date:20120530

Howdy;

I'm new to the list, so this may allready be
addressed somewhere.  Basically, I', trying
to put the sources for apache2 and php,
etc., together, and I seem to be having some
heavy wading.  1st off, I seem to have to
go searching for every last part and piece
of a project that by all accounts should have
a site or two where everything is available
for picking and choosing.  Oh well, enough
griping.

The main problem of the moment, is APR-Util.
After a bit of searchoong around, I finally
found, "apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg".  I'm not sure
what the, "dfsg", is, but I figured I'd find
out from the docs.  Unfortunately, I'm not
by any stretch of the imagination, a, "C",
programmer.  Near as I can tell, "C", stands
for, "Cuneiform".  Consequently, when presented
with error messages like the following, I'm
at a complete loss.

make[1]: *** No rule to make target `crypto/apr_md5.c',
needed by `crypto/apr_md5.lo'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory
 /usr/local/src/httpd-2.4.2/apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

Anyone know how to fix this?

TIA;

Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Michael Streeter


On 05/30/2012 07:06 AM, Bill Vance wrote:

make[1]: *** No rule to make target `crypto/apr_md5.c',
needed by `crypto/apr_md5.lo'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory
  /usr/local/src/httpd-2.4.2/apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

Hello,

It looks like you are trying to build against an old version of 
apr-util.  Try apr-1.4.6 and apr-util-1.4.1.


http://apr.apache.org/download.cgi

Hope that helps,
-Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?

2012-05-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas

--On 29 May 2012 16:02:25 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
 wrote:



This was documented feature in 1.3 and 2.0:

The complete list of names in the VirtualHost  directive are treated just
like a ServerAlias (but are not overridden by any ServerAlias statement)
if all names resolve to the same address set. Note that subsequent Listen
statements for this vhost will not affect the ports assigned in the
address set.

It seems that in 2.2 it should work as you expect. Do you still use 2.0
or does this problem apply in 2.2 too?
(I've checked now and seems it's gone in 2.2)


On 29.05.12 16:40, Alex Bligh wrote:

I am using 2.2 (latest from Ubuntu Lucid).



I am not sure how to parse your second paragraph. There is only one
Listen statement as this is a NameVirtualHost (in this case a Listen
for *:80). NameVirtualHost is on 192.200.0.1:80 because there are
non-namebased virtual hosts on other IP addresses.


it's not mine, but from apache 1.3/2.0 docs. 


I think what you are saying is that in 1.3 and 2.0 the first declared
virtual host not only acts as the default virtual host but also as if
it had an alias defined for the IP address/port pair it is listening
on.


Not the on it's listening on, but the one in VirtualHost section.
It means than for



the some.na.me becomes a hidden alias of the virtualhost.
So, when you define




ServerName 192.168.0.1


the second won't apply for 192.168.0.1, because 192.168.0.1 is already 
alias (hidden) of the first (default) virtual host.



My understanding from the documentation is that this is not the
intended behaviour on 2.2 - i.e. each vhost should be responding only
for its defined ServerAlias and ServerName, and if none match the
default should be used. That does not /appear/ to be happening, so perhaps
the behaviour has not changed from the 1.3/2.0 behaviour you describe.

Is that meant to be the case?

If so, is there any way around this? (i.e. so an arbitrary DNS name pointing
to the IP address will get the default vhost, but the IP address itself
will get a different vhost).


I worked around this problem by defining fake name in NameVirtualHost 
and VirtualHost sections


# some.na.me maps to 192.168.0.1
NameVirtualHost some.na.me
NameVirtualHost 192.168.0.1

# some.na.me is not resolvable from outside, so this host will ONLY get 
# default hosts - unspecified below


ServerName some.na.me


# This host will only process requests for 192.168.0.1

ServerName 192.168.0.1


--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Microsoft dick is soft to do no harm

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Mark Montague


On May 30, 2012 8:06 , Bill Vance  wrote:

I'm new to the list, so this may allready be
addressed somewhere.  Basically, I', trying
to put the sources for apache2 and php,
etc., together, and I seem to be having some
heavy wading.


Do you have a reason to want to build from source?  For example, as a 
learning exercise, or because you will be modifying the code, or because 
you are using a very esoteric hardware platform?


If the answer is "no", consider getting both Apache and PHP pre-built 
from someone who has built it already for you -- preferably, your OS 
distributor (for example, if you are running a Red Hat Linux based OS, 
run the command "sudo yum install httpd php" to get everything), or a 
trusted group who provide a pre-packaged stack that contains both Apache 
and PHP ( see 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Apache%E2%80%93MySQL%E2%80%93PHP_packages 
).


Either way -- whether you get httpd and php pre-packaged or build it 
yourself -- it would be helpful to know what OS you're using.




The main problem of the moment, is APR-Util.
After a bit of searchoong around, I finally
found, "apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg".  I'm not sure
what the, "dfsg", is, but I figured I'd find
out from the docs.


I have no idea what this is either.  In general, it's not a good idea to 
use random thing you find lying around without knowing what they are, 
who they came from, and how they are special.


The authoritative place to get the APR-Util source code is 
https://apr.apache.org/  If you need version 1.3.x for some reason, you 
can get it by clicking on the "Download" link in the "Apache Portable 
Runtime Utility 1.4.1 Released" section, then, on the resulting page, 
click on the "Other files" link in the "APR-util 1.4.1 is the best 
available version" section.


However, a much better way, considering the directory path in the error 
message below is to go to http://httpd.apache.org/ and download both 
httpd-2.4.2.tar.bz2 and httpd-2.4.2-deps.tar.bz2.  The former gets your 
the Apache HTTP Server source, and the latter gets you versions of the 
source code of both APR and APR-Util that are packaged to work with it.  
Unpack both into the same directory, like this:


tar jxf httpd-2.4.2.tar.bz2
tar jxf httpd-2.4.2-deps.tar.bz2

The source for httpd will be in httpd-2.4.2 while the source for APR and 
APR-Utils will be in httpd-2.4.2/srclib (although you don't need to know 
this).


Then follow the instructions at 
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/install.html  (Be sure to read the 
paragraph about PCRE in the "Requirements" section!)






make[1]: *** No rule to make target `crypto/apr_md5.c',
needed by `crypto/apr_md5.lo'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory
  /usr/local/src/httpd-2.4.2/apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

Anyone know how to fix this?


