XSane v995 to v996

2009-01-21 Thread Scott Andrews
Hi,

 

I was wondering when Ubuntu would upgrade XSane from 995 to 996. As a Noob
to Ubuntu (or Linux for that matter) I have trouble trying to upgrade from
tar@#$%^&* files and their scripts. The bug fixes in 996, especially the
2nd fix is kind of important. The bug fixes are:

*   corrected bug in PDF documents
*   viewer window does not use full screen without window frame for
large images any more

 

Any possibility of an upgrade?

 

Scotty

 

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Band in a Box

2009-01-21 Thread Rick
Greetings,

Forgive me if this has been handled in the past, but is there any
possibility that the developers can make BIAB work properly with Ubuntu?
(I don't mean with wine)

BAIB is the only reason I keep a Windows computer in my office.

Cheers,
Rick


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


openoffice 3.0.1rc2 debs

2009-01-21 Thread Christoph Thielecke
Hello,

I got OOo 3.0.1 from
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/openoffice-pkgs/ubuntu hardy main
which has broken openoffice.org-kde package. I heard that is fixed in 3.0.1rc2 
which is available for debian.

When the update to 3.0.1rc2 can downloaded?


Best regards

Christoph
-- 
Linux User Group Wernigerode
http://www.lug-wr.de/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: XSane v995 to v996

2009-01-21 Thread Christoph Schmied
Hi!

The search on http://packages.ubuntu.com showed me that in the Jaunty
Release the version 996 shout be used. So the full name of the package will
be 0.996-1ubuntu1.

Here the link to my serach result:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=xsane&searchon=names&suite=jaunty§ion=all

Cheers Chris

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Scott Andrews wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>
>
> I was wondering when Ubuntu would upgrade XSane from 995 to 996. As a Noob
> to Ubuntu (or Linux for that matter) I have trouble trying to upgrade from
> tar@#$%^&* files and their scripts. The bug fixes in 996, especially
> the 2nd fix is kind of important. The bug fixes are:
>
>- corrected bug in PDF documents
>- viewer window does not use full screen without window frame for large
>images any more
>
>
>
> Any possibility of an upgrade?
>
>
>
> Scotty
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Lack of support for 32bits libraries under Ubuntu 64bits

2009-01-21 Thread Patrice Vetsel
Hi,

I'm part of beta team test for a proprietary software (bibble 5). This 
software is compiled for 32 bits and 64bits is not planed at all.

So after reporting a new bug for this app, I discovered a big difference 
between Ubuntu64 and OpenSuse64.

Bibble 5 beta need libuuid in 32 bits installed. OpenSuse have many, 
many libraries installed in 64 AND 32, and many others available.
Under Ubuntu it's the oposite. 4 libraries are provided in 32 bits for 
compatibilities and are available for installation in ubuntu64.

The result is that i had to manually download/extract the libuuid for 
32bits. Manually because installing automatically (forcing installation 
of i386 package) libuuid in 32bits overwrite the 64bits verion files.

What is the position of ubuntu devs for this kind of problem ?

Regards

-- 
Patrice Vetsel 
Aka/Alias Kagou
https://launchpad.net/people/vetsel-patrice
gpg key: 0x15c094db


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Band in a Box

2009-01-21 Thread Remco
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Rick  wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been handled in the past, but is there any
> possibility that the developers can make BIAB work properly with Ubuntu?

The developers of Band in a Box can certainly do that. That's where
you might want to direct your question to. Ubuntu developers can only
deal with software that is supposed to work on Linux.

> (I don't mean with wine)

Realistically, you'll only get BiaB working on your system if you run
it in Wine. You can see here [1] how well it works with Wine, and if
it doesn't you can file bug reports here [2].

Remco

[1] http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=1094
[2] http://bugs.winehq.org/

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Lack of support for 32bits libraries under Ubuntu 64bits

2009-01-21 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Patrice Vetsel wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm part of beta team test for a proprietary software (bibble 5). This
> software is compiled for 32 bits and 64bits is not planed at all.

Err.. I've bought BibblePro, and AIUI a native 64bit version should be 
released when v5 is out?


> So after reporting a new bug for this app, I discovered a big difference
> between Ubuntu64 and OpenSuse64.
>
> Bibble 5 beta need libuuid in 32 bits installed. OpenSuse have many,
> many libraries installed in 64 AND 32, and many others available.
> Under Ubuntu it's the oposite. 4 libraries are provided in 32 bits for
> compatibilities and are available for installation in ubuntu64.
>
> The result is that i had to manually download/extract the libuuid for
> 32bits. Manually because installing automatically (forcing installation
> of i386 package) libuuid in 32bits overwrite the 64bits verion files.
>
> What is the position of ubuntu devs for this kind of problem ?

Depend on ia32-libs, which does include libuuid and many others.

t

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: QuitAppletPlus is ready for your feedback!

2009-01-21 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Roman,

thanks for the introduction. I am CC'ing the -desktop list, since the
discussion is a bit better suited there.

Roman Friesen [2009-01-18 12:32 +0100]:
> It's not a replacement for the current Intrepid fast-switch-user applet,
> the ideas from both should be merged.

Code-wise, is that a fork of f-u-s-a, or a rewrite?
 
> - quit actions are easy available, without overloading the view

That is also the case with the current fusa applet, right?

> - more intuitive action names and icons for inexperienced users

I don't think it should be considered a feature to use different
strings in different projects. This is certainly a point where both
should be merged.

Currently hard to compare for me, since my fusa is in German, while
your screenshots are in English, but they do not seem to be
dramatically different to me?

> - configurable quit applet menu design/behavior

That's certainly a nice thing to have.

> - protection against accidentally choosing wrong actions without "Are
> you sure?"-confirmations

Likewise, although our design guys might have an explicit reason for
not having an extra confirmation dialog by default?

> - alternative approach to protect other logged-in users if you perform
> shut down or restart

How does that work in your project? ATM consolekit requires you to
enter your password to "override" and shut down if other people are
still logged in.

> - graphical countdown by automatic quit

The current logout dialog in system -> Log out counts down in steps of
10 seconds. If you have a similar one, both dialogs should be made
consistent.

> - and finally you can power off the computer only with one mouse click!

Doesn't that contradict with your explicit confirmation dialogs?
Current fusa requires two mouse clicks, which doesn't seem to be
excessive for something you'd only do once a day?

This certainly has some interesting ideas, not to the least having
some icons to the shutdown/restart/etc. actions, plus configurability.

It would be great to merge some features into fusa itself, I don't
think it makes too much sense to have a completely separate
alternative applet, since we couldn't use it by default.

Thank you for working on this! 

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Lack of support for 32bits libraries under Ubuntu 64bits

2009-01-21 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Timo Aaltonen wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Patrice Vetsel wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm part of beta team test for a proprietary software (bibble 5). This
>> software is compiled for 32 bits and 64bits is not planed at all.
>
> Err.. I've bought BibblePro, and AIUI a native 64bit version should be
> released when v5 is out?

Ok, checked the forums and 64bit is not coming in the initial release, but 
"likely later with a point-release".

>> So after reporting a new bug for this app, I discovered a big difference
>> between Ubuntu64 and OpenSuse64.
>>
>> Bibble 5 beta need libuuid in 32 bits installed. OpenSuse have many,
>> many libraries installed in 64 AND 32, and many others available.
>> Under Ubuntu it's the oposite. 4 libraries are provided in 32 bits for
>> compatibilities and are available for installation in ubuntu64.
>>
>> The result is that i had to manually download/extract the libuuid for
>> 32bits. Manually because installing automatically (forcing installation
>> of i386 package) libuuid in 32bits overwrite the 64bits verion files.
>>
>> What is the position of ubuntu devs for this kind of problem ?
>
> Depend on ia32-libs, which does include libuuid and many others.
>
> t
>
> -- 
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
>


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: QuitAppletPlus is ready for your feedback!

2009-01-21 Thread Siegfried-Angel
2009/1/21 Martin Pitt :
>> - protection against accidentally choosing wrong actions without "Are
>> you sure?"-confirmations
>
> Likewise, although our design guys might have an explicit reason for
> not having an extra confirmation dialog by default?

If I remember correctly (but I may be wrong), there were plans to let
the fast-user-switch-applet show the same dialogue as the options in
the System menu, but that couldn't be finished on time for Intrepid.

-- 
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Ubuntu Developer. Debian Contributor.

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: QuitAppletPlus is ready for your feedback!

2009-01-21 Thread Roman Friesen
Am Mittwoch, den 21.01.2009, 12:45 +0100 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> thanks for the introduction. I am CC'ing the -desktop list, since the
> discussion is a bit better suited there.
Should we discuss this topic only on the desktop list further on?


> > It's not a replacement for the current Intrepid fast-switch-user applet,
> > the ideas from both should be merged.
> 
> Code-wise, is that a fork of f-u-s-a, or a rewrite?
Neither first nor the second. It is only a graphical prototype (mock-up)
written in python. I just thought it would be a better way to present
this ideas.


> > - quit actions are easy available, without overloading the view
> 
> That is also the case with the current fusa applet, right?
I'm sorry, I didn't mention it directly. If I say "Ubuntu quit applet",
I mean the whole concept including f-u-s-a and the quit options in the
System menu. The f-u-s-a is fine. But, I think, the dialogs in the
System menu are not, because it's not common to place buttons such as in
this dialogs, I think it's a a hard break of the usability.


> > - more intuitive action names and icons for inexperienced users
> 
> I don't think it should be considered a feature to use different
> strings in different projects. This is certainly a point where both
> should be merged.
> Currently hard to compare for me, since my fusa is in German, while
> your screenshots are in English, but they do not seem to be
> dramatically different to me?
The German translations are more human than the English original. For
the English I suggest: "Shut Down" -> "Power Off", "Suspend (to RAM)" ->
"Standby". But it's not only translations or icons, please look also,
how the "Hibernate" action can be made more intuitive:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuitAppletPlus#How%20to%20present%20technical%
20actions%20for%20inexperienced%20users
 

> > - configurable quit applet menu design/behavior
> 
> That's certainly a nice thing to have.
Thank you :)


> > - protection against accidentally choosing wrong actions without "Are
> > you sure?"-confirmations
> 
> Likewise, although our design guys might have an explicit reason for
> not having an extra confirmation dialog by default?
I think it's a very good idea for not having confirmation dialogs in f-u-s-a. 
In the QuitAppletPlus there isn't any confirmation dialog too (the quit
dialog is not a confirmation dialog).


> > - alternative approach to protect other logged-in users if you perform
> > shut down or restart
> 
> How does that work in your project? ATM consolekit requires you to
> enter your password to "override" and shut down if other people are
> still logged in.
Please use the "Test scenarios" dialog (via the applet context menu) in
order to simulate this scenario. 
If you mean the approach description, you can find that here (have I
misunderstood your question?):
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuitAppletPlus#How%20to%20protect%20another%
20logged-in%20users


> > - graphical countdown by automatic quit
> 
> The current logout dialog in system -> Log out counts down in steps of
> 10 seconds. If you have a similar one, both dialogs should be made
> consistent.
It's just a progress bar (counts down in 1 second steps). Maybe a
progress bar is not the best choice, but I think a graphical countdown
is much better than the text based countdown (I didn't even notice this
countdown at first...). 
You can also stop the countdown or just turn it of in the applet
preferences. For more details please see here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuitAppletPlus#Automatic%20Shut%20Down



> > - and finally you can power off the computer only with one mouse click!
> 
> Doesn't that contradict with your explicit confirmation dialogs?
You cannot perform this actions by mistake, because you have to hold the
related keys, therefore the confirmation dialogs are not needed here.
(Per design there is not any confirmation dialogs in the QuitAppletPlus)


> Current fusa requires two mouse clicks, which doesn't seem to be
> excessive for something you'd only do once a day?
You can also lock the screen with one mouse click. But you are right,
it's not a must, but I think it could be a nice feature for Ubuntu
release notes:
"With Ubuntu you can power off or lock the screen only with one click!"
;)
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuitAppletPlus#One%20Click%20Actions


> This certainly has some interesting ideas, not to the least having
> some icons to the shutdown/restart/etc. actions, plus configurability.
> 
> It would be great to merge some features into fusa itself, I don't
> think it makes too much sense to have a completely separate
> alternative applet, since we couldn't use it by default.
As I have written above, it is only a graphical prototype, so there is
only one merge direction -> to f-u-s-a :))


> Thank you for working on this! 
Thank you too :)


Roman


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: QuitAppletPlus is ready for your feedback!

2009-01-21 Thread Roman Friesen
Am Mittwoch, den 21.01.2009, 13:50 +0100 schrieb Siegfried-Angel:
> 2009/1/21 Martin Pitt :
> >> - protection against accidentally choosing wrong actions without "Are
> >> you sure?"-confirmations
> >
> > Likewise, although our design guys might have an explicit reason for
> > not having an extra confirmation dialog by default?
> 
> If I remember correctly (but I may be wrong), there were plans to let
> the fast-user-switch-applet show the same dialogue as the options in
> the System menu, but that couldn't be finished on time for Intrepid.
Oh, please no...

It's not common to place buttons such as in this dialogs, it's only a
single place with such layout I know in Gnome... I think it's a a hard
break of the usability.
GNOME Human Interface Guidelines / Make Your Application Consistent:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/principles-consistency.html.en


Roman


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: QuitAppletPlus is ready for your feedback!

2009-01-21 Thread Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT)
2009/1/21 Roman Friesen :
>> If I remember correctly (but I may be wrong), there were plans to let
>> the fast-user-switch-applet show the same dialogue as the options in
>> the System menu, but that couldn't be finished on time for Intrepid.
> Oh, please no...
>
> It's not common to place buttons such as in this dialogs, it's only a
> single place with such layout I know in Gnome... I think it's a a hard
> break of the usability.

I don't want to offend you, but personally I find that the dialogue in
the System menu is much more usable than your proposal.Yours offers
quite some additional features, but IMHO it is not something which
should be on my grandma's desktop (despite this, I'm happy to see the
initiative that you've put into this, and and if it's not used by
default I think it may still be provided as an optional package for
those users who like it).

By the way, there's a specification about this topic on
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/ExitStrategy. The intention
there is to remove options, not to add more.

-- 
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Ubuntu Developer. Debian Contributor.

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss