Re: More boot questions
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 02:08, Tim via users wrote: > On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 17:56 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > My system disk is a Samsung EVO SSD (2TB) and I'm unaware of any > > problems with it. Smartcontrol shows no errors. > > Likewise. And I just bought a new 500 gig Samsung Evo 860 to install > in a server. > Reports of problems using AMD hardware: https://eu.community.samsung.com/t5/Computers-IT/860-EVO-250GB-causing-freezes-on-AMD-system/td-p/575813 00:11.0 SATA controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller [AHCI mode] (rev 40) Subsystem: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller [AHCI mode] Kernel driver in use: ahci Kernel modules: ahci I wrote to Samsung's EU support (samsungmem...@hanaro.eu) and they told me to "use an Intel controller or SATA AHCI controller." to which I explained that it's obvious that the controller in the AMD chipset is SATA AHCI. After few more mails where I explained that it's not normal for the SSD to act like that, they continued to blame the AMD SATA controller, I clearly stated that I'm not going to buy new system just to get the SSD working correctly and that the issue is in their SSD controller and not the AMD SATA controller and it's up to them to fix it with firmware update. Well, it's seems that it's not going to happen - they told me to return the SSD back to the retailer or to send it to their service center in the Netherlands -- George N. White III ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I change the grub kernel boot parameters in F32 ?
On 16/6/20 9:06 am, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-06-16 07:01, Tom H wrote: The kernel options are in the BLS entries, so it doesn't matter what you have in grubenv. From the grub2 changelog on may 13th: Store cmdline in BLS snippets instead of using a grubenv variable The kernel cmdline was stored as a kernelopts variable in the grubenv file and the BLS snippets used that. But this turned out to be fragile since the grubenv file could be removed or get corrupted easily. To prevent the entries to not have a cmdline if the grubenv can't be read, a fallback variable was set in the GRUB config file. But this still caused issues since the config needs to be re-generated to change the parameters. Instead, let's store the cmdline in the BLS snippets. This will make the configuration more robust, since it will work even without the grubenv file and the BLS entries will contain all the information needed to boot. Thanks for that. Just to complete my understanding, by the BLS snippets you mean the /boot/loader/entries/*.conf files? Hi Ed, If GRUB_ENABLE_BLSCFG=false is not going to be supported anymore, how does one disable BLS if we don't want it? regards, Steve ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I change the grub kernel boot parameters in F32 ?
On 2020-06-16 19:42, Stephen Morris wrote: > If > > GRUB_ENABLE_BLSCFG=false is not going to be supported anymore, how does one > disable BLS if we don't want it? If that should happen then one needs to learn how to work with BLS. Legacy methods aren't supported forever. Just like we don't have System V init scripts. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
systemctl status distccd
Hi, Since it's awfully quiet on the initscripts-devel mailing list. Best regards, Mischa. distccd.service.d.tar.xz Description: application/xz-compressed-tar [root@tp02 ~]# systemctl status distccd ● distccd.service - Distccd A Distributed Compilation Server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/distccd.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2020-06-16 09:35:00 CEST; 21min ago Process: 741 ExecStart=/usr/bin/distccd --no-detach --daemon --whitelist=/etc/distcc/clients.allow $OPTIONS (code=exited, status=102) Main PID: 741 (code=exited, status=102) CPU: 16ms Jun 16 09:35:00 tp02.localdomain systemd[1]: Started Distccd A Distributed Compilation Server. Jun 16 09:35:00 tp02.localdomain distccd[741]: (dcc_listen_by_addr) ERROR: bind of 192.168.0.2:3632 failed: Cannot assign requested address Jun 16 09:35:00 tp02.localdomain systemd[1]: distccd.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=102/n/a Jun 16 09:35:00 tp02.localdomain systemd[1]: distccd.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. [root@tp02 mjbaars1977]# systemctl status distccd ● distccd.service - Distccd A Distributed Compilation Server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/distccd.