Since you're using a dubious version of APR-Util, I'm not even going to 
try.  Please consider using a complete pre-packaged httpd+php stack as 
described at the top of this message.  But if you are going to build 
this from source, try again using the instructions above.  If you 
encounter problems, include the following information


- What configure command you used
- Any errors or warnings from the configure command.
- What operating system you're using (e.g., "Fedora 17"), including 
version and platform-specific details (e.g., "x86_64").



Good luck.  I hope this helps!

--
  Mark Montague
  m...@catseye.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

[users@httpd] Problem with URL Rewriting

2012-05-30 Thread Jean-Christophe Boggio


Hello, I have a problem with URL Rewriting.

I'm trying to transform URLs of the form :

http://medecine-et-enfance.net/archives/voir.html?file=J_2005_01_039.pdf
to
http://medecine-et-enfance.net/showpdf.html?file=J_2005_01_039.pdf

I have defined the following in the VirtualHost :

RewriteEngine   on

RewriteLog  "/tmp/ecm3-rewrite.log"
RewriteLogLevel 4

RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} 
file=(.*)
RewriteRule ^/archives/voir.html
/showpdf.html?file=%1 [L]

RewriteRule (^/data/pdf/.*) 
/showpdf.html?file=$1 [L]

This last line is to address a different case where users could get the files 
directly
by requesting :
http://medecine-et-enfance.net/data/pdf/J_2005_01_039.pdf


Everything seems fine, if I look at the logs :

81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200] 
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (2) 
init rewrite engine with requested uri /archives/voir.html
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200] 
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (3) 
applying pattern '^/archives/voir.html' to uri '/archives/voir.html'
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200] 
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (4) 
RewriteCond: input='file=/data/pdf/J_2005_01_039.pdf' pattern='file=(.*)' => 
matched
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200] 
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (2) 
rewrite '/archives/voir.html' -> 
'/showpdf.html?file=/data/pdf/J_2005_01_039.pdf'
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200] 
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (3) split 
uri=/showpdf.html?file=/data/pdf/J_2005_01_039.pdf -> uri=/showpdf.html, 
args=file=/data/pdf/J_2005_01_039.pdf
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200] 
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (2) 
local path result: /showpdf.html
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200] 
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (2) 
prefixed with document_root to /var/www/sites/ecm3/showpdf.html
81.56.192.64 - - [30/May/2012:14:48:51 +0200] 
[www.medecine-et-enfance.net/sid#7fd445aa0668][rid#7fd43f2f80a0/initial] (1) 
go-ahead with /var/www/sites/ecm3/showpdf.html [OK]

But I have put a spy in /archives/voir.html to see if the page is still being 
called, and it is :

==> /var/log/apache2/ecm/error.log <==
[Wed May 30 14:48:51 2012] [warn] [27627]ERR:  32:  Warning in Perl code: Acces a 
voir.html non filtre ! at //var/www/sites/ecm3/archives/voir.html line 20, 
 line 4.
[Wed May 30 14:48:51 2012] [warn] [27627]ERR:  32:  Warning in Perl code: showpdf: 
/data/pdf/J_2005_01_039.pdf at /var/www/sites/ecm3/showpdf.html line 25,  
line 4.

The users still can get the files using voir.html (though showpdf.html seems to 
be called ?!)

Thanks for your help,

JC

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

[users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.

2012-05-30 Thread eric.berg

I've set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it's still writing to the logs.

Apache 2.2

Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this?

Thanks.

Eric


___

This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or 
otherwise protected from 
disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not 
duplicate or redistribute 
it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender 
that you have received 
it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy 
or sell or a 
solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other 
financial product or 
service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement 
of Barclays. Any 
views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not 
necessarily represent those 
of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link: 
www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. 
By messaging with Barclays you consent to the foregoing.  Barclays offers 
premier investment banking 
products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC, a company 
registered in England 
(number 1026167) with its registered office at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 
5HP.  This email may 
relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group.

___

[users@httpd] mod_jk vs. mod_proxy_ajp

2012-05-30 Thread Frank Mancini





anyone have a recommendation and differences?
 
can I get precompiles of mok_jk somewhere for Sun Solaris?

Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.

have you set is as OFF in -


...
 

If yes and if it's still not working send us httpd.conf (after
removing all sensitive information).

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM,   wrote:
> I’ve set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it’s still writing to the
> logs.
>
> Apache 2.2
>
> Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Eric
>
>
> ___
>
> This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of
> this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete
> it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in
> error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy or
> sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or
> other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any
> transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions
> presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
> those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the
> following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays
> you consent to the foregoing.  Barclays offers premier investment banking
> products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC, a company
> registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office at 1
> Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP.  This email may relate to or be sent from
> other members of the Barclays Group.
>
> ___

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

RE: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.

2012-05-30 Thread eric.berg

Thanks for your reply, Ishita.

All of the Debug statements are set to OFF.

I have one major question at this point:  Are the mod_wl directives scoped 
local to the  and  sections in 
which they appear?

We have many sections that create wl clusters, but the only requests that I 
have noticed in the wl logs are from this section:




WebLogicCluster host1:port, host2:port, etc.

Debug OFF
DebugConfigInfo OFF
SetHandler weblogic-handler
PathTrim /PNT/Indices
WLCookieNamePST_JSESSIONID
WLLogFile wl.log



Could it be that simply having the WLLogFile onfig option set is causing the 
logging to persist despite the OFF value of Debug?

Eric

> -Original Message-
> From: Ishita Kapadiya [mailto:ishim...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:24 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.
> 
> have you set is as OFF in -
> 
> 
> ...
>  
> 
> If yes and if it's still not working send us httpd.conf (after
> removing all sensitive information).
> 
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM,   wrote:
> > I've set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it's still writing to
> the
> > logs.
> >
> > Apache 2.2
> >
> > Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >
> > ___
> >
> > This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged
> or
> > otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended
> recipient of
> > this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please
> delete
> > it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received
> it in
> > error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to
> buy or
> > sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment
> products or
> > other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any
> > transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or
> opinions
> > presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent
> > those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the
> > following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with
> Barclays
> > you consent to the foregoing.  Barclays offers premier investment
> banking
> > products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC, a
> company
> > registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office at
> 1
> > Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP.  This email may relate to or be
> sent from
> > other members of the Barclays Group.
> >
> > ___
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error

Thanks Nick.
I have compiled Apache for myself both the time and both are 32-bit.
The same modules all other instances are using and thus i am not sure
what is different with this instance that causing Segmentation fault
error.

I tried to dig more into it and here is what i got -

mdb core
> ::stack
libc.so.1`_read+0xc(6, ffbff5e3, 1, 0, 10b4, fef73ac0)
ap_mpm_pod_check+0x18(d6800, 68764, 68f8c, 1b7ec0, 0, 1)
child_main+0x2d4(0, 682dc, 0, fee58000, fef73700, fedf2a00)
make_child+0x128(9bc00, 0, 1, 9cc00, 9b400, 9c800)
ap_mpm_run+0x740(fe720058, 4, 0, a, 1, 0)
main+0x77c(a7810, 99c00, 9bc00, 9bc00, a5808, 0)
_start+0x5c(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)

pstack core
 fef45874 _read(6, ffbff5e3, 1, 0, 10b4, fef73ac0) + c
 0006b714 ap_mpm_pod_check (d6800, 68764, 68f8c, 1b7ec0, 0, 1) + 18
 000697b4 child_main (0, 682dc, 0, fee58000, fef73700, fedf2a00) + 2d4
 00069930 make_child (9bc00, 0, 1, 9cc00, 9b400, 9c800) + 128
 0006a160 ap_mpm_run (fe720058, 4, 0, a, 1, 0) + 740
 00029bc8 main (a7810, 99c00, 9bc00, 9bc00, a5808, 0) + 77c
 00028f7c _start   (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 5c

pmap core
0001 448K r-x--  /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd
0008  32K r-x--
00096000  24K rwx--  /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd
0009C000  16K rwx--  /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd
000A6528K rwx--[ heap ]
FAB7A000   8K rw---[ stack tid=36 ]
...
(removed rest of the lines to avoid length)

mdb /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd

> ::dis ap_mpm_pod_check!head
ap_mpm_pod_check:   save  %sp, -0x78, %sp
ap_mpm_pod_check+4: ld[%i0], %o1
ap_mpm_pod_check+8: call  +0x2d0e0  
ap_mpm_pod_check+0xc:   add   %fp, -0x14, %o0
ap_mpm_pod_check+0x10:  ld[%fp - 0x14], %o0
ap_mpm_pod_check+0x14:  add   %fp, -0x15, %o1
ap_mpm_pod_check+0x18:  call  +0x2cdc4  
ap_mpm_pod_check+0x1c:  mov   1, %o2

Please help me what could be the problem? It's affecting my production
env and i really don't know what to do next?

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Nick Kew  wrote:
>
> On 29 May 2012, at 23:11, Ishita Kapadiya wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am using this configurations -
>>
>> Solaris sparc 10/apache 2.2.22/openssl 1.0.0g/simteminder sso/mod-jk 1.30
>
> Did you compile everything yourself?
>
> If yes, could any compile options have changed?  E.g. between 32-bit and 
> 64-bit,
> or something less obvious but just as important?
>
> If no, what suppliers do your binaries come from, and have you checked with 
> them?
>
> --
> Nick Kew
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.

Hi Eric,

yes. mod_wl directives scoped local to the  and
 sections in which they appear. It's
good idea to see default configuration for WL plug-in with -
“__WebLogicBridgeConfig” (you also need to set DebugConfigInfo ON) and
check if Debug is ON by default. in that case you have to explicitly
set it OFF in each section where wl config present.

Thanks

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:31 AM,   wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, Ishita.
>
> All of the Debug statements are set to OFF.
>
> I have one major question at this point:  Are the mod_wl directives scoped 
> local to the  and  sections in 
> which they appear?
>
> We have many sections that create wl clusters, but the only requests that I 
> have noticed in the wl logs are from this section:
>
>
> 
>    
>        WebLogicCluster host1:port, host2:port, etc.
>
>        Debug OFF
>        DebugConfigInfo OFF
>        SetHandler weblogic-handler
>        PathTrim /PNT/Indices
>        WLCookieName    PST_JSESSIONID
>        WLLogFile wl.log
>    
> 
>
> Could it be that simply having the WLLogFile onfig option set is causing the 
> logging to persist despite the OFF value of Debug?
>
> Eric
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ishita Kapadiya [mailto:ishim...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:24 AM
>> To: users@httpd.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.
>>
>> have you set is as OFF in -
>>
>> 
>> ...
>>  
>>
>> If yes and if it's still not working send us httpd.conf (after
>> removing all sensitive information).
>>
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM,   wrote:
>> > I've set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it's still writing to
>> the
>> > logs.
>> >
>> > Apache 2.2
>> >
>> > Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > Eric
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> >
>> > This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged
>> or
>> > otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended
>> recipient of
>> > this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please
>> delete
>> > it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received
>> it in
>> > error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to
>> buy or
>> > sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment
>> products or
>> > other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any
>> > transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or
>> opinions
>> > presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent
>> > those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the
>> > following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with
>> Barclays
>> > you consent to the foregoing.  Barclays offers premier investment
>> banking
>> > products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC, a
>> company
>> > registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office at
>> 1
>> > Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP.  This email may relate to or be
>> sent from
>> > other members of the Barclays Group.
>> >
>> > ___
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

RE: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.

2012-05-30 Thread eric.berg

Thanks, Ishita.  That's very helpful.  Do you know where the scoping issue is 
mentioned in the WL docs, or is it an apache thing?

The thing is that every single wl config section has "Debug OFF", and it's 
still logging to those wl files.

When you suggest that logging might be on by default, where would that be set, 
and why doesn't the setting of Debug to "OFF" affect this?

I'll try enabling DebugConfigInfo and see what I get.

