[Bug 245500] Re: Jigdo cannot build ubuntu-8.04.1-alternate-i386.iso: .jigdo file refers to missing package
I can confirm this bug, I observe the same. -- Jigdo cannot build ubuntu-8.04.1-alternate-i386.iso: .jigdo file refers to missing package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301289] [NEW] No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: zsync This is not a real bug but I don't know where to enter this improvement. ISO images of Ubuntu are distributed in many ways. RAW ISO, Jidgo support, etc. I miss support for zsync. zsync is similar to rsync but is designed for client download, it doesn't create no extra load on the server, and no rsync is required to run on the server. zsync uses standard HTTP protocol and only needs a special file with metadata at web server, file that has pre-calculated checksums for rsync algorithm. This ticket is about request to add files with zsync extension for every Ubuntu ISO you have. It will enable download of Ubuntu ISO images from web servers in efficient way with zsync client when user has older ISO image. Ubuntu current generates support files for torrent and jidgo as I know. Example: ubuntu-8.04.1-dvd-amd64.iso ubuntu-8.04.1-dvd-amd64.iso.torrent ubuntu-8.04.1-dvd-amd64.iso.jidgo Ubuntu should generate zsync files too, like: ubuntu-8.04.1-dvd-amd64.iso.zsync Information about pre-calculated checksums for the rsync algorithm stored in "zsync file", this file is downloaded by zsync client first and is used to download iso file in efficient way, like rsync does. File with zsync meta data is creted with "zsyncmake" utility. zsync technical and design details: http://zsync.moria.org.uk/ ** Affects: zsync (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301291] [NEW] zsyncmake miss "-V" switch to report version.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: zsync zsync-0.5-1ubuntu3, i386. Ubuntu 8.04.1 zsyncmake command line utility is part of zsync package. I miss these switches in zsyncmake: -V to report software version -h to print help ** Affects: zsync (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- zsyncmake miss "-V" switch to report version. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301289] Re: No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs
This is way I think that zsync files can be created:
for FILE in *.iso; do
echo "Processing "$FILE"
zsyncmake -v -u "$FILE" -f "$FILE" -o "${FILE}.zsync" "$FILE"
done
--
No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301289
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301289] Re: No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs
Sample files to show that zsync files are "small", about 1.5MB for CD and 6.5MB for DVD: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3371372544 2006-08-08 01:03 dapper-dvd-i386.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root6584882 2008-11-23 15:41 dapper-dvd-i386.iso.zsync -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 731744256 2006-06-01 18:16 ubuntu-6.06-desktop-i386.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root1429379 2008-11-23 15:44 ubuntu-6.06-desktop-i386.iso.zsync -- No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174232] Re: hgpullsvn dies with exceptation when started out of repository
I can repeat it in 8.10 i386 too:
# uname -rvs; cd /; hgpullsvn
Linux 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Fri Oct 24 06:42:44 UTC 2008
* svn 'info' '--xml' '.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/hgpullsvn", line 8, in
load_entry_point('hgsvn==0.1.6', 'console_scripts', 'hgpullsvn')()
File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/hgsvn/run/hgpullsvn.py", line 271, in
main
return locked_main()
File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/hgsvn/run/hgpullsvn.py", line 188, in
locked_main
svn_info = get_svn_info('.')
File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/hgsvn/svnclient.py", line 137, in
get_svn_info
fail_if_stderr=True)
File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/hgsvn/common.py", line 209, in run_svn
args=args, bulk_args=bulk_args, fail_if_stderr=fail_if_stderr)
File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/hgsvn/common.py", line 149, in
run_command
return _run_raw_command(cmd, map(_transform_arg, args), fail_if_stderr)
File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/hgsvn/common.py", line 123, in
_run_raw_command
% (pipe.returncode, cmd_string, err))
hgsvn.errors.ExternalCommandFailed: External program failed (return code 1):
svn 'info' '--xml' '.'
svn: '.' is not a working copy
--
hgpullsvn dies with exceptation when started out of repository
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301289] Re: No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs
I would like to highlight one interesting point about ZSYNC. It can support jidgo downloads. I use jidgo often and it happens time from time that you cannot get several packages to successfully finish ISO image. Recommended way in this case is to use rsync to get missing pieces of a file. But it is a painful and time consuming process to find working RSYNC server and to locate images on the server. ZSYNC can offer the same service like RSYNC but it is easier to use. The same apply to torrent downloads. It can happen that you cannot finish your download because there is no peer offering your missing part of a file. You have to wait or you can use RSYNC to finish download. I think most people will just wait or download the whole image with WGET or similar utility. ZSYNC can offer valuable help here. I am not sure if it is problem to download Ubuntu images with torrent client but it is general observation from downloading other files with torrent client. One missing part of a file can degrade all your effort and you have to wait and wait and sometimes just give up and delete unfinished file. -- No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322949] [NEW] initrd.img is build during kernel removal
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity Ubuntu 8.04.2, i386 but I think this "bug" is in Ubuntu for long time and is not 8.04.2 specific. Description: Ramdisk initrd.img file is created during kernel removal. This is a nonsense form my point of view, why to create something that will be deleted in next second. Creation of ramdisk can take longer time at slower computer. Can be this step skipped during kernel removal? There is another problem with initrd disk build during kernel removal. When /boot is at separate small partition, it is possible to run out of space in /boot during kernel update. The same risk is here for kernel removal when initrd file is build; I use separate /boot disk and I know it happens... Notice these lines in following example: Removing linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-23-server ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.24-23-server Removing linux-image-2.6.24-23-server ... Example: # uname -a Linux ubuntu 2.6.24-23-generic #1 SMP Mon Jan 26 00:13:11 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux # apt-get remove linux-image-2.6.24-23-server Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: linux-image-2.6.24-23-server linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-23-server 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded. After this operation, 80.4MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 146147 files and directories currently installed.) Removing linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-23-server ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.24-23-server Removing linux-image-2.6.24-23-server ... Running postrm hook script /sbin/update-grub. Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub Searching for default file ... found: /boot/grub/default Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.24-23-generic Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.24-22-generic Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.24-16-generic Found kernel: /boot/memtest86+.bin Replacing config file /var/run/grub/menu.lst with new version Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done The link /vmlinuz.old is a damaged link Removing symbolic link vmlinuz.old you may need to re-run your boot loader[grub] The link /initrd.img.old is a damaged link Removing symbolic link initrd.img.old you may need to re-run your boot loader[grub] ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- initrd.img is build during kernel removal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222421] Re: initrd not configured in menu.lst after upgrade from Ubuntu 7.10 to 8.04
I created new bug #322949. I think it is related to this one from some point of view. initrd.img is build during kernel removal. -- initrd not configured in menu.lst after upgrade from Ubuntu 7.10 to 8.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222421 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322970] [NEW] /etc/mt-daap.conf is not modified for Ubuntu/Debian
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mt-daapd Ubuntu 8.04.2, i386 # mt-daapd -V Firefly Media Server: Version svn-1696 c# dpkg -la | grep mt-daapd ii mt-daapd 0.9~r1696-1.1ubuntu0.1 Default configuration file is not modified for Ubuntu/Debian I see this item in config file: db_parms = /usr/var/cache/mt-daapd Isn't this better? db_parms = /var/cache/mt-daapd Directory should be created and owner set (mkdir /var/cache/mt-daapd; chown mt-daapd.root /var/cache/mt-daapd ) I see this comment about inodes in config file: # Location of the mp3 files to share. Note that because the # files are stored in the database by inode, these must be # in the same physical filesystem. # mp3_dir = /home/media/music Is this the comment right? Maybe it is some historical information... I put my DB and music to different file systems and I don't see problem. Is information about inodes still valid? Notice mp3_dir too. I would like to see something like /var/lib/mt- daapd/music there. Is it possible? I use mpd package as a reference... ** Affects: mt-daapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- /etc/mt-daap.conf is not modified for Ubuntu/Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322970 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322974] [NEW] manual page for mt-daapd is missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mt-daapd Ubuntu 8.04.2, i386 # dpkg -la | grep mt-daapd ii mt-daapd 0.9~r1696-1.1ubuntu0.1 Description: manual page for mt-daapd is missing. I don't know if a manual page is part of the original package but I don't see a man page in Ubuntu and I feel this as a bug. # man mt-daapd No manual entry for mt-daapd See 'man 7 undocumented' for help when manual pages are not available. # man -k mt-daapd # man -k daapd # man -k daap ** Affects: mt-daapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- manual page for mt-daapd is missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384504] [NEW] asoundconf, trouble with spaces in device name
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: asoundconf-gtk Ubuntu 8.04, i686. asoundconf, doesn't handle sound card driver with spaces well. Here is an example: ALSA device name (from AlsaMixer): Card: SSS USB Headphone Set Chip: USB Mixer Device listed with asoundconf: $ asoundconf list Names of available sound cards: FM801AU SAA7134 UART Set The last "Set" is the item related to my USB sound card (ID 0c76:1605 JMTek, LLC.). ** Affects: asoundconf-gtk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- asoundconf, trouble with spaces in device name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384504] Re: asoundconf, trouble with spaces in device name
The same is valid for other sound card in my PC, Full name is "ForteMedia FM801-AU" but asoundconf list it as FM801-AU. I missed this before as it was clear what the card is... Card: ForteMedia FM801-AU Chip: SigmaTel STAC9704 -- asoundconf, trouble with spaces in device name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379934] [NEW] USB DVB-T device "MSI Digi VOX mini III" doesn't work
