Fedora 21 release schedule, etc.
Up to Fedora 21, releases have occurred at roughly 6 month intervals. Fedora 21 is scheduled to be released about 11 months after Fedora 20. Is the intention to schedule future releases at roughly 12 month intervals, or is the long interval for Fedora 21 only (or whatever)? Will Fedora 20 be supported till Fedora 22 is released, or for about 13 months after it was released, i.e. about January 2015 (or whatever)? Sorry if this has already been discussed; I haven't been following the list carefully. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 20 and Dell Latitude e6400
On Wednesday 27 August 2014 18:46:26 Brian Johnson wrote: > Hello all, > > I was recently gifted an old Dell Latitude E6400 laptop and, given its age > and what I've read, I thought getting Fedora 20 going on it would be > smooth. > > And, to some extent, it was. I was primarily concerned with the wireless, > but that seems to have been fixed for some time. > > Sadly, it wasn't without issues. I'm currently having issues getting my > trackpad and my webcam going. I've done some looking around with no luck. > > For the touchpad, I get basic functionality. I can "tap to click" and use > the pointer, but I can't use the scroll areas on the side/bottom for > scrolling. Clicking both physical buttons don't perform a middle-click, and > tapping with 2-fingers don't give me a "right" click. Going under "mouse & > touchpad" in Settings only gives me very basic options. > > Running "xinput list" shows it being seen as a "PS/2 ALPS DualPoint > TouchPad". Searching for Fedora and this don't yield much/anything. > > I'm running Fedora 20 updated as of today. Kernel is > 3.15.10-200.fc20.x86_64. > > I also would like to get the webcam going. When I try to run Cheese, I get > a "no device found" error. Running lsusb doesn't show a camera attached. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. > > Brian To get the two button emulation working on my DELL Vostro with my logitech wireless mouse I have the following: [gary@gary ~]$ cat .kde/Autostart/3button #!/bin/bash X='/usr/bin/xinput' for F in `$X list|grep Logitech|cut -d = -f 2|cut -c1-3` ; do $X set-prop $F "Evdev Middle Button Emulation" 1 done [gary@gary ~]$ It works on my touchpad without me having to do anything. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Dicom image -
On 08/26/14 19:33, Roger Heflin wrote: I had to go find the CD I had with dicom files on it. I was not able to get anything selecting the diacomdir file...I had to go into dicom dir and go down to where there were real files (select show all files) and then was able to display the image by selecting each image that was in several different dirs. I find the best way for me to view the images is to view the list of image files in the file manager [Thunar], select the one I want and then open it using aeskulap. Then "clicking" on the image brings up the start/stop button for display of the live video action. I looked at the other applications suggested but found none of those available via yum and since aeskulap seems to work well and did what I needed that's as far as I got so far ... Thank you, Bob -- http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 Fedora-20/64bit Linux/XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Dicom image -
On 28 August 2014 09:34, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > On 08/26/14 19:33, Roger Heflin wrote: >> >> I had to go find the CD I had with dicom files on it. >> >> I was not able to get anything selecting the diacomdir file...I had to >> go into dicom dir and go down to where there were real files (select >> show all files) and then was able to display the image by selecting >> each image that was in several different dirs. > > Yes, I think lots of stuff just ignores DICOMDIR and scans image files directly, it's also not an image file itself (though it is another type of DICOM file) and only used when images are on 'DICOM media' (which I think amounts to tape or CD), so lots of viewers probably aren't equipped to handle it. Some applications will let you specify a directory to load as an alternative to individual files. > > I find the best way for me to view the images is to view the list of image > files in the file manager [Thunar], select the one I want and then open it > using aeskulap. Then "clicking" on the image brings up the start/stop button > for display of the live video action. > > I looked at the other applications suggested but found none of those > available via yum and since aeskulap seems to work well and did what I > needed that's as far as I got so far ... > Cool, haven't used that one before, will have to check it out. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: exfat on SD card getting mounted read-only
Allegedly, on or about 27 August 2014, jd1008 sent: > It is electro-mechanical. No opticals involved at all. Then try putting a tiny dot of superglue put on top of the slider, itself, just to make that part of the card a bit bigger. Poke a toothpick into the glue, and use that to put a dot on the slider. That's the simplest way I can think of to make the switch more prominent to the sensor, without making the whole card too big to fit. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. ZNQR LBH YBBX -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Chrome not exiting
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:02:44AM +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > On Thursday, August 28, 2014 06:31:23 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > > It will come back > > Again see the problem exist in unstable version and if it does file a bug. > That is the best possible solution. If the GNOME solution I already posted doesn't work, you can also go into Settings in Chrome and turn off the option marked "Continue running background apps when Google Chrome is closed." -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 21 release schedule, etc.
