Re: Systemctl status network.service Displays Wrong Timestamp on Output Display

[Stephen Morris]

On 14/07/16 09:54, Ed Greshko wrote:


On 07/14/16 06:08, Stephen Morris wrote:

 Below are the messages I get when I issue command 'systemctl status
network.service'. The time stamp on the messages is incorrect by 1 hour,
can anyone tell me why?

Sounds like the system processes think they are in a different time zone than 
user
processes.  This can sometimes happen when system time is set to a UTC offset 
while users
have their zones set to a local zone which has "standard" time as well as 
"summer" time.

But, your email address would suggest you're located in Australia and now on 
"standard"
time so they should match up.

So, it isn't clear why this is happening in your case.

I would check the output of "hwclock" as well as check what /etc/localtime 
links to as a
start.
Thanks Ed, the output from both commands is below, but they are both 
showing what I expect them to show based on what local time is and the 
timezone location I have set.


hwclock
hwclock: Sorry, only the superuser can use the Hardware Clock.
bash-4.3$ sudo hwclock
[sudo] password for steve:
2016-07-15 07:05:30.593023+10:00
bash-4.3$ less /etc/localtime
"/etc/localtime" may be a binary file.  See it anyway?
bash-4.3$ ll /etc/localtime
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 41 Jun  3 07:40 /etc/localtime -> 
../usr/share/zoneinfo/Australia/Melbourne


regards,
Steve

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Systemctl status network.service Displays Wrong Timestamp on Output Display

[Stephen Morris]

On 14/07/16 09:54, Ed Greshko wrote:


On 07/14/16 06:08, Stephen Morris wrote:

 Below are the messages I get when I issue command 'systemctl status
network.service'. The time stamp on the messages is incorrect by 1 hour,
can anyone tell me why?

Sounds like the system processes think they are in a different time zone than 
user
processes.  This can sometimes happen when system time is set to a UTC offset 
while users
have their zones set to a local zone which has "standard" time as well as 
"summer" time.

But, your email address would suggest you're located in Australia and now on 
"standard"
time so they should match up.

So, it isn't clear why this is happening in your case.

I would check the output of "hwclock" as well as check what /etc/localtime 
links to as a
start.
I think I now understand what the timestamp issue is, it looks like it 
is my lack of understanding of what the command is showing. I thought 
the timestamp was the time the command was issued, but it appears from 
the output below where I issued the command several minutes apart, that 
the timestamp reflects when the network was physically started at boot 
time. Looking at the output again it looks like the information in the 
3rd output line (the Active: line) is key as to what the timestamp on 
the messages actually is.


sudo systemctl status network.service
● network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking
   Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network; bad; vendor preset: disabled)
   Active: active (exited) since Fri 2016-07-15 07:01:22 AEST; 11min ago
 Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
  Process: 1099 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start (code=exited, 
status=0/SUCCESS)

Tasks: 0 (limit: 512)

Jul 15 07:01:20 localhost.localdomain systemd[1]: Starting LSB: Bring 
up/down networking...
Jul 15 07:01:20 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: Bringing up 
loopback interface:  Could not loa
Jul 15 07:01:21 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: Could not load file 
'/etc/sysconfig/network-sc
Jul 15 07:01:21 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: Could not load file 
'/etc/sysconfig/network-sc
Jul 15 07:01:21 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: Could not load file 
'/etc/sysconfig/network-sc

Jul 15 07:01:21 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: [  OK  ]
Jul 15 07:01:22 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: Bringing up 
interface Linksys07468_5Ghz:  [  O
Jul 15 07:01:22 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: Bringing up 
interface enp7s0:  [  OK  ]
Jul 15 07:01:22 localhost.localdomain systemd[1]: Started LSB: Bring 
up/down networking.

bash-4.3$ sudo systemctl status network.service
● network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking
   Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network; bad; vendor preset: disabled)
   Active: active (exited) since Fri 2016-07-15 07:01:22 AEST; 13min ago
 Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
  Process: 1099 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start (code=exited, 
status=0/SUCCESS)

Tasks: 0 (limit: 512)

Jul 15 07:01:20 localhost.localdomain systemd[1]: Starting LSB: Bring 
up/down networking...
Jul 15 07:01:20 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: Bringing up 
loopback interface:  Could not loa
Jul 15 07:01:21 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: Could not load file 
'/etc/sysconfig/network-sc
Jul 15 07:01:21 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: Could not load file 
'/etc/sysconfig/network-sc
Jul 15 07:01:21 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: Could not load file 
'/etc/sysconfig/network-sc

Jul 15 07:01:21 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: [  OK  ]
Jul 15 07:01:22 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: Bringing up 
interface Linksys07468_5Ghz:  [  O
Jul 15 07:01:22 localhost.localdomain network[1099]: Bringing up 
interface enp7s0:  [  OK  ]
Jul 15 07:01:22 localhost.localdomain systemd[1]: Started LSB: Bring 
up/down networking.


regards,
Steve
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't start mariadb-server_Solved

[Samuel Sieb]

On 07/14/2016 11:22 AM, jd1008 wrote:

But the installation process should create a unique user also, specific
to the name of the db package. Keeping things separate is, as I see it,
the way to go to prevent clashing pathnames.


mariadb at this point is supposed to be pretty much a drop-in 
replacement for mysql.  By keeping the same username and directories, it 
makes it much easier for users to continue using existing documentation. 
 I don't know if mariadb is supposed to be able to use existing mysql 
databases, but I would expect so.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: cron -- abrt issue

[Samuel Sieb]

On 07/14/2016 08:55 AM, bruce wrote:

Jul 14 08:45:09 crawl1 abrt: detected unhandled Python exception in
'/crawl_tmp/jcccParse_cloud_test.py'
Jul 14 08:45:09 crawl1 abrtd: Directory
'pyhook-2016-07-14-08:45:09-14939' creation detected
Jul 14 08:45:09 crawl1 abrt-server[14944]: Saved Python crash dump of
pid 14939 to /var/spool/abrt/pyhook-2016-07-14-08:45:09-14939
Jul 14 08:45:09 crawl1 abrtd: Executable
'/crawl_tmp/jcccParse_cloud_test.py' doesn't belong to any package and
ProcessUnpackaged is set to 'no'
Jul 14 08:45:09 crawl1 abrtd: 'post-create' on
'/var/spool/abrt/pyhook-2016-07-14-08:45:09-14939' exited with 1
Jul 14 08:45:09 crawl1 abrtd: Deleting problem directory
'/var/spool/abrt/pyhook-2016-07-14-08:45:09-14939'

Your python script is running into an exception for some reason, but 
abrt doesn't know about your application so clears the data.  Try 
running it with stdout and stderr redirected to a file somewhere.  Then 
you should be able to see what the exception is.  You could also try 
setting ProcessUnpackaged to yes.  On my systems, in 
/etc/abrt/abrt-action-save-package-data.conf, that setting it turned on. 
 Do you have that?  Maybe it needs to be set in /etc/abrt/abrt.conf as 
well.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: dual boot - Windows 10 upgrade.

[Stephen Morris]

On 14/07/16 19:49, Ger van Dijck wrote:
Op Thu, 14 Jul 2016 02:47:13 +0200 schreef Robin Laing 
:


I need to do the windows 10 upgrade on a dual boot laptop.  Any 
serious worries I need to watch out for?


Thank you in advance.

Robin
--


Just do the upgrade to Windows 10 and reinstall new Fedora 24 : When 
upgrading to Windows 10 Fedora keeps in the bootloader the name of the 
former version of Windows , then reinstall new Fdora 24 and in the 
bootloader appears Windows 10.


My experience is that when you upgrade or do a new install of Windows 
dual boot does not functionate anymore.


Greetings ,

I haven't played around with this functionality for quite some time 
since moving from a Linux distro that allowed the linux boot blocks (and 
hence dual boot functionality) to be installed to a partition.
As I understand it a Windows install will install its boot blocks to the 
mbr of the disk it is installed on. Grub via grub2-install will let you 
install the grub boot blocks to the mbr on any physical disk that is 
available, so if you multiple disks you can install the grub dual-boot 
boot blocks to hard disk that Windows is not installed on, and then 
configure your bios (assuming your bios has this capability) to boot 
from the disk that has the linux boot blocks instead of the disk that 
has the windows boot blocks.
Failing that there is an application that you can install on to a dvd 
that will search your system for grub config files and let you boot from 
any entry in the configs it can find, so you could use it to boot back 
into linux and then use grub to put the dual-boot boot blocks back into 
the mbr.


regards,
Steve



Ger van Dijck.

users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org 


Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: application to listen to on-line broadcasts? [SOLVED]

[William Mattison]

I was wrong about the National Weather Service weather RADAR pages.  When I 
click a "Loop" button, the display shows a message "A plugin is needed to 
display this content." message.  I used Firefox's "Inspect Element" function, 
and what I see includes this:
 
followed by a small gray-filled rounded rectangle with "ev" inside.  So these 
animations do not need Java, they need flash.

There is still a "gnash" website, but it shows the most recent release being 
about 4 years old.  The Wikipedia page for "gnash" gives me the sense that it's 
dying thanks to legal risks and lack of programmers.  I wonder...  Does Redhat 
have the money and programmers (and legal eagles) to make a good flash 
substitute?!  Redhat: are you listening?

In the next day or 2, I'll try working through ask.fedora question 10217 as 
suggested by Samuel.

I did the "setsebool" command.  One of these days, I'll find a web page that 
will provide a test.  The NWS RADAR sites are no good for this.

Thank-you.
Bill.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Burning to disk an iso file

[Antonio M]

I assume that when I right-click on an Iso file, I sshould have the
write-to-disk option available, but it doesn't work, no ption available. Is
it a bug or a changed option??
Antonio Montagnani

Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
inviato da Gmail
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: OT: grep and regex patterns

[Jon LaBadie]

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:02:02PM +1000, c...@zip.com.au wrote:
> On 13Jul2016 22:03, Mike Wright  wrote:
> > OK, thanks everybody.
> > 
> > Had to use egrep. This works:
> > 
> > PATTERN='https?://[^/]*\.in(/.*)*'
> > egrep $PATTERN file.of.links > links.in
> 
> You need quotes around $PATTERN when you use it, thus:
> 
>  egrep "$PATTERN" file.of.links > links.in
> 
...
> > Covers cases with https and where nothing follows the .in
> 
> Your:
> 
>  (/.*)*
> 
> is better written:
> 
>  (/.*)?
> 
I'll mention one of my pet peeves (kinda like RLS's UUOC* award).

In a simple pattern matching grep RE, a repetition operator, '*'
(and in egrep '?'), is useless at the start or end of the pattern
and may reduce grep's efficiency.

  grep .*abc
  grep   abc.*
  grep .*abc.*
  grep   abc

Will all match the same set of lines.

Note, I'm not referring to some situations where anchors are used
(ex. 'abc[0-9]*$'), or sed substitutions, or even grep with the
'-o' option to output the matched portion.

Jon

 * Randal L Schwarz' Useless Use Of Cat
-- 
Jon H. LaBadie  jo...@jgcomp.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Grub2 UEFI PXE chainloader unloading Network Stack when chainloading an EFI module

[Gordon Messmer]

On 07/14/2016 12:49 PM, Leandro Gustavo Biss Becker wrote:

Analyzing the source code for both versions, I found an interesting change on 
grub-core\loader\efi\chainloader.c:382 ( I do not know if this change is 
broking what I need). In the newer version of grub, there is a call to 
grub_device_close(dev), so I'm wondering if this is causing the custom 
application to fail opening UEFI Network Protocols.



I'm not a grub developer, so I'm not familiar with the code, but you 
probably want to look at pxechainloader.c and the pxe.c file in the 
drivers directory.   don't see the change that broke things, but it 
looks to me like grub_pxe_shutdown needs to be called with the 
GRUB_LOADER_FLAG_PXE_NOT_UNLOAD flag, and nothing is setting that.  In 
pxechainloader.c, the grub_pxechain_unload is registered with that flag.


I don't have enough time to chase this down further, but if you want to, 
maybe start there.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Burning to disk an iso file

[Samuel Sieb]

On 07/14/2016 11:05 PM, Antonio M wrote:

I assume that when I right-click on an Iso file, I sshould have the
write-to-disk option available, but it doesn't work, no ption available.
Is it a bug or a changed option??
Antonio Montagnani

If I right-click an iso file in Nautilus, there's an option in the menu 
called "Write to Disc..." which brings up the disc writing dialog.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: application to listen to on-line broadcasts? [SOLVED]

[Samuel Sieb]

On 07/14/2016 07:46 PM, William Mattison wrote:

There is still a "gnash" website, but it shows the most recent release being about 4 
years old.  The Wikipedia page for "gnash" gives me the sense that it's dying thanks to 
legal risks and lack of programmers.  I wonder...  Does Redhat have the money and programmers (and 
legal eagles) to make a good flash substitute?!  Redhat: are you listening?


And it is mostly only useful for playing videos, not general flash apps.

Mozilla was working on a Firefox addon called shumway, but has since 
abandoned it.  It seemed to be at a reasonable level of usability.  You 
might be able to get it to work.



In the next day or 2, I'll try working through ask.fedora question 10217 as 
suggested by Samuel.

It's really easy.  Just install the adobe-release rpm from the link 
provided.  Then "dnf install flash-plugin".  And keep it up-to-date. 
Every couple of weeks, firefox disables it for security issues.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: application to listen to on-line broadcasts? [SOLVED]

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, Samuel Sieb  said:
> It's really easy.  Just install the adobe-release rpm from the link
> provided.  Then "dnf install flash-plugin".  And keep it up-to-date.
> Every couple of weeks, firefox disables it for security issues.

The Adobe-released Linux Flash is woefully out of date.  If you must
have Flash on Linux, IMHO the best way is to install Google Chrome (even
if you don't use it) and freshplayer (a plugin wrapper to run the Google
Pepper API variant of Flash in Firefox's NPAPI plugin environment).
-- 
Chris Adams 
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: application to listen to on-line broadcasts? [SOLVED]

[Samuel Sieb]

On 07/15/2016 11:04 AM, Chris Adams wrote:

Once upon a time, Samuel Sieb  said:

It's really easy.  Just install the adobe-release rpm from the link
provided.  Then "dnf install flash-plugin".  And keep it up-to-date.
Every couple of weeks, firefox disables it for security issues.


The Adobe-released Linux Flash is woefully out of date.  If you must
have Flash on Linux, IMHO the best way is to install Google Chrome (even
if you don't use it) and freshplayer (a plugin wrapper to run the Google
Pepper API variant of Flash in Firefox's NPAPI plugin environment).

The Linux version is still at 11.x instead of whatever windows gets. 
But they keep patching it and I haven't found any sites that it doesn't 
work on.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Burning to disk an iso file

[Antonio M]

That should be but i am missing that option

Il 15/Lug/2016 19:50, "Samuel Sieb"  ha scritto:

> On 07/14/2016 11:05 PM, Antonio M wrote:
>
>> I assume that when I right-click on an Iso file, I sshould have the
>> write-to-disk option available, but it doesn't work, no ption available.
>> Is it a bug or a changed option??
>> Antonio Montagnani
>>
>> If I right-click an iso file in Nautilus, there's an option in the menu
> called "Write to Disc..." which brings up the disc writing dialog.
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Burning to disk an iso file

[jd1008]

On 07/15/2016 12:58 PM, Antonio M wrote:


That should be but i am missing that option


Il 15/Lug/2016 19:50, "Samuel Sieb" > ha scritto:


On 07/14/2016 11:05 PM, Antonio M wrote:

I assume that when I right-click on an Iso file, I sshould
have the
write-to-disk option available, but it doesn't work, no ption
available.
Is it a bug or a changed option??
Antonio Montagnani

If I right-click an iso file in Nautilus, there's an option in the
menu called "Write to Disc..." which brings up the disc writing
dialog.


I do not have that option in Nautilus either.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Burning to disk an iso file

[Antonio M]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997219

I understand that it is not new...my system is un updated system from F23
to F24...I will check another system

Antonio Montagnani

Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
inviato da Gmail

2016-07-15 21:21 GMT+02:00 jd1008 :

>
>
> On 07/15/2016 12:58 PM, Antonio M wrote:
>
>>
>> That should be but i am missing that option
>>
>>
>> Il 15/Lug/2016 19:50, "Samuel Sieb" > sam...@sieb.net>> ha scritto:
>>
>> On 07/14/2016 11:05 PM, Antonio M wrote:
>>
>> I assume that when I right-click on an Iso file, I sshould
>> have the
>> write-to-disk option available, but it doesn't work, no ption
>> available.
>> Is it a bug or a changed option??
>> Antonio Montagnani
>>
>> If I right-click an iso file in Nautilus, there's an option in the
>> menu called "Write to Disc..." which brings up the disc writing
>> dialog.
>>
>> I do not have that option in Nautilus either.
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Burning to disk an iso file

[Antonio M]

same behaviour also on the second system

Antonio Montagnani

Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
inviato da Gmail

2016-07-15 21:27 GMT+02:00 Antonio M :

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997219
>
> I understand that it is not new...my system is un updated system from F23
> to F24...I will check another system
>
> Antonio Montagnani
>
> Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
> inviato da Gmail
>
> 2016-07-15 21:21 GMT+02:00 jd1008 :
>
>>
>>
>> On 07/15/2016 12:58 PM, Antonio M wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> That should be but i am missing that option
>>>
>>>
>>> Il 15/Lug/2016 19:50, "Samuel Sieb" >> sam...@sieb.net>> ha scritto:
>>>
>>> On 07/14/2016 11:05 PM, Antonio M wrote:
>>>
>>> I assume that when I right-click on an Iso file, I sshould
>>> have the
>>> write-to-disk option available, but it doesn't work, no ption
>>> available.
>>> Is it a bug or a changed option??
>>> Antonio Montagnani
>>>
>>> If I right-click an iso file in Nautilus, there's an option in the
>>> menu called "Write to Disc..." which brings up the disc writing
>>> dialog.
>>>
>>> I do not have that option in Nautilus either.
>>
>> --
>> users mailing list
>> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>>
>
>
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Burning to disk an iso file

[Samuel Sieb]

On 07/14/2016 11:05 PM, Antonio M wrote:

I assume that when I right-click on an Iso file, I sshould have the
write-to-disk option available, but it doesn't work, no ption available.
Is it a bug or a changed option??
Antonio Montagnani


dnf install brasero-nautilus
I don't know what is supposed to pull it in, but I have it on all my 
computers.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Burning to disk an iso file

[John Pilkington]

On 15/07/16 20:36, Antonio M wrote:

same behaviour also on the second system

Antonio Montagnani

Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
inviato da Gmail

2016-07-15 21:27 GMT+02:00 Antonio M mailto:antonio.montagn...@gmail.com>>:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997219

I understand that it is not new...my system is un updated system
from F23 to F24...I will check another system

Antonio Montagnani

Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
inviato da Gmail

2016-07-15 21:21 GMT+02:00 jd1008 mailto:jd1...@gmail.com>>:



On 07/15/2016 12:58 PM, Antonio M wrote:


That should be but i am missing that option


Il 15/Lug/2016 19:50, "Samuel Sieb" mailto:sam...@sieb.net> >> ha scritto:

On 07/14/2016 11:05 PM, Antonio M wrote:

I assume that when I right-click on an Iso file, I
sshould
have the
write-to-disk option available, but it doesn't work,
no ption
available.
Is it a bug or a changed option??
Antonio Montagnani

If I right-click an iso file in Nautilus, there's an
option in the
menu called "Write to Disc..." which brings up the disc
writing
dialog.

I do not have that option in Nautilus either.


I have always used the k3b GUI, 'Tools > Burn Image' or 'More Actions > 
Burn Image', but in el7/Konq it comes with a Right-click under 
'Actions.'   My f23 box isn't running at present...


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Burning to disk an iso file

[Antonio M]

I installed Brasero, that works fine. It surprises me that this option was
working some time ago, and it seems that this a cycling issue (poor control
of nautilus package??)

Antonio Montagnani

Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
inviato da Gmail

2016-07-15 22:32 GMT+02:00 John Pilkington :

