[users@httpd] Re: Distribution repository vs compiled.

2018-06-01 Thread @lbutlr
On 01 Jun 2018, at 00:09, Mimiko  wrote:
> Tell me, please, what's better to use in production:
> 1) Precompiled binaries of apache httpd from distribution
> 2) or Self compiled from sources
> 
> What are the risks for each options and pro and cons of each?

Which is better to use in our company cafeteria, a kitchen staff to make food 
or a food service company to bring in food?

There is no better, they are both solutions that will work well, Which one you 
want depends on you and your needs and not inherent properties of the food.

There is certainly more ease and convenience in using compiled binary installs, 
but there is more flexibility in compiling your own from source.


-- 
SOURCERERS MAKE THEIR OWN DESTINY. THEY TOUCH THE EARTH LIGHTLY.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



[users@httpd] mod_wsgi in Apache 2.4

2018-06-01 Thread Stormy
To support Python code, it appears that mod_wsgi is necessary? | 
desirable. It appears to function correctly within Apache 2.4, but I 
cannot find it in the *Apache* documentation 
 (the developer's documentation 
is easily available.)


Does anyone have any experience, thoughts, caveats, recommendations?

Thanks -- Paul

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org



Re: [users@httpd] mod_wsgi in Apache 2.4

2018-06-01 Thread Luca Toscano
Hi!

2018-06-01 15:38 GMT+02:00 Stormy :

> To support Python code, it appears that mod_wsgi is necessary? |
> desirable. It appears to function correctly within Apache 2.4, but I cannot
> find it in the *Apache* documentation  /2.4/mod/> (the developer's documentation is easily available.)
>
> Does anyone have any experience, thoughts, caveats, recommendations?
>
>
mod_wsgi is a third party module not shipped with httpd, but recently
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_proxy_uwsgi.html was donated
to the project and now it is available for 2.4 too.

Hope that helps,

Luca