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:48:06 -0700 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > Up to Fedora 21, releases have occurred at roughly 6 month intervals. > Fedora 21 is scheduled to be released about 11 months after Fedora 20. > Is the intention to schedule future releases at roughly 12 month > intervals, or is the long interval for Fedora 21 only (or whatever)? The long Fedora 21 cycle was to allow time for bringing up tools like QA's taskotron and rework deliverables to add Server/Workstation/Cloud products. I expect we will go back to a 6 month cycle with f22. > Will Fedora 20 be supported till Fedora 22 is released, or for about > 13 months after it was released, i.e. about January 2015 (or > whatever)? Right now as far as I know it should be supported until 1 month after Fedora 22 is released. > Sorry if this has already been discussed; I haven't been following the > list carefully. No problems. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
md5 encryption
hi all, I just had a question. so I have been hearing that md5 has been compromised, how much of a security threat does this impose? if it is something that poses a large concern is it possible to change the encryption method from md5 to crypt? or another method that is not compromised? thanks -dustink -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
BIOS boot partition, 4x3TB disks, and raid, problems with anaconda
Hi! I tried to set up a system using four 3TB disks as a raid6. The disks are new, no old partitions laying around. I used a USB stick as install media (Fedora 20 x86_64 Gnome Live). I chose manual partitioning to get everything as I wanted. When this was ready I got the error message that I also needed a BIOS boot partition (I gather that this due to being rather large disks). I tried to create one of those, but it seemed to only be created on one of the discs in the raid array, I wanted it created on all disks, just as the raid partitions. This to be able to boot from any of the disks in the array in case of a failure. As it is now, if the main disk dies, I can not start the system at all. Actually I ended up having three BIOS boot partition on the first disk, being 2, 1, and 1 MB large. Which is quite annoying. But that's another problem... Before submitting a bug report/RFE on this. Is there anyone out there that have done this, from anaconda? I.e. creating raid partitions and BIOS boot partitions on ALL disks? If so, how did you do it? Lars -- Lars E. Pettersson http://www.sm6rpz.se/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: BIOS boot partition, 4x3TB disks, and raid, problems with anaconda
On 08/28/2014 10:48 AM, Lars E. Pettersson issued this missive: Hi! I tried to set up a system using four 3TB disks as a raid6. The disks are new, no old partitions laying around. I used a USB stick as install media (Fedora 20 x86_64 Gnome Live). I chose manual partitioning to get everything as I wanted. When this was ready I got the error message that I also needed a BIOS boot partition (I gather that this due to being rather large disks). I tried to create one of those, but it seemed to only be created on one of the discs in the raid array, I wanted it created on all disks, just as the raid partitions. This to be able to boot from any of the disks in the array in case of a failure. As it is now, if the main disk dies, I can not start the system at all. Actually I ended up having three BIOS boot partition on the first disk, being 2, 1, and 1 MB large. Which is quite annoying. But that's another problem... Before submitting a bug report/RFE on this. Is there anyone out there that have done this, from anaconda? I.e. creating raid partitions and BIOS boot partitions on ALL disks? If so, how did you do it? AFAIK, a BIOS boot partition has to be on the primary disk where it can be found. At boot time, the BIOS no idea about the RAID since it's a construct of the operating system. Thus the BIOS can't use a partition on the RAID to boot. I think you need to reserve some small space on all the drives (and with 3TB drives you can afford to sacrifice a few MB), use the remainder as your RAID, and let the system put the boot partition in that reserved space on the primary drive (the one the BIOS sees as the boot drive). I prefer hardware RAID for just this reason (e.g. if you lose the primary drive, it can still boot since the RAID is visible to the BIOS). Hardware SATA RAID controllers aren't that expensive ($350 US) for the peace of mind they bring. This is just my opinion. Your mileage may vary. Void where prohibited. Batteries not included. Some assembly required. Yadda, yadda. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - grep me no patterns and I'll tell you no lines - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: BIOS boot partition, 4x3TB disks, and raid, problems with anaconda
