Re: F36 kernel (packaging) problems?

[Adrian Sevcenco]

On 26.05.2022 10:43, John Pilkington wrote:

On 26/05/2022 07:56, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:

Hi! I have a very strange situation after i updated my system to fedora 36:
the new 5.17.9-300.fc36.x86_64 does not boot or at least cannot start my monitor (i get on the monitor "no signal 
received")

while the identical fedora 35 one worrks 5.17.9-200.fc35.x86_64

having an nvidia card, i checked that i have kmods for both kernels
root@hal: entries # rpm -qa | grep kmod-nvidia
akmod-nvidia-515.43.04-1.fc36.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-5.17.9-200.fc35.x86_64-515.43.04-1.fc36.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-5.17.9-300.fc36.x86_64-515.43.04-1.fc36.x86_64

and my GRUB_CMD_LINE looks like this:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="acpi_osi='Windows 2013' acpi_enforce_resources=lax iommu=soft iomem=relaxed quiet mitigations=off 
libahci.ignore_sss=1 root=/dev/md1 rootfstype=ext4 selinux=0 rd.plymouth=0 plymouth.enable=0 rd.auto rd.md=1 rd.dm=1 
rd.lvm=0 rd.luks=0 rd.vconsole.font=ter-v32n KEYTABLE=us LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau 
modprobe.blacklist=nouveau"


any idea why f36 kernel would not work and how can i troubleshoot this?

Thanks a lot!
Adrian


There was a similar thread earlier this month.  Try depmod, or dnf reinstall 
the nvidia packages.


thanks a lot! i'm not sure if "reinstall nvidia packages" meant the exact words or just rebuilding (with reinstalling) 
the kmod (generated by akmod) ... but it did not worked .. (including any version of depmod command)


i even tried to give up nvidia drivers (and just use nouveau) but plasma 
crashes in a loop and does not start at all
horrendous experience especially that i do not know what i will be doing in the future because i cannot stay with the 
f35 kernel...


Thanks!
Adrian


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 kernel (packaging) problems?

[Barry]

> On 27 May 2022, at 08:25, Adrian Sevcenco  wrote:
> 
> On 26.05.2022 10:43, John Pilkington wrote:
>>> On 26/05/2022 07:56, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>>> Hi! I have a very strange situation after i updated my system to fedora 36:
>>> the new 5.17.9-300.fc36.x86_64 does not boot or at least cannot start my 
>>> monitor (i get on the monitor "no signal received")
>>> while the identical fedora 35 one worrks 5.17.9-200.fc35.x86_64
>>> 
>>> having an nvidia card, i checked that i have kmods for both kernels
>>> root@hal: entries # rpm -qa | grep kmod-nvidia
>>> akmod-nvidia-515.43.04-1.fc36.x86_64
>>> kmod-nvidia-5.17.9-200.fc35.x86_64-515.43.04-1.fc36.x86_64
>>> kmod-nvidia-5.17.9-300.fc36.x86_64-515.43.04-1.fc36.x86_64
>>> 
>>> and my GRUB_CMD_LINE looks like this:
>>> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="acpi_osi='Windows 2013' acpi_enforce_resources=lax 
>>> iommu=soft iomem=relaxed quiet mitigations=off libahci.ignore_sss=1 
>>> root=/dev/md1 rootfstype=ext4 selinux=0 rd.plymouth=0 plymouth.enable=0 
>>> rd.auto rd.md=1 rd.dm=1 rd.lvm=0 rd.luks=0 rd.vconsole.font=ter-v32n 
>>> KEYTABLE=us LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau 
>>> modprobe.blacklist=nouveau"
>>> 
>>> any idea why f36 kernel would not work and how can i troubleshoot this?
>>> 
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>> Adrian
>> There was a similar thread earlier this month.  Try depmod, or dnf reinstall 
>> the nvidia packages.
> 
> thanks a lot! i'm not sure if "reinstall nvidia packages" meant the exact 
> words or just rebuilding (with reinstalling) the kmod (generated by akmod) 
> ... but it did not worked .. (including any version of depmod command)
> 
> i even tried to give up nvidia drivers (and just use nouveau) but plasma 
> crashes in a loop and does not start at all
> horrendous experience especially that i do not know what i will be doing in 
> the future because i cannot stay with the f35 kernel...

See https://rpmfusion.org/CommonBugs it has the issue listed and the fix.
I hit the same issue and the listed depmod command fixed it for me.

Reinstall does not work and is not expected to.

Barry

> 
> Thanks!
> Adrian
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 kernel (packaging) problems?

[John Pilkington]

On 27/05/2022 09:13, Barry wrote:




On 27 May 2022, at 08:25, Adrian Sevcenco  wrote:

On 26.05.2022 10:43, John Pilkington wrote:

On 26/05/2022 07:56, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Hi! I have a very strange situation after i updated my system to 
fedora 36:
the new 5.17.9-300.fc36.x86_64 does not boot or at least cannot 
start my monitor (i get on the monitor "no signal received")

while the identical fedora 35 one worrks 5.17.9-200.fc35.x86_64

having an nvidia card, i checked that i have kmods for both kernels
root@hal: entries # rpm -qa | grep kmod-nvidia
akmod-nvidia-515.43.04-1.fc36.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-5.17.9-200.fc35.x86_64-515.43.04-1.fc36.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-5.17.9-300.fc36.x86_64-515.43.04-1.fc36.x86_64

and my GRUB_CMD_LINE looks like this:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="acpi_osi='Windows 2013' 
acpi_enforce_resources=lax iommu=soft iomem=relaxed quiet 
mitigations=off libahci.ignore_sss=1 root=/dev/md1 rootfstype=ext4 
selinux=0 rd.plymouth=0 plymouth.enable=0 rd.auto rd.md=1 rd.dm=1 
rd.lvm=0 rd.luks=0 rd.vconsole.font=ter-v32n KEYTABLE=us 
LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau modprobe.blacklist=nouveau"


any idea why f36 kernel would not work and how can i troubleshoot this?

Thanks a lot!
Adrian
There was a similar thread earlier this month.  Try depmod, or dnf 
reinstall the nvidia packages.


thanks a lot! i'm not sure if "reinstall nvidia packages" meant the 
exact words or just rebuilding (with reinstalling) the kmod (generated 
by akmod) ... but it did not worked .. (including any version of 
depmod command)


i even tried to give up nvidia drivers (and just use nouveau) but 
plasma crashes in a loop and does not start at all
horrendous experience especially that i do not know what i will be 
doing in the future because i cannot stay with the f35 kernel...


See https://rpmfusion.org/CommonBugs 
 it has the issue listed and the fix.

I hit the same issue and the listed depmod command fixed it for me.

Reinstall does not work and is not expected to.

Barry



Thanks!
Adrian


I started and saved this draft before Barry's reply above.  I hadn't 
then found the rpmfusion 'CommonBugs' page or the BZ.  I'll post this 
because in one case depmod didn't work for me and the reinstall 
apparently did...


I had assumed that you were using the rpmfusion packages and that 
nouveau was running X11.


I have only F35 and expect to stay with that for some months.  My 
"reinstall" was based on https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/NVIDIA, and for 
recent cards (Current GeForce/Quadro/Tesla) the equivalent would probably be


{{{

sudo dnf reinstall xorg-x11-drv-nvidia  akmod-nvidia
sudo dnf reinstall xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda
sudo systemctl reboot

}}}

Good luck!

John



___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Frequent Crashes with Puddletag

[stan via users]

On Thu, 26 May 2022 14:29:31 -0700
Samuel Sieb  wrote:

> On 5/26/22 06:18, stan via users wrote:
> > So, the problem is in this function,
> > 
> >  def wheelEvent(self, e):
> >  h = self.horizontalScrollBar()
> >  if not self.verticalScrollBar().isVisible() and
> > h.isVisible(): numsteps = e.angleDelta().y() / 5  
> 
> Python3 changed the default for division.  Python2 would always give
> you an integer result from dividing integers, but Python3 will give
> you a float if the numbers are not evenly divisible.  The simplest
> fix would be to change the "/" to a "//" (integer division).

Good catch!  I attached to the argument 1 and got caught by the off by 1
error, the argument count starts at zero, not 1, and so was looking at
h.value() instead of numsteps.  
TypeError: setValue(self, int): argument 1 has unexpected type 'float'

> 
> >  h.setValue(h.value() - numsteps)   <  here
> >  e.accept()
> >  else:
> >  QTableView.wheelEvent(self, e)  
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 kernel (packaging) problems?

[Barry]

> On 27 May 2022, at 11:51, John Pilkington  wrote:
> 
> On 27/05/2022 09:13, Barry wrote:
 On 27 May 2022, at 08:25, Adrian Sevcenco  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 26.05.2022 10:43, John Pilkington wrote:
 On 26/05/2022 07:56, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Hi! I have a very strange situation after i updated my system to fedora 
> 36:
> the new 5.17.9-300.fc36.x86_64 does not boot or at least cannot start my 
> monitor (i get on the monitor "no signal received")
> while the identical fedora 35 one worrks 5.17.9-200.fc35.x86_64
> 
> having an nvidia card, i checked that i have kmods for both kernels
> root@hal: entries # rpm -qa | grep kmod-nvidia
> akmod-nvidia-515.43.04-1.fc36.x86_64
> kmod-nvidia-5.17.9-200.fc35.x86_64-515.43.04-1.fc36.x86_64
> kmod-nvidia-5.17.9-300.fc36.x86_64-515.43.04-1.fc36.x86_64
> 
> and my GRUB_CMD_LINE looks like this:
> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="acpi_osi='Windows 2013' acpi_enforce_resources=lax 
> iommu=soft iomem=relaxed quiet mitigations=off libahci.ignore_sss=1 
> root=/dev/md1 rootfstype=ext4 selinux=0 rd.plymouth=0 plymouth.enable=0 
> rd.auto rd.md=1 rd.dm=1 rd.lvm=0 rd.luks=0 rd.vconsole.font=ter-v32n 
> KEYTABLE=us LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau 
> modprobe.blacklist=nouveau"
> 
> any idea why f36 kernel would not work and how can i troubleshoot this?
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> Adrian
 There was a similar thread earlier this month.  Try depmod, or dnf 
 reinstall the nvidia packages.
>>> 
>>> thanks a lot! i'm not sure if "reinstall nvidia packages" meant the exact 
>>> words or just rebuilding (with reinstalling) the kmod (generated by akmod) 
>>> ... but it did not worked .. (including any version of depmod command)
>>> 
>>> i even tried to give up nvidia drivers (and just use nouveau) but plasma 
>>> crashes in a loop and does not start at all
>>> horrendous experience especially that i do not know what i will be doing in 
>>> the future because i cannot stay with the f35 kernel...
>> See https://rpmfusion.org/CommonBugs  it 
>> has the issue listed and the fix.
>> I hit the same issue and the listed depmod command fixed it for me.
>> Reinstall does not work and is not expected to.
>> Barry
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> Adrian
> 
> I started and saved this draft before Barry's reply above.  I hadn't then 
> found the rpmfusion 'CommonBugs' page or the BZ.  I'll post this because in 
> one case depmod didn't work for me and the reinstall apparently did...

What I found was that because the nvidia modules exist akmod does not attempt 
to build them on system-upgrade.
The rpmfusion folks discussed this a bit on rpmfusion-devel and are looking at 
why this happens to some people, but not all.

Barry


> 
> I had assumed that you were using the rpmfusion packages and that nouveau was 
> running X11.
> 
> I have only F35 and expect to stay with that for some months.  My "reinstall" 
> was based on https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/NVIDIA, and for recent cards 
> (Current GeForce/Quadro/Tesla) the equivalent would probably be
> 
> {{{
> 
> sudo dnf reinstall xorg-x11-drv-nvidia  akmod-nvidia
> sudo dnf reinstall xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda
> sudo systemctl reboot
> 
> }}}
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Foliate does not work

[Paul Smith]

Dear All,

I cannot be sure, but I suspect that after having upgraded to F36,
Foliate no longer works.

Any ideas? Do others experience the same problem?

Thanks in advance,

Paul
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Frequent Crashes with Puddletag

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/27/22 06:03, stan via users wrote:

On Thu, 26 May 2022 14:29:31 -0700
Samuel Sieb  wrote:


On 5/26/22 06:18, stan via users wrote:

So, the problem is in this function,

  def wheelEvent(self, e):
  h = self.horizontalScrollBar()
  if not self.verticalScrollBar().isVisible() and
h.isVisible(): numsteps = e.angleDelta().y() / 5


Python3 changed the default for division.  Python2 would always give
you an integer result from dividing integers, but Python3 will give
you a float if the numbers are not evenly divisible.  The simplest
fix would be to change the "/" to a "//" (integer division).


Good catch!  I attached to the argument 1 and got caught by the off by 1
error, the argument count starts at zero, not 1, and so was looking at
h.value() instead of numsteps.
TypeError: setValue(self, int): argument 1 has unexpected type 'float'




  h.setValue(h.value() - numsteps)   <  here
  e.accept()
  else:
  QTableView.wheelEvent(self, e)


Argument 1 is "h.value() - numsteps".  Argument 0 is the "self" 
parameter that you don't see.  It's a class method call, so the first 
argument is the instance variable.  (Referred to as "this" in several 
other languages.)

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Foliate does not work

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/27/22 12:09, Paul Smith wrote:

I cannot be sure, but I suspect that after having upgraded to F36,
Foliate no longer works.

Any ideas? Do others experience the same problem?


You need to provide more details about what "not working" means.  I just 
installed it on F36 and opened an epub file with no problem.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Foliate does not work

[Paul Smith]

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 8:56 PM Samuel Sieb  wrote:
>
> > I cannot be sure, but I suspect that after having upgraded to F36,
> > Foliate no longer works.
> >
> > Any ideas? Do others experience the same problem?
>
> You need to provide more details about what "not working" means.  I just
> installed it on F36 and opened an epub file with no problem.

Thanks, Samuel. When I try to open whatever epub file, I get the
following error message:

"Could not open file
Empty Response"

Paul
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Foliate does not work

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/27/22 13:06, Paul Smith wrote:

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 8:56 PM Samuel Sieb  wrote:



I cannot be sure, but I suspect that after having upgraded to F36,
Foliate no longer works.

Any ideas? Do others experience the same problem?


You need to provide more details about what "not working" means.  I just
installed it on F36 and opened an epub file with no problem.


Thanks, Samuel. When I try to open whatever epub file, I get the
following error message:

"Could not open file
Empty Response"


That is a very strange error.  Is that a local file?  I also just tried 
accessing an online file and that worked as well.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Foliate does not work

[Paul Smith]

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 9:17 PM Samuel Sieb  wrote:
>
> >>> I cannot be sure, but I suspect that after having upgraded to F36,
> >>> Foliate no longer works.
> >>>
> >>> Any ideas? Do others experience the same problem?
> >>
> >> You need to provide more details about what "not working" means.  I just
> >> installed it on F36 and opened an epub file with no problem.
> >
> > Thanks, Samuel. When I try to open whatever epub file, I get the
> > following error message:
> >
> > "Could not open file
> > Empty Response"
>
> That is a very strange error.  Is that a local file?  I also just tried
> accessing an online file and that worked as well.

Yes, Samuel, it is a local file.

Paul
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Foliate does not work

[George N. White III]

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 5:07 PM Paul Smith  wrote:

> On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 8:56 PM Samuel Sieb  wrote:
> >
> > > I cannot be sure, but I suspect that after having upgraded to F36,
> > > Foliate no longer works.
> > >
> > > Any ideas? Do others experience the same problem?
> >
> > You need to provide more details about what "not working" means.  I just
> > installed it on F36 and opened an epub file with no problem.
>
> Thanks, Samuel. When I try to open whatever epub file, I get the
> following error message:
>
> "Could not open file
> Empty Response"
>

"Empty Response" issues were discussed for multiple distros and install
methods
in foliate could not open file · Issue #401 · johnfactotum/foliate
(github.com) .
It seems to stem from cross-origin protections:

Quoting the wiki: By default, JavaScript and all external resources are
blocked in Foliate.
For additional safeguard against potential vulnerabilities it is
recommended to run Foliate
in a sandboxed environment, for example, by using the Flatpak package.

-- 
George N. White III
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Foliate does not work

[Paul Smith]

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 10:37 PM George N. White III  wrote:
>
>> > > I cannot be sure, but I suspect that after having upgraded to F36,
>> > > Foliate no longer works.
>> > >
>> > > Any ideas? Do others experience the same problem?
>> >
>> > You need to provide more details about what "not working" means.  I just
>> > installed it on F36 and opened an epub file with no problem.
>>
>> Thanks, Samuel. When I try to open whatever epub file, I get the
>> following error message:
>>
>> "Could not open file
>> Empty Response"
>
> "Empty Response" issues were discussed for multiple distros and install 
> methods
> in foliate could not open file · Issue #401 · johnfactotum/foliate 
> (github.com).
> It seems to stem from cross-origin protections:
>
> Quoting the wiki: By default, JavaScript and all external resources are 
> blocked in Foliate.
> For additional safeguard against potential vulnerabilities it is recommended 
> to run Foliate
> in a sandboxed environment, for example, by using the Flatpak package.

Thanks, George. That is exactly the same problem I am having!

Paul
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Foliate does not work

[Paul Smith]

On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 12:05 AM Paul Smith  wrote:
>
> >> > > I cannot be sure, but I suspect that after having upgraded to F36,
> >> > > Foliate no longer works.
> >> > >
> >> > > Any ideas? Do others experience the same problem?
> >> >
> >> > You need to provide more details about what "not working" means.  I just
> >> > installed it on F36 and opened an epub file with no problem.
> >>
> >> Thanks, Samuel. When I try to open whatever epub file, I get the
> >> following error message:
> >>
> >> "Could not open file
> >> Empty Response"
> >
> > "Empty Response" issues were discussed for multiple distros and install 
> > methods
> > in foliate could not open file · Issue #401 · johnfactotum/foliate 
> > (github.com).
> > It seems to stem from cross-origin protections:
> >
> > Quoting the wiki: By default, JavaScript and all external resources are 
> > blocked in Foliate.
> > For additional safeguard against potential vulnerabilities it is 
> > recommended to run Foliate
> > in a sandboxed environment, for example, by using the Flatpak package.
>
> Thanks, George. That is exactly the same problem I am having!

Moreover, the flatpak foliate package works just fine!

Paul
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Foliate does not work

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/27/22 16:05, Paul Smith wrote:

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 10:37 PM George N. White III  wrote:



I cannot be sure, but I suspect that after having upgraded to F36,
Foliate no longer works.

Any ideas? Do others experience the same problem?


You need to provide more details about what "not working" means.  I just
installed it on F36 and opened an epub file with no problem.


Thanks, Samuel. When I try to open whatever epub file, I get the
following error message:

"Could not open file
Empty Response"


"Empty Response" issues were discussed for multiple distros and install methods
in foliate could not open file · Issue #401 · johnfactotum/foliate (github.com).
It seems to stem from cross-origin protections:

Quoting the wiki: By default, JavaScript and all external resources are blocked 
in Foliate.
For additional safeguard against potential vulnerabilities it is recommended to 
run Foliate
in a sandboxed environment, for example, by using the Flatpak package.


Thanks, George. That is exactly the same problem I am having!


That issue is all over the place.  It mostly seemed to be referring to 
the snap install, but then there were a couple of mentions of other 
types.  The rpm version works perfectly fine for me.  Is that what you 
are using?  Where is the file you're trying to open?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure