RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I try download apache at

[Boyle Owen]

> -Original Message-
> From: lse123 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 8:44 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I try download apache at
> 
> 
> After get this msi file what to do ?

http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/platform/windows.html

Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. 

> 
> 
> Joshua Slive-2 wrote:
> > 
> > On 10/2/07, lse123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On
> >> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/httpd/binaries/win32/
> >> >I try download apache at
> >> > http://apache.siamwebhosting.com/httpd/binaries/win32/
> >> > but a list of files appear , what to do to download ? this is all
> >> together
> >> > download ?
> >> > like  http://apache.osuosl.org/httpd/binaries/win32/
> > 
> > Assuming you're running windows, you probably want the file
> > apache_2.2.6-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8e.msi
> > from that list.
> > 
> > Joshua.
> > 
> > 
> -
> > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP 
> Server Project.
> > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >"   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/I-try-download-apache-at-tf4555662.html#
a13013689
> Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive 
> at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> -
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP 
> Server Project.
> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>"   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
 
 
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, 
proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege 
is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, 
please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and 
any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any 
hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, 
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended 
recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail 
communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are 
those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and 
the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] How to modify the default page in Apache 2 ??

[ChiaTzung Liu -劉佳宗]

Hi.. 
 
  I think that everyone should know that the default page of Apache is very 
WHITE when no default files (index.htm, index.html... etc) in the web 
directories.
I hope I can establish a http file server by Apache and let the default page 
more beautiful like HFS (http://www.rejetto.com/hfs/). What can I do??

Thank you very much!!

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to modify the default page in Apache 2 ??

[Tony Stevenson]

ChiaTzung Liu -劉佳宗 wrote:
Hi.. 
 
  I think that everyone should know that the default page of Apache is very WHITE when no default files (index.htm, index.html... etc) in the web directories.


If you have no default files in your directory, then you will be given a 
 404 error, by default this will be whatever your local browser 
displays as a 404 error message.  This can be altered to show a custome 
error page:


ErrorDocument 404 /path/to/404-error.html



I hope I can establish a http file server by Apache and let the default page 
more beautiful like HFS (http://www.rejetto.com/hfs/). What can I do??
If you want to use a service similar to HFS, then you need to look at 
MOD_DAV - http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_dav.html

and
MOD-DAV_FS - http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_dav_fs.html


That is, if I understand your request properly.



Cheers,
Tony




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy Timeout

[Christian Folini]

Hi there,

There has not been a response to the problem outlined below. 
As nobody came up and contradicted my conclusion, I am not
sure how to go on.

If it is a bug, I could issue bug report, but I doubt
it would be fixed anytime soon. The core documentation
has been stating for years, that "there may still be odd
places in the code where the timer is not reset when a packet 
is sent." This sounds like nobody dares to touch the code
in question and I doubt a bug report more would help.

So if I came to the conclusion that this sould be
solved by updating the documentation (and forward
the problem to to the documentation mailinglist),
would that be a good idea?

regs,

Christian

On 2007-09-27 8:09:05, Christian Folini wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Back in March 2007, there was a report on unexpected behaviour of
> timeout settings in a reverse proxy setup:
> 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-users/200703.mbox/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> 
> I have stumbled over the same issue one of these days and
> it is bugging me.
> 
> I am working with apache 2.0.61 in prefork mode. There is a client
> (netcat) connecting to the apache reverse proxy. Then apache
> connects to a backend running netcat in listen mode. 
> 
> The config and the test runs:
> 
> client:
>   nc localhost 80 < /tmp/get-request
> 
> apache config (stripped down test config):
>   Timeout 10
>   
> Timeout   20
> ProxyPass /   http://127.0.0.1:8080/
> ProxyTimeout  30
>   
> 
> backend application:
>   nc -l -p 8080
>   -> output:
>  GET / HTTP/1.1
>  Host: 127.0.0.1:8080
>  Max-Forwards: 10
>  X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1
>  X-Forwarded-Host: testhost
>  X-Forwarded-Server: testhost.myhome.net
> 
> 
> When the backend is not reacting, apache interrupts the
> connection and issues a "502 Proxy Error" to the client, which
> is the expected behaviour. The problem is the timeout.
> 
> There are three timeout values configured above. A global server
> one, a virtual host timeout and a ProxyTimeout statement.
> 
> One would expect that ProxyTimeout is in charge here.
> (See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxytimeout
> for example)
> 
> But in fact, the virtual host timeout is taken (-> 20 seconds).
> See my tcpdump output:
> 
> tcpdump -i lo  port 80:
> ...
> 09:56:03.010405 IP localhost.44761 > localhost.www: S 
> 2165749057:2165749057(0) win 32792  0,nop,wscale 7>
> 09:56:03.010560 IP localhost.www > localhost.44761: S 
> 2167281898:2167281898(0) ack 2165749058 win 32768  214957352 214957352,nop,wscale 7>
> 09:56:03.010412 IP localhost.44761 > localhost.www: . ack 1 win 257 
> 
> 09:56:03.010441 IP localhost.44761 > localhost.www: P 1:31(30) ack 1 win 257 
> 
> 09:56:03.010449 IP localhost.www > localhost.44761: . ack 31 win 256 
> 
> 09:56:23.008039 IP localhost.www > localhost.44761: P 1:530(529) ack 31 win 
> 256 
> 09:56:23.008049 IP localhost.44761 > localhost.www: . ack 530 win 265 
> 
> 09:56:23.008102 IP localhost.www > localhost.44761: F 530:530(0) ack 31 win 
> 256 
> 09:56:23.008150 IP localhost.44761 > localhost.www: F 31:31(0) ack 531 win 
> 265 
> 09:56:23.008162 IP localhost.www > localhost.44761: . ack 32 win 256 
> 
> 
> 
> This is 20 seconds after the connection to the backend and not
> thirty seconds as issued by ProxyTimeout.
> 
> It seems as if ProxyTimeout would only affect forward proxy setups and not
> reverse proxy configurations. Unfortunately, the documentation addresses
> all proxy requests.
> 
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxytimeout :
> > This directive allows a user to specifiy a timeout on proxy requests. 
> > This is useful when you have a slow/buggy appserver which hangs, 
> > and you would rather just return a timeout and fail gracefully 
> > instead of waiting however long it takes the server to return.
> 
> And in fact, the explanation of the Timeout directive in the core 
> documentation does not cover this either:
> 
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#timeout :
> 
> > The TimeOut directive currently defines the amount of time Apache will wait 
> > for three things:
> > 
> >   1. The total amount of time it takes to receive a GET request.
> >   2. The amount of time between receipt of TCP packets on a POST or PUT 
> > request.
> >   3. The amount of time between ACKs on transmissions of TCP packets in 
> > responses.
> 
> Could somebody please confirm this? I am not sure wether this is
> an unexpected behaviour, an undocumented feature, a bug or a
> misconfiguration on my behalf.
> 
> Any comment is appreciated.
> 
> Christian Folini
> 
> 
> 
> -
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>"   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web server fail over setup

[Asrai khn]

Hi list

I am looking for  what's the best failover setup for apache websever. We are
running apache web server with lot of virtual hosting. Sometime the servers
fail which also makes all sites hosting at that server unavailable.

So I am looking for suggestions how to make his failures of web server less
pain.

1. setup identical web server (do i have to use rysync to copy the contents
of one to another) ?

2. If the masters web server fails the slave automatically/or with less
hassle  take over all the traffic.


Regards. Askar

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web server fail over setup

[Christian Folini]

On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +0500, Asrai khn wrote:
> So I am looking for suggestions how to make his failures of web server less
> pain.

Lot of suggestions are possible, but they all inflict pain. 
A very clean and widspread solution is to have two identical
webservers (use a deployment script to keep the servers
absolutely in sync) and use a hardware loadbalancer in front 
of the two servers. This is likely to cause financial pain.

An alternative is to setup Linux HA-cluster. There are
lot of how-tos around. Still the learning curve is so
steep, it means pain. Not theoretically, but in practice,
high-availability is only the goal. At first, it just
hurts.

You could also try to go with the most simple solution
and make your server more stable. If you know
you can cut your downtime by 50% by investing a week
of work in the server, then this is probably worth
it. Unless you need to cut it by 95% or 99%. But
this would mean a lot of pain anyways.

regs,

Christian


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web server fail over setup

[Peter Milanese]

Hey-

   I ran LVS for about 5 years, mostly while it was in its infancy. We do over 
a billion hits a year, and I had it running on VERY small machines, heading 4 
others with many Vhosts. It cost a couple of grand for the two boxes.

  The result of this was proof that we needed the solution, and we should 
invest money in it. 
  
  A couple of years ago, we replaced the LVS boxes with F5's. The F5's are 
linux based, and get the job done quite well. It's going to cost about 30k+ to 
get involved though. They have been doing the job quite well ever since, and 
route about 30 virts to various backend devices.





  

Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html
 

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web server fail over setup

[Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV]

No matter which solution you choose, the real problem is to detect that the 
server fails.

If the server stops responding to requests, that's easy enough. However if 
there is not a clear-cut failure, e.g. one server gradually slows down, or 
still responds to the polls from the load balancer but not to certain requests 
from clients the judgement call is harder...

Apart from clustering solutions and HW load balancers, you could also add 
Apache 2.2 and mod_proxy_balancer to the list.

-ascs
 
-Message d'origine-
De : Christian Folini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : mercredi 3 octobre 2007 14:33
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web server fail over setup

On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +0500, Asrai khn wrote:
> So I am looking for suggestions how to make his failures of web server 
> less pain.

Lot of suggestions are possible, but they all inflict pain. 
A very clean and widspread solution is to have two identical webservers (use a 
deployment script to keep the servers absolutely in sync) and use a hardware 
loadbalancer in front of the two servers. This is likely to cause financial 
pain.

An alternative is to setup Linux HA-cluster. There are lot of how-tos around. 
Still the learning curve is so steep, it means pain. Not theoretically, but in 
practice, high-availability is only the goal. At first, it just hurts.

You could also try to go with the most simple solution and make your server 
more stable. If you know you can cut your downtime by 50% by investing a week 
of work in the server, then this is probably worth it. Unless you need to cut 
it by 95% or 99%. But this would mean a lot of pain anyways.

regs,

Christian


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to modify the default page in Apache 2 ??

[Joshua Slive]

On 10/3/07, ChiaTzung Liu -劉佳宗 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi..
>
>   I think that everyone should know that the default page of Apache is very 
> WHITE when no default files (index.htm, index.html... etc) in the web 
> directories.
> I hope I can establish a http file server by Apache and let the default page 
> more beautiful like HFS (http://www.rejetto.com/hfs/). What can I do??
>

I believe you're talking about the automatic directory listings. If
so, see the documentation for mod_autoindex. There are a ton of
options for styling this, including specifing HeaderName and
ReadmeName files to wrap the file listing, and specifying a custom
stylesheet.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AD and apache

[Peter Milanese]

I think the question is "does Apache support AD". 

Yeah, you can do it, there are many tutorials online if you need help.

- Original Message 
From: Melanie Pfefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 6:30:56 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AD and apache

hello folks,

a question about AD: Does AD supports apache?
Do I have to use LDAP server (sun/open ldap)?

thx


  ___
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ 

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








  

Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user panel 
and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy Timeout

[Joshua Slive]

On 10/3/07, Christian Folini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> There has not been a response to the problem outlined below.
> As nobody came up and contradicted my conclusion, I am not
> sure how to go on.
>
> If it is a bug, I could issue bug report, but I doubt
> it would be fixed anytime soon. The core documentation
> has been stating for years, that "there may still be odd
> places in the code where the timer is not reset when a packet
> is sent." This sounds like nobody dares to touch the code
> in question and I doubt a bug report more would help.
>
> So if I came to the conclusion that this sould be
> solved by updating the documentation (and forward
> the problem to to the documentation mailinglist),
> would that be a good idea?

I believe it's worth a bug report either way.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] AD and apache

[Melanie Pfefer]

hello folks,

a question about AD: Does AD supports apache?
Do I have to use LDAP server (sun/open ldap)?

thx


  ___
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ 

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AD and apache

[Melanie Pfefer]

in my case apache is already installed but with no
ldap module.

Looking on the net, auth_ldap-1.6.0 needs openldap
(does not mention AD)

thanks
--- Peter Milanese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I think the question is "does Apache support AD". 
> 
> Yeah, you can do it, there are many tutorials online
> if you need help.
> 
> - Original Message 
> From: Melanie Pfefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 6:30:56 AM
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AD and apache
> 
> hello folks,
> 
> a question about AD: Does AD supports apache?
> Do I have to use LDAP server (sun/open ldap)?
> 
> thx
> 
> 
>  
>
___
> Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there
> knows the answer. Try it
> now.
> http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ 
> 
>
-
> The official User-To-User support forum of the
> Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for
> more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>"   from the digest:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>

> Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. 
> Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us.
>
http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
> 
> 



  ___ 
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good  
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AD and apache

[Tom Hart]

This is the same issue I've been having. Auth_LDAP is built into apache
now (probably if you found something it's designed for 1.x or 2.0.x).
My issue is that I'm unable to figure out how to install auth_ldap
after I've already installed apache on windows using the msi.

I suppose I could get into the code and compiling it and all, but this
setup is going to be used in a financial institution, and stability is
a huge concern. I fear that doing the compiling myself is going to
cause problems.

Melanie Pfefer wrote:

  in my case apache is already installed but with no
ldap module.

Looking on the net, auth_ldap-1.6.0 needs openldap
(does not mention AD)

thanks
--- Peter Milanese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  
  
I think the question is "does Apache support AD". 

Yeah, you can do it, there are many tutorials online
if you need help.

- Original Message 
From: Melanie Pfefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 6:30:56 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AD and apache

hello folks,

a question about AD: Does AD supports apache?
Do I have to use LDAP server (sun/open ldap)?

thx


 


  
  ___
  
  
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there
knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ 



  
  -
  
  
The official User-To-User support forum of the
Apache HTTP Server Project.
See  for
more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]








 


  
  
  
  
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. 
Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us.


  
  http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
  
  


  
  


  ___ 
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good  http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See  for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  





-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See  for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AD and apache

[Peter Milanese]

It needs OpenLDAP in order to compile the module. It does not need a directory 
setup on OpenLDAP.

- Original Message 
From: Tom Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 8:10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AD and apache




  

This is the same issue I've been having. Auth_LDAP is built into apache
now (probably if you found something it's designed for 1.x or 2.0.x).
My issue is that I'm unable to figure out how to install auth_ldap
after I've already installed apache on windows using the msi.



I suppose I could get into the code and compiling it and all, but this
setup is going to be used in a financial institution, and stability is
a huge concern. I fear that doing the compiling myself is going to
cause problems.



Melanie Pfefer wrote:

  in my case apache is already installed but with no
ldap module.

Looking on the net, auth_ldap-1.6.0 needs openldap
(does not mention AD)

thanks
--- Peter Milanese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  
  
I think the question is "does Apache support AD". 

Yeah, you can do it, there are many tutorials online
if you need help.