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:10:54 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: I think you need to reserve some small space on all the drives (and with 3TB drives you can afford to sacrifice a few MB), use the remainder as your RAID, and let the system put the boot partition in that reserved space on the primary drive (the one the BIOS sees as the boot drive). I think using raid 1 (with the 1.0 header format) can work well for that. There can still grub issues with having a boot just work, but at least you have the stuff you need available. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: BIOS boot partition, 4x3TB disks, and raid, problems with anaconda
On 08/28/14 20:21, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:10:54 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: I think you need to reserve some small space on all the drives (and with 3TB drives you can afford to sacrifice a few MB), use the remainder as your RAID, and let the system put the boot partition in that reserved space on the primary drive (the one the BIOS sees as the boot drive). I think using raid 1 (with the 1.0 header format) can work well for that. There can still grub issues with having a boot just work, but at least you have the stuff you need available. Yes, that was my intention, raid1 for /boot and raid6 for / Accidentally I set /boot also to raid6 :) But that can be fixed. On my old system I use 1TB disks, with /boot as raid1, and grub boot-loader installed on all disks. On that one I can boot the system from any of disks. Which is quite handy. The problem here seem to be that due to the disks being large (larger than 1TB) they are setup as GPT (GUID Partition Table), and they then also need a BIOS boot partition to work on non UEFI based systems (if I have understood it correctly). So, to be able to boot from any of the disks, I need a BIOS boot partition on all disks, but anaconda seem to only install it on one of the disks (i.e. I want the exactly identical partition tables on all disks). Lars -- Lars E. Pettersson http://www.sm6rpz.se/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: md5 encryption
On 28.08.2014, dustin kempter wrote: > hi all, I just had a question. so I have been hearing that md5 has been > compromised, how much of a security threat does this impose? MD5 is not used for encryption. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5 for further details and for what md5 actually is. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: md5 encryption
Note my day job IS data communications and security. I am NOT a cryptographer. I am in a different select group that often refer to ourselves as the crypto-plumbers. We know how to carefully use the crypto blocks to build whole systems. On 08/28/2014 11:34 AM, dustin kempter wrote: hi all, I just had a question. so I have been hearing that md5 has been compromised, how much of a security threat does this impose? if it is something that poses a large concern is it possible to change the encryption method from md5 to crypt? or another method that is not compromised? md5 is a message digest / hash. It is an earlier effort by Ron Rivest. It was paired with Ron's rc5 streaming encryption cipher, but lived by itself as one of the major hash functions in 90s (md5, md160 (do I have that right :) ), and sha1). All have been weakened to different levels. md5 has real attacks where with crafted change to a message you can still get the same hash value. Today you might STILL use sha1; it has had tremendous resiliency. NIST was expecting it to fall as badly as md5 by this point. Most use at least sha256, and sha3 is now out there. Choose your poison. data confidentiality is another subject. Hope this helps. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: exfat on SD card getting mounted read-only
On 08/28/2014 06:32 AM, Tim wrote: Allegedly, on or about 27 August 2014, jd1008 sent: It is electro-mechanical. No opticals involved at all. Then try putting a tiny dot of superglue put on top of the slider, itself, just to make that part of the card a bit bigger. Poke a toothpick into the glue, and use that to put a dot on the slider. That's the simplest way I can think of to make the switch more prominent to the sensor, without making the whole card too big to fit. Well, I decided to wait for the 64gbyte xtreme card to soon go on sale at costco, and will see if it has the same problem. If it does, then I will return it and try the glue trick. If the 64gbyte is mountable rw, I will donate my 16gbyte to a friend :) Thanx, JD -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
2nd IP address on an interface
This is on a F20 arm system. It SHOULD follow F20 rules...
