Re: [Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

[Jonathan Ryshpan]

Thanks - jon

-Original Message-

Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:37:52 -0700
Subject: Re: [Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Reply-to: Community support for Fedora users 
From: Kevin Fenzi 
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:34:46 -0800
Jonathan Ryshpan  wrote:

> I'm getting requests for more info about a bug that I filed in 2010
> against Fedora-19.  The latest is appended here.  How can I stop them?

Go to the bug and go to the bottom and check the: 
[ ] I am providing the requested information for this bug (Will clear
all needinfo requests). 
checkbox. Then hit 'save changes'. 

kevin

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Missing apm module

[ale]

Hello,
today I delved a little into systemd and, trying to understand how it works, I 
came across a puzzling little problem: systemd-modules-load fails because apd 
module cannot be loaded.

In fact I have `/etc/modules-load.d/apmd.conf` that tries to load `apm`, but 
the module is not present (modprobe fails). If I run `apm` I get "No APM 
support in kernel".

So, I was wondering if apm and apmd are necessary and why the module is not 
present. If it's not compiled in the kernel, why is it missing? I can `dnf 
remove apmd` without any other dependency, is it safe? Shall I remove it?

I am running F25 with kernel 4.9.5-200.

Thanks!
~Aki
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [...] D-Link DWA-192 - Realtek RTL8814AU WiFi USB 3.0

[poma]

On 30.01.2017 22:37, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 31/01/2017 02:58, poma wrote:
>> On 29.01.2017 22:42, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> On 27/01/2017 21:20, poma wrote:
 On 26.01.2017 22:12, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 24/01/2017 15:12, poma wrote:
>> On 23.01.2017 21:14, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> On 23/01/2017 08:27, poma wrote:
 On 22.01.2017 21:49, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 23/01/2017 00:43, poma wrote:
>> On 21.01.2017 21:00, poma wrote:
>>> On 17.01.2017 22:12, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> [...]
 The lsusb output for that device is also below.

 Bus 010 Device 002: ID 2001:331a D-Link Corp.

>>> [...]
>>>
>>> D-Link DWA-192 - Realtek RTL8814AU WiFi USB 3.0
>>>
>>> https://wikidevi.com/wiki/D-Link_DWA-192
>>> http://support.dlink.com/ProductInfo.aspx?m=DWA-192
>>> ftp://files.dlink.com.au/products/DWA-192
>>> https://openitforum.pl/index/recenzje/karty/d-link-dwa-192-r225
>>>
>>> https://wikidevi.com/wiki/Edimax_EW-7833UAC
>>> http://www.edimax.com/edimax/download/download/data/edimax/global/download/for_home/wireless_adapters/wireless_adapters_ac1750_dual-band/ew-7833uac
>>> http://www.edimax.com/edimax/mw/cufiles/files/download/Driver_Utility/EW-7833UAC_linux_4.3.21_kernel_3.16-4.4.zip
>>>
>>> https://github.com/pld-linux/rtl8812au
>>> https://github.com/diederikdehaas/rtl8812AU
>>>
>>> ~~~
>>>
>>> $ unzip EW-7833UAC_linux_4.3.21_kernel_3.16-4.4.zip
>>> $ cd 
>>> EW7833UAC_linux_4.3.21_kernel_3.16-4.4/EW7833UAC_linux_v4.3.21_17997.20160531/
>>>
>>> $ curl -s 
>>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pld-linux/rtl8812au/master/disable-debug.patch
>>>  | patch -p1
>>> $ curl -s 
>>> https://github.com/diederikdehaas/rtl8812AU/commit/e6d6beb.patch | 
>>> patch -p1
>>> $ curl -s 
>>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pld-linux/rtl8812au/master/linux-4.7.patch
>>>  | patch -p1
>>> $ curl -s 
>>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pld-linux/rtl8812au/master/linux-4.8.patch
>>>  | patch -p1
>>>
>>> $ make -j3
>>> $ su
>>> # cp 8814au.ko /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/updates/
>>> # depmod
>>> # modinfo 8814au | grep 2001
>>>
>>> # modprobe -v 8814au
>>> # dmesg:
>>> ...
>>> RTL871X: module init start
>>> RTL871X: rtl8814au v4.3.21_17997.20160531
>>> RTL871X: build time: Jan 21 2017 20:04:38
>>> usbcore: registered new interface driver rtl8814au
>>> RTL871X: module init ret=0
>>> ...
>>> # modprobe -rv 8814au
>>> # dmesg:
>>> ...
>>> RTL871X: module exit start
>>> usbcore: deregistering interface driver rtl8814au
>>> RTL871X: module exit success
>>> ...
>>> 
>>>
>>> Wifi ball works now?
>>>
>>>
>>> HW add.
>>> https://wikidevi.com/wiki/ASUS_USB-AC68
>>> https://www.asus.com/Networking/USB-AC68/HelpDesk_Download
>>>
>>> https://wikidevi.com/wiki/TP-LINK_Archer_T9UH
>>> http://www.tp-link.com/en/download/Archer-T9UH.html
>>>
>>> https://wikidevi.com/wiki/TRENDnet_TEW-809UB
>>> https://www.trendnet.com/support/supportdetail.asp?prod=100_TEW-809UB
>>>
>>> SW add.
>>> https://github.com/abperiasamy/rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux
>>> https://github.com/austinmarton/rtl8812au_linux
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> OR
>> according to "rtl8814au? #10"
>> https://github.com/diederikdehaas/rtl8812AU/issues/10
>>
>> $ git clone -b driver-4.3.21 
>> https://github.com/uminokoe/rtl8812AU.git RTL8814AU-uminokoe
>> $ cd RTL8814AU-uminokoe/
>> $ git revert -n 9260f77 8d33100
>> // "Disabled debugging code."
>> $ curl -s 
>> https://github.com/diederikdehaas/rtl8812AU/commit/3e80ebc.patch | 
>> patch -p1
>> // Enables CONFIG_MP_VHT_HW_TX_MODE
>> $ sed -i '/CONFIG_MP_VHT_HW_TX_MODE/s/n/y/' Makefile
>> $ sed -i '/CONFIG_MP_VHT_HW_TX_MODE/s/#//' Makefile
>>
>> OR
>> $ git clone https://github.com/diederikdehaas/rtl8814AU.git 
>> RTL8814AU-diederikdehaas
>> $ cd RTL8814AU-diederikdehaas/
>> // Adds missing Vendor/Product ID
>> $ sed -i '/0xA834/ a\\t{USB_DEVICE(0x7392, 0xA833), .driver_info = 
>> RTL8814A}, /* Edimax - Edimax */' os_dep/linux/usb_intf.c
>> // "Added VHT capabilities."
>> $ curl -s https://github.com/uminokoe/rtl8812AU/commit/5f75242.patch 
>> | patch -p1
>> /

Dummy audio and no Wifi after upgrading to f25

[Tomas Repik]

Hi,

I've been struggling with both audio and wifi since i upgraded from F24 to F25. 
I went through many advices and suggestions (different kernels, restarting, 
reinstalling both alsa and pulseaudio) to solve the issues with no result.

I don't have any audio feedback from my device (in audio settings only dummy 
output is shown). I filed a bug against pulseaudio [1]. I also provide output 
from lshw command [2].

It shows that both wifi and audio devices are UNCLAIMED (don't know what that 
mean).

thanks for any help

Tomas

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416291
[2] https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/tmp/lshw
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[Frédéric Bron]

I experience very very slow internet connexions, in particular when on
google web sites. Mostly I use firefox but occasionnaly konqueror. Is
there anything I could do to determine if it comes from fedora,
firefox or my internet provider?

$ ping www.google.com
64 bytes from wk-in-x93.1e100.net (2a00:1450:400c:c04::93): icmp_seq=1
ttl=47 time=42.2 ms

Cheers,

Frédéric
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[Snaker Mota]

If fedora 25 was not ready for release it is better not to lansarla is
unstable when it will be stable?

El martes, 31 de enero de 2017, Frédéric Bron 
escribió:

> I experience very very slow internet connexions, in particular when on
> google web sites. Mostly I use firefox but occasionnaly konqueror. Is
> there anything I could do to determine if it comes from fedora,
> firefox or my internet provider?
>
> $ ping www.google.com
> 64 bytes from wk-in-x93.1e100.net (2a00:1450:400c:c04::93): icmp_seq=1
> ttl=47 time=42.2 ms
>
> Cheers,
>
> Frédéric
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[Rick Stevens]

On 01/31/2017 09:45 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> I experience very very slow internet connexions, in particular when on
> google web sites. Mostly I use firefox but occasionnaly konqueror. Is
> there anything I could do to determine if it comes from fedora,
> firefox or my internet provider?
> 
> $ ping www.google.com
> 64 bytes from wk-in-x93.1e100.net (2a00:1450:400c:c04::93): icmp_seq=1
> ttl=47 time=42.2 ms

A single ping is never enough to troubleshoot a connection issue as it
could be a DNS issue, route, or something else. There are several things
you could do:

1. Perform a "traceroute www.google.com" or other site you
are having issues with. You may find a hop in the route taken
that points to an issue.

2. Do several "host -v www.google.com" or other site you have
problems with. Look at the last line ("Received xx bytes from
[ip-address-of-dns-server]#53 in yy ms"). Check the address of
the DNS server to make sure it's correct and look at the "yy ms"
bit to see if the server is being pokey.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-  Whoever said "Money can't buy happiness" obviously never had any  -
- money! -
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[Rick Stevens]

On 01/31/2017 10:26 AM, Snaker Mota wrote:
> 
> If fedora 25 was not ready for release it is better not to lansarla is
> unstable when it will be stable?

F25 was (and is) as stable as any Fedora release. If you want real
stability, you have to use something like CentOS. Fedora is an
experimental, bleeding edge distribution.

Also, this has NOTHING to do with the OP's issue. Please don't just
reply to a message to post a new topic. Post an entirely NEW message.

> El martes, 31 de enero de 2017, Frédéric Bron  > escribió:
> 
> I experience very very slow internet connexions, in particular when on
> google web sites. Mostly I use firefox but occasionnaly konqueror. Is
> there anything I could do to determine if it comes from fedora,
> firefox or my internet provider?
> 
> $ ping www.google.com 
> 64 bytes from wk-in-x93.1e100.net 
> (2a00:1450:400c:c04::93): icmp_seq=1
> ttl=47 time=42.2 ms

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Frédéric

--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-  You know the old saying--any technology sufficiently advanced is  -
-   indistinguishable from a Perl script -
- --Programming Perl, 2nd Edition-
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[Joe Zeff]

On 01/31/2017 10:37 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:

1. Perform a "traceroute www.google.com" or other site you
are having issues with. You may find a hop in the route taken
that points to an issue.


Sometimes, you'll get no response from most of the hops (nothing but 
***) but it gets through.  If that happens, try traceroute -I instead, 
although you'll need to do it as root.  That uses ICMP ECHO for the 
probes, and is less likely to be dropped.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[Rick Stevens]

On 01/31/2017 10:56 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 01/31/2017 10:37 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> 1. Perform a "traceroute www.google.com" or other site you
>> are having issues with. You may find a hop in the route taken
>> that points to an issue.
> 
> Sometimes, you'll get no response from most of the hops (nothing but
> ***) but it gets through.  If that happens, try traceroute -I instead,
> although you'll need to do it as root.  That uses ICMP ECHO for the
> probes, and is less likely to be dropped.

Yes, that is true, but keep in mind that -I may also not work. Sometimes
pings are not returned (if the target has ICMP blocked for some reason,
such as being the VIP for a load balanced cluster).

The important thing is for the hops that return data, looking to see if
some of the hops are slow. It also would be useful to let ping run for
15-20 seconds to get a fair sampling. A single ping is rarely enough
except to merely check for connectivity and one may see some pings take
a LOT longer to happen than others.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
- We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?   -
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[Joe Zeff]

On 01/31/2017 11:26 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:

On 01/31/2017 10:56 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:

>On 01/31/2017 10:37 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:

>> 1. Perform a "traceroutewww.google.com" or other site you
>> are having issues with. You may find a hop in the route taken
>> that points to an issue.

>
>Sometimes, you'll get no response from most of the hops (nothing but
>***) but it gets through.  If that happens, try traceroute -I instead,
>although you'll need to do it as root.  That uses ICMP ECHO for the
>probes, and is less likely to be dropped.

Yes, that is true, but keep in mind that -I may also not work. Sometimes
pings are not returned (if the target has ICMP blocked for some reason,
such as being the VIP for a load balanced cluster).


Indeed.  However, using -I will often get you more data to work with, 
and doesn't take much time, so it's worth trying if a regular traceroute 
doesn't get much response.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[Frédéric Bron]

Thanks, I will try all what was said:
- traceroute
- longer ping
- host -v

will report later when it comes back slow.

Cheers
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[linux guy]

In case this helps.

​From my RPi:

# ping www.google.com
PING www.google.com (172.217.1.36) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56
time=51.5 ms
64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56
time=51.9 ms
64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56
time=71.4 ms
64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56
time=54.0 ms
64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56
time=53.0 ms
64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=6 ttl=56
time=53.4 ms
64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=7 ttl=56
time=50.0 ms
64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=8 ttl=56
time=56.8 ms

--- www.google.com ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7008ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 50.072/55.293/71.494/6.409 ms


>From my i7 workstation:

$ ping www.google.com
PING www.google.com (216.58.216.100) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56
time=62.0 ms
64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56
time=65.4 ms
64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56
time=62.4 ms
64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56
time=65.8 ms
64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56
time=62.0 ms
64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=6 ttl=56
time=65.9 ms
64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=7 ttl=56
time=63.3 ms
^C
--- www.google.com ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6008ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 62.063/63.879/65.987/1.687 ms


My Rpi pings faster than my workstation.  Both wireless, same router, etc.

Caveat: I'm using a USB Wifi dongle on the RPi.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[linux guy]

Sorry, wrong list... I thought this was an RPi related issue.
​
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[Joe Zeff]

On 01/31/2017 11:59 AM, linux guy wrote:


My Rpi pings faster than my workstation.  Both wireless, same router, etc.


Different IP addresses.  Try pinging the IP to make sure you're pinging 
the same box.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[linux guy]

RPi:

# ping 172.217.1.36
PING 172.217.1.36 (172.217.1.36) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=50.8 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=54.9 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=66.2 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=55.6 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=55.1 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=52.5 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=53.1 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=52.8 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=62.8 ms
^C
--- 172.217.1.36 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 9 received, 0% packet loss, time 8010ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 50.805/56.025/66.264/4.846 ms

​i7 Workstation:

$ ping 172.217.1.36
PING 172.217.1.36 (172.217.1.36) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=146 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=66.8 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=55.1 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=52.3 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=134 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=156 ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=96.0
ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=52.9
ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=60.2
ms
64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=10 ttl=56 time=63.8
ms
^C

--- 172.217.1.36 ping statistics
---

10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time
9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 52.344/88.498/156.517/39.663 ms

RPi is running console only.   Workstation running KDE and several apps
open.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[Tom Horsley]

The real problem is likely to be some completely different web
site than the one you are connecting to. You think you are trying
to look at site1.com, but the page on site1.com references sites
2 through near-infinity to drag in ads, images, javascript, etc.

Most of the time, you can't even guess which site to ping or
traceroute :-(.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion

[linux guy]

Install an ad blocker and flash blocker.  Block everything and then slowly
allow things one at a time.
​
I find firefox pretty intolerant of "bad" scripts compared to Chrome.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Dummy audio and no Wifi after upgrading to f25

[stan]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:14:47 -0500 (EST)
Tomas Repik  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've been struggling with both audio and wifi since i upgraded from
> F24 to F25. I went through many advices and suggestions (different
> kernels, restarting, reinstalling both alsa and pulseaudio) to solve
> the issues with no result.
> 
> I don't have any audio feedback from my device (in audio settings
> only dummy output is shown). I filed a bug against pulseaudio [1]. I
> also provide output from lshw command [2].
> 
> It shows that both wifi and audio devices are UNCLAIMED (don't know
> what that mean).
> 
> thanks for any help
> 
> Tomas
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416291
> [2] https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/tmp/lshw

The alsa-info output in your ticket shows that alsa is not recognizing
your sound cards.  That's a show stopper, since pulse depends on alsa
to access the hardware.

