs used or documented. The man page states: excludepkgs list Exclude packages of this repository, speci‐ fied by a name or a glob and separated by a comma, from all operations. Can be disabled using --disableexcludes command line switch. Defaults to []. Put them all together, not a bunch of different definitions. Note: "separated by a comma" - the commented-out lines were separated by spaces (I assume these were failed attempts). excludepkgs=wine*,resolvconf,systemd-resolved Did work. I missed what Samuel's said. This is a regression from Fedora 36. I updates the bug report. It might be a change, but it's not a regression. It's clearly documented in the man page. Where in the man page does it say you can only have one entry, so cram it all on the same line? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
> On 4 Feb 2023, at 08:33, ToddAndMargo via users > wrote: > > On 2/4/23 00:05, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>> On 2/3/23 21:32, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >>> On 2/3/23 20:10, Go Canes wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 10:11 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: > > This is not the way I've ever seen excludepkgs used or > documented. The man page states: > > excludepkgs >list > >Exclude packages of this repository, speci‐ >fied by a name or a glob and separated by a >comma, from all operations. Can be disabled >using --disableexcludes command line switch. >Defaults to []. > > Put them all together, not a bunch of different definitions. Note: "separated by a comma" - the commented-out lines were separated by spaces (I assume these were failed attempts). >>> >>> excludepkgs=wine*,resolvconf,systemd-resolved >>> >>> Did work. I missed what Samuel's said. >>> >>> This is a regression from Fedora 36. I updates >>> the bug report. >> It might be a change, but it's not a regression. It's clearly documented in >> the man page. > > Where in the man page does it say you can > only have one entry, so cram it all on > the same line? Where does it say you can repeat lines? I always understood that each tag can only appear once. > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
On 2/4/23 00:39, Barry wrote: On 4 Feb 2023, at 08:33, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/4/23 00:05, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2/3/23 21:32, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/3/23 20:10, Go Canes wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 10:11 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: This is not the way I've ever seen excludepkgs used or documented. The man page states: excludepkgs list Exclude packages of this repository, speci‐ fied by a name or a glob and separated by a comma, from all operations. Can be disabled using --disableexcludes command line switch. Defaults to []. Put them all together, not a bunch of different definitions. Note: "separated by a comma" - the commented-out lines were separated by spaces (I assume these were failed attempts). excludepkgs=wine*,resolvconf,systemd-resolved Did work. I missed what Samuel's said. This is a regression from Fedora 36. I updates the bug report. It might be a change, but it's not a regression. It's clearly documented in the man page. Where in the man page does it say you can only have one entry, so cram it all on the same line? Where does it say you can repeat lines? I always understood that each tag can only appear once. Seems I got away with it a lot ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 2/4/23 00:39, Barry wrote: >> >> I always understood that each tag can only appear once. > > Seems I got away with it a lot Multiple excludepkgs entries in dnf.conf don't work in f36 either. Only the last one is used. # rpm -q dnf dnf-4.14.0-1.fc36.noarch # printf 'excludepkgs=%s\n' 'wine*' 'git*' >>/etc/dnf/dnf.conf # dnf -qq list wine | cat Available Packages wine.i686 8.0-1.fc36 updates wine.x86_648.0-1.fc36 updates # sed -i '/^excludepkgs=/d' /etc/dnf/dnf.conf # printf 'excludepkgs=%s\n' 'git*' 'wine*' >>/etc/dnf/dnf.conf # dnf -qq list wine Error: No matching Packages to list # dnf -qq list git | cat Available Packages git.x86_64 2.39.1-1.fc36updates I'm not sure you got away with anything. You may not have noticed it wasn't working as you had hoped. :) -- Todd signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 3:33 AM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 2/4/23 00:05, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 2/3/23 21:32, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >> On 2/3/23 20:10, Go Canes wrote: > >>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 10:11 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: > > This is not the way I've ever seen excludepkgs used or > documented. The man page states: > > excludepkgs > list > > Exclude packages of this repository, speci‐ > fied by a name or a glob and separated by a > comma, from all operations. Can be disabled > using --disableexcludes command line switch. > Defaults to []. > > Put them all together, not a bunch of different definitions. > >>> > >>> Note: "separated by a comma" - the commented-out lines were separated > >>> by spaces (I assume these were failed attempts). > >> > >> excludepkgs=wine*,resolvconf,systemd-resolved > >> > >> Did work. I missed what Samuel's said. > >> > >> This is a regression from Fedora 36. I updates > >> the bug report. > > > > It might be a change, but it's not a regression. It's clearly > > documented in the man page. > > Where in the man page does it say you can > only have one entry, so cram it all on > the same line? I don't see the discussion in the dnf(8) man page after a quick read. And in particular, the discussion under PACKAGE FILTERING.[1] I think the use of multiple excludepkgs is intuitive. Each time you want to pin a package, you add an excludepkgs. When you no longer want to pin a package, you delete the particular excludepkgs. I also understand the usage may be one excludepkgs with commas separating a list of package names. That makes sense, too. I think this is probably a documentation bug. You should file a bug report at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ . Jeff [1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/dnf.8.html ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: power profiles