- Original Message 
From: Melanie Pfefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 6:30:56 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AD and apache

hello folks,

a question about AD: Does AD supports apache?
Do I have to use LDAP server (sun/open ldap)?

thx


 


  
  ___
  
  
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there
knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ 



  
  -
  
  
The official User-To-User support forum of the
Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for
more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]








 


  
  

  
  
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. 
Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us.


  
  http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
  
  

  
  

  ___ 
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good  
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See  for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







   

Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play 
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/  

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apr module

[Melanie Pfefer]

hi again,

I am using apache 2.0.59 and noticed that apr version
is libapr-0.so.0.

is it normal to have this version? shoudn't be 2.0.59?

thx


  ___
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ 

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apr module

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Melanie Pfefer wrote:
> hi again,
> 
> I am using apache 2.0.59 and noticed that apr version
> is libapr-0.so.0.

apr != httpd.

APR 0.9.x was used for Apache 2.0.

APR 1.2.x (and later 1.x versions) are used for Apache 2.2.



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] windows/install issues

[Tom Hart]

I used the .msi installer to setup apache on my windows 2003 system, and 
selected all the modules I thought I'd need. After more research, I'd 
like to do directory-based authentication with auth_ldap. However I seem 
to be unable to figure out how to install built-in modules in win32 
after apache is already installed without uninstalling and reinstalling. 
Can somebody point me in the right direction?


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] windows/install issues

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Tom Hart wrote:
> I used the .msi installer to setup apache on my windows 2003 system, and
> selected all the modules I thought I'd need. After more research, I'd
> like to do directory-based authentication with auth_ldap. However I seem
> to be unable to figure out how to install built-in modules in win32
> after apache is already installed without uninstalling and reinstalling.
> Can somebody point me in the right direction?

With the ASF installer you simply uncomment the corresponding #LoadModule
lines from your httpd.conf file by removing the '#' comment marker.

But - if you deleted instead of commenting out the LoadModule lines,
refer back to httpd.default.conf that was installed to help you out of
this sort of trouble, and copy the lines across to the 'live' httpd.conf.



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[Mark A. Craig]

I've been making futile efforts to compile a module, mod_httpbl.c, and
not having any luck.  I found and installed (or at least think I have)
the contents of apxs_win32.zip, with which William/Bill Rowe seems to
have had some involvement.  However, when I try to follow the
recommended instructions for compiling this module, it fails with
various errors.  Along the way I discovered that apxs.bat used a
long-filename reference to perl.exe, but it wasn't properly quoted and
it was failing to find perl.exe, so I had to actually edit apxs.bat and
change the reference to 8.3 format.

The command I'm instructed to use to compile it is:

apxs -c -i -a mod_httpbl.c

When I try this from a Command window in \bin\ and the .c file in that
same directory, I get the following response:

cl  /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG
-I"C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include"  /c /Fomod_httpbl.lo mod_httpbl.c

'cl' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
apxs:Error: Command failed with rc=65536

Is it going to be practical to compile this module?  I may be in far
over my head.

Mark


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Mark A. Craig wrote:
> I've been making futile efforts to compile a module, mod_httpbl.c, and
> not having any luck.  I found and installed (or at least think I have)
> the contents of apxs_win32.zip, with which William/Bill Rowe seems to
> have had some involvement.

Thanks on that are to Randy Kobes :)

> However, when I try to follow the
> recommended instructions for compiling this module, it fails with
> various errors.  Along the way I discovered that apxs.bat used a
> long-filename reference to perl.exe, but it wasn't properly quoted and
> it was failing to find perl.exe, so I had to actually edit apxs.bat and
> change the reference to 8.3 format.
> 
> The command I'm instructed to use to compile it is:
> 
> apxs -c -i -a mod_httpbl.c
> 
> When I try this from a Command window in \bin\ and the .c file in that
> same directory, I get the following response:
> 
> cl  /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG
> -I"C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include"  /c /Fomod_httpbl.lo
> mod_httpbl.c
> 
> 'cl' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
> operable program or batch file.
> apxs:Error: Command failed with rc=65536
> 
> Is it going to be practical to compile this module?  I may be in far
> over my head.

If you don't have a VC compiler, and you don't run the vcvars32.bat file
first, it's not going to find a cl.exe to run.


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] windows/install issues

[Tom Hart]

For some reason auth_ldap does not show up on my loadmodule list. I
checked the default httpd.conf and it's not there either...

Here's my loadmodule chunk from httpd.conf

LoadModule actions_module modules/mod_actions.so
LoadModule alias_module modules/mod_alias.so
LoadModule asis_module modules/mod_asis.so
LoadModule auth_basic_module modules/mod_auth_basic.so
#LoadModule auth_digest_module modules/mod_auth_digest.so
#LoadModule authn_anon_module modules/mod_authn_anon.so
#LoadModule authn_dbm_module modules/mod_authn_dbm.so
LoadModule authn_default_module modules/mod_authn_default.so
LoadModule authn_file_module modules/mod_authn_file.so
#LoadModule authz_dbm_module modules/mod_authz_dbm.so
LoadModule authz_default_module modules/mod_authz_default.so
LoadModule authz_groupfile_module modules/mod_authz_groupfile.so
LoadModule authz_host_module modules/mod_authz_host.so
LoadModule authz_user_module modules/mod_authz_user.so
LoadModule autoindex_module modules/mod_autoindex.so
#LoadModule cern_meta_module modules/mod_cern_meta.so
LoadModule cgi_module modules/mod_cgi.so
#LoadModule dav_module modules/mod_dav.so
#LoadModule dav_fs_module modules/mod_dav_fs.so
#LoadModule deflate_module modules/mod_deflate.so
LoadModule dir_module modules/mod_dir.so
LoadModule env_module modules/mod_env.so
#LoadModule expires_module modules/mod_expires.so
#LoadModule file_cache_module modules/mod_file_cache.so
#LoadModule headers_module modules/mod_headers.so
LoadModule imagemap_module modules/mod_imagemap.so
LoadModule include_module modules/mod_include.so
#LoadModule info_module modules/mod_info.so
LoadModule isapi_module modules/mod_isapi.so
LoadModule log_config_module modules/mod_log_config.so
LoadModule mime_module modules/mod_mime.so
#LoadModule mime_magic_module modules/mod_mime_magic.so
#LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so
#LoadModule proxy_ajp_module modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so
#LoadModule proxy_balancer_module modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so
#LoadModule proxy_connect_module modules/mod_proxy_connect.so
#LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so
#LoadModule proxy_ftp_module modules/mod_proxy_ftp.so
LoadModule negotiation_module modules/mod_negotiation.so
#LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so
LoadModule setenvif_module modules/mod_setenvif.so
#LoadModule speling_module modules/mod_speling.so
#LoadModule status_module modules/mod_status.so
#LoadModule unique_id_module modules/mod_unique_id.so
LoadModule userdir_module modules/mod_userdir.so
#LoadModule usertrack_module modules/mod_usertrack.so
#LoadModule vhost_alias_module modules/mod_vhost_alias.so
#LoadModule ssl_module modules/mod_ssl.so
#Put in by me - LoadModule authnz_ldap modules/mod_authnz_ldap.so -
Doesn't Work


William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

  Tom Hart wrote:
  
  
I used the .msi installer to setup apache on my windows 2003 system, and
selected all the modules I thought I'd need. After more research, I'd
like to do directory-based authentication with auth_ldap. However I seem
to be unable to figure out how to install built-in modules in win32
after apache is already installed without uninstalling and reinstalling.
Can somebody point me in the right direction?

  
  
With the ASF installer you simply uncomment the corresponding #LoadModule
lines from your httpd.conf file by removing the '#' comment marker.

But - if you deleted instead of commenting out the LoadModule lines,
refer back to httpd.default.conf that was installed to help you out of
this sort of trouble, and copy the lines across to the 'live' httpd.conf.



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See  for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  





-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See  for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] http parent dies obtaining mutex

[rmorriso]

We are seeing the root parent httpd process dying regularly - usually within
a few hours of startup - on 2.2.4/6 on Solaris 10 on SPARC. After parent
death, the child processes continue to run. 

Excerpt from error_log:

[Wed Oct 03 02:09:31 2007] [emerg] (46)No record locks available: couldn't
grab
the accept mutex
[Wed Oct 03 02:09:31 2007] [alert] Child 24023 returned a Fatal error...
Apache
is exiting!
[Wed Oct 03 02:09:34 2007] [emerg] (46)No record locks available: couldn't
grab
the accept mutex

Apache has been built with SSL support, but we are not using it.

Any ideas?
- Rick
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/http-parent-dies-obtaining-mutex-tf4563138.html#a13023407
Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] windows/install issues

[Peter Milanese]

I don't think the default conf file includes it. Just add:

LoadModule ldap_module modules/mod_ldap.so
LoadModule authnz_ldap_module modules/mod_authnz_ldap.s

And it should load.

- Original Message 
From: Tom Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 9:31:19 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] windows/install issues




  

For some reason auth_ldap does not show up on my loadmodule list. I
checked the default httpd.conf and it's not there either...



Here's my loadmodule chunk from httpd.conf



LoadModule actions_module modules/mod_actions.so

LoadModule alias_module modules/mod_alias.so

LoadModule asis_module modules/mod_asis.so

LoadModule auth_basic_module modules/mod_auth_basic.so

#LoadModule auth_digest_module modules/mod_auth_digest.so

#LoadModule authn_anon_module modules/mod_authn_anon.so

#LoadModule authn_dbm_module modules/mod_authn_dbm.so

LoadModule authn_default_module modules/mod_authn_default.so

LoadModule authn_file_module modules/mod_authn_file.so

#LoadModule authz_dbm_module modules/mod_authz_dbm.so

LoadModule authz_default_module modules/mod_authz_default.so

LoadModule authz_groupfile_module modules/mod_authz_groupfile.so

LoadModule authz_host_module modules/mod_authz_host.so

LoadModule authz_user_module modules/mod_authz_user.so

LoadModule autoindex_module modules/mod_autoindex.so

#LoadModule cern_meta_module modules/mod_cern_meta.so

LoadModule cgi_module modules/mod_cgi.so

#LoadModule dav_module modules/mod_dav.so

#LoadModule dav_fs_module modules/mod_dav_fs.so

#LoadModule deflate_module modules/mod_deflate.so

LoadModule dir_module modules/mod_dir.so

LoadModule env_module modules/mod_env.so

#LoadModule expires_module modules/mod_expires.so

#LoadModule file_cache_module modules/mod_file_cache.so

#LoadModule headers_module modules/mod_headers.so

LoadModule imagemap_module modules/mod_imagemap.so

LoadModule include_module modules/mod_include.so

#LoadModule info_module modules/mod_info.so

LoadModule isapi_module modules/mod_isapi.so

LoadModule log_config_module modules/mod_log_config.so

LoadModule mime_module modules/mod_mime.so

#LoadModule mime_magic_module modules/mod_mime_magic.so

#LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so

#LoadModule proxy_ajp_module modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so

#LoadModule proxy_balancer_module modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so

#LoadModule proxy_connect_module modules/mod_proxy_connect.so

#LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so

#LoadModule proxy_ftp_module modules/mod_proxy_ftp.so

LoadModule negotiation_module modules/mod_negotiation.so

#LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so

LoadModule setenvif_module modules/mod_setenvif.so

#LoadModule speling_module modules/mod_speling.so

#LoadModule status_module modules/mod_status.so

#LoadModule unique_id_module modules/mod_unique_id.so

LoadModule userdir_module modules/mod_userdir.so

#LoadModule usertrack_module modules/mod_usertrack.so

#LoadModule vhost_alias_module modules/mod_vhost_alias.so

#LoadModule ssl_module modules/mod_ssl.so

#Put in by me - LoadModule authnz_ldap modules/mod_authnz_ldap.so -
Doesn't Work





William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

  Tom Hart wrote:
  
  
I used the .msi installer to setup apache on my windows 2003 system, and
selected all the modules I thought I'd need. After more research, I'd
like to do directory-based authentication with auth_ldap. However I seem
to be unable to figure out how to install built-in modules in win32
after apache is already installed without uninstalling and reinstalling.
Can somebody point me in the right direction?

  
  With the ASF installer you simply uncomment the corresponding #LoadModule
lines from your httpd.conf file by removing the '#' comment marker.

But - if you deleted instead of commenting out the LoadModule lines,
refer back to httpd.default.conf that was installed to help you out of
this sort of trouble, and copy the lines across to the 'live' httpd.conf.



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See  for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







  

Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 and CGI problem redux

[Apache]

Not a total solution but getting there.

Joshua Slive had some of the answer.
He enlightened me that I was using SSI and told me to used SetOutputFilter
and I read-up on the SSI howto.

So I can include JavaScript files and they work nicely. However perl
scripts in the cgi-bin directly stubbornly refuse to fire unless called by
an HREF tag.

The config is simple:

ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "/usr/local/www/cgi-bin/"
Alias /javascript/ "/usr/local/www/javascript/"
AddHandler cgi-script .cgi .pl


 AllowOverride None
 Options +ExecCGI +Includes
 AddType text/html .html
 AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .html
 Order allow,deny
 Allow from all




 AllowOverride None
 Options +ExecCGI +Includes
 AddType text/html .html
 AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .html
 Order allow,deny
 Allow from all



The web page (index.html) is damn simple too:

http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTML1/DTD/XHTML1-strict.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; lang="en" xml:lang="en">


   
 Test page
   

   
 It works! Or so I say.David
 
  Test This 
 
 
 
 
   



And the perl script is trivial.
#!/usr/bin/perl
print "Content-type: text/html\r\n\r\n";
print "Work, damn it all!\n";


Any idea of what I'm missing? I'm going with html all pages will be using
dynamic HTML, if I can ever get it to work.

Does the new details ring bells with anybody?

Thanks, again.

Outstanding action: Contact the CGI HowTo doc people to put a ref to the
SSI HowTo doc.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Newbie problem - can only get 'It Works'

[Robert A. Rawlinson]

I installed apache2 on my Suse Linux 10.2 system. I wanted to make some 
changes to an existing perl script and test them out. I decided to check 
to be sure the script, which has been working, would work on my machine. 
All I can get is 'It Works!'. I edited the index.html script to invoke 
the script to test it but I just get the original it works. I have 
checked and the index.html at /srv/www/htdocs has the changes I made but 
it still seems to only show the old html. Where am I going wrong?

Bob R
Below is the html:


Test Script/title>
content="0;url=http://localhost/cgi-bin/TestScript.pl";>







-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newbie problem - can only get 'It Works'

[Peter Milanese]

Are you sure you're editing the right file?

Do a :

find / -name index.html | grep 'It Works'

- Original Message 
From: Robert A. Rawlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Apache2 Users 
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 11:11:43 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newbie problem - can only get 'It Works'

I installed apache2 on my Suse Linux 10.2 system. I wanted to make some 
changes to an existing perl script and test them out. I decided to check 
to be sure the script, which has been working, would work on my machine. 
All I can get is 'It Works!'. I edited the index.html script to invoke 
the script to test it but I just get the original it works. I have 
checked and the index.html at /srv/www/htdocs has the changes I made but 
it still seems to only show the old html. Where am I going wrong?
Bob R
Below is the html:


Test Script/title>
http://localhost/cgi-bin/TestScript.pl";;>






-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








   

Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. 
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. 
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newbie problem - can only get 'It Works'

[Robert A. Rawlinson]

Thanks for your response. I tried the find as you had it and it did not 
report anything. I thought Firefox might have cashed it so I stopped it 
and restarted it.