first: cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
# Added by 'write_udev' for detected device 'eth0'.
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="02:67:15:00:01:78", NAME="eth0"
First IP address is:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
DEVICE="eth0"
BOOTPROTO=none
ONBOOT="yes"
TYPE="Ethernet"
NAME="System eth0"
MACADDR=02:67:15:00:01:63
MTU=1500
DNS1=208.83.67.188
GATEWAY="208.83.67.161"
IPADDR="208.83.67.163"
NETMASK="255.255.255.240"
HOSTNAME="miredo.htt-consult.com"
IPV6INIT="yes"
DNS2=2607:f4b8:3:3:9254:5400:0:188
this works fine. But now for the second IP address I add:
# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0
DEVICE="eth0:0"
BOOTPROTO=none
ONBOOT="yes"
TYPE="Ethernet"
NAME="System eth0"
MTU=1500
GATEWAY="208.83.67.161"
IPADDR="208.83.67.164"
NETMASK="255.255.255.240"
But no second IP address is shown:
]# ifconfig
eth0: flags=4163 mtu 1500
inet 208.83.67.163 netmask 255.255.255.240 broadcast
208.83.67.175
inet6 fe80::67:15ff:fe00:163 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20
ether 02:67:15:00:01:63 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 21 bytes 2556 (2.4 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 12 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 147 bytes 11726 (11.4 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 87 base 0x6000
lo: flags=73 mtu 16436
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10
loop txqueuelen 0 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 90 bytes 8076 (7.8 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 90 bytes 8076 (7.8 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ??
Or something else?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:55 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ?? These days, I'm pretty sure you are supposed to include IPADDR2=, NETMASK2=, etc. in the one ifcfg-eth0 file rather than creating a eth0:0 file (at least that worked for me on centos 6.5 this week when setting up IP aliases). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
On 08/28/14 22:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote: # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0 DEVICE="eth0:0" BOOTPROTO=none ONBOOT="yes" TYPE="Ethernet" NAME="System eth0" MTU=1500 GATEWAY="208.83.67.161" IPADDR="208.83.67.164" NETMASK="255.255.255.240" I think you need to add ONPARENT=yes to make it start when its parent does. That is at least the major difference I see comparing to my setup. Lars -- Lars E. Pettersson http://www.sm6rpz.se/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: md5 encryption
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 15:29:58 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Today you might STILL use sha1; it has had tremendous resiliency. NIST was expecting it to fall as badly as md5 by this point. Most use at least sha256, and sha3 is now out there. Choose your poison. sha3 isn't really ready yet (unless something changed within the last couple of months). The algorithm was chosen a while ago, but there are parameters that need to be chosen and as yet there isn't a standard sha3. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
On 08/28/2014 04:24 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:55 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ?? These days, I'm pretty sure you are supposed to include IPADDR2=, NETMASK2=, etc. in the one ifcfg-eth0 file rather than creating a eth0:0 file (at least that worked for me on centos 6.5 this week when setting up IP aliases). I added the IPADDR2 and NETMASK2 and it did not add the second address. Even after a reboot. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
On 08/28/2014 04:35 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote: On 08/28/14 22:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote: # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0 DEVICE="eth0:0" BOOTPROTO=none ONBOOT="yes" TYPE="Ethernet" NAME="System eth0" MTU=1500 GATEWAY="208.83.67.161" IPADDR="208.83.67.164" NETMASK="255.255.255.240" I think you need to add ONPARENT=yes to make it start when its parent does. That is at least the major difference I see comparing to my setup. Add this to ifcfg-eth0:0 and no change. :( Got to keep on trying. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
> 29 aug 2014 kl. 00:12 skrev Robert Moskowitz > Add this to ifcfg-eth0:0 and no change. > > :( Ok. Another difference I see is that my interface is named :1, i.e. in my case wan:1 Not sure if that makes any difference though, was years since I set this up :) Lars -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
On 08/28/2014 06:23 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote: 29 aug 2014 kl. 00:12 skrev Robert Moskowitz Add this to ifcfg-eth0:0 and no change. :( Ok. Another difference I see is that my interface is named :1, i.e. in my case wan:1 Not sure if that makes any difference though, was years since I set this up :) I took out the macaddr changes I was making, trying to go back to as much 'base' stuff as I could, and it still is not giving me a 2nd ip addr. :( -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
