[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache stops processing requests
Hi All, We have apache 2.0.59 as a forward proxy on RHEL 3.0 in Worker. The traffic on the server is around 45 Mb. Mod_status reported around 600 requests per second The worker conf is ServerLimit 18 StartServers10 ThreadsPerChild 50 MaxClients 900 MinSpareThreads 100 MaxSpareThreads 900 MaxRequestsPerChild 2000 KeepAlive Off Listen 8080 Apache is behaving very well for most of the time. 1. We see that the performance sometimes goes from good to bad and then back to good. What we mean bad is that pages take more time to load or get no connection message. (See the error log entries below) 2. After 3 hours apache stopped processing altogether. There is no entries in the error log. We had to restart Apache. But after 2 hours Apache stopped processing requests. We have rebooted the machine and monitoring the same. We have not come across this behavior for the past 2 months. Error log shows the following... [Tue Dec 19 08:45:34 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:35 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:37 2006] [error] [client 86.90.135.159] proxy: DNS lookup failure for: tsclient returned by http://tsclient/ [Tue Dec 19 08:45:38 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:39 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:42 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:43 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:46 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:47 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:50 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:51 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:52 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:4664 (127.0.0.1) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:54 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:55 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:58 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:45:59 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:46:02 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:46:03 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:46:06 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed [Tue Dec 19 08:46:07 2006] [error] [client 213.84.166.176] proxy: DNS lookup failure for: vectraxp returned by http://vectraxp/ [Tue Dec 19 08:46:07 2006] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:9080 (localhost) failed then automatically recovers after some time (bad to good performance). Any help / suggestion will be highly appreciated. Regards, Sai *** The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. This email does not constitute any commitment from Cordys Holding BV or any of its subsidiaries except when expressly agreed in a written agreement between the intended recipient and Cordys Holding BV or its subsidiaries. *** - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Active Directory
> If the initial bind is working then it's probably your LDAP search > criteria which depends on how your AD is layed out. > > This is what I use (I use the AD global catalog (GC)): > > > AuthLDAPURL > "ldap://ad.nos.com:3268/OU=Accounts,DC=nos,DC=com?sAMAccountName?sub?(ob jectClass=*)" > > You probably also need: > > AuthzLDAPAuthoritative Off Turning AuthzLDAPAuthoritative off worked. It was in the configuration before (I just upgraded from 2.0), so I should have known it's supposed to do something! Thanks, Dan - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Caching Authenticated content with mod_cache
Hi I have set up Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 with mod_proxy, mod_proxy_ajp and mod_cache as a reverse proxy in front of a Tomcat 5.5 server. The solution works fine except that I am having trouble getting Apache to cache content from a directory that is protected using Basic Authentication. Both servers are running on Windows XP. >From the Apache documentation I have read that Apache won't cache Authenticated content: "If the request contains an "Authorization:" header, the response will not be cached." Is there any way to force Apache HTTP Server to cache responses from Tomcat protected with Basic Authentication? I have tried using the Cache-Control header with the "public" option with no luck. My settings from httpd.conf: LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so LoadModule proxy_ajp_module modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so ProxyPass ajp://appsrv:8009/MyApp ProxyPassReverse ajp://appsrv:8009/MyApp LoadModule cache_module modules/mod_cache.so LoadModule disk_cache_module modules/mod_disk_cache.so CacheRoot c:/cacheroot/ CacheEnable disk /MyFolder/data/ CacheEnable disk /MyFolder/images/ CacheEnable disk /MyFolder/js/ CacheEnable disk /MyFolder/css/ CacheEnable disk /MyFolder/secure/ CacheDirLevels 5 CacheDirLength 3 Regards Roland Rabben Scala Inc. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caching Authenticated content with mod_cache
On 12/20/06, Roland Rabben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I have set up Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 with mod_proxy, mod_proxy_ajp and mod_cache as a reverse proxy in front of a Tomcat 5.5 server. The solution works fine except that I am having trouble getting Apache to cache content from a directory that is protected using Basic Authentication. Both servers are running on Windows XP. From the Apache documentation I have read that Apache won't cache Authenticated content: "If the request contains an "Authorization:" header, the response will not be cached." Is there any way to force Apache HTTP Server to cache responses from Tomcat protected with Basic Authentication? I believe you'd need to change the source code, although the required change would likely be very minor. But my question is: exactly why do you want to do this? Do you realize that by caching authenticated content, you essentially remove the authentication? Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BerkeleyDB RewriteMap on NFS - problems?
On 12/19/06, Julian Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) Is it bad to put BDB RewriteMaps on an NFS server? Is anyone else doing it without problems? 2) Is it true that some versions of BerkeleyDB don't have "read-only" semantics, and could this be causing the problem? 3) Is the problem here related to incorrect POSIX file-locking semantics on the NFS server as some of my colleagues at work have implied? This NFS server hardware is fairly recent (purchased within the last 3 years) so I'd be very surprised if this were the case. 4) Could it be possible that this is just tickling a bug in the Linux kernel? We're running SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9. I'm not at all an expert in this, but my understanding is that using berkeley DB over NFS -- even for read-only access -- is asking for trouble. Oracle has this to say about it: http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/ref/env/remote.html which seems to suggest that read-only access is possible. But I'd think all bets are off if you change the database, even from the local machine. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How to store an uploaded file on hard disk
Is there any command that causes Apache will be saving a file ( being uploaded via http POST), NOT to memory BUT on hardisk? Thank you La. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
Hi. Using Apache 2.0.59 on Linux FC6, I want to install 'mod_dav_svn'. I've got: /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so So I inserted within 'httpd.conf': LoadModule dav_svn_module /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so But I get this error message when restarting Apache: -- API module structure `dav_svn_module' in file /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO? - Any clue? Thank you very much. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
On 12/20/06, thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. Using Apache 2.0.59 on Linux FC6, I want to install 'mod_dav_svn'. I've got: /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so So I inserted within 'httpd.conf': LoadModule dav_svn_module /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so But I get this error message when restarting Apache: -- API module structure `dav_svn_module' in file /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO? - Any clue? Thank you very much. Where did mod_dav_svn.so come from? Are you sure it is for the right version of apache? Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
Mmm.. I don't know, Joshua. I installed it by using Yum: []# yum install mod_dav_svn I suppose I could get the right version if I build it from sources, right? Thank you very much, --Thomas On 12/20/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/20/06, thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > Using Apache 2.0.59 on Linux FC6, I want to install 'mod_dav_svn'. I've got: > /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so > > So I inserted within 'httpd.conf': > > > LoadModule dav_svn_module /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so > > > But I get this error message when restarting Apache: > -- > API module structure `dav_svn_module' in file > /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not > an Apache module DSO? > - > > Any clue? Thank you very much. Where did mod_dav_svn.so come from? Are you sure it is for the right version of apache? Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ap_proxy: could not create the lock
Hi All, I am using Apache version 2.0.55 on LINUX. when ever Apache restarts with * graceful* option, the following errors are logging.what would be the problem for this behaviour? [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [warn] (22)Invalid argument: ap_proxy: couldn't create the lock [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [warn] (22)Invalid argument: ap_proxy: couldn't create the lock [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [crit] (22)Invalid argument: ap_proxy: couldn't release the lock [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [warn] (22)Invalid argument: ap_proxy: couldn't create the lock [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [crit] (22)Invalid argument: ap_proxy: couldn't release the lock [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [warn] (22)Invalid argument: ap_proxy: couldn't create the lock [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [crit] (22)Invalid argument: ap_proxy: couldn't release the lock [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [warn] (22)Invalid argument: ap_proxy: couldn't create the lock [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [crit] (22)Invalid argument: ap_proxy: couldn't release the lock [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [warn] (22)Invalid argument: ap_proxy: couldn't create the lock [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [crit] (22)Invalid argument: ap_proxy: couldn't release the lock [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [crit] (22)Invalid argument: ap_proxy: couldn't release the lock [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [notice] Apache/2.0.55 (Unix) configured -- resuming normal operations Thanks, sharath
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Release date for Apache 2.0.60?
I was just curious if anyone knew when we can expect Apache 2.0.60. Is this right around the corner, or still several months out? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caching Authenticated content with mod_cache
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive > Sent: 20. desember 2006 15:58 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caching Authenticated content with mod_cache > > On 12/20/06, Roland Rabben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > I have set up Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 with mod_proxy, mod_proxy_ajp and > > mod_cache as a reverse proxy in front of a Tomcat 5.5 server. The > > solution works fine except that I am having trouble getting Apache to > > cache content from a directory that is protected using Basic > > Authentication. > > > > Both servers are running on Windows XP. > > > > From the Apache documentation I have read that Apache won't cache > > Authenticated content: > > > > "If the request contains an "Authorization:" header, the response will > > not be cached." > > > > Is there any way to force Apache HTTP Server to cache responses from > > Tomcat protected with Basic Authentication? > > I believe you'd need to change the source code, although the required > change would likely be very minor. > > But my question is: exactly why do you want to do this? Do you > realize that by caching authenticated content, you essentially remove > the authentication? > My goal was to use the "Cache-Control: public, no-cache" header. From what I understand that should make a cache-server cache the response, but still require authentication from the origin server before the cache releases its local representation to the next user/request. Roland - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
Or perhaps this .so got pulled from a different OS? It's been a while, but I think I got a similiar error when I accidentely tried using a .so compiled for linux on a solaris box. (Don't ask how this happened ... long story!) --- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where did mod_dav_svn.so come from? Are you sure it > is for the right > version of apache? > > Joshua. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caching Authenticated content with mod_cache
On 12/20/06, Roland Rabben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My goal was to use the "Cache-Control: public, no-cache" header. From what I understand that should make a cache-server cache the response, but still require authentication from the origin server before the cache releases its local representation to the next user/request. Is the origin server capable of generating 304 responses without using resources? Otherwise, this is pointless. An in any case, as you've noticed, it isn't supported at the moment. Just taking out the Authorization check may make it work, but I'm not sure. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 as Loadbalancer
Hi,
I am using Apache 2.2 as loadbalancer for a JBOSS-J2EE-Cluster. The
incoming calls are redirected by ajp.
This is the configuration I added to the httpd.conf
ProxyPass /FOnetConsole !
ProxyPass / balancer://FOnetCluster/
BalancerMember ajp://wnasw022:8009
BalancerMember ajp://kpmg1:8009
Additionally I activated these modules :
LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so
LoadModule proxy_ajp_module modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so
LoadModule proxy_balancer_module modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so
What is my problem?
Loadbalancing works fine. But I wolud like to log to which balancemember
the http calls are redirceted to.
Thus I configured logging for the access log like this:
CustomLog logs/access.log "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b
%{BALANCER_WORKER_NAME}e"
The environment variable BALANCER_WORKER_NAME is described in apache
module mod_proxy_balancer
Nevertheless, this variable is not resolved within the access-log. Log
entries look like this:
172.18.25.135 - - [19/Dec/2006:19:45:02 +0100] "POST /FOnetCounter
HTTP/1.1" 200 139 -
Any clue why this variable is not resolved ? Is there another way to log
the balancememeber to which a call is redirected to?
THX Oliver
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
where can I find the mod_dav_svn.so for FC6? On 12/20/06, Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Or perhaps this .so got pulled from a different OS? It's been a while, but I think I got a similiar error when I accidentely tried using a .so compiled for linux on a solaris box. (Don't ask how this happened ... long story!) --- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where did mod_dav_svn.so come from? Are you sure it > is for the right > version of apache? > > Joshua. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
I am not familiar with this module so I don't know how it is being distributed ... but can't you just locate the source and compile it yourself? --- thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > where can I find the mod_dav_svn.so for FC6? > __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
[]# yum info mod_dav_svn Name : mod_dav_svn Arch : i386 Version: 1.4.2 Release: 2.fc6 Size : 135 k Repo : installed - On 12/20/06, thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: where can I find the mod_dav_svn.so for FC6? On 12/20/06, Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or perhaps this .so got pulled from a different OS? > It's been a while, but I think I got a similiar error > when I accidentely tried using a .so compiled for > linux on a solaris box. (Don't ask how this happened > ... long story!) > > > --- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Where did mod_dav_svn.so come from? Are you sure it > > is for the right > > version of apache? > > > > Joshua. > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
Hmmm ... perhaps this module got compiled with a compiler not compatible with the compiler used to compile apache. I personally would still try to get a hold of the source-code, and compile this module with apxs. R --- thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > []# yum info mod_dav_svn > > Name : mod_dav_svn > Arch : i386 > Version: 1.4.2 > Release: 2.fc6 > Size : 135 k > Repo : installed > - > __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Release date for Apache 2.0.60?
Richard de Vries wrote: > I was just curious if anyone knew when we can expect > Apache 2.0.60. Is this right around the corner, or > still several months out? There are no plans whatsoever. I wouldn't worry yourself about it when 2.2.3 is current, 2.2.4 is around the corner and only 2.2.x and the future 2.4.x are being actively developed. The next time you see a 2.0.x release will likely be in response to some security flaw. If you are asking to obtain the current bug fixes, you were already on the wrong page. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Release date for Apache 2.0.60?
Thanks William. I am currently re-evaluating the version of Apache we're running and trying to plan around any "planned" updates. I would love to go to Apache 2.2.x, but some third party modules we're running are not yet compatible and I don't have access to their source-code. But anyway, thanks for the feedback! --- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard de Vries wrote: > > I was just curious if anyone knew when we can > expect > > Apache 2.0.60. Is this right around the corner, or > > still several months out? > > There are no plans whatsoever. I wouldn't worry > yourself about it when > 2.2.3 is current, 2.2.4 is around the corner and > only 2.2.x and the future > 2.4.x are being actively developed. > > The next time you see a 2.0.x release will likely be > in response to some > security flaw. If you are asking to obtain the > current bug fixes, you were > already on the wrong page. > > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the > Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for > more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >" from the digest: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] public server
On 12/20/06, Daniel Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thank you guys, but: The http://localhost works fine when my server is running. WinXP. And I don't know if I am behind a NAT router.But, it's possible that Try disabling the windows firewall on the specific interface, if that works make sure to open tcp80 and restore the firewall back into filter mode (security!). Thanks again. HTH 2006/12/19, Mark Lavi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > It's odd that you didn't use the two forward slashes in your posting for http://, because that should not be a legitimate URL in a web browser. > > > > Any IP is valid, no matter if it is used statically or dynamically. > > > > Unless you have access control filters on your web server (you can test by trying http://localhost on your server), you may be running into firewall issues on your host running the web server and/or with your network provider/ISP not allowing public web servers on their network. > > > > Also, the time honored test is to telnet to port 80 on a remote computer to test network connectivity and that the server is up and listening. > > > > > --Mark Mark Lavi, Enterprise Web Management Team @ SGI > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] || phone:+1-650-933-7707 > > > > > From: Daniel Marques [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:29 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] public server > > > > Hi everybody, > > I have a simple question (I think): > > I've got the apache 2.2 running on my computer, I know my IP at the moment (by www.whatismyip.com) and I was trying to access my server, like this: > http:\\201.18.148.4:80, from another computer on the internet. And it doesn't work. Later, I tried the tomcat, like this: http:\\201.18.148.4:8080, and nothing happens as well. > > Am I doing anything wrong? How can I make my server visible to the world? Do I need a real IP (buy one), or my dynamic IP can do it just fine? > > Thank you in advance. -- Cheers, Maxim Veksler "Free as in Freedom" - Do u GNU ? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite and HTTP headers. (Accept-Language)
I am an absolute newbie when it comes to mod_rewrite and I am still going thru some documentation to see whether I can make it do what I need. While I am going thru the docs and examples, I figured to post a message on this list as well, just in case someone knows the answer right from the top of their head. I am running Apache in front of servletexec (an application server) and we're having some application issues with certain locales. I would like to use mod_rewrite to analyze the Accept-Language header, and rewrite it if needed. Can mod_rewrite do this? Does anyone have an example? R __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite and HTTP headers. (Accept-Language)
On 12/20/06, Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am an absolute newbie when it comes to mod_rewrite and I am still going thru some documentation to see whether I can make it do what I need. While I am going thru the docs and examples, I figured to post a message on this list as well, just in case someone knows the answer right from the top of their head. I am running Apache in front of servletexec (an application server) and we're having some application issues with certain locales. I would like to use mod_rewrite to analyze the Accept-Language header, and rewrite it if needed. Can mod_rewrite do this? Does anyone have an example? There are a few hundred examples (good and bad, of course) here: http://www.google.com/search?q=RewriteCond+Accept-Language Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] public server