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-firmware Ubuntu 9.04, kernel 2.6.28-11-generic i686 DVB-T receiver "MSI Digi VOX mini III" doesn't work in Ubuntu 9.04. I think when I installed Ubuntu 9.04 it was working but now it is not working, I see errors in the log files. I thought that device is dead but I checked under WinXP that it is healthy. First, firmware is installed: # ls -l /lib/firmware/dvb-usb-af9015.fw -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12700 2009-04-02 23:46 /lib/firmware/dvb-usb-af9015.fw # uname -a Linux box 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux Details from /var/logs/messages: May 24 12:17:38 box kernel: [ 493.204543] usb 1-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 May 24 12:17:38 box kernel: [ 493.340096] usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice May 24 12:17:38 box kernel: [ 493.359279] dvb-usb: found a 'MSI Digi VOX mini III' in cold state, will try to load a firmware May 24 12:17:38 box kernel: [ 493.359285] usb 1-2: firmware: requesting dvb-usb-af9015.fw May 24 12:17:38 box kernel: [ 493.417864] dvb-usb: downloading firmware from file 'dvb-usb-af9015.fw' May 24 12:17:38 box kernel: [ 493.471649] dvb-usb: found a 'MSI Digi VOX mini III' in warm state. May 24 12:17:38 box kernel: [ 493.471695] dvb-usb: will pass the complete MPEG2 transport stream to the software demuxer. May 24 12:17:38 box kernel: [ 493.472371] DVB: registering new adapter (MSI Digi VOX mini III) May 24 12:17:38 box kernel: [ 493.854356] af9013: firmware version:4.65.0 May 24 12:17:38 box kernel: [ 493.857484] DVB: registering adapter 0 frontend 0 (Afatech AF9013 DVB-T)... May 24 12:17:38 box kernel: [ 493.864590] tda18271 1-00c0: creating new instance May 24 12:17:38 box kernel: [ 493.870356] TDA18271HD/C1 detected @ 1-00c0 May 24 12:17:40 box kernel: [ 495.928668] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:17:44 box kernel: [ 499.928647] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:17:46 box kernel: [ 501.940574] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:17:50 box kernel: [ 505.940678] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:17:52 box kernel: [ 507.976600] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:17:56 box kernel: [ 511.976581] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:17:58 box kernel: [ 513.988632] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:02 box kernel: [ 517.988612] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:05 box kernel: [ 520.000664] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:09 box kernel: [ 524.000643] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:11 box kernel: [ 526.012569] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:15 box kernel: [ 530.012548] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:17 box kernel: [ 532.048598] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:21 box kernel: [ 536.048577] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:23 box kernel: [ 538.060630] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:27 box kernel: [ 542.060609] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:29 box kernel: [ 544.072661] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:33 box kernel: [ 548.091633] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:35 box kernel: [ 550.100565] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:39 box kernel: [ 554.100544] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:41 box kernel: [ 556.148593] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:45 box kernel: [ 560.148571] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:47 box kernel: [ 562.148626] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:51 box kernel: [ 566.148605] af9013: I2C read failed reg:d417 May 24 12:18:51 box kernel: [ 566.148612] dvb-usb: MSI Digi VOX mini III successfully initialized and connected. May 24 12:18:53 box kernel: [ 568.148673] dvb_usb_af9015: probe of 1-2:1.0 failed with error -110 ** Affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- USB DVB-T device "MSI Digi VOX mini III" doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379934 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379944] [NEW] User administration, groups are not sortable; users-admin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools Ubuntu 9.04, i686; 1) GNOME tool to administer users in easy way, with GUI. I miss an option to sort groups in alphanumeric order. Groups are listed based on ID that it is not visible in the list. I would like to have an option to sort available groups based on ID or NAME. I talk about Manage "GROUP Window" 2) Until I don't unlock User management, I cannot see group details, all group names are printed in gray and I cannot open properties. As I can open file /etc/groups, I don't see any reason why to block this feature in lock mode. 3) I wish have to have an option to see in user detail groups he is member of. I see some list of predefined groups (User privileges) there but user can be added to other group in Manage group" window and this is hidden here. 4) When I run the tool from command line, I see some critical error: # users-admin ** (users-admin:8828): CRITICAL **: Unable to lookup session information for process '8828' ** Affects: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- User administration, groups are not sortable; users-admin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379944 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 371338] Re: cannot stop RAID1
# mdadm --version mdadm - v2.6.3 - 20th August 2007 -- cannot stop RAID1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 371338] Re: cannot stop RAID1
# uname -srvmo Linux 2.6.24-23-server #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 22:22:14 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux -- cannot stop RAID1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 371338] [NEW] cannot stop RAID1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mdadm Ubuntu 8.04.2, i386, server Cannot stop RAID1 device. I do a disk cleanup and I want to replace RAID1 device with RAID10 device. I cannot stop RAID1 device. /dev/md1 was used as a swap, but swap is "off" now. # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] md2 : active raid5 sda5[0] sdd5[3] sdc5[2] sdb5[1] 879100416 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [] [==>..] resync = 11.6% (34281344/293033472) finish=251.8min speed=17120K/sec md1 : active raid1 sdb3[1] 979840 blocks [2/1] [_U] md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1] 8787456 blocks [2/2] [UU] unused devices: # free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem:515436 131576 383860 0 8632 69280 -/+ buffers/cache: 53664 461772 Swap:0 0 0 # mdadm --stop /dev/md1 mdadm: fail to stop array /dev/md1: Device or resource busy # mdadm /dev/md1 --fail /dev/sdb3 mdadm: set /dev/sdb3 faulty in /dev/md1 # mdadm /dev/md1 --remove /dev/sdb3 mdadm: hot remove failed for /dev/sdb3: Device or resource busy # mdadm --stop -v /dev/md1 mdadm: fail to stop array /dev/md1: Device or resource busy My observation is that most documentation focus on creation of new RAID devices but there is only little information about destruction of RAID devices (that is needed sometimes...). I want to delete /dev/md1 and create new /dev/md1 that will be RAID10 type. Should be an easy task but I met an issue I cannot overcome... ** Affects: mdadm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- cannot stop RAID1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77609] Re: mdadm reports "/dev/md0: No md super block found, not an md component."
Ubuntu server 6.06.2 i386 (kernel 2.6.15-52-server) I can repeat the scenario. I am not sure now if this is an issue or correct behavior. # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md1 : active raid1 hda6[0] hdc6[1] 283161536 blocks [2/2] [UU] md0 : active raid1 hda5[0] hdc5[1] 7815488 blocks [2/2] [UU] unused devices: # mdadm --query /dev/md0 /dev/md0: 7.45GiB raid1 2 devices, 0 spares. Use mdadm --detail for more detail. /dev/md0: No md super block found, not an md component. # mdadm --query /dev/hda5 /dev/hda5: is not an md array /dev/hda5: device 0 in 2 device active raid1 md0. Use mdadm --examine for more detail. -- mdadm reports "/dev/md0: No md super block found, not an md component." https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77609 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 48409] Re: Dictionary; some problem with data conversion
I cannot reproduce the bug under Ubuntu 8.04 any more, I think it was fixed already. -- Dictionary; some problem with data conversion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48409 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222444] Re: Login screen has wrong resolution
The issue was not fixed yet. Current Xorg.0.log is attached. Ubuntu 8.04 i386 with the latest updates, on-board Nvidia TNT2 card. ** Attachment added: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log, Ubuntu 8.04" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18847988/Xorg.0.log.gz -- Login screen has wrong resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222444 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222444] Re: Login screen has wrong resolution
** Attachment added: "lspci -vvnn" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18848101/lspci.txt -- Login screen has wrong resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222444 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 53962] Re: Nautilus-cd-burner is unable to blank DVD-RW
Ubuntu 8.04.1, i386, Nautilus 2.22.3 I can reproduce the issue. When I try to write an ISO image to a DVD+RW or DVD-RW and the rewritable disk s not empty, I am informed that disk has to be erased. When I press ERASE button, I get an error after a while that disk cannot be erased. and that is correct, DVD-RW disk has to be formatted... Nautilus should run format (not erase) for DVD rewritable disks. Or it should offer a FORMAT button for DVD-RW and DVD+RW disks. As a workaround, I run GnomeBaker and format a disk manually from Tools menu. -- Nautilus-cd-burner is unable to blank DVD-RW https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/53962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134021] Re: xtraceroute is trying to use /usr/sbin/traceroute
Ubuntu 8.04, i386 I think this bug is not fixed, I can repeat it: $ xtraceroute -h Xtraceroute version 0.9.1 Usage: xtraceroute [--texture <(day) texture file>] [--ntexture ] [--night | --nonight] [--lod ] [--stdin | - | ] [--version] [--help] $ xtraceroute Can't find a binary I need! I'm looking for "/usr/bin/traceroute".: No such file or directory $ ll /usr/bin/traceroute lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 2007-01-01 21:21 /usr/bin/traceroute -> /etc/alternatives/traceroute $ ll /etc/alternatives/traceroute lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 2007-01-01 21:21 /etc/alternatives/traceroute -> /usr/bin/traceroute.lbl $ ll /usr/bin/traceroute.lbl ls: cannot access /usr/bin/traceroute.lbl: No such file or directory $ traceroute The program 'traceroute' can be found in the following packages: * traceroute-nanog * traceroute Try: sudo apt-get install bash: traceroute: command not found $ sudo apt-get install traceroute Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done traceroute is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. -- xtraceroute is trying to use /usr/sbin/traceroute https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134021 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222955] Re: package cupsys 1.3.7-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg
This is not an issue for me at all. I don't print from Linux, I found it too risky in the past. I print from my notebook that runs WinXP, it saves me time, paper and toner. I reported this issue as it apeared during my Linux upgrade. If you think that problem is with scrollkeeper and is not related to cups, close it. I think that scrolkeeper package was not fixed yet (I didn't notice such upgrade). -- package cupsys 1.3.7-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89945] Re: scp doesn't report correct filenames with spaces in verbose mode
Ubuntu 8.04, i386. I can confirm that I can repeat the issue as demonstrated by eldragon. Problem is not fixed. I cannot copy (scp) file with space in filename from one machine to other. -- scp doesn't report correct filenames with spaces in verbose mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258373] [NEW] webfs doesn't report SW version
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: webfs webfs 1.21; Ubuntu 8.04.1, i386 webfsd doesn't report SW version. There is no command line switch to report version. No version is reported in debug mode (-d switch). No version is reported to log file (-s switch). What about "-V" switch that will report version and exit. ** Affects: webfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- webfs doesn't report SW version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258378] [NEW] large files are truncated
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: webfs webfs 1.21. Ubuntu 8.04.1, i386 I tried webfs to serve static files but found that many large files are truncated in the middle. I test in on local network, so I don't expect serius network problems. How to repliace: I have several large PDF documants in the directory, I have problem with bigger files (> 1MB or > 30MB). When I click on the link, I expect, IE explorer will display document in IE window but only a part of the document is opened. I see a progress of file download in IE status bar, I see downlaod progress is stalled after several hundred kB. This is serius issue from my point of view and I will not use webfs, I tried it to replace lighttpd. Here is a debug output from webfsd: fix_ug: uid=0 euid=0 / gid=0 egid=0 http server started ipv6 : yes node : jeos.test ipaddr: :: port : 80 export: . user : root group : root 004: new request (1) 004: connect from (:::2.252.213.211) 004: GET "/BARCODE" HTTP/1.1 004: 302 redirect: /BARCODE/, connection=Keep-Alive 004: tcp_cork=1 004: keepalive wait 004: tcp_cork=0 004: GET "/BARCODE/" HTTP/1.1 004: if-modified-since: "Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:52:20 GMT" dir: reading ./BARCODE/ uid: 1000 n= 0, name=user gid: 1000 n= 0, name=user 004: 304, connection=Keep-Alive 004: keepalive wait 004: done (0) 004: new request (1) 004: connect from (:::2.252.213.211) 004: GET "/BARCODE/marta23_2.pdf" HTTP/1.1 004: 200, connection=Keep-Alive 004: tcp_cork=1 006: new request (2) 006: connect from (:::2.252.213.211) 006: GET "/BARCODE/marta23_2.pdf" HTTP/1.1 006: 3 ranges: 667928-668952 range error 006: error: 400, connection=Keep-Alive 006: tcp_cork=1 006: keepalive wait 006: tcp_cork=0 006: keepalive timeout 006: done (1) network timeout (peer=:::2.252.213.211) 004: done (0) ** Affects: webfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- large files are truncated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258378] Re: large files are truncated
When I see the debug output I want to highlight that I miss a timestamps at the beginning of lines. How to find duration of requests, how to find what time was needed before timeout was reported? Default timeout is 60 seconds and I didn't toched it... -- large files are truncated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258378] Re: large files are truncated
I replaced webfs with lighttpd and I see similar issue (PDF documents truncated) so I think I have probably some problem at my test client, at machine with WinXP and MS IE. -- large files are truncated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312895] [NEW] /var/lib/scrollkeeper/fr/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml:5105
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: scrollkeeper Ubuntu 8.04.1, i386: Error reported during apt-get install: /var/lib/scrollkeeper/fr/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml:5105: parser error : Extra content at the end of the document BIND ^ Corrupted file scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml attached. ** Affects: scrollkeeper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- /var/lib/scrollkeeper/fr/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml:5105 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312895] Re: /var/lib/scrollkeeper/fr/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml:5105
** Attachment added: "scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20844140/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml -- /var/lib/scrollkeeper/fr/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml:5105 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301289] Re: No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs
Ubuntu 8.04.2 is out. It was great opportunity to test zsync in real life. To test upgrade of Ubuntu iso images from 8.04.1 to 8.04.2 with zsync. Opportunity that was missed :-( -- No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301289] Re: No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs
I prepared a ZSYNC file to test download of Ubuntu 8.04.2 images. ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso.zsync was created in this way: FILE="ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso"; zsyncmake -v -u "$FILE" -u "http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.04.2/$FILE"; -f "$FILE" -o "$FILE.zsync" "$FILE" To test zsync update, copy old ISO image to some temporary directory at your disk. I use ubuntu-8.04.1-server-i386.iso in my example to build ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso. Download ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso.zsync to the same directory and run this command: zsync -i ./ubuntu-8.04.1-server-i386.iso ./ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso.zsync With support from zsync, you have to download only 50% of the ISO file. In the case you don't have old ISO image,you can try to download while ISO image with this command: zsync ./ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso.zsync In this case, zsync doesn't add real value compared with wget and other similar tools. In the case that official Ubuntu server will support ZSYNC, you can use this (only sci-fi now): zsync -i ./ubuntu-8.04.1-server-i386.iso http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.04.2/ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso.zsync And you can use "-u" option to overwrite URL embedded in the zsync file with server you prefer: zsync -i ./ubuntu-8.04.1-server-i386.iso -u http://ftp.sh.cvut.cz/MIRRORS/ubuntu- releases/releases/releases/8.04.2/ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso ./ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso.zsync ** Attachment added: "ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso.zsync" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21601550/ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso.zsync -- No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301289] Re: No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs
More ZSYNC files for Ubuntu 8.04.1 and 8.04.2 can be downloaded from this location: http://psl.ic.cz/zsync/ To upgrade ISO image ubuntu-8.04.1-server-i386.iso to ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso, you can run this command: zsync -i ./ubuntu-8.04.1-server-i386.iso http://psl.ic.cz/zsync/ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso.zsync -- No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301289] Re: No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs
Link to the article at brainstorm. Article is related to to topic "ZSYNC support for Ubuntu ISO images": http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/7590/ -- No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 319403] [NEW] AMD 780G motherboard doesn't work with USB 1.1 devices (2.0 devices are OK)
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 8.04.1, kernel 2.6.24-xx-generic, i386 Motherboad Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H, AM2+ socket board with on-board VGA Problem description: When a USB 1.1 device is plugged to USB port and "lsusb" issued from command line, command is frozen, no output is returned. I think that system has to be rebooted to restore USB functionality. When 2.0 USB device is plugged to the motherboard, it works OK, without any problem. I found that I can overcome this issue when I plug an USB 2.0 HUB to the motherboard and I plug USB 1.x devices only to external USB HUB; in this case USB 1.x devices work fine. Please notice, when I plug USB 1.1 HUB to the motherboard, I have this issue too... The simple scenario to check the issue is to use USB 1.1 HUB or flash disk and connect it to the motherboard and type lsusb command. I think this issue is not Ubuntu specific issue. # lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 Host Bridge 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 PCI to PCI bridge (int gfx) 00:0a.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 5) 00:11.0 SATA controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 SATA Controller [IDE mode] 00:12.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI0 Controller 00:12.1 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI1 Controller 00:12.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB EHCI Controller 00:13.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI0 Controller 00:13.1 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI1 Controller 00:13.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB EHCI Controller 00:14.0 SMBus: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 SMBus Controller (rev 3a) 00:14.1 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 IDE Controller 00:14.2 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 Azalia 00:14.3 ISA bridge: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 LPC host controller 00:14.4 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 PCI to PCI Bridge 00:14.5 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI2 Controller 00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration 00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map 00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller 00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon HD 3200 Graphics 01:05.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc RS780 Azalia controller 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02) 03:0e.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB23 IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link) # lspci -n 00:00.0 0600: 1022:9600 00:01.0 0604: 1022:9602 00:0a.0 0604: 1022:9609 00:11.0 0106: 1002:4390 00:12.0 0c03: 1002:4397 00:12.1 0c03: 1002:4398 00:12.2 0c03: 1002:4396 00:13.0 0c03: 1002:4397 00:13.1 0c03: 1002:4398 00:13.2 0c03: 1002:4396 00:14.0 0c05: 1002:4385 (rev 3a) 00:14.1 0101: 1002:439c 00:14.2 0403: 1002:4383 00:14.3 0601: 1002:439d 00:14.4 0604: 1002:4384 00:14.5 0c03: 1002:4399 00:18.0 0600: 1022:1100 00:18.1 0600: 1022:1101 00:18.2 0600: 1022:1102 00:18.3 0600: 1022:1103 01:05.0 0300: 1002:9610 01:05.1 0403: 1002:960f 02:00.0 0200: 10ec:8168 (rev 02) 03:0e.0 0c00: 104c:8024 # dmidecode 2.9 SMBIOS 2.4 present. 57 structures occupying 2517 bytes. Table at 0x000F0100. Handle 0x, DMI type 0, 24 bytes BIOS Information Vendor: Award Software International, Inc. Version: F6 Release Date: 12/31/2008 Address: 0xE Runtime Size: 128 kB ROM Size: 1024 kB # lsusb Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 05e3:0606 Genesys Logic, Inc. USB 2.0 Hub / D-Link DUB-H4 USB 2.0 Hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub # cat /proc/bus/usb/devices T: Bus=07 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#= 1 Spd=12 MxCh= 2 B: Alloc= 0/900 us ( 0%), #Int= 0, #Iso= 0 D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=1d6b ProdID=0001 Rev= 2.06 S: Manufacturer=Linux 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i686 ohci_hcd S: Product=OHCI Host Controller S: SerialNumber=:00:14.5 C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr= 0mA I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub E: Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 2 Ivl=255ms T: Bus=06 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#= 1 Spd=12 MxCh= 3 B: Alloc= 0/900 us ( 0%), #Int= 0, #Iso= 0 D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub ) Sub=00 Pro
[Bug 319403] Re: AMD 780G motherboard doesn't work with USB 1.1 devices (2.0 devices are OK)
I think, there was no error in dmesg, only message that new USB device was connected. Device was not activated (like LED powered on USB hub or flash disk): [ 122.317106] usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2 This is correct output when USB 1.1 hub is connected: [ 117.445692] usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2 [ 117.550185] usb 3-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 117.551120] hub 3-1:1.0: USB hub found [ 117.554871] hub 3-1:1.0: 5 ports detected I cannot repeat the issue anymore, my motherboard works as expected now. I tried to install Fedora to have some distribution with the latest kernel. I was able to reproduce USB issue at Fedora too. As the Fedora was very unstable and kernel crashed frequently, I reset my BIOS setting after several reboots. And from that point PC is stable and USB issue was fixed. I was able to install Fedora from DVD without any problem but I received several crashes during time when I updated Fedora packages from the Internet. After several crashes I reset BIOS setting, from that time PC was stable, I was able to finish Fedora update. I found today that USB issue is fixed, too. From this point it looks as a HW configuration issue. Very confusing was that USB 2.0 devices worked but 1.x devices was not working. This is new PC and I had problem with USB from the begging. I thought that my motherboard is damaged too (USB card reader was not working, etc). When I found that USB 2.0 device works without any problem it looked as Linux issue. ** Attachment added: "lspci -vvnn, issue is fixed now." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21502606/lspci_vnn.txt -- AMD 780G motherboard doesn't work with USB 1.1 devices (2.0 devices are OK) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47055] Re: Custom partitioner creates extended partition incorrectly