On 26/1/23 00:58, Neal Becker wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 7:14 AM Frederic Muller wrote: On 25/01/2023 17:34, Stephen Morris wrote: On 25/1/23 21:25, Frederic Muller wrote: On 25/01/2023 17:01, Barry Scott wrote: On 25/01/2023 06:30, Frederic Muller wrote: Hi! It seems i can only stay in Power Saver mode, balanced seems to be clickable but quickly reverts to Power Saver and Performance is not even clickable. Any idea if there is any way to do that 'manually' as my laptop is really slow now. [...] Where do I find the logs? Where are you finding the power settings. I'm not using a laptop but in KDE in the system settings under Power Management I don't seem to have the options you are referring to. In kde look for "battery and brightness". I found it under "show hidden icons" on the bottom right, I believe that's called the system tray? In my kde desktop in F37, in the "Hidden Icons" drop down in the system tray I don't have that option, I have "Power Management" with is the same option as in system settings. Also in the Energy Saving option in Power Management I don't have a screen brightness entry at all. Am I missing a package that should be installed? regards, Steve ___ users mailing list --users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email tousers-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Adobe Acrobat Can't Find the pdf File When Trying to Display an Email Attachment in Thunderbird Daily
Hi, I have Adobe Acrobat Reader DC installed in F37 via Snap. When I click on a pdf attachment in Thunderbird Daily I get a prompt asking if I want to view it in the Ocular default or save the attachment. If I click "OK" to display it in Ocular it displays fine. When I click on the Drop Down in the prompt and select "Other" to display the pdf in something other than Ocular I am not shown Acrobat in the list, but if I look at "KDE System Settings->Applications->File Associations->application->pdf" Adobe Acrobat is shown as the third entry in the list of applications. If I move Adobe Acrobat to the top then the prompt from Thunderbird shows Adobe Acrobat as the default as expected. With the prompt now asking if I want to view the pdf in Acrobat, if I click on "OK" Acrobat is launched but produced the error "There was an error opening this document. This file cannot be found". If I edit the pdf association entry for Acrobat and add "%U" into the empty Arguments text box, in the same way it is specified for the Ocular entry, Acrobat still produces the error message that it can't find the file. Has the snap process not installed Acrobat correctly, or is the file argument for Acrobat not "%U", or is there something else at play here? regards, Steve ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
On Sat, 2023-02-04 at 13:55 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I think the use of multiple excludepkgs is intuitive. Each time you > want to pin a package, you add an excludepkgs. I don't. It flies in the face of many other configuration files that I've adjusted. If I do something like the following in one file: setting=this setting=that setting=something The setting gets changed on each iteration, and finally becomes just: setting=something Sure, there are *some* exceptions, but *there* the documentation tells that multiple statements can be used. e.g. Various servers let you do: listen 127.0.0.1:80 listen 192.168.0.1:8080 So it'll listen on more than one interface and port. Trying to be logical about it you might want to pick on the absence or presence of the equals sign, but I highly doubt that's consistent behaviour. Sure it could be somewhat of a documentation problem, that it says nothing about this, though I'm never inclined to do things that docs don't suggest are possible. Certainly not without some experimenting, and always being mindful that undocumented features can never be relied upon, now or later on. Back in the days of when we had no compilers and had to program the CPU directly in op-codes, there were a few undocumented commands that were nick-named HCF codes (for Halt and Catch Fire). They worked on some CPUs and not others. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.83.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jan 25 16:41:43 UTC 2023 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 11:33 PM Tim wrote: > > On Sat, 2023-02-04 at 13:55 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > I think the use of multiple excludepkgs is intuitive. Each time you > > want to pin a package, you add an excludepkgs. > > I don't. It flies in the face of many other configuration files that > I've adjusted. If I do something like the following in one file: I hope multiple configuration files in config.d/ directories don't offend your delicate sensibilities. Jeff ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