I'll try to make contact with my ISP provider. Maybe I don't have any power over his router. Thanks for all the help. 2006/12/20, Maxim Veksler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 12/20/06, Daniel Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you guys, but: > > > The http://localhost works fine when my server is running. > WinXP. And I don't know if I am behind a NAT router.But, it's possible that Try disabling the windows firewall on the specific interface, if that works make sure to open tcp80 and restore the firewall back into filter mode (security!). > Thanks again. > HTH > 2006/12/19, Mark Lavi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > It's odd that you didn't use the two forward slashes in your posting for > http://, because that should not be a legitimate URL in a web browser. > > > > > > > > Any IP is valid, no matter if it is used statically or dynamically. > > > > > > > > Unless you have access control filters on your web server (you can test by > trying http://localhost on your server), you may be running into firewall > issues on your host running the web server and/or with your network > provider/ISP not allowing public web servers on their network. > > > > > > > > Also, the time honored test is to telnet to port 80 on a remote computer > to test network connectivity and that the server is up and listening. > > > > > > > > > > --Mark Mark Lavi, Enterprise Web Management Team @ SGI > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] || phone:+1-650-933-7707 > > > > > > > > > > > From: Daniel Marques [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:29 PM > > To: users@httpd.apache.org > > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] public server > > > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I have a simple question (I think): > > > > I've got the apache 2.2 running on my computer, I know my IP at the moment > (by www.whatismyip.com) and I was trying to access my server, like this: > > http:\\201.18.148.4:80, from another computer on the internet. And it > doesn't work. Later, I tried the tomcat, like this: > http:\\201.18.148.4:8080, and nothing happens as well. > > > > Am I doing anything wrong? How can I make my server visible to the world? > Do I need a real IP (buy one), or my dynamic IP can do it just fine? > > > > Thank you in advance. > > -- Cheers, Maxim Veksler "Free as in Freedom" - Do u GNU ? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 as proxy
Hi,
I have set up Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 with mod_proxy as a forward proxy
on RHEL 4.0 and I am planning to build a filter.
In Apache 2.2.3, when I use 'mod_case_filter_in.c' from the experimental
modules, I always get r->unparsed_uri, r->uri and r->filename as NULL.
I get r->hostname and r->the_request as expected.
static void CaseFilterInInsertFilter(request_rec *r)
{
CaseFilterInConfig
*pConfig=ap_get_module_config(r->server->module_config,
&case_filter_in_module);
if(!pConfig->bEnabled)
return;
ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r,
"REQUEST : %s", r->the_request);
ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r,
"HOSTNAME : %s", r->hostname);
ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r,
"UNPARSED URI : %s", r->unparsed_uri);
ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r,
"URI : %s", r->uri);
ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r,
"FILENAME : %s", r->filename);
ap_add_input_filter(s_szCaseFilterName,NULL,r,r->connection);
}
Error Log entries:
[Thu Dec 21 10:36:26 2006] [notice] Apache/2.2.3 (Unix) configured --
resuming normal operations
[Thu Dec 21 10:36:36 2006] [error] [client 10.192.70.24] REQUEST : GET
http://www.google.com/ HTTP/1.0
[Thu Dec 21 10:36:36 2006] [error] [client 10.192.70.24] HOSTNAME :
www.google.com
[Thu Dec 21 10:36:36 2006] [error] [client 10.192.70.24] UNPARSED URI :
(null)
[Thu Dec 21 10:36:36 2006] [error] [client 10.192.70.24] URI : (null)
[Thu Dec 21 10:36:36 2006] [error] [client 10.192.70.24] FILENAME :
(null)
This was not the case with the previous versions of Apache.
Thanks in Advance,
Harsha
***
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the
message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on
it is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact
the sender if you have received this message in error. This email
does not constitute any commitment from Cordys Holding BV or
any of its subsidiaries except when expressly agreed in a written
agreement between the intended recipient and
Cordys Holding BV or its subsidiaries.
***
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd 2.2.3 as an SSL proxy with a client certificate fails on connect
*snip* Anyone? Shai Yallin IT Manager & Developer LocatioNet Systems Ltd. Tel: +972-9-8856451 Fax: +972-9-8856452 Mobile: +972-54-4840868 "...we will be restoring normality just as soon as we are sure what is normal anyway." - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
