[Bug 574244] Re: etckeeper hook breaks 9.04->9.10 upgrade with "command line too long"
I can confirm this bug. I attached a screenshot of the failed upgrade. I resolved it by manually commiting the configuration to etckeeper and then doing a partial upgrade (that worked well then). The title of the bug is misleading. It should be 9.10 → 10.04, shouldn't it? ** Attachment added: "screenshot of the etckeeper upgrade bug" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48180994/etckeeper_upgrade-bug-screenshot.png ** Summary changed: - etckeeper hook breaks 9.04->9.10 upgrade with "command line too long" + etckeeper hook breaks 9.10→10.04 upgrade with "Argument list too long" -- etckeeper hook breaks 9.10→10.04 upgrade with "Argument list too long" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574244 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475845] Re: delay on printing dialog in evince
Wojtek Kazimierczak's workaround [1] is working great! Thx for the tip! [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/+bug/475845/comments/29 -- delay on printing dialog in evince https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475845 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152650] Re: [needs-packaging] MuseScore
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- [needs-packaging] MuseScore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152650 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519315] Re: tc/kernel/postinst.d/nvidia-common exited with return code 10
I had the same problem after a messy upgrade to maveric. Reinstalling nvidia-common solved the problem. Thanks! -- tc/kernel/postinst.d/nvidia-common exited with return code 10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519315 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574244] Re: etckeeper hook breaks upgrade with "Argument list too long"
@Arvid: my system was not in a broken state although it reported a "partial upgrade" some boot operations later. So I followed the proposed "upgrade" and the system was upgraded once more. I don't know what it did there exactly but it was similar to the normal upgrade process. It just didn't take a long time because all the packages were upgraded already. The "cleanup" can mostly be done manually using "System → Administration → Computer Janitor" (don't know the program name in Swedish though). -- etckeeper hook breaks upgrade with "Argument list too long" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574244 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 26452] Re: netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
@Darik: What do you mean by that? I can't find any reference to **GnuTLS** on the debian bug page. Also a Google search didn't reveal anything. I think the encrypted authentication now works with lucid. My /etc/netatalk/afpd.conf contains at the end the uncommented line: - -transall -uamlist uams_dhx.so,uams_dhx2.so -nosavepassword So i think cleartext passwords are not allowed, it should use dhx2 instead. Am I right? How can find it out? Using Wireshark? -- netatalk not built with encrypted auth support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