Bob R

Peter Milanese wrote:

Are you sure you're editing the right file?

Do a :

find / -name index.html | grep 'It Works'

- Original Message 
From: Robert A. Rawlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Apache2 Users 
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 11:11:43 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newbie problem - can only get 'It Works'

I installed apache2 on my Suse Linux 10.2 system. I wanted to make some
changes to an existing perl script and test them out. I decided to check
to be sure the script, which has been working, would work on my machine.
All I can get is 'It Works!'. I edited the index.html script to invoke
the script to test it but I just get the original it works. I have
checked and the index.html at /srv/www/htdocs has the changes I made but
it still seems to only show the old html. Where am I going wrong?
Bob R
Below is the html:


Test Script/title>
content="0;url=http://localhost/cgi-bin/TestScript.pl"; 
;>







-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers 
from 
someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. 



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 and CGI problem redux

[Joshua Slive]

On 10/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not a total solution but getting there.
>
> Joshua Slive had some of the answer.
> He enlightened me that I was using SSI and told me to used SetOutputFilter
> and I read-up on the SSI howto.
>
> So I can include JavaScript files and they work nicely. However perl
> scripts in the cgi-bin directly stubbornly refuse to fire unless called by
> an HREF tag.
>
> The config is simple:
>
> ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "/usr/local/www/cgi-bin/"
> Alias /javascript/ "/usr/local/www/javascript/"
> AddHandler cgi-script .cgi .pl

You missed one little part of my suggestion: "the directory where the HTML pages
lives has "Options Includes" ".

It is the html file that needs SSI, so you need to activate the
Includes option and the INCLUDES filter for that directory, not for
the cgi-bin directory.

Also, I told you to use #include virtual, not #exec virtual. The
latter doesn't exist, as far as I know.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newbie problem - can only get 'It Works'

[Peter Milanese]

You'd want to do the find on the command line of your linux box. 

That should tell you if there are other index.html files that you may be 
confusing.

- Original Message 
From: Robert A. Rawlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 11:29:06 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newbie problem - can only get 'It Works'

Thanks for your response. I tried the find as you had it and it did not 
report anything. I thought Firefox might have cashed it so I stopped it 
and restarted it.
Bob R

Peter Milanese wrote:
> Are you sure you're editing the right file?
>
> Do a :
>
> find / -name index.html | grep 'It Works'
>
> - Original Message 
> From: Robert A. Rawlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Apache2 Users 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 11:11:43 AM
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newbie problem - can only get 'It Works'
>
> I installed apache2 on my Suse Linux 10.2 system. I wanted to make some
> changes to an existing perl script and test them out. I decided to check
> to be sure the script, which has been working, would work on my machine.
> All I can get is 'It Works!'. I edited the index.html script to invoke
> the script to test it but I just get the original it works. I have
> checked and the index.html at /srv/www/htdocs has the changes I made but
> it still seems to only show the old html. Where am I going wrong?
> Bob R
> Below is the html:
> 
> 
> Test Script/title>
>  content="0;url=http://localhost/cgi-bin/TestScript.pl";; 
> ;>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
>
> -
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>"   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> 
> Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers 
> from
>  
> someone who knows.
> Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. 


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








  

Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, 
and more!
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: mod_rewrite startup failure on PPC-binary on intel Mac

[Neville Hillyer]

I am only replying because nobody else appears to have done so. I 
understand very little of your technicalities but I do know that on 
occasions it is necessary to check/adjust file permissions on OS X 
especially on an Xserve - I think the owner should be www but 
depending upon how you have done things not all installs end up with 
the correct owner.


Neville


At 14:23 -0400 01/10/2007, Zak Burke wrote:

I'm working on a PPC build of httpd 2.2.4 on an Intel Mac. I'm
doing this because I need Oracle support built into mod_php; because 
Oracle has only released PPC libraries, I have to compile
PPC-only apps if I want to use them. I have a working httpd/php 
combo and now I'm trying to add mod_rewrite to the mix. I can get 
mod_rewrite to work if I totally disable logging at compiletime, but 
if logging is allowed httpd will not start.


Here is a bit of history: httpd compiles after configuring like this:

$ CPPFLAGS="-arch ppc" LDFLAGS="-arch ppc" ./configure
--build=ppc-apple-darwin8.10.2

but it won't start. The error log showed messages like this:

[emerg] (14)Bad address: Couldn't set permissions on
cross-process lock; check User and Group directives

The problem is a bad default AcceptMutex setting (sysvsem; pthread 
also fails; flock, fcntl and posixsem all work fine). Thanks to 
Vincent Bray to putting me on the track to figuring out that problem.


Building mod_rewrite with apxs like this:

sudo /usr/local/apache2-ppc/bin/apxs -Wc,"-arch ppc"
-Wl,"-arch ppc" -i -a -c mod_rewrite.c

works but gives a similar error when trying to start httpd:

[crit] (14)Bad address: mod_rewrite: Could not set permissions
on rewrite_log_lock; check User and Group directives

Configuration Failed

This error comes from a block near line 4048 of mod_rewrite.c. It's 
in a double-nested ifdef-block:


#ifndef REWRITELOG_DISABLED
...
#ifdef AP_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS

The second ifdef, defined in defined in os/unix/os.h, is kinda 
suspicious given the AcceptMutex issue I originally faced. I tried 
moving the AcceptMutex directive before the "LoadModule 
rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so" directive, I tried all the 
different AcceptMutex options, and I tried building mod_rewrite 
statically into the httpd binary; none work.


Happily, the comments for the REWRITELOG_DISABLED constant (see line 
101 of mod_rewrite.c) note that you can totally disable logging at 
compiletime (compile with -DREWRITELOG_DISABLED), which sidesteps 
the problem by totally skipping this block. But it doesn't really 
solve the problem, and it would be kinda nice to have logging 
available.


Does anybody have any hints on how I might proceed?

Thanks,

zak.



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[Mark A. Craig]

I have the Visual Studio and C++ 2005 Express Edition that MS gave away free... 
would that work?  I actually tried to first compile the module with that, but 
got so many errors from trying that I gave up.  So what do I need to do to make 
the APXS feature work correctly?  What's the vcvars32.bat file?


Oh... THERE it is!  Gotta give this another try

Mark

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with 
APXS.BAT/.PL

From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 09:24:40 AM


Mark A. Craig wrote:

I've been making futile efforts to compile a module, mod_httpbl.c, and
not having any luck.  I found and installed (or at least think I have)
the contents of apxs_win32.zip, with which William/Bill Rowe seems to
have had some involvement.


Thanks on that are to Randy Kobes :)


However, when I try to follow the
recommended instructions for compiling this module, it fails with
various errors.  Along the way I discovered that apxs.bat used a
long-filename reference to perl.exe, but it wasn't properly quoted and
it was failing to find perl.exe, so I had to actually edit apxs.bat and
change the reference to 8.3 format.

The command I'm instructed to use to compile it is:

apxs -c -i -a mod_httpbl.c

When I try this from a Command window in \bin\ and the .c file in that
same directory, I get the following response:

cl  /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG
-I"C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include"  /c /Fomod_httpbl.lo
mod_httpbl.c

'cl' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
apxs:Error: Command failed with rc=65536

Is it going to be practical to compile this module?  I may be in far
over my head.


If you don't have a VC compiler, and you don't run the vcvars32.bat file
first, it's not going to find a cl.exe to run.