I met this issue during install of Ubuntu 8.04.1 too. I don't like it, it creates trouble for other installations, for adding new partitions, etc. I was not prepared for this behavior and I was surprised. I think I see some reasons why extended partition is kept at minimum size but I think this should be only one option; default. User should be able to configure partitioner to create extended partition with minimum or maximum size. From my point of view, partitioner should ask user about size of extended partition (minimal maximal, custom size). -- Custom partitioner creates extended partition incorrectly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309989] [NEW] Game crash
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wesnoth Ubuntu 8.10 i386, Wesnoth 1.4.5 I have a situation that results in game crash. It is repeatable $ wesnoth Battle for Wesnoth v1.4.5 Started on Sat Dec 20 15:19:24 2008 Checking video mode: 1280x1024x32... setting mode to 1280x1024x32 set locale to '' set locale to '' loadscreen: filesystem counter = 107 loadscreen: binarywml counter = 32476 loadscreen: setconfig counter = 44 loadscreen: parser counter = 244 loadscreen: filesystem counter = 0 loadscreen: binarywml counter = 19354 loadscreen: setconfig counter = 0 loadscreen: parser counter = 4 scenario: '6a_Tidings_Good_And_Ill' next_scenario: '' 20081220 15:19:32 error display: could not open image '' wesnoth: unit_map.cpp:61: void unit_map::add(std::pair*): Assertion `res.second' failed. Aborted I attach a "saved game". Load the game and select "END TURN", you should see a crash in few seconds. ** Affects: wesnoth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Game crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309989 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309989] Re: Game crash
** Attachment added: "Saved game that crashes TSG-Tidings,_Good_and_Ill_Turn_8-CRASH.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20597199/TSG-Tidings%2C_Good_and_Ill_Turn_8-CRASH.gz -- Game crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309989 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 342580] [NEW] smbcontrol reports Segmentation fault
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Ubuntu 8.04, i386 smbcontrols reports Segmentation fault when invalid parameter is entered at command line. It is repeatable. $ smbcontrol -V Version 3.0.28a Example: $ smbcontrol - Invalid option Usage: smbcontrol [OPTION...] -t, --timeout=TIMEOUT Set timeout value in seconds Help options: -?, --help Show this help message --usageDisplay brief usage message Common samba options: -d, --debuglevel=DEBUGLEVELSet debug level -s, --configfile=CONFIGFILEUse alternate configuration file -l, --log-basename=LOGFILEBASE Base name for log files -V, --version Print version Segmentation fault ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- smbcontrol reports Segmentation fault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352987] [NEW] lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lm-sensors Ubuntu 8.04.2, i386 Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H (AMD 78G chipset) CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5400+ # sensors -v sensors version 3.0.0 with libsensors version 3.0.0 lm-sensors report incorrect temperature of CPU core. CPU in load: k8temp-pci-00c3 Adapter: PCI adapter Core0 Temp: +28.0C Core0 Temp: +25.0C Core1 Temp: +31.0C Core1 Temp: +33.0C ... temp3: +57.0C Only temp3 value has real CPU temperature, Core0 and Core1 values are wrong. BTW, why 4 values are reported when CPU has only 2 cores? When CPU is idle, Core0, and Core1 are about zero, sometimes even negative... Do you want to buy my CPU cooler? It was cheap... ;-) ** Affects: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: lm-sensors - Ubuntu 6.04.1, i386 + Ubuntu 8.04.2, i386 Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H (AMD 78G chipset) CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5400+ # sensors -v sensors version 3.0.0 with libsensors version 3.0.0 lm-sensors report incorrect temperature of CPU core. CPU in load: k8temp-pci-00c3 Adapter: PCI adapter Core0 Temp: +28.0C Core0 Temp: +25.0C Core1 Temp: +31.0C Core1 Temp: +33.0C ... temp3: +57.0C Only temp3 value has real CPU temperature, Core0 and Core1 values are wrong. BTW, why 4 values are reported when CPU has only 2 cores? When CPU is idle, Core0, and Core1 are about zero, sometimes even negative... Do you want to buy my CPU cooler? It was cheap... ;-) -- lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352987] Re: lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature
# lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 Host Bridge 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 PCI to PCI bridge (int gfx) 00:0a.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 5) 00:11.0 SATA controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 SATA Controller [IDE mode] 00:12.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI0 Controller 00:12.1 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI1 Controller 00:12.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB EHCI Controller 00:13.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI0 Controller 00:13.1 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI1 Controller 00:13.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB EHCI Controller 00:14.0 SMBus: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 SMBus Controller (rev 3a) 00:14.1 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 IDE Controller 00:14.2 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 Azalia 00:14.3 ISA bridge: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 LPC host controller 00:14.4 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 PCI to PCI Bridge 00:14.5 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI2 Controller 00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration 00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map 00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller 00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon HD 3200 Graphics 01:05.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc RS780 Azalia controller 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02) 03:0e.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB23 IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link) Full report from sensors, CPU under load (temp1 is motherboard, temp2 is northbridge with GPU, temp3 temperature of CPU): # sensors k8temp-pci-00c3 Adapter: PCI adapter Core0 Temp: +27.0C Core0 Temp: +25.0C Core1 Temp: +30.0C Core1 Temp: +31.0C it8718-isa-0228 Adapter: ISA adapter in0: +1.30 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in1: +1.94 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in2: +3.28 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in3: +2.88 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in4: +3.04 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in5: +3.17 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in6: +4.08 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in7: +3.28 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in8: +3.07 V fan1: 1917 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan2: 0 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan3: 0 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan5: 0 RPM (min =0 RPM) temp1: +40.0C (low = +127.0C, high = +127.0C) sensor = transistor temp2: +95.0C (low = +127.0C, high = +127.0C) sensor = transistor temp3: +57.0C (low = +127.0C, high = +127.0C) sensor = transistor cpu0_vid: +1.375 V -- lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 66298] Re: Wrong CPU temperature shown
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 352987 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352987 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 352987 lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature -- Wrong CPU temperature shown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66298 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352987] Re: lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature
Full report from sensors, CPU switched from 2.8GHz to 1.0GHz: # sensors k8temp-pci-00c3 Adapter: PCI adapter Core0 Temp: +12.0C Core0 Temp: +5.0C Core1 Temp: +15.0C Core1 Temp: +13.0C it8718-isa-0228 Adapter: ISA adapter in0: +1.06 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in1: +1.94 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in2: +3.28 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in3: +2.90 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in4: +3.06 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in5: +3.17 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in6: +4.08 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in7: +3.28 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in8: +3.07 V fan1:877 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan2:220 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan3: 0 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan5: 0 RPM (min =0 RPM) temp1: +40.0C (low = +127.0C, high = +127.0C) sensor = transistor temp2: +92.0C (low = +127.0C, high = +127.0C) sensor = transistor temp3: +40.0C (low = +127.0C, high = +127.0C) sensor = transistor cpu0_vid: +1.375 V -- lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352987] Re: lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature
I think that on-board sensors are right. BIOS shows correct values too. I have a problem with sensors located in CPU core... Do you ask me to install Windows to my PC and check sensors in Windows OS? -- lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352987] Re: lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature
There is a Windows CPU tempareture monitor at http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/ Change log for version "Version 0.99.4" lists this item: - Add: AMD AM2 65nm K8 based processors get a 21c offset to fix incorrect temperature reporting (info from AMD). I think this can be related to issue I reported... I didn't tried this SW as I don't have Windows OS at my PC... BIOS doesn't report CPU core temperature, BIOS reports only motherborad sensors, those are reported iby lm-sensors" well. There are 4 temperature sensors in the AMD CPU core and output from sensors is correct, only values are not right, they are too low to be real. -- lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352987] Re: lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature
Full report from sensors, CPU idle, temperature of one sensor is negative: # sensors k8temp-pci-00c3 Adapter: PCI adapter Core0 Temp: +7.0°C Core0 Temp: -3.0°C Core1 Temp: +9.0°C Core1 Temp: +6.0°C it8718-isa-0228 Adapter: ISA adapter in0: +1.04 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in1: +1.94 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in2: +3.28 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in3: +2.90 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in4: +3.06 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in5: +3.17 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in6: +4.08 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in7: +3.28 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) in8: +3.07 V fan1:379 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan2:215 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan3: 0 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan5: 0 RPM (min =0 RPM) temp1: +38.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = transistor temp2: +90.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = transistor temp3: +34.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = transistor cpu0_vid: +1.375 V -- lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301291] Re: zsyncmake miss "-V" switch to report version.
This problem is fixed in zsync-0.6, it is available at ZSYNC home site (http://zsync.moria.org.uk/) -- zsyncmake miss "-V" switch to report version. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301289] Re: No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs
Another example. Use "server" image ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso to create "jeos" image. jeos-8.04.2-jeos-i386.iso file has 105644032 bytes, only 13738663 were downloaded from HTTP server, it is only 13% of the original iso size because these iso images "share" several files. Details: $ zsync -i ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso http://psl.ic.cz/zsync/jeos-8.04.2-jeos-i386.iso.zsync 100.0% 0.0 kBps DONE reading seed file ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso: ***Read ubuntu-8.04.2-server-i386.iso. Target 87.0% complete. downloading from http://psl.ic.cz/zsync/jeos-8.04.2-jeos-i386.iso: #--- 87.0%bad status code 404 #--- 87.0% 0.0 kBps aborted failed to retrieve from jeos-8.04.2-jeos-i386.iso downloading from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/jeos/releases/8.04.2/release/jeos-8.04.2-jeos-i386.iso: 100.0% 482.0 kBps DONE verifying download...checksum matches OK used 91918336 local, fetched 13738663 $ ls -ltr jeos-* -rw-r--r-- 1 psl psl 105644032 2009-01-27 09:48 jeos-8.04.2-jeos-i386.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 psl psl180811 2009-04-11 15:47 jeos-8.04.2-jeos-i386.iso.zsync -- No support for zsync at Ubuntu ISOs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267267] [NEW] ntp for amd64 is broken
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp Ubuntu 8.04.1 server, ntp 4.2.4p4+dfsg-3ubuntu2, amd64. amd64 is important here. ntp at amd64 system doesn't work. i686 Ubuntu system works great but Ubuntu AMD64 system doesn't work. My TZ is Europe/Prague. $ ntp -v ntp.ubuntu.com; date; uname -a 20 Nov 11:52:50 ntpdate[14269]: ntpdate [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 7 20:36:59 UTC 2008 (1) 20 Nov 11:52:51 ntpdate[14269]: adjust time server 91.189.94.4 offset -0.005494 sec Sat Nov 20 11:52:51 CET 2280 Linux ubuntu64 2.6.24-19-server #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 18:43:06 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux System time is set to nonsense (Nov 2280...). Correct date is 6 Sep 2008. >From my point of view, this is critical issue. I run this test under VMware ESX server... ** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ntp for amd64 is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267267] Re: ntp for amd64 is broken
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 238805 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238805 correct command line for test is this one (ntpdate, not ntp...) $ ntpdate -v ntp.ubuntu.com; date; uname -a -- ntp for amd64 is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267267] Re: ntp for amd64 is broken
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 238805 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238805 I fixed time manuly with date and I can see that ntpdate doesn't update it. So it looks as I see the same issue as described in #238805. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 238805 ntpd doesn't work - time is not synchronized -- ntp for amd64 is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267267] Re: ntp for amd64 is broken
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 238805 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238805 I am not sure what I observe here, it is more complicated. 1) system time was wrong year 2280, ntpdate cannot fix it (and it reports offest -0.005494 sec) 2) system time was wrong, year 2009, ntpdate fixed it (offset reported was something like -31542056.85). Maybe it is some bug in ntp. I think now, that this bug is not duplacte of #238805. -- ntp for amd64 is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267267] Re: ntp for amd64 is broken
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 238805 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238805 I cannot repeat the same scenario at i686, I cannot set year 2280 at i686 system. AMD64: $ date 110300102280 Wed Nov 3 00:10:00 UTC 2280 $ ntpdate -v ntp.ubuntu.com; date 20 Nov 11:37:01 ntpdate[14368]: ntpdate [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 7 20:36:59 UTC 2008 (1) 20 Nov 11:37:01 ntpdate[14368]: adjust time server 91.189.94.4 offset -0.008843 sec Sat Nov 20 11:37:01 UTC 2280 i386: $ date 110300102280 date: invalid date '110300102280' -- ntp for amd64 is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267267] Re: ntp for amd64 is broken
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 238805 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238805 I have a problem with ntpdate that cannot fix incorrect time at 64-bit Ubuntu server, it reports that year 2280 is OK (offset only -0.008843 sec). This has to be a bug in ntpdate/ntpd. (ntpd was running on the system all the time) I checked if the wrong time was on my server from the beginning or if it was set up latter. I was able to find a lines in /var/log/messages those indicate that wrong ime was created by some incident: Sep 4 01:53:18 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 34.900778] lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions Sep 4 01:53:18 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 35.814779] ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 1036.211444] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 149951476369 ns) Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4637.400352] Time: acpi_pm clocksource has been installed. Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713320] CPU 0: Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713321] Modules linked in: iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables ipv6 lp loop af_packet evdev container parport_pc button serio_raw ac parport shpchp i2c_piix4 i2c_core psmouse pcspkr pci_hotplug intel_agp reiserfs sr_mod cdrom sg sd_mod ata_piix ata_generic floppy pata_acpi mptspi mptscsih mptbase scsi_transport_spi libata e1000 scsi_mod thermal processor fan fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor fuse Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713423] Pid: 4516, comm: postgres Not tainted 2.6.24-19-server #1 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713425] RIP: 0010:[floppy:_spin_lock_irqsave+0x15/0x30] [floppy:_spin_lock_irqsave+0x15/0x30] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x15/0x30 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713430] RSP: 0018:81001e8bb960 EFLAGS: 0286 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713431] RAX: 0286 RBX: 81001d7ac000 RCX: c100 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713433] RDX: 81001e8ba000 RSI: 81001e8bb9a8 RDI: 81001d7ac000 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713434] RBP: 81001cc4a340 R08: 81001e8ba000 R09: Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713435] R10: 81000100cc60 R11: 0001 R12: Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713437] R13: 81001f582d00 R14: R15: 81001e852000 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713439] FS: 7f47f55d8700() GS:805c4000() knlGS: Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713441] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 8005003b Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713442] CR2: 009a2f90 CR3: 1ccda000 CR4: 06e0 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713447] DR0: DR1: DR2: Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713451] DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713452] Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713453] Call Trace: Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713456] [lock_timer_base+0x34/0x70] lock_timer_base+0x34/0x70 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713460] [try_to_del_timer_sync+0x18/0x60] try_to_del_timer_sync+0x18/0x60 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713462] [shpchp:del_timer_sync+0x10/0x70] del_timer_sync+0x10/0x20 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713464] [shpchp:schedule_timeout+0x67/0x350] schedule_timeout+0x67/0xd0 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713466] [process_timeout+0x0/0x10] process_timeout+0x0/0x10 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713468] [shpchp:schedule_timeout+0x5a/0x350] schedule_timeout+0x5a/0xd0 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713471] [do_select+0x468/0x570] do_select+0x468/0x570 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713474] [do_page_fault+0x1d0/0x840] do_page_fault+0x1d0/0x840 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713476] [__pollwait+0x0/0x130] __pollwait+0x0/0x130 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713497] [reiserfs:get_cnode+0x84/0x90] :reiserfs:get_cnode+0x84/0x90 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713507] [reiserfs:journal_mark_dirty+0xfe/0x2a0] :reiserfs:journal_mark_dirty+0xfe/0x2a0 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713515] [reiserfs:inode2sd+0xcc/0x110] :reiserfs:inode2sd+0xcc/0x110 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713522] [reiserfs:pathrelse+0x30/0x50] :reiserfs:pathrelse+0x30/0x50 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713528] [reiserfs:reiserfs_update_sd_size+0x1c5/0x2b0] :reiserfs:reiserfs_update_sd_size+0x1c5/0x2b0 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713535] [reiserfs:do_journal_end+0x369/0xdb0] :reiserfs:do_journal_end+0x369/0xdb0 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713540] [] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x30 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713543] [file_read_actor+0x138/0x160] file_read_actor+0x138/0x160 Nov 18 08:28:51 ubuntu64 kernel: [ 4648.713546] [do_generic_mapping_read+0x16c/0x3c0] do_generic_map
[Bug 267267] Re: ntp for amd64 is broken
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 238805 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238805 I replicated this issue in 64-bit ArchLinux. The issue (ntpdate doesn't synchronise time when year is in far future) is not Ubuntu specific. -- ntp for amd64 is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267267] Re: ntp for amd64 is broken
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 238805 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238805 Bug entered to NTP bugzilla. https://support.ntp.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1061 -- ntp for amd64 is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 411606] Re: Ekiga is not responding after incoming call accept
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30125234/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30125235/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30125237/ProcStatus.txt -- Ekiga is not responding after incoming call accept https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 411606] [NEW] Ekiga is not responding after incoming call accept
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ekiga Ubuntu 9.04, i386, Ekiga 3.2.0. Ekiga registered to SIP server, I was able to dial and to receive calls. New call was coming, Ekiga printed dialog "do you accept incoming call?" I ignored the dialog, it stayed on the screen. Caller hanged down his phone. After some time I pressed Ekiga "accept call" button and this action hanged Ekiga, GUI it stopped to respond my actions. I killed it... Ekiga should handle this situation in the code. Incoming call is not received and user later press accept button. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/ekiga Package: ekiga 3.2.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ekiga Uname: Linux 2.6.28-14-server i686 ** Affects: ekiga (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Ekiga is not responding after incoming call accept https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412413] [NEW] zsync cannot download DVD image
