Re: /etc/grub2.cfg Flagged a Potenially missing
On 1/9/22 09:45, Roger Heflin wrote: On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 6:02 PM Stephen Morris wrote: On 30/8/22 01:16, Roger Heflin wrote: sudo/root is required to access the grub subdirectory because the permissions are locked down. I would guess since there can be encrypted grub passwords (and possibly other similar stuff) in there that is why it is locked down. I did check the acl on the folder and noticed it was locked down to root. I could put an acl on the folder to make the folder readable by me without enabling reading of the contents of the files in that folder, but is that the only way to stop ls from flagging a file as deleted when the parent folder is locked down? regards, Steve Pretty much. From the command run as a real user the file does not exist because of permissions, but the command has no way to know that so it is simply missing. Thanks Roger, I thought that might be the situation. regards, Steve ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
cupsd spamming the journal
I'm getting this in the journal (repeats once per second): Sep 01 11:02:05 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... Sep 01 11:02:04 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... Sep 01 11:02:03 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... Sep 01 11:02:02 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... Sep 01 11:02:01 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... Sep 01 11:02:00 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... Sep 01 11:01:59 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... Sep 01 11:01:58 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... Sep 01 11:01:57 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... Sep 01 11:01:56 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... Sep 01 11:01:55 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... Any thoughts? poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: following thunderbird upgrade to 102, it takes over 1h of 100% CPU to start
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 08:57 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote: > I'm not sure about emptying the junk folder automatically, my > interpretation of the junk process was the mails have to remain in that > folder for the junk processing to determine a new mail is junk according > to your rules, My understanding was that the interpretation had already been done, and they remain in the junk folder in case it got it wrong. You can check what it's junking, you can find a mail it erroneously junked, and you can reclassify it as being non-junk. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Aug 10 16:21:17 UTC 2022 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: following thunderbird upgrade to 102, it takes over 1h of 100% CPU to start
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 9:43 AM Tim via users wrote: > On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 08:57 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote: > > I'm not sure about emptying the junk folder automatically, my > > interpretation of the junk process was the mails have to remain in that > > folder for the junk processing to determine a new mail is junk according > > to your rules, > > My understanding was that the interpretation had already been done, and > they remain in the junk folder in case it got it wrong. You can check > what it's junking, you can find a mail it erroneously junked, and you > can reclassify it as being non-junk. > I routinely clear out the junk folder. Junk detection works well (for an account created when internet first reached my city so the address is readily available to spammers). -- George N. White III ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: cupsd spamming the journal
> On 1 Sep 2022, at 11:20, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I'm getting this in the journal (repeats once per second): > > Sep 01 11:02:05 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > Sep 01 11:02:04 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > Sep 01 11:02:03 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > Sep 01 11:02:02 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > Sep 01 11:02:01 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > Sep 01 11:02:00 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > Sep 01 11:01:59 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > Sep 01 11:01:58 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > Sep 01 11:01:57 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > Sep 01 11:01:56 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > Sep 01 11:01:55 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > > Any thoughts? Do a web search , the web seems to know all about this. Barry > > poc > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: cupsd spamming the journal
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 18:00 +0100, Barry Scott wrote: > > > > On 1 Sep 2022, at 11:20, Patrick O'Callaghan > > wrote: > > > > I'm getting this in the journal (repeats once per second): > > > > Sep 01 11:02:05 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > > Sep 01 11:02:04 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > > Sep 01 11:02:03 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > > Sep 01 11:02:02 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > > Sep 01 11:02:01 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > > Sep 01 11:02:00 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > > Sep 01 11:01:59 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > > Sep 01 11:01:58 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > > Sep 01 11:01:57 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > > Sep 01 11:01:56 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > > Sep 01 11:01:55 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions... > > > > Any thoughts? > > Do a web search , the web seems to know all about this. First thing I tried before posting. It gets two hits: The first hit is from 20 years ago and basically says "don't worry about it" while referring to a man page I don't understand. The second hit points to a RedHat page that wants me to create an account to access their knowledge base for RHEL. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Call To Action] Fedora 37 Pre-Beta Release Validation
Hey Fedorans, We are running a Fedora 37 Pre-Beta Release Validation[0] Test Week! Come help test the Pre-Beta image and fill up matrixes in here[1]. If you have any questions, reach out to #fedora-test-day on libera or test list! [0] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/f37-pre-beta-release-validation/ [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Summary -- //sumantro Fedora QE TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: following thunderbird upgrade to 102, it takes over 1h of 100% CPU to start
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 22:12 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > My understanding was that the interpretation had already been done, and > they remain in the junk folder in case it got it wrong. You can check > what it's junking, you can find a mail it erroneously junked, and you > can reclassify it as being non-junk. For what it's worth, that's certainly the way other programs worked. As mail is processed, spam rules are made somewhere else. Back when I used a program using Bayesian rules, I quickly programmed it in two stages: Using a folder of lots of kept spam, selected them all, and flagged them as spam. And folders of kept non-spam, selected them all, and flagged them as non-spam. It was quite effective, but for one thing: If a mailing list became a source of spam, and you kept marking mail from it as being spam, the system can add the mailing list itself as being spam. Eventually I settled on not using junk detection, using a separate email address for mailing lists, having that address *only* accept mail from those lists. You get no false positives (real mail getting falsely flagged as spam), and the few that slip through I just hit the delete button once or twice each day (yes, it's that few). False positives are a huge curse. You lose touch with friends, you miss jobs and incoming bills. If you have to keep checking your junk mail folder for them, what's the point of using spam filtering? You're going to see the spam, anyway. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Aug 10 16:21:17 UTC 2022 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Help building custom kernel RPM.
I want to build a custom kernel with some modules and patches added, and
package this as an rpm to install. I have tried adding it like building the
kernel from the git source, but it doesnt have the modules. I think it might
have to do with the .spec file. I added the patches to the rpm, and I modified
the source tarball so it has the modules added. I ran
```
dnf install -y fedora-packager git curl pesign ncurses-devel libkcapi
libkcapi-devel libkcapi-static libkcapi-tools libbpf fedpkg rpmdevtools dwarves
rpmdev-setuptree
cd ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES
koji download-build --arch=src kernel-${FEDORA_KERNEL_VERSION}
rpm -Uvh kernel-${FEDORA_KERNEL_VERSION}.src.rpm
cd /root/rpmbuild/SPECS
dnf -y builddep kernel.spec
cp /path/to/driver /path/to/kernel source tarbal from spec/drivers/staging
tar -cJf ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/kernel-version.tar.xz /path/to/kernel/src
rpmbuild -bb --with baseonly --without debug --without debuginfo
--target=x86_64 kernel.spec
```
I know that I install some extra useless dependencies. When I do the same
process to the kernel sources, but instead use make to build the vanilla kernel
git, the modules are built. I noticed this
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelStagingPolicy, but I dont know if it is
related. The necessary drivers are in drivers/staging, and I added the sources
to the spec file. Can someone please help me make this modifications into a
kernel rpm.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
I am trying to build a custom kernel rpm and need help.
I have a few custom (out-of-tree) drivers and patches, and I want to add them to a rpm package for the kernel, how can I do that. The drivers have to go in the staging folder, but they dont seem to get built by the spec file. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: I am trying to build a custom kernel rpm and need help.
Please ignore this, I though my previous post was accidentally deleted. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: I am trying to build a custom kernel rpm and need help.
Sharpened Blade via users writes: I have a few custom (out-of-tree) drivers and patches, and I want to add them to a rpm package for the kernel, how can I do that. The drivers have to go in the staging folder, but they dont seem to get built by the spec file. Correct. The mere presence of some additional patch files makes no difference, whatsoever. You also need to modify the spec file accordingly, and apply the patch. You might want to start by looking at some other, smaller, simple packages that apply a handful of basic patches to upstream source before building it. The kernel package is one of the bigger and the most complicated ones. You want to get your bearings, first, by looking at something simpler. pgpcO9nvI5tmE.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: following thunderbird upgrade to 102, it takes over 1h of 100% CPU to start
On 02/09/2022 11.11, Tim via users wrote: On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 22:12 +0930, Tim via users wrote: My understanding was that the interpretation had already been done, and they remain in the junk folder in case it got it wrong. You can check what it's junking, you can find a mail it erroneously junked, and you can reclassify it as being non-junk. For what it's worth, that's certainly the way other programs worked. As mail is processed, spam rules are made somewhere else. Back when I used a program using Bayesian rules, I quickly programmed it in two stages: Using a folder of lots of kept spam, selected them all, and flagged them as spam. And folders of kept non-spam, selected them all, and flagged them as non-spam. It was quite effective, but for one thing: If a mailing list became a source of spam, and you kept marking mail from it as being spam, the system can add the mailing list itself as being spam. Eventually I settled on not using junk detection, using a separate email address for mailing lists, having that address *only* accept mail from those lists. You get no false positives (real mail getting falsely flagged as spam), and the few that slip through I just hit the delete button once or twice each day (yes, it's that few). False positives are a huge curse. You lose touch with friends, you miss jobs and incoming bills. If you have to keep checking your junk mail folder for them, what's the point of using spam filtering? You're going to see the spam, anyway. I mark the spam folder to only show unread messages. This way I see what was added before marking all as read (after unJunking any mistakes). -- Eyal Lebedinsky (fed...@eyal.emu.id.au) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