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[Mark A. Craig]

Got a tiny bit further:

C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>vsvars32.bat
Setting environment for using Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 x86 tools.

C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>apxs -c -i -a 
mod_httpbl.c

cl  /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG 
-I"C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include"  /c /Fomod_httpbl.lo mod_httpbl.c


mod_httpbl.c

C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include\apr.h(92) : fatal error C1083: Cannot 
open include file: 'windows.h': No such file or directory


apxs:Error: Command failed with rc=131072

How do I resolve this include failure, and how many other includes will it fail 
to find?  There are a LOT of includes in that .c file!  I know, for a guy who 
once upon a time did programming, I'm such a complete newb.  I haven't touched 
any code file that didn't end in .html since the 80s.  :-/


Mark

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with 
APXS.BAT/.PL

From: Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 12:52:12 PM

I have the Visual Studio and C++ 2005 Express Edition that MS gave away 
free... would that work?  I actually tried to first compile the module 
with that, but got so many errors from trying that I gave up.  So what 
do I need to do to make the APXS feature work correctly?  What's the 
vcvars32.bat file?


Oh... THERE it is!  Gotta give this another try

Mark

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 
2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 09:24:40 AM


Mark A. Craig wrote:

I've been making futile efforts to compile a module, mod_httpbl.c, and
not having any luck.  I found and installed (or at least think I have)
the contents of apxs_win32.zip, with which William/Bill Rowe seems to
have had some involvement.


Thanks on that are to Randy Kobes :)


However, when I try to follow the
recommended instructions for compiling this module, it fails with
various errors.  Along the way I discovered that apxs.bat used a
long-filename reference to perl.exe, but it wasn't properly quoted and
it was failing to find perl.exe, so I had to actually edit apxs.bat and
change the reference to 8.3 format.

The command I'm instructed to use to compile it is:

apxs -c -i -a mod_httpbl.c

When I try this from a Command window in \bin\ and the .c file in that
same directory, I get the following response:

cl  /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG
-I"C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include"  /c /Fomod_httpbl.lo
mod_httpbl.c

'cl' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
apxs:Error: Command failed with rc=65536

Is it going to be practical to compile this module?  I may be in far
over my head.


If you don't have a VC compiler, and you don't run the vcvars32.bat file
first, it's not going to find a cl.exe to run.




-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[Dragon]

Mark A. Craig wrote:

Got a tiny bit further:

C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>vsvars32.bat
Setting environment for using Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 x86 tools.

C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>apxs -c -i 
-a mod_httpbl.c


cl  /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG 
-I"C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include"  /c /Fomod_httpbl.lo mod_httpbl.c


mod_httpbl.c

C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include\apr.h(92) : fatal error 
C1083: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No such file or directory


apxs:Error: Command failed with rc=131072

How do I resolve this include failure, and how many other includes 
will it fail to find?  There are a LOT of includes in that .c 
file!  I know, for a guy who once upon a time did programming, I'm 
such a complete newb.  I haven't touched any code file that didn't 
end in .html since the 80s.  :-/

 End original message. -

windows.h (and a whole bunch of other things you will need) are part 
of the Windows SDK which you can download from Microsoft's MSDN web site.


Dragon

~~~
 Venimus, Saltavimus, Bibimus (et naribus canium capti sumus)
~~~


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Dragon wrote:
> 
> windows.h (and a whole bunch of other things you will need) are part of
> the Windows SDK which you can download from Microsoft's MSDN web site.

And once installed, on TOP of vcvars32.bat, look for setenv.bat too!  :)

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[Mark A. Craig]

You mean it doesn't come included with a WINDOWS-based compiler package from 
MICROSOFT?  o_O


And actually, in my case I'll apparently need the old-fashioned Platform SDK, 
because I'm compiling on Windows 2000


*runs outside to the hand pump connected to his pipe to the Internet, starts 
cranking*


Mark

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache  2.2.4 with 
APXS.BAT/.PL

From: Dragon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 01:19:07 PM


Mark A. Craig wrote:

Got a tiny bit further:

C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>vsvars32.bat
Setting environment for using Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 x86 tools.

C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>apxs -c -i 
-a mod_httpbl.c


cl  /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG 
-I"C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include"  /c /Fomod_httpbl.lo 
mod_httpbl.c


mod_httpbl.c

C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include\apr.h(92) : fatal error C1083: 
Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No such file or directory


apxs:Error: Command failed with rc=131072

How do I resolve this include failure, and how many other includes 
will it fail to find?  There are a LOT of includes in that .c file!  I 
know, for a guy who once upon a time did programming, I'm such a 
complete newb.  I haven't touched any code file that didn't end in 
.html since the 80s.  :-/

 End original message. -

windows.h (and a whole bunch of other things you will need) are part of 
the Windows SDK which you can download from Microsoft's MSDN web site.


Dragon



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Mark A. Craig wrote:
> You mean it doesn't come included with a WINDOWS-based compiler package
> from MICROSOFT?  o_O
> 
> And actually, in my case I'll apparently need the old-fashioned Platform
> SDK, because I'm compiling on Windows 2000

NO - you want the modern one that integrates into VS2005.  Don't panic,
it will even compile Windows NT 4 programs, still :)

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[Mark A. Craig]

Damn, ya mean I gotta take my eye patch off and use both eyes?

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache  2.2.4 with 
APXS.BAT/.PL

From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 01:29:09 PM


Dragon wrote:

windows.h (and a whole bunch of other things you will need) are part of
the Windows SDK which you can download from Microsoft's MSDN web site.


And once installed, on TOP of vcvars32.bat, look for setenv.bat too!  :)



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[Dragon]

Mark A. Craig wrote:
You mean it doesn't come included with a WINDOWS-based compiler 
package from MICROSOFT?  o_O


And actually, in my case I'll apparently need the old-fashioned 
Platform SDK, because I'm compiling on Windows 2000


*runs outside to the hand pump connected to his pipe to the 
Internet, starts cranking*

 End original message. -

Nope, not unless you buy an MSDN subscription or the pro version of 
the compiler.


But it's free, you just have to go get it.

Dragon

~~~
 Venimus, Saltavimus, Bibimus (et naribus canium capti sumus)
~~~


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[Mark A. Craig]

I think you're right... I'm trying to install the Platform SDK right now, and 
apparently it's HUNG copying files.


*runs back outside to the pump again*

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache  2.2.4 with 
APXS.BAT/.PL

From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 01:48:18 PM


Mark A. Craig wrote:

You mean it doesn't come included with a WINDOWS-based compiler package
from MICROSOFT?  o_O

And actually, in my case I'll apparently need the old-fashioned Platform
SDK, because I'm compiling on Windows 2000


NO - you want the modern one that integrates into VS2005.  Don't panic,
it will even compile Windows NT 4 programs, still :)

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[Mark A. Craig]

Downloaded the SDK for "Vista and .NET 3.0 Runtime Components", and now it's 
telling me that Setup.exe is not a valid Win32 application!  I've downloaded and 
tried to run it three separate times now, same response each time.  And yes, I 
downloaded it from microsoft.com.  o_O


Mark

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache  2.2.4 with 
APXS.BAT/.PL

From: Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 01:57:38 PM

I think you're right... I'm trying to install the Platform SDK right 
now, and apparently it's HUNG copying files.


*runs back outside to the pump again*

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache  
2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 01:48:18 PM


Mark A. Craig wrote:

You mean it doesn't come included with a WINDOWS-based compiler package
from MICROSOFT?  o_O

And actually, in my case I'll apparently need the old-fashioned Platform
SDK, because I'm compiling on Windows 2000


NO - you want the modern one that integrates into VS2005.  Don't panic,
it will even compile Windows NT 4 programs, still :)

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server 
Project.

See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 and CGI problem - solved - doc bug?

[Apache]

Thanks to my not reading Joshua Silve's reply and his second correction 
everything is working.


I needed a Directory entry for the directory that had the *html files that 
call the JavaScript and CGI files. So I needed three entries as follows:


For the file with *html:
AllowOverride None
Options +Includes
AddType text/html .html
AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .html
Order allow,deny
Allow from all

For the JavaScript area:
AllowOverride None
Options +Includes
Order allow,deny
Allow from all

For the CGI scripts:
AllowOverride None
Options +ExecCGI
Order allow,deny
Allow from all

I'll give the Apache people a few days to read this as I think this is a 
doucmentation bug.


1. I think the http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/cgi.html should have 
link to http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/ssi.html. Some of the data 
is related and required to get CGI running.


2. An example of http.conf entries (like given above) should be included 
with explanation on why each entry is needed with a recommended settings 
(which would need someone with more experience than me).


Thanks,

David

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] YAMRQ (Yet Another Mod Rewrite Question)

[Ajai Khattri]

Im struggling with getting my URL rewriting rules working, basically I 
want to have certain URLS to redirect to a different host and I also want 
the inverse case (i.e. if the URL is NOT any of those URLs then redirect 
back to the original host).

So, the first case is for the two /create and /edit URLs:

  RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.example\.com [NC]
  RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/create$
  RewriteRule (.*) http://edit.example.com/create [L,R]

  RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.example\.com [NC]
  RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/edit/(.*)$
  RewriteRule (.*) http://edit.quamut.com/$1 [L,R]

Those work just fine.

Now, you would think the inverse of these rules would work to redirect 
back to the original host but they dont work (in fact, the next two rules 
break the first two rules - if I comment these out, the first two rules 
start working again):

  RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^edit\.example\.com [NC]
  RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/create$
  RewriteRule (.*) http://www.example.com/$1 [R,L]
  
  RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^edit\.example\.com [NC]
  RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/edit/(.*)$
  RewriteRule (.*) http://www.example.com/$1 [R,L]


Any ideas what am I missing here?


-- 
A


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[Mark A. Craig]

Turns out there might be a good reason it wouldn't run: it's NOT for Windows 
2000... Windows XP SP2 is listed as a minimum requirement.


So I started the PSDK again, and this time I noticed that it's a WEB install, so 
when I thought it was hung it was just downloading a large file.  The install 
finished when I was more patient, and got still further, but hit YAIP (Yet 
Another Include Problem):



C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>vsvars32.bat
Setting environment for using Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 x86 tools.

C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>setenv.cmd /2000
Attempting to detect a Microsoft Visual Studio installation
Targeting Windows 2000 and IE 5.0 DEBUG

C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>apxs -c -i -a 
mod_httpbl.c
cl  /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG 
-I"C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include"  /c /Fomod_httpbl.lo mod_httpbl.c


mod_httpbl.c

mod_httpbl.c(360) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'sys/socket.h': 
No such file or directory


apxs:Error: Command failed with rc=131072

So why am I missing this one, and what SDK do I hafta download to get it?

Mark

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache  2.2.4 with 
APXS.BAT/.PL

From: Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 02:10:51 PM

Downloaded the SDK for "Vista and .NET 3.0 Runtime Components", and now 
it's telling me that Setup.exe is not a valid Win32 application!  I've 
downloaded and tried to run it three separate times now, same response 
each time.  And yes, I downloaded it from microsoft.com.  o_O


Mark

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache  
2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

From: Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 01:57:38 PM

I think you're right... I'm trying to install the Platform SDK right 
now, and apparently it's HUNG copying files.


*runs back outside to the pump again*

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache  
2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 01:48:18 PM


Mark A. Craig wrote:

You mean it doesn't come included with a WINDOWS-based compiler package
from MICROSOFT?  o_O

And actually, in my case I'll apparently need the old-fashioned 
Platform

SDK, because I'm compiling on Windows 2000


NO - you want the modern one that integrates into VS2005.  Don't panic,
it will even compile Windows NT 4 programs, still :)

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server 
Project.

See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Mark A. Craig wrote:
> C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>apxs -c -i -a
> mod_httpbl.c
> cl  /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG
> -I"C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include"  /c /Fomod_httpbl.lo
> mod_httpbl.c
> 
> mod_httpbl.c
> 
> mod_httpbl.c(360) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file:
> 'sys/socket.h': No such file or directory
> 
> apxs:Error: Command failed with rc=131072
> 
> So why am I missing this one, and what SDK do I hafta download to get it?

You are there!!!  You will be able to build 'many' modules.

Sadly this author isn't using the APR API (w/httpd) for socket io.  There
is no win32 sys/socket.h.  Essentially this is not a win32 ported (or
generally portable) module.  Even on unix, sys/socket.h frequently
changes identity (which is why there is so much autoconf gunk in the
wheels of apr and httpd's ./configure).

Bill

Bill

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 and CGI problem - solved - doc bug?

[Eric Covener]

On 10/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. I think the http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/cgi.html should have
> link to http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/ssi.html. Some of the data
> is related and required to get CGI running.

What part of the SSI doc that isn't duplicated in the CGI doc is
related or required? Is this stemming from #include
virtual=/cgi-bin/foo where /cgi-bin/foo isn't served as CGI on that
system?

-- 
Eric Covener
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] snooping on cgi data

[Eric S. Johansson]

are there any tools/techniques for snooping on the data sent to and from a cgi 
program?  I'm thinking something like wireshark for webservers.



-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[Mark A. Craig]

Actually, Bill, it kinda sorta does use APR:



#define WIN32   1

// from IPC example module
#if !defined(OS2) && !defined(WIN32) && !defined(BEOS) && !defined(NETWARE)
#include "unixd.h"
#define MOD_EXIPC_SET_MUTEX_PERMS // XXX Apache should define something
#endif
/*   */
/* End #defines Section */

/* Begin #includes Section */
/*   */
#include "apr.h"
#include "apr_version.h"
#include "apr_signal.h"
#include "apr_buckets.h"
#include "apr_strings.h"
#include "apr_network_io.h"
#include "apr_file_io.h"
#include "apr_time.h"
#include "apr_getopt.h"
#include "apr_general.h"
#include "apr_lib.h"
#include "apr_portable.h"
#include "ap_config.h"
#include "ap_release.h"
#include "apr_poll.h"
#define APR_WANT_STRFUNC
#include "apr_want.h"
#include "apr_base64.h"
#if APR_HAVE_STDIO_H
#include 
#endif
#if APR_HAVE_STDLIB_H
#include 
#include 
#endif
#if APR_HAVE_CTYPE_H
#include 
#endif
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#if APR_HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H
#include 
#endif
#if APR_HAVE_UNISTD_H
#include 
#endif
#include "httpd.h"
#include "http_main.h"
#include "http_core.h"
#include "http_config.h"
#include "http_log.h"
#include "http_request.h"
#include "http_protocol.h"
#include "ap_config.h"
#include "apr_buckets.h"
#include "util_script.h"
#include "util_filter.h"
#include "apr_tables.h"
#include "http_vhost.h"
#include "http_config.h"
#include "pcre.h"
//#include 
/*   */
/* End #includes Section */



I think I added the WIN32 #define myself, early on in my attempts.  Is there 
anything obvious I can do to fix this thing up, or am I hamstrung with it until 
a "real" coder comes along and fixes it?  (It's open-sourced and GPLed, so it 
could happen)  I assume I actually have apr.h, since the compiler didn't 
complain about that?