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled) Drop-In: /etc/systemd/system/distccd.service.d └─distccd.service.conf Active: active (running) since Tue 2020-06-16 12:47:54 CEST; 46s ago Main PID: 945 (distccd) Tasks: 5 (limit: 4488) Memory: 1.7M CPU: 20ms CGroup: /system.slice/distccd.service ├─ 945 /usr/bin/distccd --no-detach --daemon --whitelist=/etc/distcc/clients.allow --jobs 4 --listen 192.168.0.3 --allow 192.168.0.0/4 ├─ 952 /usr/bin/distccd --no-detach --daemon --whitelist=/etc/distcc/clients.allow --jobs 4 --listen 192.168.0.3 --allow 192.168.0.0/4 ├─ 994 /usr/bin/distccd --no-detach --daemon --whitelist=/etc/distcc/clients.allow --jobs 4 --listen 192.168.0.3 --allow 192.168.0.0/4 ├─1038 /usr/bin/distccd --no-detach --daemon --whitelist=/etc/distcc/clients.allow --jobs 4 --listen 192.168.0.3 --allow 192.168.0.0/4 └─1056 /usr/bin/distccd --no-detach --daemon --whitelist=/etc/distcc/clients.allow --jobs 4 --listen 192.168.0.3 --allow 192.168.0.0/4 Jun 16 12:47:54 tp03.localdomain systemd[1]: Started Distccd A Distributed Compilation Server. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
systemctl status distccd
Hi, Since it's awfully quiet on the initscripts-devel mailing list. Best regards, Mischa. distccd.service.d.tar.xz Description: application/xz-compressed-tar [root@tp02 ~]# systemctl status distccd ● distccd.service - Distccd A Distributed Compilation Server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/distccd.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2020-06-16 09:35:00 CEST; 21min ago Process: 741 ExecStart=/usr/bin/distccd --no-detach --daemon --whitelist=/etc/distcc/clients.allow $OPTIONS (code=exited, status=102) Main PID: 741 (code=exited, status=102) CPU: 16ms Jun 16 09:35:00 tp02.localdomain systemd[1]: Started Distccd A Distributed Compilation Server. Jun 16 09:35:00 tp02.localdomain distccd[741]: (dcc_listen_by_addr) ERROR: bind of 192.168.0.2:3632 failed: Cannot assign requested address Jun 16 09:35:00 tp02.localdomain systemd[1]: distccd.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=102/n/a Jun 16 09:35:00 tp02.localdomain systemd[1]: distccd.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. [root@tp02 mjbaars1977]# systemctl status distccd ● distccd.service - Distccd A Distributed Compilation Server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/distccd.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled) Drop-In: /etc/systemd/system/distccd.service.d └─distccd.service.conf Active: active (running) since Tue 2020-06-16 12:47:54 CEST; 46s ago Main PID: 945 (distccd) Tasks: 5 (limit: 4488) Memory: 1.7M CPU: 20ms CGroup: /system.slice/distccd.service ├─ 945 /usr/bin/distccd --no-detach --daemon --whitelist=/etc/distcc/clients.allow --jobs 4 --listen 192.168.0.3 --allow 192.168.0.0/4 ├─ 952 /usr/bin/distccd --no-detach --daemon --whitelist=/etc/distcc/clients.allow --jobs 4 --listen 192.168.0.3 --allow 192.168.0.0/4 ├─ 994 /usr/bin/distccd --no-detach --daemon --whitelist=/etc/distcc/clients.allow --jobs 4 --listen 192.168.0.3 --allow 192.168.0.0/4 ├─1038 /usr/bin/distccd --no-detach --daemon --whitelist=/etc/distcc/clients.allow --jobs 4 --listen 192.168.0.3 --allow 192.168.0.0/4 └─1056 /usr/bin/distccd --no-detach --daemon --whitelist=/etc/distcc/clients.allow --jobs 4 --listen 192.168.0.3 --allow 192.168.0.0/4 Jun 16 12:47:54 tp03.localdomain systemd[1]: Started Distccd A Distributed Compilation Server. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
New HPLIP release 3.20.6 doesn't require plugin for printers whose needed plugin in the past
Hi all, I'm HPLIP maintainer in Fedora and I would like to ask *the users which have HP printers which needed their HP plugin to test the scratch build* of new hplip. HPLIP released a new version 3.20.6, where most models, which previously required HP plugin, were set to do not require plugin anymore. Although requirement of HP plugin was questionable with some printer models, other models may really needed it and they will not work without it. Please try the following scratch builds: Rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45790790 F32: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45790902 F31: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45790908 And if the update breaks printing or scanning for you, please let the upstream know here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip Thank you in advance for helping with testing! Zdenek -- Zdenek Dohnal Software Engineer Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: New HPLIP release 3.20.6 doesn't require plugin for printers whose needed plugin in the past
