Re: Vivaldi web browser - anybody?
On 31/01/2023 19:19, lejeczek via users wrote: Hi guys. Does anybody use Vivaldi? I've had for a few years but have used it only for specific subset of wwws. I've only recently noticed I do not get sound during video playback, Youtube and others. Can somebody confirm, using their yum/rpm packaged installation? many thanks, L. This is silly, freaking silly - in OS's "Volume Levels" Vivaldi shows up as Chromium, which was simply muted and because I use multiple browsers at the same time, including Chromium right... thanks, L. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Nvidia again..
On 02/02/2023 11:19, GianPiero Puccioni wrote: Hi, as reported elsewhere I had problem with the nvidia driver when updating from F35 to F37. The last kernel update fixed that, but now there is something strange. The driver is installed and works, but every time I boot the machine I get a "SELinux Alert" about "preventing gdb from read access on the chr_file nvidia0". It doesn't seem to have any adverse effect but I have no idea why gdb is doing that or if is it something that normally happens. As usual: update, akmod rebuilt the driver and the alert disappeared... Thanks for the help. G ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Nvidia again..
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 5:19 AM GianPiero Puccioni wrote: > > as reported elsewhere I had problem with the nvidia driver when updating from > F35 to F37. The last kernel update fixed that, but now there is something > strange. > > The driver is installed and works, but every time I boot the machine I get a > "SELinux Alert" about "preventing gdb from read access on the chr_file > nvidia0". > > It doesn't seem to have any adverse effect but I have no idea why gdb is doing > that or if is it something that normally happens. > > Any suggestion? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901406 Jeff ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: VPN routing differences
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023, at 5:53 AM, Tibor Attila Anca wrote: > The most significant difference (for me) is the output of resolvectl. With > Network-Manager vpn I get this in the section Global: > > Global >Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported > resolv.conf mode: stub > > With Cisco VPN this section looks like this: > > Global > Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported > resolv.conf mode: foreign > Current DNS Server: 192.168.3.133 >DNS Servers: 192.168.3.33 192.168.3.133 > DNS Domain: fritz.box ***-***.de > The entry with the stars is the vpn Domain of my company. > > Could this be the relevant part? > > The strange thing is: if I terminate the vpn connection with the Cisco client > and activete it through network-manager, the Global section gives me the DNS > Domain of my company. But after a restart of the system the network-manager > vpn does not make that entry/change on its own. > This article gives an overview of how systemd-resolved works with a VPN. https://fedoramagazine.org/systemd-resolved-introduction-to-split-dns/ You might just need to manually add your company DNS and/or search domains to the OpenConnect VPN network connection you created. You can use nm-connection-editor to configure the specific DNS and search domains for your corporate network specifically just for the VPN network connection. My workplace uses two domains for internal resources but only one is provided via the VPN DHCP I always need to manually tweak the settings when I set up the VPN.___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
On 2/2/23 22:26, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2/1/23 23:05, Joe Zeff wrote: On 02/01/2023 10:55 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: # grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf excludepkgs=wine* excludepkgs=wine-* The second exclude should be redundant, as it's already covered by the first one. That doesn't explain what's going on, but I did want to mention it. I think the second one *replaces* the first one. There's no indication that it would accumulate. I have tried to with and without ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
On 2/2/23 22:29, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2/1/23 21:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: What is wrong with my wine dnf excludes? # grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf excludepkgs=wine* excludepkgs=wine-* dnf still tried to upgrade wine I bet you have some other excludepkgs lines after that. Only the last one takes effect. I just tested it and "excludepkgs=wine*" stops even "dnf upgrade wine*". Here is the whole thing, which worked under fc36: $ cat /etc/dnf/dnf.conf [main] gpgcheck=1 installonly_limit=3 clean_requirements_on_remove=True excludepkgs=metasploit-framework # excludepkgs=metasploit-framework wine* # excludepkgs=thunderbird* metasploit-framework wine* # excludepkgs=thunderbird* metasploit-framework excludepkgs=wine* # excludepkgs=wine-* excludepkgs=resolvconf excludepkgs=systemd-resolved OH GET A LOAD OF THIS # dnf upgrade --excludepkgs=wine* Works!!! AAHH !! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
On 2/3/23 18:13, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/2/23 22:29, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2/1/23 21:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: What is wrong with my wine dnf excludes? # grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf excludepkgs=wine* excludepkgs=wine-* dnf still tried to upgrade wine I bet you have some other excludepkgs lines after that. Only the last one takes effect. I just tested it and "excludepkgs=wine*" stops even "dnf upgrade wine*". Here is the whole thing, which worked under fc36: $ cat /etc/dnf/dnf.conf [main] gpgcheck=1 installonly_limit=3 clean_requirements_on_remove=True excludepkgs=metasploit-framework # excludepkgs=metasploit-framework wine* # excludepkgs=thunderbird* metasploit-framework wine* # excludepkgs=thunderbird* metasploit-framework excludepkgs=wine* # excludepkgs=wine-* excludepkgs=resolvconf excludepkgs=systemd-resolved OH GET A LOAD OF THIS # dnf upgrade --excludepkgs=wine* Works!!! AAHH !! I just enter the following bug report: dnf.conf excludepkgs=wine* no longer works https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167036 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Vivaldi web browser - anybody?
On 2/3/23 02:35, lejeczek via users wrote: On 31/01/2023 19:19, lejeczek via users wrote: Hi guys. Does anybody use Vivaldi? I've had for a few years but have used it only for specific subset of wwws. I've only recently noticed I do not get sound during video playback, Youtube and others. Can somebody confirm, using their yum/rpm packaged installation? many thanks, L. This is silly, freaking silly - in OS's "Volume Levels" Vivaldi shows up as Chromium, which was simply muted and because I use multiple browsers at the same time, including Chromium right... thanks, L. These guys are very helpful: https://forum.vivaldi.net/category/35/vivaldi-for-linux ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 2/2/23 22:29, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 2/1/23 21:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >>> What is wrong with my wine dnf excludes? >>> >>> # grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf >>> excludepkgs=wine* >>> excludepkgs=wine-* >>> >>> dnf still tried to upgrade wine >> >> I bet you have some other excludepkgs lines after that. Only the last >> one takes effect. You should take heed of Samuel's words above. > Here is the whole thing, which worked under fc36: I don't find this to be true. Testing it locally, it fails just as I'd expect and as the documentation suggests. > $ cat /etc/dnf/dnf.conf > [main] > gpgcheck=1 > installonly_limit=3 > clean_requirements_on_remove=True > excludepkgs=metasploit-framework > # excludepkgs=metasploit-framework wine* > # excludepkgs=thunderbird* metasploit-framework wine* > # excludepkgs=thunderbird* metasploit-framework > excludepkgs=wine* > # excludepkgs=wine-* > excludepkgs=resolvconf > excludepkgs=systemd-resolved This is not the way I've ever seen excludepkgs used or documented. The man page states: excludepkgs list Exclude packages of this repository, speci‐ fied by a name or a glob and separated by a comma, from all operations. Can be disabled using --disableexcludes command line switch. Defaults to []. Put them all together, not a bunch of different definitions. -- Todd signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 10:11 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: > > ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 2/2/23 22:29, Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> On 2/1/23 21:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > $ cat /etc/dnf/dnf.conf > > [main] > > gpgcheck=1 > > installonly_limit=3 > > clean_requirements_on_remove=True > > excludepkgs=metasploit-framework > > # excludepkgs=metasploit-framework wine* > > # excludepkgs=thunderbird* metasploit-framework wine* > > # excludepkgs=thunderbird* metasploit-framework > > excludepkgs=wine* > > # excludepkgs=wine-* > > excludepkgs=resolvconf > > excludepkgs=systemd-resolved > > This is not the way I've ever seen excludepkgs used or > documented. The man page states: > >excludepkgs > list > > Exclude packages of this repository, speci‐ > fied by a name or a glob and separated by a > comma, from all operations. Can be disabled > using --disableexcludes command line switch. > Defaults to []. > > Put them all together, not a bunch of different definitions. Note: "separated by a comma" - the commented-out lines were separated by spaces (I assume these were failed attempts). ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
On 2/3/23 20:10, Go Canes wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 10:11 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/2/23 22:29, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2/1/23 21:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: $ cat /etc/dnf/dnf.conf [main] gpgcheck=1 installonly_limit=3 clean_requirements_on_remove=True excludepkgs=metasploit-framework # excludepkgs=metasploit-framework wine* # excludepkgs=thunderbird* metasploit-framework wine* # excludepkgs=thunderbird* metasploit-framework excludepkgs=wine* # excludepkgs=wine-* excludepkgs=resolvconf excludepkgs=systemd-resolved This is not the way I've ever seen excludepkgs used or documented. The man page states: excludepkgs list Exclude packages of this repository, speci‐ fied by a name or a glob and separated by a comma, from all operations. Can be disabled using --disableexcludes command line switch. Defaults to []. Put them all together, not a bunch of different definitions. Note: "separated by a comma" - the commented-out lines were separated by spaces (I assume these were failed attempts). excludepkgs=wine*,resolvconf,systemd-resolved Did work. I missed what Samuel's said. This is a regression from Fedora 36. I updates the bug report. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is wrong with my dnf exclude for wine?
On 2/3/23 20:10, Go Canes wrote: Note: "separated by a comma" - the commented-out lines were separated by spaces (I assume these were failed attempts). Thank you for that. I have been using a space as as separator all these years! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