Mark

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache  2.2.4 with 
APXS.BAT/.PL

From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 03:41:57 PM


Mark A. Craig wrote:

C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>apxs -c -i -a
mod_httpbl.c
cl  /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG
-I"C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include"  /c /Fomod_httpbl.lo
mod_httpbl.c

mod_httpbl.c

mod_httpbl.c(360) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file:
'sys/socket.h': No such file or directory

apxs:Error: Command failed with rc=131072

So why am I missing this one, and what SDK do I hafta download to get it?


You are there!!!  You will be able to build 'many' modules.

Sadly this author isn't using the APR API (w/httpd) for socket io.  There
is no win32 sys/socket.h.  Essentially this is not a win32 ported (or
generally portable) module.  Even on unix, sys/socket.h frequently
changes identity (which is why there is so much autoconf gunk in the
wheels of apr and httpd's ./configure).

Bill


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Mark A. Craig wrote:
> Actually, Bill, it kinda sorta does use APR:

Yup... it looks half ported; right up through ctype.h it looks like the
author had reduced the headers to what was available, and then surrendered.

I suspect that this is the typical kitchen sink; throw in every usual
header so that any feature is available.  It might be worthwhile to comment
them all out and readd them one-by-one for the actual declarations that are
required by the code.

Witness, for example, the redundant sys/types.h :)

As I mention, comment them all out (I prefer #if 0 ... #endif for that sort
of thing) and start readding one-by-one, and possibly even state something
like /* for foo_fn() declaration */ explaining why that header is needed.

Bill


> #define WIN321
> 
> // from IPC example module
> #if !defined(OS2) && !defined(WIN32) && !defined(BEOS) && !defined(NETWARE)
> #include "unixd.h"
> #define MOD_EXIPC_SET_MUTEX_PERMS // XXX Apache should define something
> #endif
> /*   */
> /* End #defines Section */
> 
> /* Begin #includes Section */
> /*   */
> #include "apr.h"
> #include "apr_version.h"
> #include "apr_signal.h"
> #include "apr_buckets.h"
> #include "apr_strings.h"
> #include "apr_network_io.h"
> #include "apr_file_io.h"
> #include "apr_time.h"
> #include "apr_getopt.h"
> #include "apr_general.h"
> #include "apr_lib.h"
> #include "apr_portable.h"
> #include "ap_config.h"
> #include "ap_release.h"
> #include "apr_poll.h"
> #define APR_WANT_STRFUNC
> #include "apr_want.h"
> #include "apr_base64.h"
> #if APR_HAVE_STDIO_H
> #include 
> #endif
> #if APR_HAVE_STDLIB_H
> #include 
> #include 
> #endif
> #if APR_HAVE_CTYPE_H
> #include 
> #endif
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> #if APR_HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H
> #include 
> #endif
> #if APR_HAVE_UNISTD_H
> #include 
> #endif
> #include "httpd.h"
> #include "http_main.h"
> #include "http_core.h"
> #include "http_config.h"
> #include "http_log.h"
> #include "http_request.h"
> #include "http_protocol.h"
> #include "ap_config.h"
> #include "apr_buckets.h"
> #include "util_script.h"
> #include "util_filter.h"
> #include "apr_tables.h"
> #include "http_vhost.h"
> #include "http_config.h"
> #include "pcre.h"
> //#include 
> /*   */
> /* End #includes Section */
> 
> 
> 
> I think I added the WIN32 #define myself, early on in my attempts.  Is
> there anything obvious I can do to fix this thing up, or am I hamstrung
> with it until a "real" coder comes along and fixes it?  (It's
> open-sourced and GPLed, so it could happen)  I assume I actually
> have apr.h, since the compiler didn't complain about that?
> 
> Mark
> 
>  Original Message  
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 
> 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 03:41:57 PM
> 
>> Mark A. Craig wrote:
>>> C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>apxs -c -i -a
>>> mod_httpbl.c
>>> cl  /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG
>>> -I"C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include"  /c /Fomod_httpbl.lo
>>> mod_httpbl.c
>>>
>>> mod_httpbl.c
>>>
>>> mod_httpbl.c(360) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file:
>>> 'sys/socket.h': No such file or directory
>>>
>>> apxs:Error: Command failed with rc=131072
>>>
>>> So why am I missing this one, and what SDK do I hafta download to get
>>> it?
>>
>> You are there!!!  You will be able to build 'many' modules.
>>
>> Sadly this author isn't using the APR API (w/httpd) for socket io.  There
>> is no win32 sys/socket.h.  Essentially this is not a win32 ported (or
>> generally portable) module.  Even on unix, sys/socket.h frequently
>> changes identity (which is why there is so much autoconf gunk in the
>> wheels of apr and httpd's ./configure).
>>
>> Bill
> 
> -
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 


-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] snooping on cgi data

[Joshua Slive]

On 10/3/07, Eric S. Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> are there any tools/techniques for snooping on the data sent to and from a cgi
> program?  I'm thinking something like wireshark for webservers.

I think you should be more specific about what you are trying to
accomplish. You can try the ScriptLog directive, but really the info
sent to and from CGI scripts is almost identical to the info sent to
and from the http server itself. There is only a little header
manipulation and some environment variables set.

Joshua.

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

[Mark A. Craig]

Errr, wouldn't I have to know exactly what functions from which includes were 
actually being referenced in order to do that?  I'm a pretty non-functional 
coder at this point... I never actually coded in C at all.


(My last "language" was actually Pascal, which I prefer because of the strong 
typing.  If everyone had been using Pascal all these years instead of C, we'd 
have never had to worry about buffer overruns!)


So how do I do this, figure out which ones are actually required by the code?

Mark

 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache  2.2.4 with 
APXS.BAT/.PL

From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 07:39:58 PM


Mark A. Craig wrote:

Actually, Bill, it kinda sorta does use APR:


Yup... it looks half ported; right up through ctype.h it looks like the
author had reduced the headers to what was available, and then surrendered.

I suspect that this is the typical kitchen sink; throw in every usual
header so that any feature is available.  It might be worthwhile to comment
them all out and readd them one-by-one for the actual declarations that are
required by the code.

Witness, for example, the redundant sys/types.h :)

As I mention, comment them all out (I prefer #if 0 ... #endif for that sort
of thing) and start readding one-by-one, and possibly even state something
like /* for foo_fn() declaration */ explaining why that header is needed.

Bill



 Original Message  
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling module under Windows for Apache 
2.2.4 with APXS.BAT/.PL

From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 03:41:57 PM


Mark A. Craig wrote:

C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin>apxs -c -i -a
mod_httpbl.c
cl  /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG
-I"C:\PROGRA~1\APACHE~1\Apache2.2\include"  /c /Fomod_httpbl.lo
mod_httpbl.c

mod_httpbl.c

mod_httpbl.c(360) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file:
'sys/socket.h': No such file or directory

apxs:Error: Command failed with rc=131072

So why am I missing this one, and what SDK do I hafta download to get
it?

You are there!!!  You will be able to build 'many' modules.

Sadly this author isn't using the APR API (w/httpd) for socket io.  There
is no win32 sys/socket.h.  Essentially this is not a win32 ported (or
generally portable) module.  Even on unix, sys/socket.h frequently
changes identity (which is why there is so much autoconf gunk in the
wheels of apr and httpd's ./configure).

Bill

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] YAMRQ (Yet Another Mod Rewrite Question)

[Christian Folini]

On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:42:15PM -0400, Ajai Khattri wrote:
> Any ideas what am I missing here?

I am missing the context. :)
Please provide your whole config. I think it has to
do with the structure of your config file.

regs,

Christian


> 
> 
> -- 
> A
> 
> 
> -
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>"   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]