On 08/29/14 06:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > On 08/28/2014 04:24 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:55 -0400 >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >>> So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ?? >> These days, I'm pretty sure you are supposed to include >> IPADDR2=, NETMASK2=, etc. in the one ifcfg-eth0 file >> rather than creating a eth0:0 file (at least that worked >> for me on centos 6.5 this week when setting up IP aliases). > I added the IPADDR2 and NETMASK2 and it did not add the second address. Even > after a reboot. > You may be getting confused by using "ifconfig". [egreshko@f20f network-scripts]$ cat ifcfg-p2p1 TYPE="Ethernet" BOOTPROTO=none DEFROUTE="yes" IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=yes IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE="yes" IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL="no" NAME="p2p1" UUID="5ce325cb-5048-48d7-bdc0-457f278fe1f1" ONBOOT="yes" DNS1=192.168.1.18 DOMAIN=greshko.com HWADDR=08:00:27:B7:04:4A IPADDR0=192.168.1.227 PREFIX0=24 GATEWAY0=192.168.1.1 IPADDR1=192.168.1.19 PREFIX1=24 IPV6_PEERDNS=yes IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes [egreshko@f20f network-scripts]$ ifconfig enp0s3: flags=4163 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.1.227 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 2001:470:d:6bd:a00:27ff:feb7:44a prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0 inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:feb7:44a prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 ether 08:00:27:b7:04:4a txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 478 bytes 57719 (56.3 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 383 bytes 54641 (53.3 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 *BUT* [egreshko@f20f network-scripts]$ ip addr 2: enp0s3: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 08:00:27:b7:04:4a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.227/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global enp0s3 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet 192.168.1.19/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global secondary enp0s3 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 2001:470:d:6bd:a00:27ff:feb7:44a/64 scope global noprefixroute dynamic valid_lft 7200sec preferred_lft 600sec inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:feb7:44a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever And from a second system [egreshko@meimei ~]$ ping 192.168.1.19 PING 192.168.1.19 (192.168.1.19) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.337 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.290 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.269 ms -- If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
On 08/29/14 07:20, Ed Greshko wrote: > And from a second system > > [egreshko@meimei ~]$ ping 192.168.1.19 > PING 192.168.1.19 (192.168.1.19) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.337 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.290 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.269 ms For completeness [egreshko@meimei ~]$ ssh 192.168.1.19 Last login: Fri Aug 29 07:15:07 2014 from meimei.greshko.com [egreshko@f20f ~]$ exit logout Connection to 192.168.1.19 closed. [egreshko@meimei ~]$ ssh 192.168.1.227 Last login: Fri Aug 29 07:31:22 2014 from meimei.greshko.com -- If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:20:18 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > You may be getting confused by using "ifconfig". Yea, I forgot that bit, my aliases didn't show up in ifconfig, but I could ping them from another computer on the same network. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
On 08/28/2014 07:20 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 08/29/14 06:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 08/28/2014 04:24 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:55 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ?? These days, I'm pretty sure you are supposed to include IPADDR2=, NETMASK2=, etc. in the one ifcfg-eth0 file rather than creating a eth0:0 file (at least that worked for me on centos 6.5 this week when setting up IP aliases). I added the IPADDR2 and NETMASK2 and it did not add the second address. Even after a reboot. You may be getting confused by using "ifconfig". [egreshko@f20f network-scripts]$ cat ifcfg-p2p1 TYPE="Ethernet" BOOTPROTO=none DEFROUTE="yes" IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=yes IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE="yes" IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL="no" NAME="p2p1" UUID="5ce325cb-5048-48d7-bdc0-457f278fe1f1" ONBOOT="yes" DNS1=192.168.1.18 DOMAIN=greshko.com HWADDR=08:00:27:B7:04:4A IPADDR0=192.168.1.227 PREFIX0=24 GATEWAY0=192.168.1.1 IPADDR1=192.168.1.19 PREFIX1=24 IPV6_PEERDNS=yes IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes [egreshko@f20f network-scripts]$ ifconfig enp0s3: flags=4163 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.1.227 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 2001:470:d:6bd:a00:27ff:feb7:44a prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0 inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:feb7:44a prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 ether 08:00:27:b7:04:4a txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 478 bytes 57719 (56.3 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 383 bytes 54641 (53.3 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 *BUT* [egreshko@f20f network-scripts]$ ip addr 2: enp0s3: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 08:00:27:b7:04:4a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.227/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global enp0s3 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet 192.168.1.19/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global secondary enp0s3 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 2001:470:d:6bd:a00:27ff:feb7:44a/64 scope global noprefixroute dynamic valid_lft 7200sec preferred_lft 600sec inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:feb7:44a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever And from a second system [egreshko@meimei ~]$ ping 192.168.1.19 PING 192.168.1.19 (192.168.1.19) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.337 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.290 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.269 ms # ip addr show 1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 02:56:02:01:f3:b9 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 208.83.67.163/28 brd 208.83.67.175 scope global eth0 inet 208.83.67.164/28 brd 208.83.67.175 scope global secondary eth0 inet6 fe80::56:2ff:fe01:f3b9/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever you are right. ifconfig USE to be able to do this, but now it is just a shell? over ip and so... So now to undo a lot of changes and see if I can get back to everything working. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
SOLVED - Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
It is all ifconfigs fault :)
I just assumed that in f20 it was still good enough until F21.
# cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
# Added by 'write_udev' for detected device 'eth0'.
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="02:67:15:00:01:78", NAME="eth0"
# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
DEVICE="eth0"
BOOTPROTO=none
ONBOOT="yes"
TYPE="Ethernet"
NAME="System eth0"
MACADDR=02:67:15:00:01:63
MTU=1500
DNS1=208.83.67.148
GATEWAY="208.83.67.161"
IPADDR="208.83.67.163"
IPADDR2="208.83.67.164"
NETMASK="255.255.255.240"
NETMASK2="255.255.255.240"
HOSTNAME="miredo.htt-consult.com"
IPV6INIT="yes"
DNS2=2607:f4b8:3:0:9254:5400:0:148
# ip addr show
1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
group default
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 02:67:15:00:01:63 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 208.83.67.163/28 brd 208.83.67.175 scope global eth0
inet 208.83.67.164/28 brd 208.83.67.175 scope global secondary eth0
inet6 fe80::67:15ff:fe00:163/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
On 08/28/2014 07:37 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:20:18 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
You may be getting confused by using "ifconfig".
Yea, I forgot that bit, my aliases didn't show up
in ifconfig, but I could ping them from another
computer on the same network.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 21 release schedule, etc.
On 08/28/2014 01:48 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: Up to Fedora 21, releases have occurred at roughly 6 month intervals. Fedora 21 is scheduled to be released about 11 months after Fedora 20. Is the intention to schedule future releases at roughly 12 month intervals, or is the long interval for Fedora 21 only (or whatever)? Will Fedora 20 be supported till Fedora 22 is released, or for about 13 months after it was released, i.e. about January 2015 (or whatever)? Sorry if this has already been discussed; I haven't been following the list carefully. Seems that ever since fedora switched to every 6 months release schedule, the number of bugs has been higher. I think it is impossible to perform thorough testing and iron out all the bugs of a new release every 6 months. Simply put, not enough dedicated and SAVVY testers of kernel subsystems and features being introduced every 6 months. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 21 release schedule, etc.
Seems that ever since fedora switched to every 6 months release schedule, the number of bugs has been higher. I think it is impossible to perform thorough testing and iron out all the bugs of a new release every 6 months. Simply put, not enough dedicated and SAVVY testers of kernel subsystems and features being introduced every 6 months. I've often wondered if a 1 year release cycle would be better. -- -- Derrik Derrik Walker v2.0, RHCE dwal...@doomd.net "Those UNIX guys, they think weird!" -- John C. Dvorak -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 21 release schedule, etc.