There isn't a sucg list, but basically you can check git log at https://github.com/zdohnal/hplip . On 6/16/20 3:14 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 03:01:22PM +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm HPLIP maintainer in Fedora and I would like to ask *the users which >> have HP printers which needed their HP plugin to test the scratch build* >> of new hplip. >> >> HPLIP released a new version 3.20.6, where most models, which previously >> required HP plugin, were set to do not require plugin anymore. > Is there a list of printers not requiring plugin anymore? > Downloading this plugin was the most cumbersome. In line with > Murphys's laws, I was noticing hplip was upgraded, and thus requiring > re-downloading plugin, when I had to print/scan something urgently. > > -- Zdenek Dohnal Software Engineer Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: New HPLIP release 3.20.6 doesn't require plugin for printers whose needed plugin in the past
And please don't try to reinstall plugin. It seems they haven't built a new one yet or they aren't planning to. See http://www.openprinting.org/download/printdriver/auxfiles/HP/plugins/ On 6/16/20 3:01 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm HPLIP maintainer in Fedora and I would like to ask *the users > which have HP printers which needed their HP plugin to test the > scratch build* of new hplip. > > HPLIP released a new version 3.20.6, where most models, which > previously required HP plugin, were set to do not require plugin anymore. > > Although requirement of HP plugin was questionable with some printer > models, other models may really needed it and they will not work > without it. > > Please try the following scratch builds: > > Rawhide: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45790790 > > F32: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45790902 > > F31: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45790908 > > And if the update breaks printing or scanning for you, please let the > upstream know here: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip > > > Thank you in advance for helping with testing! > > > Zdenek > > -- > Zdenek Dohnal > Software Engineer > Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C > > ___ > devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Zdenek Dohnal Software Engineer Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: More boot questions
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 07:59 -0300, George N. White III wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 02:08, Tim via users > wrote: > > > On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 17:56 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > My system disk is a Samsung EVO SSD (2TB) and I'm unaware of any > > > problems with it. Smartcontrol shows no errors. > > > > Likewise. And I just bought a new 500 gig Samsung Evo 860 to install > > in a server. > > > > Reports of problems using AMD hardware: > https://eu.community.samsung.com/t5/Computers-IT/860-EVO-250GB-causing-freezes-on-AMD-system/td-p/575813 > > 00:11.0 SATA controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] > SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller [AHCI mode] (rev 40) > Subsystem: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller > [AHCI mode] > Kernel driver in use: ahci > Kernel modules: ahci > > I wrote to Samsung's EU support (samsungmem...@hanaro.eu) and they told me > to "use an Intel controller or SATA AHCI controller." to which I explained > that it's obvious that the controller in the AMD chipset is SATA AHCI. > After few more mails where I explained that it's not normal for the SSD to > act like that, they continued to blame the AMD SATA controller, I clearly > stated that I'm not going to buy new system just to get the SSD working > correctly and that the issue is in their SSD controller and not the AMD > SATA controller and it's up to them to fix it with firmware update. Well, > it's seems that it's not going to happen - they told me to return the SSD > back to the retailer or to send it to their service center in the > Netherlands My mobo is a fairly old MSI with an Intel chipset. The SSD is connected to a SATA-3 header. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I change the grub kernel boot parameters in F32 ?