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: zsync Ubuntu 9.04 i386, zsync 0.5 zsync cannot download DVD image of Ubuntu (karmic-dvd-i386.iso). DVD image has size 4355870720 but zsync downloads only 2147483647 bytes. Problem could be related to 32-bit Ubuntu I run, DVD size is greater than 2^31. I think rsync doesn't have similar limitation, I can download the same DVD image with rsync at 32-bit Linux. To test it, try command like this one: # zsync http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/dvd/current/karmic-dvd-i386.iso.zsync In the case that zsync has this limit by design, it should warn the user that it cannot download such huge file and give up. Better way is to fix zsync to don't have such limit... ** Affects: zsync (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- zsync cannot download DVD image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412413] Re: zsync cannot download DVD image
I retested with Ubuntu 9.04 amd64 and zsync 0.5. I can download DVD image in 64-bit Linux, bug is isoloated to 32-bit code. Thisis good news... I tried to generate zsync file for DVD ISO image under Ubuntu 9.04 386 and Ubuntu 9.04 amd64 and I get the same file in both cases. This is great. My conlusison is that only zsync client in 32-bit Linux has some bug that limits it use to some small ISO images (CD is OK, DVD is too big). -- zsync cannot download DVD image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414017] [NEW] Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf smbd only
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Ubuntu 9.04 i386/amd_64 server Samba 3.3.2 Message "* Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf smbd only" is periodically written to root console. I guess that interval is about 30 minutes. I don't see such message in /var/log/samba/log.smbd or other samba log file. I installed Samba during server install but I left default samba configuration, no SMB config files were edited. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf smbd only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414017] Re: Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf smbd only
Part of log.smbd. Restarting message was written to thye console at 15:55:59 and 16:24:59, events with SIGHUP: [2009/08/15 15:36:32, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_connect(103) Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost:631 - Connection refused [2009/08/15 15:59:59, 1] smbd/server.c:open_sockets_smbd(657) Reloading services after SIGHUP [2009/08/15 15:59:59, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_connect(103) Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost:631 - Connection refused [2009/08/15 15:59:59, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_connect(103) Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost:631 - Connection refused [2009/08/15 16:24:59, 1] smbd/server.c:open_sockets_smbd(657) Reloading services after SIGHUP [2009/08/15 16:24:59, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_connect(103) Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost:631 - Connection refused [2009/08/15 16:24:59, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_connect(103) Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost:631 - Connection refused -- Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf smbd only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414017] Re: Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf smbd only
I run DHCPD client at my machines. -- Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf smbd only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414017] Re: Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf smbd only
>From my point of view bug is that message "* Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf smbd only" is written to root console. This message should be written to log file or to /dev/null, not to the console of root. It is good that you know why this message is written. Can you redirect it? -- Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf smbd only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414017] Re: Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf smbd only
One more notice. I run DHCPD client but IP address is the same, no changes of IP address in time; once assigned, address is preserved at DHCP server -- Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf smbd only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54536] Re: USB disk is automount to "/media/USB DISK" mount point
What about Ubuntu applications that cannot handle space in mount point filename? Let's try to find something in Ubuntu 6.06. Run from GNOME Menu this: System/Administration/Disks Select USB disk, switch to partitions tab Notice "Access path: /media/USB" Press "browse", you get empty folder. BTW, there is an option (button) to change acess path, when you know what is wrong, you can fix it. Is more evidence needed that it is easier to fix pmount than most other Linux tools? -- USB disk is automount to "/media/USB DISK" mount point https://launchpad.net/bugs/54536 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54758] Ubuntu 6.06 Disk Manager cannot handle mount points with spaces
Public bug reported: My USB stick has volume name "USB DISK", it is default name created by manufacturer. When I plug this stick tu Ubuntu 6.06 box, pmount automounts it to directory "/media/USB DISK"; notice space in mount point. Disk Manager (GNOME menu System/Administration/Disks) cannot handle space in filename, as when I select USB disk, it lists "Access path: /media/USB". When you press "Browse" button, it shows empty folder, as it opens file manager for "/media/USB", not "/media/USB DISK". It was originaly bug #54536 against pmount but feedback from software engineers is this is not a bug to use spaces, it is feature and all applications that cannot handle such spaces have to be fixed and bug agains such applications have to be created. BTW, is there a simple way in Ubuntu Linux to rename USB disk volume name without reformating disk (vfat file system)? ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Ubuntu 6.06 Disk Manager cannot handle mount points with spaces https://launchpad.net/bugs/54758 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54536] Re: USB disk is automount to "/media/USB DISK" mount point
What about this workarround inspired by Windows world. Why to make the mount name based on disk volume name? That is a stupid idea as volume name can be source of trouble (spaces). Take it simple, it will even not confuse windows users (no supprise for user): /media/A /media/B /media/C etc... Isn't this smart? ;-) BTW, I created bug agains GNOME Disk Manager, bug #54758. -- USB disk is automount to "/media/USB DISK" mount point https://launchpad.net/bugs/54536 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54979] ePDFView issue when new file is opened
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: epdfview ePDFView 1.0.4, Ubuntu 6.06 1) Open a pdf file in ePDFView. It is OK, you see your file. 2) Press open new file icon (CTRL+O) 3) select different PDF file 4) press OK 5) You see the first PDF file opened. I expect new file will to be displayed in the viewer. Workarround is to force RELOAD (CTRL+R), after this, second file is displayed. ** Affects: epdfview (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- ePDFView issue when new file is opened https://launchpad.net/bugs/54979 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55408] jigdo-lite, exceptation on bad status
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: jigit Ubuntu 6.06, jigdo-lite 0.7.2 (package jigit?) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ jigdo-lite --version Jigsaw Download "lite" Copyright (C) 2001-2005 | jigdo@ Richard Atterer | atterer.net Loading settings from `/home/oem/.jigdo-lite' jigdo-lite/0.7.2 (GNU Wget 1.10.2; linux-gnu) I am not sure if this is a bug, I guess it is. Here is a dump of exceptation: 17% [++ ] 121,994,3851.09K/s Exception in thread Thread-30: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.4/threading.py", line 442, in __bootstrap self.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/threading.py", line 422, in run self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/BitTorrent/Rerequester.py", line 84, in rerequest h = urlopen(url) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 130, in urlopen return _opener.open(url, data) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 358, in open response = self._open(req, data) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 376, in _open '_open', req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 337, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/BitTorrent/zurllib.py", line 33, in http_open fp = HTTPHandler.http_open(self,req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 1021, in http_open return self.do_open(httplib.HTTPConnection, req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 994, in do_open r = h.getresponse() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 866, in getresponse response.begin() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 336, in begin version, status, reason = self._read_status() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 300, in _read_status raise BadStatusLine(line) BadStatusLine 18% [++ ] 125,072,5451.74K/s ETA 93:36:56 ** Affects: jigit (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- jigdo-lite, exceptation on bad status https://launchpad.net/bugs/55408 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 51575] Re: Applet crash at startup
It crashes on my PC running Ubuntu 6.06 too. lm-sensors cannot find any sensors on my PC (Debian 3.1 can see sensors, i2c-i810 module; sensors- detect cannot find sensors in Ubuntu, it prints no i2c bus...). PC is some Fujitsu-Siemens Scenic Sx, [EMAIL PROTECTED], I810 chipset. When I run Applet, it starts and print "No sensors found!". When I try to set preferences, it shows emty dialog box, with CLOSE button. It sometimes crashes after CLOSE. When I start hddtemp daemon (to monitor /dev/hda), hw applet daemon crashes after start. Point here is, that when hddtemp daemon is not running, applet runs and shows "no sensors" found. When I start hddtemp and after that start apllet, I see crash. -- Applet crash at startup https://launchpad.net/bugs/51575 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55917] jigdo files for Ubuntu releases
Public bug reported: 1) no jigdo files for "desktop" CDs (Ubuntu, Kununtu, Xubuntu). Reported for relese 6.06.1. Jigdo files only for server and alternate CDs. Why not for desktop CDs? 2) xubuntu 6.06.1 jigdo file is not ok (observed with alternate.i386.iso). 3) dvd "jigdo" teplate file for DVD image has size about 650MB. I am not sure if this is real problem; it could be result of jigdo design. But for DVD image is template too big; for CD template is about 1.5MB, it is 0.2% of size of CD image. For DVD image, template file is about 20% of image size! ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- jigdo files for Ubuntu releases https://launchpad.net/bugs/55917 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55934] Freeloader exceptation
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: freeloader Ubuntu 6.06, freeloader 0.3; Sometimes I get this exceptation; [EMAIL PROTECTED] freeloader Exception in thread Thread-7: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.4/threading.py", line 442, in __bootstrap self.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/threading.py", line 422, in run self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/BitTorrent/Rerequester.py", line 84, in rerequest h = urlopen(url) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 130, in urlopen return _opener.open(url, data) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 358, in open response = self._open(req, data) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 376, in _open '_open', req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 337, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/BitTorrent/zurllib.py", line 33, in http_open fp = HTTPHandler.http_open(self,req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 1021, in http_open return self.do_open(httplib.HTTPConnection, req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 994, in do_open r = h.getresponse() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 866, in getresponse response.begin() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 336, in begin version, status, reason = self._read_status() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 300, in _read_status raise BadStatusLine(line) BadStatusLine ** Affects: freeloader (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Freeloader exceptation https://launchpad.net/bugs/55934 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55935] Freeloader exceptation
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: freeloader Ubuntu 6.06, freeloader 0.3; Sometimes I get this exception: [EMAIL PROTECTED] freeloader Exception in thread Thread-7: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.4/threading.py", line 442, in __bootstrap self.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/threading.py", line 422, in run self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/BitTorrent/Rerequester.py", line 84, in rerequest h = urlopen(url) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 130, in urlopen return _opener.open(url, data) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 358, in open response = self._open(req, data) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 376, in _open '_open', req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 337, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/BitTorrent/zurllib.py", line 33, in http_open fp = HTTPHandler.http_open(self,req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 1021, in http_open return self.do_open(httplib.HTTPConnection, req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 994, in do_open r = h.getresponse() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 866, in getresponse response.begin() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 336, in begin version, status, reason = self._read_status() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 300, in _read_status raise BadStatusLine(line) BadStatusLine ** Affects: freeloader (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Freeloader exceptation https://launchpad.net/bugs/55935 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55935] Re: Freeloader exceptation
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 55934 *** Similar to bug #55408. Problem in Python library? -- Freeloader exceptation https://launchpad.net/bugs/55935 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55408] Re: jigdo-lite, exceptation on bad status
Similar to bug #55935. Problem in Python library? -- jigdo-lite, exceptation on bad status https://launchpad.net/bugs/55408 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55940] PS2 mouse generates sometimes more events as expected
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 6.06 (6.06.1), Gnome My mouse generates sometimes more events as expected. I can see it very well when I work with Firefox for example. When I click on "X" to close tab in Firefox, in some cases two tabs are closed. The similar behavoir is in different applications too. Single click generates double click sometimes. >From my point of view, mouse generates "glitch/noise" and mouse driver in Ubuntu doesn't remove them (no filter). As a result, single click is sometimes understand as doubleclick or two single clicks. As I have this problem only in Ubuntu, I guess that problem is with mouse driver. My PS2 mouse is Genius Optical mouse with wheel. It is connected through electronic KVM switch (Edimax, 4 PC to 1). I have no idea how to generate more detail report with technical details. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- PS2 mouse generates sometimes more events as expected https://launchpad.net/bugs/55940 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55925] Re: For DVD image "jigdo", template file is about 20% of image size
Debian jigdo template files for DVD have size about 9MB, that is about 0.3% of image size. This is evidence that Ubuntu generates jigdo template for DVD images in wong way; yes, Ubuntu jigdo file and template for DVD are ok, they work. But they are too big and Debian shows that they could be significantly smaller. -- For DVD image "jigdo", template file is about 20% of image size https://launchpad.net/bugs/55925 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55924] Re: xubuntu 6.06.1 jigdo file is not ok
Try this to check that jigdo is broken or xubuntu; template will not be found: $ jigdo-lite http://cdimage.ubuntulinux.org/xubuntu/releases/dapper/release.1/xubuntu-6.06.1-alternate-i386.jigdo -- xubuntu 6.06.1 jigdo file is not ok https://launchpad.net/bugs/55924 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55922] Re: No jigdo files for "desktop" CDs
** Description changed: - no jigdo files for "desktop" CDs (Ubuntu, Kununtu, Xubuntu). Reported + no jigdo files for "desktop" CDs (Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu). Reported for relese 6.06.1. Jigdo files only for server and alternate CDs. Why not for desktop CDs? -- No jigdo files for "desktop" CDs https://launchpad.net/bugs/55922 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55934] Re: Freeloader exceptation
Similar to bug #55408. Problem in Python library? ** Summary changed: - Freeloader exceptation + Freeloader exception; BadStatusLine ** Description changed: Binary package hint: freeloader - Ubuntu 6.06, freeloader 0.3; Sometimes I get this exceptation; + Ubuntu 6.06, freeloader 0.3; Sometimes I get this exception; [EMAIL PROTECTED] freeloader Exception in thread Thread-7: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.4/threading.py", line 442, in __bootstrap self.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/threading.py", line 422, in run self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/BitTorrent/Rerequester.py", line 84, in rerequest h = urlopen(url) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 130, in urlopen return _opener.open(url, data) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 358, in open response = self._open(req, data) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 376, in _open '_open', req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 337, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/BitTorrent/zurllib.py", line 33, in http_open fp = HTTPHandler.http_open(self,req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 1021, in http_open return self.do_open(httplib.HTTPConnection, req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 994, in do_open r = h.getresponse() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 866, in getresponse response.begin() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 336, in begin version, status, reason = self._read_status() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 300, in _read_status raise BadStatusLine(line) BadStatusLine -- Freeloader exception; BadStatusLine https://launchpad.net/bugs/55934 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55408] Re: jigdo-lite, exception BadStatusLine
** Summary changed: - jigdo-lite, exceptation on bad status + jigdo-lite, exception BadStatusLine -- jigdo-lite, exception BadStatusLine https://launchpad.net/bugs/55408 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55922] Re: No jigdo files for "desktop" CDs
Reference: http://releases.ubuntu.com/6.06.1/ -- No jigdo files for "desktop" CDs https://launchpad.net/bugs/55922 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55982] Freeloader reports Done after break download
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: freeloader Ubuntu 6.06.1, Freeloader 0.3 Feeloader reports "DONE" on file that was downloaded only partly. WWW server reported correct file size, it is shown by freedowloader as 238.7MB but it downloaded only about 90MB and reports DONE. It is possible that connection was broken, there was a timeout or something like that; "wget" can handle such network drops without problem. Reference file, size 238.7MB (I think it is not important, just to have some reference here): http://surfnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/freeloaderlinux/privare.iso Downloaded with freeloader, reports DONE: $ ls -lh *iso -rw-r--r-- 1 oem oem 94M Aug 11 09:25 /home/oem/privare.iso >From my point of view, freeloader should report ERROR or try to reconnect. ** Affects: freeloader (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Freeloader reports Done after break download https://launchpad.net/bugs/55982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55982] Re: Freeloader reports Done after break download
In log file, freeloader reports "unfinished download: privare.iso". Freeloader did 4 tries to download file, after that it give up. Yes, I know I have problems with my network conectivity this week but as I reported, wget can handle it and it is very confusing when freeloader software reports OK for download that was not finished. After "RESTART download" freeloader starts to download from 0. I miss "RESUME" download feature. I miss a way to get file source URL from Freeloader to the clipboard. When Freeloader fails, I want to use better tool to get file (like wget). I cannot export URL of broken file from Freeloader dialog. I have to found original www page of file and get URL of file from there. -- Freeloader reports Done after break download https://launchpad.net/bugs/55982 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 51535] system over loaded by unknown process
Public bug reported: My Ubuntu sytem is loaded at "3" but I cannot see source of this load; could be some kernel problem?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -a Linux duran 2.6.15-25-k7 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jun 14 11:43:20 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uptime 23:38:32 up 1:20, 3 users, load average: 3.17, 3.20, 3.07 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# top -n1 top - 23:38:59 up 1:21, 3 users, load average: 3.42, 3.26, 3.09 Tasks: 86 total, 1 running, 85 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 25.8% us, 3.4% sy, 0.2% ni, 66.5% id, 3.2% wa, 0.2% hi, 0.7% si Mem:255580k total, 226316k used,29264k free,25392k buffers Swap: 1060208k total,35252k used, 1024956k free,88996k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 4276 root 15 0 110m 12m 5972 S 7.8 4.9 7:02.85 Xorg 8807 root 15 0 2188 1000 768 R 1.9 0.4 0:00.01 top 1 root 16 0 1568 528 460 S 0.0 0.2 0:01.42 init 2 root RT 0 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0 3 root 34 19 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0 4 root RT 0 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0 5 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.16 events/0 6 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 khelper 7 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread 9 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.07 kblockd/0 10 root 20 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid 102 root 15 0 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.13 pdflush 103 root 15 0 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.26 pdflush 105 root 19 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0 104 root 15 0 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.35 kswapd0 693 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod 1857 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd 2018 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 reiserfs/0 2240 root 12 -4 2540 1004 368 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.52 udevd 3066 root 20 0 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 shpchpd_event 3465 dhcp 13 -2 2456 772 488 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.00 dhclient3 4116 root 16 0 2156 1176 632 S 0.0 0.5 0:00.01 acpid 4216 syslog16 0 1764 668 548 S 0.0 0.3 0:01.06 syslogd 4242 root 15 0 1676 492 412 S 0.0 0.2 0:01.00 dd 4244 klog 19 0 2396 1320 388 S 0.0 0.5 0:00.21 klogd 4266 root 15 0 10904 1556 1172 S 0.0 0.6 0:00.01 gdm 4267 root 16 0 11256 2208 1820 S 0.0 0.9 0:00.20 gdm 4299 hplip 16 0 12868 660 636 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.00 hpiod 4325 hplip 15 0 9404 3612 1092 S 0.0 1.4 0:00.02 python 4373 cupsys16 0 4064 1684 1208 S 0.0 0.7 0:00.34 cupsd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# mount /dev/mapper/system-root on / type reiserfs (rw) proc on /proc type proc (rw) /sys on /sys type sysfs (rw) varrun on /var/run type tmpfs (rw) varlock on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw) procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw) udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) devshm on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) lrm on /lib/modules/2.6.15-25-k7/volatile type tmpfs (rw) /dev/hda1 on /boot type ext2 (rw) /dev/mapper/system-home on /home type reiserfs (rw) ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- system over loaded by unknown process https://launchpad.net/bugs/51535 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 48409] Re: Dictionary; some problem with data conversion
>From your comment I see two separate issues: 1) dictionary has data those are not correctly UTF-8 encoded (you don't now what to do with them) 2) Gnome dictionary is confused with data those are not UTF-8 encoded and stops to work correctly. Restart needed. -- Dictionary; some problem with data conversion https://launchpad.net/bugs/48409 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58141] Evince cannot display ps file
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince Ubuntu 6.06.1, Evince 0.5.2 I tried to open postscript (.ps) file in Ubuntu 6.06. Evince 0.5.2 was started but it displayed only "Loading". For long time. No error. I found that postscript compiler (like gs-gpl) was not instaled on my system. After installing postscript interpreter, Evince worked fine. I report this as a bug as there was no error message from Evince that it miss postscript support that is needed to open the file. Observed on this package: http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter/files/postscriptbarcode.tgz This is a gz archive, that has several ps files inside; it could be open with archiver (Fle Roller 2.14.4) and after that you can start Evince by selecting some ps file from this archive. On the other side, I can open this file with the same Evince without any problem: http://local.wasp.uwa.edu.au/~pbourke/dataformats/postscript/4.ps ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Evince cannot display ps file https://launchpad.net/bugs/58141 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 48409] Re: [Bug 48409] Re: Dictionary; some problem with data conversion
Sebastian, I understand that source of the problem is at server side, it sends data those are not in UTF encoding. This is first part of issue. Dictionary could add support for other encodings; This is probably not easy. The second part is why Dictionary is "demaged" by such data. It should survive unexpected data attack, it could possibly print an error message like "sorry, I cannot display this garbage as I don't understand this format". This is easy from my point of view. With regards, Petr -- Original Message -- Received: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:30:15 PM CEST From: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug 48409] Re: Dictionary; some problem with data conversion > could you follow upstream? they seem to argue that the bug is a server > one and it might be the case > > -- > Dictionary; some problem with data conversion > https://launchpad.net/bugs/48409 > - Petr Slansky, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Dictionary; some problem with data conversion https://launchpad.net/bugs/48409 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58141] Re: [Bug 58141] Re: Evince cannot display ps file
Sebastien, I tried it on two different PCs. I installed on one of them gs-gpl and after that I was able to see ps document. I report this as I miss error message in Evince that something is wrong. Without message it is difficult for unexperienced user to fix it (like instaling some missing gs package). I reported the bug as I am not happy that Evince only prints "Loading...". I don't know what is real problem; it could be mising dependency, or maybe that my sample postrcript file was corrupted/incorrect. I am not expert on this, developers should understand what is real issue and what is the best workarround/fix. >From the point of desktop user I miss information from Evince that something is wrong and document cannot be presented. Thanks for your help, Petr -- Original Message -- Received: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:50:09 AM CEST From: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug 58141] Re: Evince cannot display ps file > Thanks for your bug. evince Depends on "gs-esp | gs", did you have one > of those installed? Is your bug about a Depends issue or about some > files not being open? The example from the .tgz seem to be incorrect: > > "Operand stack: >(CODE 39) (includecheck includetext) > Execution stack: >%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- > Dictionary stack: >--dict:1123/1686(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:80/200(L)-- > Current allocation mode is local > Current file position is 165 > ESP Ghostscript 815.02: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1" > > which is not an evince issue > > ** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu) >Importance: Untriaged => Low > Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs >Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info > > -- > Evince cannot display ps file > https://launchpad.net/bugs/58141 > - Petr Slansky, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Evince cannot display ps file https://launchpad.net/bugs/58141 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58141] Re: [Bug 58141] Re: Evince cannot display ps file
Sebastien, try to display barcodewriter.ps document. I guess that your error example is from sample.ps. I am not sure how postrcript works but you can get valid document when you merge barcode.ps and sample.ps; sample.ps uses some definitions from barcode.ps. I got the same error as you when I tried ps2pdf on sample.ps. After merge barcode.ps with sample.ps to the new document, ps2pdf generated pdf for me. ps2pdf barcodewriter.ps works fine, it is valid postsrcipt file. Try to display barcodewriter.ps in Evince. Try to remove gs interpreter from your test PC and try again. After that try to display simple postscript sample. With regards, Petr -- Original Message -- Received: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:50:09 AM CEST From: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug 58141] Re: Evince cannot display ps file > Thanks for your bug. evince Depends on "gs-esp | gs", did you have one > of those installed? Is your bug about a Depends issue or about some > files not being open? The example from the .tgz seem to be incorrect: > > "Operand stack: >(CODE 39) (includecheck includetext) > Execution stack: >%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- > Dictionary stack: >--dict:1123/1686(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:80/200(L)-- > Current allocation mode is local > Current file position is 165 > ESP Ghostscript 815.02: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1" > > which is not an evince issue > > ** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu) >Importance: Untriaged => Low > Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs >Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info > > -- > Evince cannot display ps file > https://launchpad.net/bugs/58141 > - Petr Slansky, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Evince cannot display ps file https://launchpad.net/bugs/58141 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58141] Re: Evince cannot display ps file
Maybe that I was wrong and I my analyse was not correct. Problem is not missing gs-gpl package. Try this from command line: 1) echo "This is just a evince bug demonstartion" >test.pdf 2) evince test.ps 3) you will see only "loading..." forever, no error message that test.ps is not correct postscript file. You can see some error message in command line but user that has no knowladge about command line and he only use mouse to open files will never see such message. And it is clear that evince ignores message from postscript interpreter. Evince is not user friendly software... -- Evince cannot display ps file https://launchpad.net/bugs/58141 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58141] Re: Evince cannot display ps file
Sorry, the first step should be: 1) echo "This is just a evince bug demonstartion" >test.ps But you cant try thesame with pdf file; you will get error message in that case. -- Evince cannot display ps file https://launchpad.net/bugs/58141 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 53951] dependency on missing lame package
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: a2mp3 Ubuntu 6.06: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install a2mp3 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following packages have unmet dependencies: a2mp3: Depends: lame but it is not installable E: Broken packages [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# I found a package toolame that could be replacement for missing lame package. ** Affects: a2mp3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- dependency on missing lame package https://launchpad.net/bugs/53951 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54536] USB disk is automount to "/media/USB DISK" mount point
Public bug reported: This is not exacly bug but a design feature. I plug my USB stick to Ubuntu 6.06 box and it was automunted. When I checked details I noticed this: # mount /dev/sda1 on /media/USB DISK type vfat (rw,nosuid,nodev,quiet,shortname=mixed,uid=1000,gid=1000,umask=077,iocharset=utf8) Are you joking? Why do you want to copy from Windows every bad idea? It is very bad idea to add spaces to filenames from my point of view... I know Linux suports spaces in filenames. In the case user creates filenames with spaces, it is his problem and his responsibility. But why system creates source of trouble when it is not needed? Please, review your idea about naming mount points... Please, forget about spaces in filenames. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- USB disk is automount to "/media/USB DISK" mount point https://launchpad.net/bugs/54536 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54536] Re: USB disk is automount to "/media/USB DISK" mount point
You are right, "USB DISK" is volume name, created by usb stick manufacturer. I missed that. It will good idea to replace spaces with undercore in such case. -- USB disk is automount to "/media/USB DISK" mount point https://launchpad.net/bugs/54536 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54536] Re: USB disk is automount to "/media/USB DISK" mount point
spaces in filenames could be real suprise for programmer; it makes design of awk and perl scripts more difficult. -- USB disk is automount to "/media/USB DISK" mount point https://launchpad.net/bugs/54536 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