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:44:41 -0600 jd1008 wrote: > Seems that ever since fedora switched to every 6 months release > schedule, the number of bugs has been higher. > I think it is impossible to perform thorough testing and iron out all > the bugs > of a new release every 6 months. > Simply put, not enough dedicated and SAVVY testers of kernel > subsystems and features being introduced every 6 months. Fedora has pretty much always been on a 6 month release cycle. I think a few of the early core releases were longer, and we had a longer cycle in f18 due to lots of stuff. IMHO, things are less buggy these days, but it might just be that I don't hit the same things other folks do, or better know how to work around them. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 21 release schedule, etc.
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:44:41 -0600 jd1008 wrote: > > On 08/28/2014 01:48 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > Up to Fedora 21, releases have occurred at roughly 6 month > > intervals. Fedora 21 is scheduled to be released about 11 months > > after Fedora 20. Is the intention to schedule future releases at > > roughly 12 month intervals, or is the long interval for Fedora 21 only > > (or whatever)? Will Fedora 20 be supported till Fedora 22 is > > released, or for about 13 months after it was released, i.e. about > > January 2015 (or whatever)? > > > > Sorry if this has already been discussed; I haven't been following the > > list carefully. > > > > > > > Seems that ever since fedora switched to every 6 months release schedule, > the number of bugs has been higher. > I think it is impossible to perform thorough testing and iron out all > the bugs > of a new release every 6 months. > Simply put, not enough dedicated and SAVVY testers of kernel subsystems > and features being introduced every 6 months. Fedora has always been on a 6 month-release schedule. Fedora 21 is the first to buck this trend. -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. FREE 3D MARINE AQUARIUM SCREENSAVER - Watch dolphins, sharks & orcas on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/marineaquarium -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 21 release schedule, etc.
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:27:44 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:44:41 -0600 > jd1008 wrote: > > > Seems that ever since fedora switched to every 6 months release > > schedule, the number of bugs has been higher. > > I think it is impossible to perform thorough testing and iron out all > > the bugs > > of a new release every 6 months. > > Simply put, not enough dedicated and SAVVY testers of kernel > > subsystems and features being introduced every 6 months. > > Fedora has pretty much always been on a 6 month release cycle. > > I think a few of the early core releases were longer, and we had a > longer cycle in f18 due to lots of stuff. > > IMHO, things are less buggy these days, but it might just be that I > don't hit the same things other folks do, or better know how to work > around them. My experience has also been similar. Ranjan -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote: > > On 08/28/14 22:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0 >> [snipped] >> ONBOOT="yes" > I think you need to add > ONPARENT=yes > to make it start when its parent does. ONPARENT=yes is indeed the parameter instead of ONBOOT for aliases. It would not matter here, as "yes" is the default value. As far as I am aware the suggestion from Tom Horsley with things like IPADDR2, NETMASK2 in the file of the parent is cuurently the preferred method. (Not my preferred method, but then perhaps I am just stuck with old stuff that I know.) :) -- Kind regards, André -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: 2nd IP address on an interface
On 29 Aug 2014 01:32, "Robert Moskowitz" wrote: > > you are right. ifconfig USE to be able to do this, but now it is just a shell? over ip and so... > Your memory isn't quite accurate... ifconfig has never handled multiple IP addresses on an interface with aliases being used to create separate virtual interfaces instead. It is also not a shell over ip but rather a completely different package with a completely different development history... This is just yet another example of why net-tools has been deprecated a long time and that people really need to break their muscle memory and use iproute2 ... Is net-tools still in the base fedora install? Probably long since time to pull it if so... I know el7 doesn't include it in base or core package groups anymore at least.. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
recovering lost files
greetings, i have 3 drives i need to recover that have damaged boot tracks. on the 3rd drive are boot track back ups that i need to recover. within the past year, a poster was needing to recover a file. a replier suggested a boot iso that recovered files and labeled them with a file label of file's size, instead of an arbitrary number. if the poster/replier, or anyone else recognizes iso i am inquiring about, i greatly appreciate their replying. i searched archives, did not find post. i have never found a good way to search archives. is there a page to make searching easier than opening individual archives? TIA for any and all help. -- peace out. in a world with out fences, who needs gates. tc.hago. g . -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