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 Stephen Morris wrote: > On 16/6/20 9:06 am, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-06-16 07:01, Tom H wrote: >>> >>> The kernel options are in the BLS entries, so it doesn't matter >>> what you have in grubenv. >>> >>> From the grub2 changelog on may 13th: >>> >>> Store cmdline in BLS snippets instead of using a grubenv variable >>> >>> The kernel cmdline was stored as a kernelopts variable in the >>> grubenv file and the BLS snippets used that. But this turned out to >>> be fragile since the grubenv file could be removed or get corrupted >>> easily. >>> >>> To prevent the entries to not have a cmdline if the grubenv can't >>> be read, a fallback variable was set in the GRUB config file. But >>> this still caused issues since the config needs to be re-generated >>> to change the parameters. >>> >>> Instead, let's store the cmdline in the BLS snippets. This will >>> make the configuration more robust, since it will work even without >>> the grubenv file and the BLS entries will contain all the >>> information needed to boot. >> >> Thanks for that. >> >> Just to complete my understanding, by the BLS snippets you mean the >> >> /boot/loader/entries/*.conf >> >> files? > > If GRUB_ENABLE_BLSCFG=false is not going to be supported anymore, how > does one disable BLS if we don't want it? You MAY be right in assuming that Fedora might choose only to support BLS. If that day comes, we'll use BLS. I hope that, by then, we'll have a way to customize the snippets, for example, not to use the machine-id UUIDs. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: systemctl status distccd
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 13:50 +0200, Michael J. Baars wrote: > Hi, > > Since it's awfully quiet on the initscripts-devel mailing list. What is this and why is it relevant to this list rather than initscripts-devel? I'd appreciate being able to read what something's about without having to open an attached tar file. I also see you appear to have reposted the exact same message twice. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I change the grub kernel boot parameters in F32 ?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:50 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-06-16 19:42, Stephen Morris wrote: >> >> If GRUB_ENABLE_BLSCFG=false is not going to be supported anymore, >> how does one disable BLS if we don't want it? > > If that should happen then one needs to learn how to work with BLS. > Legacy methods aren't supported forever. Just like we don't have > System V init scripts. LOL. I don't think that you can call the grub config that every distribution other than Fedora and RHEL uses "legacy." I wonder whether BLSCFG's been upstreamed. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do I change the grub kernel boot parameters in F32 ?
On 2020-06-17 00:38, Tom H wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:50 PM Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-06-16 19:42, Stephen Morris wrote: >>> If GRUB_ENABLE_BLSCFG=false is not going to be supported anymore, >>> how does one disable BLS if we don't want it? >> If that should happen then one needs to learn how to work with BLS. >> Legacy methods aren't supported forever. Just like we don't have >> System V init scripts. > LOL. I don't think that you can call the grub config that every > distribution other than Fedora and RHEL uses "legacy." I wonder > whether BLSCFG's been upstreamed. Well, I do think that if a given distribution has decided to no longer support a feature it can be call "legacy" within that distribution. What was the arc of systemd? Oh, and it seems, BLS is an outgrowth of systemd? https://systemd.io/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION/ -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: systemctl status distccd
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 13:50 +0200, Michael J. Baars wrote: > Since it's awfully quiet on the initscripts-devel mailing list. There doesn't seem to be a question in your email. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1127.10.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 3 14:28:03 UTC 2020 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: More boot questions
Tim: >> And I just bought a new 500 gig Samsung Evo 860 to install >> in a server. George N. White III: > Reports of problems using AMD hardware: > https://eu.community.samsung.com/t5/Computers-IT/860-EVO-250GB-causing-freezes-on-AMD-system/td-p/575813 > > > 00:11.0 SATA controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] > > SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller [AHCI mode] (rev 40) > > Subsystem: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA > > Controller [AHCI mode] > > Kernel driver in use: ahci > > Kernel modules: ahci > > > > I wrote to Samsung's EU support (samsungmem...@hanaro.eu) and they > > told me to "use an Intel controller or SATA AHCI controller." to > > which I explained that it's obvious that the controller in the AMD > > chipset is SATA AHCI. After few more mails where I explained that > > it's not normal for the SSD to act like that, they continued to > > blame the AMD SATA controller, I clearly stated that I'm not going > > to buy new system just to get the SSD working correctly and that > > the issue is in their SSD controller and not the AMD SATA > > controller and it's up to them to fix it with firmware update. > > Well, it's seems that it's not going to happen - they told me to > > return the SSD back to the retailer or to send it to their service > > center in the Netherlands My motherboards are both ASRock B250M Pro4, I can't find anything saying what chipset is involved with SATA, just this: 6 x SATA3 6.0 Gb/s Connectors, support NCQ, AHCI and Hot Plug https://www.asrock.com/MB/Intel/B250M%20Pro4/index.asp#Specification Very unenlightening. One of the PCs has been using a 500 gig Samsung 860 drive for a couple of years without noticing any drive problems. Nor had I done anything special in the UEFI for it, just plugged it in and let Fedora install itself. The other's been using a hard drive, and I just bought the same model drive to use in it. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1127.10.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 3 14:28:03 UTC 2020 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: systemctl status distccd
On 2020-06-17 09:53, Tim via users wrote: > On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 13:50 +0200, Michael J. Baars wrote: >> Since it's awfully quiet on the initscripts-devel mailing list. > There doesn't seem to be a question in your email. > You have to open the attachments to learn what is the issue. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: More boot questions
On 6/15/20 12:57 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 6/14/20 9:40 PM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 6/14/20 3:12 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 6/14/20 9:39 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Copied my fedora 29 system to an SSD partition. Booting takes me to Grub-rescue> SuperGrub2 2.04s1 finds the system and boots it but it is read only.?? Knoppix reads and writes to the system with no problem. Used Knoppix to fix /etc/fstab and grub.cfg. I think grub-install is needed from fedora but have to be able to write to the drive. You need to provide more details. What do you mean it's read only? And grub-install write to the raw hard drive, not to a filesystem. A Fedora live boot or a net install rescue boot is a good way to fix things. ___ Any attempt to write to the system gets a message that the file system is read only. grub2-install /dev/sda fails trying writes to /boot/grub2/i386-pc. ls -l gives a list that looks completely normal with the expected permissions owners and groups. Oh, right, it wants to set up the modules too. What does "mount" show? Try running "mount -o rw,remount /". Or use "/boot" instead if you have a separate partition for it. The simplest method though is still to download a Fedora net install image and use the rescue mode. It sets everything up for you to chroot to the installed system and run whatever you want. Just be aware that it will do a full relabel on reboot. If you're sure you didn't change anything important, you can remove the /.autorelabel file before rebooting. Found my problem and it is a curiosity on how the disk designations interact. In entering the / UUID in fstab a 6 became a b. The entries in grub.cfg were correct and apparently allowed the system to boot and run as long as there was nothing needing to be written to the drive. I boot to a terminal and then start the graphical display which could not happen without writing to the .serverauth.xxx and .Xauthority files among others. Corrected, the system is working without problems and upgraded from f29 to f32. Didn't have to dig out the warranty on the drive after all. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: systemctl status distccd
Tim: >> There doesn't seem to be a question in your email. Ed Greshko: > You have to open the attachments to learn what is the issue. I did, before I wrote that. There still isn't a question, just some submitted log files. He doesn't ask anything about them. I don't know if this is some kind of bug report, or if he's asking for help with solving a configuration, or what kind of help he needs. The batteries in my crystal ball have gone flat. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1127.10.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 3 14:28:03 UTC 2020 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