> On 15/07/16 20:36, Antonio M wrote:
>
>> same behaviour also on the second system
>>
>> Antonio Montagnani
>>
>> Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
>> inviato da Gmail
>>
>> 2016-07-15 21:27 GMT+02:00 Antonio M > >:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997219
>>
>> I understand that it is not new...my system is un updated system
>> from F23 to F24...I will check another system
>>
>> Antonio Montagnani
>>
>> Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
>> inviato da Gmail
>>
>> 2016-07-15 21:21 GMT+02:00 jd1008 > >:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/15/2016 12:58 PM, Antonio M wrote:
>>
>>
>> That should be but i am missing that option
>>
>>
>> Il 15/Lug/2016 19:50, "Samuel Sieb" >  > >> ha scritto:
>>
>> On 07/14/2016 11:05 PM, Antonio M wrote:
>>
>> I assume that when I right-click on an Iso file, I
>> sshould
>> have the
>> write-to-disk option available, but it doesn't work,
>> no ption
>> available.
>> Is it a bug or a changed option??
>> Antonio Montagnani
>>
>> If I right-click an iso file in Nautilus, there's an
>> option in the
>> menu called "Write to Disc..." which brings up the disc
>> writing
>> dialog.
>>
>> I do not have that option in Nautilus either.
>>
>
> I have always used the k3b GUI, 'Tools > Burn Image' or 'More Actions >
> Burn Image', but in el7/Konq it comes with a Right-click under 'Actions.'
>  My f23 box isn't running at present...
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Burning to disk an iso file

[Corey 'linuxmodder' Sheldon]

On 07/15/2016 02:05 AM, Antonio M wrote:
> I assume that when I right-click on an Iso file, I sshould have the
> write-to-disk option available, but it doesn't work, no ption
> available. Is it a bug or a changed option??
> Antonio Montagnani
>
> Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
> inviato da Gmail
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Not natively  use something like gnome-disks with the restore option
with iso being 'source' and usb key being 'destination'

-- 

Corey W. Sheldon
PGP: 
0x5A88E539 / C006 564F FA67 CDEA E29B F202 8B4E 8943 5A88 E539
0xD2264944 / 6292 9ABD 6374 6AA7 6D4B 730F 5927 6298 D226 4944
Find me elsewhere: https://gist.github.com/linux-modder/ac5dc6fa211315c633c9

Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use only by the individual 
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential, and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If the reader of this message is 
not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering 
the message to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication 
in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its 
entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: dual boot - Windows 10 upgrade. [success]

[Robin Laing]

On 13/07/16 18:47, Robin Laing wrote:

I need to do the windows 10 upgrade on a dual boot laptop.  Any serious
worries I need to watch out for?

Thank you in advance.

Robin



I thought I would post my experience.

I started with the fear that it was going to create many headaches.  I 
was wrong.


I found the link to upgrade to Windows 10 off the Microsoft site and 
started the process.  Fingers crossed.


Various files were downloaded and then it was time to reboot so I did. 
I was expecting some strange issue on the boot but when the machine 
asked me to select Windows from grub, I was a bit surprised.  Of course 
this was the first boot.


Windows 10 installation started and the reboot process started.  I was 
not paying attention so when I looked again, I was being prompted for 
the Linux password.  CTRL+ALT+DEL and found that grub was still coming 
up.  Booted into windows.  All windows reboots were going to grub.


At the end, I had Windows 10 installed and tested and it was still being 
booted through grub.  I was very surprised and happy.


Booted into Fedora 23 and did the dnf upgrade with only one issue. 
Using KDE and sddm was not installed.  Booted into a terminal. 
Installed sddm and target graphical.default and all was well.


Full upgrade of both systems were done in less than 6 hours without rushing.

I guess Microsoft isn't so bad now.

Note, this machine is using GPT partitions and has secure boot enabled 
(other issues in the future).


Thanks to all that gave comments.

Robin
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

The selected menu items cannot be seen in gtk3 applications

[Paul Smith]

Dear All,

I am running F24 on my machine, and having problems with gtk3
applications. A very annoying problem is that the background color of
menus seem to coincide with the highlighted menu item. So, one cannot
see which menu item is being selected. Any workaround?

Thanks in advance,

Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: The selected menu items cannot be seen in gtk3 applications

[Stephen Morris]

On 16/07/16 09:27, Paul Smith wrote:

Dear All,

I am running F24 on my machine, and having problems with gtk3
applications. A very annoying problem is that the background color of
menus seem to coincide with the highlighted menu item. So, one cannot
see which menu item is being selected. Any workaround?

Thanks in advance,

Paul
Hi Paul, I have had the same issue and not just with menu items, I have 
had the same issue with inbox selections in my mail client, and the 
button tool tips in Yumex. I have found its all to do with the colour 
scheme that is being used combined with the theme. I am using the violet 
desktop colour scheme along with the Breeze theme for GTK3 applications, 
which seems to eliminate the white on white or white on light grey 
unreadability problems.


regards,
Steve


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org