You say this exact hardware worked in F24?  Then there is an alsa driver
for the device, and it is some sort of configuration error blocking
alsa from acquiring the devices.

You could specify an ~/.asoundrc to sort that out, as described below
(and probably lots of other places on the web).  On my
system, /etc/asound.conf is also empty.  I don't have ~/.asoundrc, but I
do have the equivalent of an asoundrc in /etc/modprobe.d/soundcard.conf
and it seems to work fine.

A quick search turned up this older page about a problem like yours.

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=177396

On that page, someone said the following which might apply to your
issue.


...
Actually The Wiki here also describes the case when two cards use the
same module (snd_hda_intel) but you want to specify some desired order
of detection with index=x parameter in /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf
file and need some way to distinguish them. You should use VID and PID.
Using output of this command:

$ lspci -nn | grep -i audio

outputs this in my case

00:03.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen
Core Processor HD Audio Controller [8086:0c0c] (rev 06) 00:1b.0 Audio
device [0403]: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset High
Definition Audio Controller [8086:8c20] (rev 04)

I set my Asus H87-PRO modo sound cards order like this
in /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf :

options snd-hda-intel index=0 model=auto vid=8086 pid=8c20
options snd-hda-intel index=1 model=auto vid=8086 pid=0c0c

Seems working and no additional ~/.asoundrc used yet.
...
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [...] D-Link DWA-192 - Realtek RTL8814AU WiFi USB 3.0

[Stephen Morris]

$ rfkill unblock wifi
OR
$ nmcli radio wifi on
IF
$ systemctl is-active NetworkManager
active
AND
subsequently
$ nmcli device wifi list
to show the APs within the range.

$ rpm -qi NetworkManager-wifi | grep Summary
Summary : Wifi plugin for NetworkManager

It is installed, right?


One question I have, in the 8814 instructions above you mentioned:

// Adds missing Vendor/Product ID
$ sed -i '/0xA834/ a\\t{USB_DEVICE(0x7392, 0xA833), .driver_info = RTL8814A}, 
/* Edimax - Edimax */' os_dep/linux/usb_intf.c

Should the values inside the USB_DEVICE brackets be the idVendor and idProduct 
numbers mentioned in the dmesg output above?


It is not for for D-Link DWA-192 - VID/PID 2001:331a is already there
https://github.com/diederikdehaas/rtl8814AU/blob/driver-4.3.21/os_dep/linux/usb_intf.c#L208


I've isolated one problem I have with this. Device wlp4s6 is still there 
and it is an old pci wireless device that I thought was dead. It looks 
like it wasn't and all the time that I thought I was using the DWA192 I 
was actually using the pci device, so I need to provide an apology to 
everyone who provided help on this, I was working under a false impression.


But having compiled the 8814au driver that I downloaded from the web 
site you provided it seems to be using working now on the 5GHz channel, 
but the device has a blue light around the middle of it that the driver 
seems to be flashing all the time. When the device is active the light 
should be permanently on and goes out when connection to the net is 
lost. I could switch the light off but that defeats the purpose of what 
it is for. Under windows that process works correctly.


In network manager the device it is talking to shows this: wlp3s0u2 
(0E:13:3D:F9:D2:A4). I thought the information within the brackets was 
the mac address of the device, but if I am correct it has determined the 
mac address incorrectly.


regards,
Steve

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [...] D-Link DWA-192 - Realtek RTL8814AU WiFi USB 3.0

[Rick Stevens]

On 01/31/2017 01:47 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> 
>> $ rfkill unblock wifi
>> OR
>> $ nmcli radio wifi on
>> IF
>> $ systemctl is-active NetworkManager
>> active
>> AND
>> subsequently
>> $ nmcli device wifi list
>> to show the APs within the range.
>>
>> $ rpm -qi NetworkManager-wifi | grep Summary
>> Summary : Wifi plugin for NetworkManager
>>
>> It is installed, right?
>>
>>> One question I have, in the 8814 instructions above you mentioned:
>>>
>>> // Adds missing Vendor/Product ID
>>> $ sed -i '/0xA834/ a\\t{USB_DEVICE(0x7392, 0xA833), .driver_info =
>>> RTL8814A}, /* Edimax - Edimax */' os_dep/linux/usb_intf.c
>>>
>>> Should the values inside the USB_DEVICE brackets be the idVendor and
>>> idProduct numbers mentioned in the dmesg output above?
>>>
>> It is not for for D-Link DWA-192 - VID/PID 2001:331a is already there
>> https://github.com/diederikdehaas/rtl8814AU/blob/driver-4.3.21/os_dep/linux/usb_intf.c#L208
>>
>>
>>
> I've isolated one problem I have with this. Device wlp4s6 is still there
> and it is an old pci wireless device that I thought was dead. It looks
> like it wasn't and all the time that I thought I was using the DWA192 I
> was actually using the pci device, so I need to provide an apology to
> everyone who provided help on this, I was working under a false impression.
> 
> But having compiled the 8814au driver that I downloaded from the web
> site you provided it seems to be using working now on the 5GHz channel,
> but the device has a blue light around the middle of it that the driver
> seems to be flashing all the time. When the device is active the light
> should be permanently on and goes out when connection to the net is
> lost. I could switch the light off but that defeats the purpose of what
> it is for. Under windows that process works correctly.
> 
> In network manager the device it is talking to shows this: wlp3s0u2
> (0E:13:3D:F9:D2:A4). I thought the information within the brackets was
> the mac address of the device, but if I am correct it has determined the
> mac address incorrectly.

Yes, that should be the MAC address of the device. The newer kernels
number the network devices in the order they're discovered on the bus
and name them according to their position in the bus (e.g. "p4s0"
meaning PCI device 4, subdevice 0). Typically hardwired stuff starts
off with "en", wireless with "wl". Toss in USB and I'm not sure what
they'd be.

In your case, the PCI device is probably found first and would be, by
default, the one NM tries to use. Your USB dongle would probably be
discovered last and you'll need to tell NM to use it in place of the
PCI card.

Again, "ip link show" will show you the various network devices you
have, along with their names and in the "link/ether" line for each
device, the MAC address of the device. You can then use "ethtool -i
" to see which driver that device is using. Make note of
the MAC address of your new device and make sure it's using the driver
you expect it to use.

If you really want to start from scratch, then in NM, I would delete
any existing configurations you have, then click "Add", then select
"Wi-Fi" in the "Connection Type" window. In the "Wi-Fi" tab, fill in
the SSID of your wireless network, select "Client" (or "Managed") in
the "Mode" field, then use the drop-down in "Device" and select the MAC
of the new device.

Click the "Wi-Fi Security" tab, fill in the appropriate data. Finally,
click the "General" tab and tick the "Automatically connect to this
network when it is available" option, then click "Save". Hopefully,
it'll come right up with a DHCP address. If not, right-click on the NM
applet, disable networking, then re-enable it.

--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-  You know the old saying--any technology sufficiently advanced is  -
-   indistinguishable from a Perl script -
- --Programming Perl, 2nd Edition-
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [...] D-Link DWA-192 - Realtek RTL8814AU WiFi USB 3.0

[poma]

On 31.01.2017 22:47, Stephen Morris wrote:
[...]
> but the device has a blue light around the middle of it that the driver 
> seems to be flashing all the time. When the device is active the light 
> should be permanently on and goes out when connection to the net is 
> lost. I could switch the light off but that defeats the purpose of what 
> it is for. Under windows that process works correctly.

http://support.dlink.com/ContactSupport.aspx?m=DWA-192
What was the reply from D-Link Support upon that question?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Dummy audio and no Wifi after upgrading to f25

[Samuel Sieb]

On 01/31/2017 07:14 AM, Tomas Repik wrote:

It shows that both wifi and audio devices are UNCLAIMED (don't know what that 
mean).

That usually means that no kernel module is registered to handle that 
device.  Do you still have one of the F24 kernels?  If so, try booting 
it and see if they are claimed there.  Otherwise, show us the output of 
"lspci".

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org