Eric

> -Original Message-
> From: Ishita Kapadiya [mailto:ishim...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:42 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.
> 
> Hi Eric,
> 
> yes. mod_wl directives scoped local to the  and
>  sections in which they appear. It's
> good idea to see default configuration for WL plug-in with -
> "__WebLogicBridgeConfig" (you also need to set DebugConfigInfo ON) and
> check if Debug is ON by default. in that case you have to explicitly
> set it OFF in each section where wl config present.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:31 AM,   wrote:
> > Thanks for your reply, Ishita.
> >
> > All of the Debug statements are set to OFF.
> >
> > I have one major question at this point:  Are the mod_wl directives
> scoped local to the  and 
> sections in which they appear?
> >
> > We have many sections that create wl clusters, but the only requests
> that I have noticed in the wl logs are from this section:
> >
> >
> > 
> >    
> >        WebLogicCluster host1:port, host2:port, etc.
> >
> >        Debug OFF
> >        DebugConfigInfo OFF
> >        SetHandler weblogic-handler
> >        PathTrim /PNT/Indices
> >        WLCookieName    PST_JSESSIONID
> >        WLLogFile wl.log
> >    
> > 
> >
> > Could it be that simply having the WLLogFile onfig option set is
> causing the logging to persist despite the OFF value of Debug?
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Ishita Kapadiya [mailto:ishim...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:24 AM
> >> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.
> >>
> >> have you set is as OFF in -
> >>
> >> 
> >> ...
> >>  
> >>
> >> If yes and if it's still not working send us httpd.conf (after
> >> removing all sensitive information).
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM,   wrote:
> >> > I've set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it's still writing
> to
> >> the
> >> > logs.
> >> >
> >> > Apache 2.2
> >> >
> >> > Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> >
> >> > Eric
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ___
> >> >
> >> > This e-mail may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged
> >> or
> >> > otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended
> >> recipient of
> >> > this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means.
> Please
> >> delete
> >> > it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have
> received
> >> it in
> >> > error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer
> to
> >> buy or
> >> > sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment
> >> products or
> >> > other financial product or service, an official confirmation of
> any
> >> > transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or
> >> opinions
> >> > presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> >> represent
> >> > those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at
> the
> >> > following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with
> >> Barclays
> >> > you consent to the foregoing.  Barclays offers premier investment
> >> banking
> >> > products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC, a
> >> company
> >> > registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office
> at
> >> 1
> >> > Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP.  This email may relate to or be
> >> sent from
> >> > other members of the Barclays Group.
> >> >
> >> > ___
> >>
> >> 
> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
> >
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.

Hi Eric,

You can refer 
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/plugins/apache.html.
consider other two scenarios - 1) there is no other instance on the
server than had Debug ON 2) grep the wl log file name in apache config
which will provide you clue with that set of config.

Thanks

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:45 AM,   wrote:
> Thanks, Ishita.  That's very helpful.  Do you know where the scoping issue is 
> mentioned in the WL docs, or is it an apache thing?
>
> The thing is that every single wl config section has "Debug OFF", and it's 
> still logging to those wl files.
>
> When you suggest that logging might be on by default, where would that be 
> set, and why doesn't the setting of Debug to "OFF" affect this?
>
> I'll try enabling DebugConfigInfo and see what I get.
>
> Eric
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ishita Kapadiya [mailto:ishim...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:42 AM
>> To: users@httpd.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> yes. mod_wl directives scoped local to the  and
>>  sections in which they appear. It's
>> good idea to see default configuration for WL plug-in with -
>> "__WebLogicBridgeConfig" (you also need to set DebugConfigInfo ON) and
>> check if Debug is ON by default. in that case you have to explicitly
>> set it OFF in each section where wl config present.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:31 AM,   wrote:
>> > Thanks for your reply, Ishita.
>> >
>> > All of the Debug statements are set to OFF.
>> >
>> > I have one major question at this point:  Are the mod_wl directives
>> scoped local to the  and 
>> sections in which they appear?
>> >
>> > We have many sections that create wl clusters, but the only requests
>> that I have noticed in the wl logs are from this section:
>> >
>> >
>> > 
>> >    
>> >        WebLogicCluster host1:port, host2:port, etc.
>> >
>> >        Debug OFF
>> >        DebugConfigInfo OFF
>> >        SetHandler weblogic-handler
>> >        PathTrim /PNT/Indices
>> >        WLCookieName    PST_JSESSIONID
>> >        WLLogFile wl.log
>> >    
>> > 
>> >
>> > Could it be that simply having the WLLogFile onfig option set is
>> causing the logging to persist despite the OFF value of Debug?
>> >
>> > Eric
>> >
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: Ishita Kapadiya [mailto:ishim...@gmail.com]
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:24 AM
>> >> To: users@httpd.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.
>> >>
>> >> have you set is as OFF in -
>> >>
>> >> 
>> >> ...
>> >>  
>> >>
>> >> If yes and if it's still not working send us httpd.conf (after
>> >> removing all sensitive information).
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM,   wrote:
>> >> > I've set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it's still writing
>> to
>> >> the
>> >> > logs.
>> >> >
>> >> > Apache 2.2
>> >> >
>> >> > Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >
>> >> > Eric
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ___
>> >> >
>> >> > This e-mail may contain information that is confidential,
>> privileged
>> >> or
>> >> > otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended
>> >> recipient of
>> >> > this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means.
>> Please
>> >> delete
>> >> > it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have
>> received
>> >> it in
>> >> > error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer
>> to
>> >> buy or
>> >> > sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment
>> >> products or
>> >> > other financial product or service, an official confirmation of
>> any
>> >> > transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or
>> >> opinions
>> >> > presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> >> represent
>> >> > those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at
>> the
>> >> > following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with
>> >> Barclays
>> >> > you consent to the foregoing.  Barclays offers premier investment
>> >> banking
>> >> > products and services to its clients through Barclays Bank PLC, a
>> >> company
>> >> > registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office
>> at
>> >> 1
>> >> > Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP.  This email may relate to or be
>> >> sent from
>> >> > other members of the Barclays Group.
>> >> >
>> >> > ___
>> >>
>> >> 
>> -
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---

Re: [users@httpd] virtual hosts with different JkExtract ssl values

2012-05-30 Thread Charles Richard

Thanks for the help!

As silly as this sounds, I thought i had tried the scenario I had above and
that it hadn't worked but after I read the documentation you sent, it
didn't explicitly specify that JkExtract could not be used in a virtual
host so I tried it and it worked!

Thanks,
Charles

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Igor Cicimov  wrote:

> JkExtractSSL is On by default. You can read the JkExtractSSL definition
> in the connector documentation:
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/printer/apache.html
>
> Looks like you can play with Apache SSLOptions parameter:
>
> "In order to make SSL data available for mod_jk in Apache, you need to set
> *SSLOptions +StdEnvVars*. For the certificate information you also need
> to add *SSLOptions +ExportCertData*. "
>
> and enable the above settings only for the Vhost you need it for.
>
> Igor
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Charles Richard  > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a bit of a complex setup in which i need a same front end apache
>> server to use different virtual hosts name (wildcard SSL) to redirect to
>> either Liferay, Glassfish or Tomcat.
>>
>> This could be a misconfiguration on my part but I seem to need for my
>> regular tomcat server that JkExtractSSL be on and for the other 2 (Liferay,
>> Glassfish) that my JkExtractSSL be off.  Is there a way to do this in a
>> virtual host directive? Example:
>>
>> 
>> JkExtractSSL on
>> 
>>
>> 
>> JkExtractSSL off
>> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Charles
>>
>
>

[users@httpd] Compiling/Installing httpd 2.4.2 on AIX 6.1 with gcc/g++

2012-05-30 Thread Reimer, George

My browser tells me that "It Works!" but it took a couple days of banging my
head against the wall. I encountered the following rough spots and eventually
stumbled over their solutions as noted:

1) No libpcre
This is a pre-requisite for httpd, I did not have it. I downloaded version
8.30 from www.pcre.org. The configure script ran OK, but
the make failed with errors about libgcc missing, even though 'rpm -aq'
indicated it was present. It was necessary to remove all the gcc, g++, and
libstdc packages via 'rpm -e', and then install them again in the following
order:

libgcc-4.2.0-3.aix6.1.ppc.rpm
libstdcplusplus-4.2.0-3.aix6.1.ppc.rpm
libstdcplusplus-devel-4.2.0-3.aix6.1.ppc.rpm
gcc-cplusplus-4.2.0-3.aix6.1.ppc.rpm

These packages are all downloadable at:

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/software/aix/linux/toolbox/alpha.html

My 'rpm -aq' listing now includes:

libgcc-4.2.0-3
gcc-4.2.0-3
libstdc++-4.2.0-3
gcc-c++-4.2.0-3
libstdc++-devel-4.2.0-3

But I did NOT install any separate gcc-4.2.0-3 RPM, I think it just came along
with the gcc-c++ package. Originally I had installed a separate gcc package,
and I think that messed up the interface with libgcc.

2) Apache 'make install' fails with "install: File mod_authn_file.so was not
found."

This issue is discussed at length on the mailing list archives at:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201202.mbox/%3CCAN9c_NSp8D9ifhb0FgSmfyKHqfQSFrmwuj+5przNZpqmp7v=z...@mail.gmail.com%3E

but I did not see a resolution for it. Recommendations for work-arounds
included compiling and installing the apache "apr" sopftware as a separate
package, using an explicitly declared destination directory when running "make
install", and some other suggestions that I did not understand. None of them
worked for me.

Instead, what make the install work for me was a suggestion from the README in
the build/aix subdirectory. The scripts there are supposed to build an AIX
installp package for apache. I didn't try it, but they said that libtool did
not work well with the AIX 'install' program, and to use the GNU one instead. I
already had the GNU coreutils installed (also available from the above IBM
site), so I set the PATH so that 'which install' returned
/opt/freeware/bin/install.

After this, 'make install' ran just fine, and httpd runs for me and serves out
the test page. I had already separated out the 'apr' stuff and installed it in
/usr/local/apr and compiled apache separately, but out of curiosity I started
over again, unpacking both httpd and httpd-deps into the same directory and
running 'configure' with the "-with-included-apr" option, and that installed
and runs just fine, too!

George

_
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all
copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and
(iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any
message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons
other than the intended recipient. Thank you.

Re: [users@httpd] Compiling/Installing httpd 2.4.2 on AIX 6.1 with gcc/g++

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Reimer, George
 wrote:
> My browser tells me that “It Works!”  but it took a couple days of banging
> my head against the wall. I encountered the following rough spots and
> eventually stumbled over their solutions as noted:

can you share your gcc experience here in the wiki:

http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/AIXPlatform

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?

2012-05-30 Thread Alex Bligh




--On 30 May 2012 14:41:53 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas  
wrote:



I worked around this problem by defining fake name in NameVirtualHost and
VirtualHost sections

# some.na.me maps to 192.168.0.1
NameVirtualHost some.na.me
NameVirtualHost 192.168.0.1

# some.na.me is not resolvable from outside, so this host will ONLY get #
# default hosts - unspecified below

ServerName some.na.me


# This host will only process requests for 192.168.0.1

ServerName 192.168.0.1



OK, so it is the  that is fixing this (really) not
the ServerName some.na.me line. I'm already doing the latter:
ServerName default.example.com

My problem is this is an automated install system and (broadly speaking)
I have no control over DNS.

Is there anything else I can do, like (e.g.) put the IP address as
a hex constant or something in ? Or disable this rather
annoying feature?

--
Alex Bligh

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?

> Is there anything else I can do, like (e.g.) put the IP address as
> a hex constant or something in ? Or disable this rather
> annoying feature?

I'd suggest opening a bug report that something weird seems to happen
with the literal IP address in the

Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error

2012-05-30 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.

You didn't dump the offending stack, you dumped the first stack.  It's highly
unlikely there was a segfault in _read.

You need to dump all the thread stacks, and work out the offending one; this is
usuallly designated <<< FAULT or some other indication of where the fault 
occured.

On 5/30/2012 10:32 AM, Ishita Kapadiya wrote:
> Thanks Nick.
> I have compiled Apache for myself both the time and both are 32-bit.
> The same modules all other instances are using and thus i am not sure
> what is different with this instance that causing Segmentation fault
> error.
> 
> I tried to dig more into it and here is what i got -
> 
> mdb core
>> ::stack
> libc.so.1`_read+0xc(6, ffbff5e3, 1, 0, 10b4, fef73ac0)
> ap_mpm_pod_check+0x18(d6800, 68764, 68f8c, 1b7ec0, 0, 1)
> child_main+0x2d4(0, 682dc, 0, fee58000, fef73700, fedf2a00)
> make_child+0x128(9bc00, 0, 1, 9cc00, 9b400, 9c800)
> ap_mpm_run+0x740(fe720058, 4, 0, a, 1, 0)
> main+0x77c(a7810, 99c00, 9bc00, 9bc00, a5808, 0)
> _start+0x5c(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
> 
> pstack core
>  fef45874 _read(6, ffbff5e3, 1, 0, 10b4, fef73ac0) + c
>  0006b714 ap_mpm_pod_check (d6800, 68764, 68f8c, 1b7ec0, 0, 1) + 18
>  000697b4 child_main (0, 682dc, 0, fee58000, fef73700, fedf2a00) + 2d4
>  00069930 make_child (9bc00, 0, 1, 9cc00, 9b400, 9c800) + 128
>  0006a160 ap_mpm_run (fe720058, 4, 0, a, 1, 0) + 740
>  00029bc8 main (a7810, 99c00, 9bc00, 9bc00, a5808, 0) + 77c
>  00028f7c _start   (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 5c
> 
> pmap core
> 0001 448K r-x--  /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd
> 0008  32K r-x--
> 00096000  24K rwx--  /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd
> 0009C000  16K rwx--  /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd
> 000A6528K rwx--[ heap ]
> FAB7A000   8K rw---[ stack tid=36 ]
> ...
> (removed rest of the lines to avoid length)
> 
> mdb /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd
> 
>> ::dis ap_mpm_pod_check!head
> ap_mpm_pod_check:   save  %sp, -0x78, %sp
> ap_mpm_pod_check+4: ld[%i0], %o1
> ap_mpm_pod_check+8: call  +0x2d0e0  
> ap_mpm_pod_check+0xc:   add   %fp, -0x14, %o0
> ap_mpm_pod_check+0x10:  ld[%fp - 0x14], %o0
> ap_mpm_pod_check+0x14:  add   %fp, -0x15, %o1
> ap_mpm_pod_check+0x18:  call  +0x2cdc4  
> ap_mpm_pod_check+0x1c:  mov   1, %o2
> 
> Please help me what could be the problem? It's affecting my production
> env and i really don't know what to do next?
> 
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Nick Kew  wrote:
>>
>> On 29 May 2012, at 23:11, Ishita Kapadiya wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I am using this configurations -
>>>
>>> Solaris sparc 10/apache 2.2.22/openssl 1.0.0g/simteminder sso/mod-jk 1.30
>>
>> Did you compile everything yourself?
>>
>> If yes, could any compile options have changed?  E.g. between 32-bit and 
>> 64-bit,
>> or something less obvious but just as important?
>>
>> If no, what suppliers do your binaries come from, and have you checked with 
>> them?
>>
>> --
>> Nick Kew
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
> 
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:54:32AM -0400, Mark Montague wrote:
>Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:54:32 -0400
>From: Mark Montague 
>Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Build problem
>
>On May 30, 2012 8:06 , Bill Vance  wrote:
>>I'm new to the list, so this may allready be
>>addressed somewhere.  Basically, I', trying
>>to put the sources for apache2 and php,
>>etc., together, and I seem to be having some
>>heavy wading.
>
>Do you have a reason to want to build from source?  For example, as a
>learning exercise, or because you will be modifying the code, or
>because you are using a very esoteric hardware platform?


Well it seems to be the way everyones been discussing how to do it,
what with aspx being AWOL or whatever.  That plus whenever I get
things working, there's a bunch of other stuff I want to add, as well.


>If the answer is "no", consider getting both Apache and PHP pre-built
>from someone who has built it already for you -- preferably, your OS
>distributor (for example, if you are running a Red Hat Linux based
>OS, run the command "sudo yum install httpd php" to get everything),
>or a trusted group who provide a pre-packaged stack that contains
>both Apache and PHP ( see 
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Apache%E2%80%93MySQL%E2%80%93PHP_packages
>).


Actually I'm running KUbuntu 10.04, Lucid Lunatic, or Lynx, or
whatever that stupid name is, on an i386-32  One of the problems
here are utils like apt-get, aptitude, and synaptic, etc.  They
work real good if you only want to deal with .deb archives, but
don't seem to leave much in the way of a program directory behind
them, which some things require for working with them.


>Either way -- whether you get httpd and php pre-packaged or build it
>yourself -- it would be helpful to know what OS you're using.


Actually I just tried your pre-package suggestion, and PHP5
started complaining about deprecated, "#"'s on line 0 in it's /etc/*
files, and apache2 quit working at all.

I'll give it another go with your further suggestions below, and
see what happens.


>>The main problem of the moment, is APR-Util.
>>After a bit of searchoong around, I finally
>>found, "apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg".  I'm not sure
>>what the, "dfsg", is, but I figured I'd find
>>out from the docs.
>
>I have no idea what this is either.  In general, it's not a good idea
>to use random thing you find lying around without knowing what they
>are, who they came from, and how they are special.
>
>The authoritative place to get the APR-Util source code is
>https://apr.apache.org/  If you need version 1.3.x for some reason,
>you can get it by clicking on the "Download" link in the "Apache
>Portable Runtime Utility 1.4.1 Released" section, then, on the
>resulting page, click on the "Other files" link in the "APR-util
>1.4.1 is the best available version" section.
>
>However, a much better way, considering the directory path in the
>error message below is to go to http://httpd.apache.org/ and download
>both httpd-2.4.2.tar.bz2 and httpd-2.4.2-deps.tar.bz2.  The former
>gets your the Apache HTTP Server source, and the latter gets you
>versions of the source code of both APR and APR-Util that are
>packaged to work with it.  Unpack both into the same directory, like
>this:
>
>tar jxf httpd-2.4.2.tar.bz2
>tar jxf httpd-2.4.2-deps.tar.bz2
>
>The source for httpd will be in httpd-2.4.2 while the source for APR
>and APR-Utils will be in httpd-2.4.2/srclib (although you don't need
>to know this).
>
>Then follow the instructions at
>https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/install.html  (Be sure to read the
>paragraph about PCRE in the "Requirements" section!)
>
>
>
>
>>make[1]: *** No rule to make target `crypto/apr_md5.c',
>>needed by `crypto/apr_md5.lo'.  Stop.
>>make[1]: Leaving directory
>>  /usr/local/src/httpd-2.4.2/apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg'
>>make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>
>>Anyone know how to fix this?
>
>Since you're using a dubious version of APR-Util, I'm not even going
>to try.  Please consider using a complete pre-packaged httpd+php
>stack as described at the top of this message.  But if you are going
>to build this from source, try again using the instructions above.
>If you encounter problems, include the following information
>
>- What configure command you used
>- Any errors or warnings from the configure command.
>- What operating system you're using (e.g., "Fedora 17"), including
>version and platform-specific details (e.g., "x86_64").
>
>
>Good luck.  I hope this helps!
>
>--
>  Mark Montague
>  m...@catseye.org
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error

Thanks William. This is the stack output i got from mdb when core got
dumped. Also, when i google "ap_mpm_pod_check" then got to know that
there are lots of people who hits Apache bug.

Please refer this URL - http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/bugs/414768

Also, i ran pfiles against the core file and i got

data model = _ILP32  flags = MSACCT|MSFORK
 /1:flags = 0
sigmask = 0xbeff,0x  cursig = SIGSEGV
 /2:
 /3:flags = STOPPED  lwp_park(0x4,0x0,0x0)
why = PR_SUSPENDED
sigmask = 0xffbe6007,0xfff7
.. (rest of lines truncted)

I don't know much about debugging as i am not from developer
background but whatever o/p i got, looks like some bug with Apache
2.2.22.

Please revert.

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
 wrote:
> You didn't dump the offending stack, you dumped the first stack.  It's highly
> unlikely there was a segfault in _read.
>
> You need to dump all the thread stacks, and work out the offending one; this 
> is
> usuallly designated <<< FAULT or some other indication of where the fault 
> occured.
>
> On 5/30/2012 10:32 AM, Ishita Kapadiya wrote:
>> Thanks Nick.
>> I have compiled Apache for myself both the time and both are 32-bit.
>> The same modules all other instances are using and thus i am not sure
>> what is different with this instance that causing Segmentation fault
>> error.
>>
>> I tried to dig more into it and here is what i got -
>>
>> mdb core
>>> ::stack
>> libc.so.1`_read+0xc(6, ffbff5e3, 1, 0, 10b4, fef73ac0)
>> ap_mpm_pod_check+0x18(d6800, 68764, 68f8c, 1b7ec0, 0, 1)
>> child_main+0x2d4(0, 682dc, 0, fee58000, fef73700, fedf2a00)
>> make_child+0x128(9bc00, 0, 1, 9cc00, 9b400, 9c800)
>> ap_mpm_run+0x740(fe720058, 4, 0, a, 1, 0)
>> main+0x77c(a7810, 99c00, 9bc00, 9bc00, a5808, 0)
>> _start+0x5c(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
>>
>> pstack core
>>  fef45874 _read    (6, ffbff5e3, 1, 0, 10b4, fef73ac0) + c
>>  0006b714 ap_mpm_pod_check (d6800, 68764, 68f8c, 1b7ec0, 0, 1) + 18
>>  000697b4 child_main (0, 682dc, 0, fee58000, fef73700, fedf2a00) + 2d4
>>  00069930 make_child (9bc00, 0, 1, 9cc00, 9b400, 9c800) + 128
>>  0006a160 ap_mpm_run (fe720058, 4, 0, a, 1, 0) + 740
>>  00029bc8 main     (a7810, 99c00, 9bc00, 9bc00, a5808, 0) + 77c
>>  00028f7c _start   (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 5c
>>
>> pmap core
>> 0001     448K r-x--  /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd
>> 0008      32K r-x--
>> 00096000      24K rwx--  /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd
>> 0009C000      16K rwx--  /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd
>> 000A    6528K rwx--    [ heap ]
>> FAB7A000       8K rw---    [ stack tid=36 ]
>> ...
>> (removed rest of the lines to avoid length)
>>
>> mdb /abc/apache-2.2.22/bin/httpd
>>
>>> ::dis ap_mpm_pod_check!head
>> ap_mpm_pod_check:               save      %sp, -0x78, %sp
>> ap_mpm_pod_check+4:             ld        [%i0], %o1
>> ap_mpm_pod_check+8:             call      +0x2d0e0      
>> ap_mpm_pod_check+0xc:           add       %fp, -0x14, %o0
>> ap_mpm_pod_check+0x10:          ld        [%fp - 0x14], %o0
>> ap_mpm_pod_check+0x14:          add       %fp, -0x15, %o1
>> ap_mpm_pod_check+0x18:          call      +0x2cdc4      
>> ap_mpm_pod_check+0x1c:          mov       1, %o2
>>
>> Please help me what could be the problem? It's affecting my production
>> env and i really don't know what to do next?
>>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Nick Kew  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29 May 2012, at 23:11, Ishita Kapadiya wrote:
>>>
 Hi All,

 I am using this configurations -

 Solaris sparc 10/apache 2.2.22/openssl 1.0.0g/simteminder sso/mod-jk 1.30
>>>
>>> Did you compile everything yourself?
>>>
>>> If yes, could any compile options have changed?  E.g. between 32-bit and 
>>> 64-bit,
>>> or something less obvious but just as important?
>>>
>>> If no, what suppliers do your binaries come from, and have you checked with 
>>> them?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Nick Kew
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:54:32AM -0400, Mark Montague wrote:
>Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:54:32 -0400
>From: Mark Montague 
>Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Build problem


>However, a much better way, considering the directory path in the
>error message below is to go to http://httpd.apache.org/ and download
>both httpd-2.4.2.tar.bz2 and httpd-2.4.2-deps.tar.bz2.  The former
>gets your the Apache HTTP Server source, and the latter gets you
>versions of the source code of both APR and APR-Util that are
>packaged to work with it.  Unpack both into the same directory, like
>this:
>
>tar jxf httpd-2.4.2.tar.bz2
>tar jxf httpd-2.4.2-deps.tar.bz2


Well, I tried it, but ./configure died with:

checking for tm_gmtoff in struct tm... yes
  adding "-DAPR_DTRACE_PROVIDER" to CPPFLAGS
configure: error: 'DTrace Support in the build
system is not complete. Patches Welcome!'

Ok, so now what do I do?

Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ishita Kapadiya  wrote:
> Thanks William. This is the stack output i got from mdb when core got
> dumped. Also, when i google "ap_mpm_pod_check" then got to know that
> there are lots of people who hits Apache bug.

It means lots of people post about the first thread that shows up in
gdb/dbx/pstack

-- 
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Mark Montague


On May 30, 2012 17:28 , Bill Vance  wrote:

Actually I'm running KUbuntu 10.04, Lucid Lunatic, or Lynx, or
whatever that stupid name is, on an i386-32  One of the problems
here are utils like apt-get, aptitude, and synaptic, etc.


So load a fresh KUbuntu system -- at this point, I think you may have 
made enough changes to your current system that it might be difficult to 
get things to work -- and then do a web search for "apache kubuntu".  
Here are some of the top search results, which seem to have simple, 
straightforward instructions for your particular situation:


http://phpweby.com/node/21
https://rockmanx.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/installing-ubuntus-apache2-local-webserver/



They
work real good if you only want to deal with .deb archives, but
don't seem to leave much in the way of a program directory behind
them, which some things require for working with them.


I don't understand this statement at all.  Program directory?  Require 
for working with them?  Normally you'd install a package and get some 
configuration files and startup scripts under /etc, some binaries under 
/usr/bin and /usr/sbin, and web pages under /var/www.  Customize your 
config file (set the server name, etc.), drop in your content or web 
application under /var/www, start the service, and you're up and running.



Actually I just tried your pre-package suggestion, and PHP5 started 
complaining about deprecated, "#"'s on line 0 in it's /etc/* files, 
and apache2 quit working at all.


This isn't enough information to help you.  You don't say which one 
pre-packaged Apache+PHP distribution you picked, how you installed it, 
what changes you made, nor what you tried that resulted in PHP complaining.


In any event, now that we know you're running on KUbuntu, I'd recommend 
not downloading a separate non-Ubuntu LAMP stack, but instead using what 
Kubuntu provides -- it's the easiest and most standard thing to do in 
your specific situation.


Also, take things in stages:  get Apache HTTP Server set up and serving 
static content first, then try getting PHP running.  If you have trouble 
with PHP inside the web server, then try running a PHP script from the 
command line -- if you can't get PHP to run from the command line, it 
will never run from inside the web server.


But, again, I suspect that you likely have several things that are 
messed up on your system from your previous attempts at installing and 
getting things working.  Start over with a fresh KUbuntu installation if 
possible.  If it's not possible to reload the system you've been working 
on, consider setting up a VM guest system in which to experiment and 
learn and get things working, which you can reload as many times as needed.



--
  Mark Montague
  m...@catseye.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error

Hi Eric,

could you please let me know the next steps to mitigate Segfault error..

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Eric Covener  wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ishita Kapadiya  wrote:
>> Thanks William. This is the stack output i got from mdb when core got
>> dumped. Also, when i google "ap_mpm_pod_check" then got to know that
>> there are lots of people who hits Apache bug.
>
> It means lots of people post about the first thread that shows up in
> gdb/dbx/pstack
>
> --
> Eric Covener
> cove...@gmail.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Mark Montague


On May 30, 2012 18:14 , Bill Vance  wrote:


Well, I tried it, but ./configure died with:

checking for tm_gmtoff in struct tm... yes
   adding "-DAPR_DTRACE_PROVIDER" to CPPFLAGS
configure: error: 'DTrace Support in the build
system is not complete. Patches Welcome!'

Ok, so now what do I do?


If you don't need to build from source, don't.  Install the packages via 
apt-get instead, preferably on a freshly loaded system.  See the message 
I just sent about this.


If you are going to continue to try to build from source, I also 
recommend starting over with a fresh install of KUbuntu, as I think you 
may have changed enough things to result in the error message above.  
The reasons I say this are:


- I've recently built httpd 2.4.2 myself under Fedora 16 just this past 
weekend and did not encounter this error (and KUbuntu should not be very 
different).  I've also just now successfully run configure under MacOS 
10.7.3 without encountering the problem you describe.


- I've checked the contents of the configure script, and the only way 
you should ever see the above message is if you invoked configure with 
the --enable-trace option.  Since you say you just ran "./configure" 
(without any command line options, right?), this points to something 
being fundamentally messed up on your system; it'll be easier to start 
over fresh in a known state than to try and find and fix whatever is broken.


--
  Mark Montague
  m...@catseye.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Stormy

At 02:28 PM 5/30/2012 -0700, Bill Vance wrote:

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:54:32AM -0400, Mark Montague wrote:
>Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:54:32 -0400
>From: Mark Montague 
>Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Build problem
>
>On May 30, 2012 8:06 , Bill Vance  wrote:
>>I'm new to the list, so this may allready be
>>addressed somewhere.  Basically, I', trying
>>to put the sources for apache2 and php,
>>etc., together, and I seem to be having some
>>heavy wading.

[snip]

Actually I'm running KUbuntu 10.04, Lucid Lunatic, or Lynx, or
whatever that stupid name is, on an i386-32  One of the problems
here are utils like apt-get, aptitude, and synaptic, etc.  They
work real good if you only want to deal with .deb archives, but
don't seem to leave much in the way of a program directory behind
them, which some things require for working with them.

Not sure why you need KDE for a server, but...

Maybe 10.04 is a bit "long in the tooth?"  I just rebuilt (Monday 
afternoon) from scratch an old i386-32 as a sandbox using Ubuntu 12.04 (the 
latest LTS), and had Apache 2.2.22 and PHP 5.3.10 (as well as MySQL 5.5.22) 
up and running in less than an hour. I used apt-get for each package 
(wanted MySQL, not Postgre which comes in the standard LAMP package 
available at installation time from the standard .iso).

The Ubuntu "stupid name" for 12.04 is "Precise"; maybe for you it would be 
"Perfect"?

HTH - Paul  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 07:11:51PM -0400, Stormy wrote:
>Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:11:51 -0400
>From: Stormy 
>Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

[snip]

>Not sure why you need KDE for a server, but...
>
>Maybe 10.04 is a bit "long in the tooth?"  I just rebuilt (Monday
>afternoon) from scratch an old i386-32 as a sandbox using Ubuntu
>12.04 (the latest LTS), and had Apache 2.2.22 and PHP 5.3.10 (as well
>as MySQL 5.5.22) up and running in less than an hour. I used apt-get
>for each package (wanted MySQL, not Postgre which comes in the
>standard LAMP package available at installation time from the
>standard .iso).


12.04 being just out, is having the usual KUbuntu string of
startup nightmares, so I think I'll pass on that one.

If I do a new OS at all, What I'm considering is CentOS.
That I'm hearing, is a deal more reliable than a bunch of
other systems.

Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Eric Covener  wrote:
>> Is there anything else I can do, like (e.g.) put the IP address as
>> a hex constant or something in ? Or disable this rather
>> annoying feature?
>
> I'd suggest opening a bug report that something weird seems to happen
> with the literal IP address in the  works with *:80.


Sorry, just catching on now that Matus nailed it.  It's not so clear
what the code is trying to tolerate by comparing this way.

-- 
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?