Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

[Pavel Rojtberg]

Fonts are fine for me, but some the industrial icons are fucked up:
http://www.madman2k.net/images/0/Bildschirmfoto.png

also the cairo-canvas seems to be still off. (oodraw images get not anti
aliasing)

Pavel

Conrad Knauer schrieb:
> The upgrade from the Feisty packages worked perfectly :)
> 
> Two things I noticed which are still there though:
> 
> The splash screen and Help -> About still say "OpenOffice.org 2.0"
> (which is https://launchpad.net/bugs/78489 )
> 
> The font used in all the menus is fuzzy, making it look like a
> non-native app (I'm guessing its this bug:
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/24004  )
> 
> Compare:
> 
> http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/gedit.png
> http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/OOoWriter.png
> 
> 
> CK
> 
> On 3/1/07, *Matthias Klose* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> wrote:
> 
> Packages for OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 are available for
> testing; these are not part of any release, so be prepared for
> installation glitches and manual downgrades to the version which you can
> find in feisty. To test these packages (i386, amd64, powerpc), please
> add the following lines to your /etc/apt/sources.list file:
> 
> deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ feisty-ooo/
> deb-src http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ feisty-ooo/
> 
> Please submit bug reports in the launch bug tracker, but explicitely
> mention the version you are testing. If you do bug triage on the
> existing bug reports for OOo, please set the status to "Fix committed"
> and mention the version in a comment.
> 
> upstream changes:
>  http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.2.0rc2.html
> 
> Thanks, Matthias



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

[Pavel Rojtberg]

my point with the icons was:
can we have the tango-icons from the jimmac tango branch?

Pavel Rojtberg schrieb:
> Fonts are fine for me, but some the industrial icons are fucked up:
> http://www.madman2k.net/images/0/Bildschirmfoto.png
> 
> also the cairo-canvas seems to be still off. (oodraw images get not anti
> aliasing)
> 
> Pavel
> 
> Conrad Knauer schrieb:
>> The upgrade from the Feisty packages worked perfectly :)
>>
>> Two things I noticed which are still there though:
>>
>> The splash screen and Help -> About still say "OpenOffice.org 2.0"
>> (which is https://launchpad.net/bugs/78489 )
>>
>> The font used in all the menus is fuzzy, making it look like a
>> non-native app (I'm guessing its this bug:
>> https://launchpad.net/bugs/24004 <https://launchpad.net/bugs/24004> )
>>
>> Compare:
>>
>> http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/gedit.png
>> http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/OOoWriter.png
>> <http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/OOoWriter.png>
>>
>> CK
>>
>> On 3/1/07, *Matthias Klose* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Packages for OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 are available for
>> testing; these are not part of any release, so be prepared for
>> installation glitches and manual downgrades to the version which you can
>> find in feisty. To test these packages (i386, amd64, powerpc), please
>> add the following lines to your /etc/apt/sources.list file:
>>
>> deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ feisty-ooo/
>> deb-src http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ feisty-ooo/
>>
>> Please submit bug reports in the launch bug tracker, but explicitely
>> mention the version you are testing. If you do bug triage on the
>> existing bug reports for OOo, please set the status to "Fix committed"
>> and mention the version in a comment.
>>
>> upstream changes:
>>  http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.2.0rc2.html
>>
>> Thanks, Matthias



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

[Pavel Rojtberg]

Matthias Klose schrieb:
> Pavel Rojtberg schrieb:
>> my point with the icons was:
>> can we have the tango-icons from the jimmac tango branch?
> 
> No, not in its current form as a replacement for the well tested
> industrial_theme. In its current form its a fork of the industrial icon
> set, which I do not want to maintain separately. If we want to include
> the icons in some way:
> 
>  - rename the icon set
>  - send a patch to accept the new icon set as an alternative, which
>is turned off by default.
>  - document the changes compared to the industrial icon set; the
>README inside the zip file is very vague, who did change what and
>which icons come from which source. IMO in this form it is not
>redistributable in main or universe. To address this, add
>a ChangeLog, mentioning the copyright and changes per file.
> 
> If you want to submit changes to the existing industrial icon set,
> please send me email for the upstream contacts.
> 
>   Matthias

which zip are you referring to? I was talking about:
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co -r
cws_src680_jimmactango2 ooo_custom_images

then overwriting the contents of the current images_industrial.zip with
the tango images and re-zipping it.
(as suggested by jimmac in his blog:
http://jimmac.musichall.cz/weblog.php/2007/Feb/19)

this way you dont lose any images and the differences should be also
clear. I also assumed that stuff from oo.org cvs has no licensing problems.

but I have no I idea how to install the tango icons w/o overwriting
industrial.

Pavel

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Fwd: Mono (Re: New Programs for Hardy?)

[Pavel Rojtberg]

Sebastian Heinlein schrieb:
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.12.2007, 05:06 -0600 schrieb Conrad Knauer:
> 
>> Mono by default takes 48MB of space on the CD. The ISO download is
>> 690+ MB. Therefore, it is taking up valuable space that could be used
>> for a whole host of other things. Also, for that 48MB, there are just
>> two applications which use Mono. These are F-spot (photo manager) and
>> Tomboy (note application). Ubuntu also includes two other programs
>> which do a similar job, gThumb (photo manager) and GNOME sticky notes.
>>
>> In my opinion, these two applications function well enough to warrant
>> the removal of Mono dependent programs.
> 
> What is your data migration model? You cannot replace software in each
> release.
> 
actually you dont need any data migration if you remove something from
the default install.
Existing F-Spot & Tomboy users wont be affected.

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss