[Bug 252346] [NEW] /lib/modules/2.6.24.4-generic/volatile not created
Public bug reported: I have a problem where /lib/modules/2.6.24.4-generic/volatile is not created and causes an error on boot. I remedied the situation myself by creating the folder and rebooting. I have had the same problem with the folder being uncreated since alpha1 (obviously with different kernel) although alpha1 was an upgrade rather thna clean install. I today did a clean install of alpha3, formatting partition, and the folder still had to be manually created to resolve the error. Sorry I'm not sure which package to put this against. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: intrepid -- /lib/modules/2.6.24.4-generic/volatile not created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252346 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252346] Re: /lib/modules/2.6.24.4-generic/volatile not created
Thanks for doing that - I did read that page but I didn't think that linux was the right package as it seemed to be too simple - I was expecting a longer package name :) -- /lib/modules/2.6.24.4-generic/volatile not created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252346 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222613] Re: X apps displayed on wrong screen when started from secondary
If Kristof can't reproduce it on Jaunty and my addition isn't enough then maybe I can start another bug for the same thing. Seems a bit odd but who am I to know why :) If necessary I assume that I can `ubuntu-bug -p xserver-xorg-video-ati` But without -ati ? -- X apps displayed on wrong screen when started from secondary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332170] Re: [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset
So can I. Thanks -- [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332170] Re: [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset
Thank you. -- [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 293107] Re: Offer nvidia driver version 96 again
This is working fine for me, reports that the 96 driver is enabled. -- Offer nvidia driver version 96 again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293107 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251107] Re: [Intrepid] nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: AllocateScreenPrivateIndex
Hi - just a bit of information really, at the moment I don't actually have any problems with the 96 driver but On a default installation I was able to install the 96.43.09 driver and once I'd edited my xorg.conf started properly. After I'd changed the repos to those for jaunty - nothing was reported to be updated so that is good. On my normal installation the driver installed properly over the top of an already installed nvidia .run driver - I'd installed that one as soon as it became available and before I found this bug. But on neither of the installations did jockey inform me of there being a proprietary driver available - as I'd looked on my normal installation first I assumed that it was because of the already installed nVidia driver. As the same thing happened on the new and default install I now assume that to be not the case. I don't appear to have had yet a jockey update, if though it's down to servers catching up and jockey shows the driver I will come back and say so - I'm in the UK using the main server as repo source -- [Intrepid] nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: AllocateScreenPrivateIndex https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251107 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236619] [NEW] Openoffice update in proposed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org-base I got an update through the proposed repo today for - Upgraded the following packages: openoffice.org-base-core (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-calc (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-common (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-core (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-draw (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-gnome (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-gtk (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-help-en-gb (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu1) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-help-en-us (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu1) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-impress (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-l10n-common (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu1) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-l10n-en-gb (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu1) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-l10n-en-za (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu1) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-style-human (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-writer (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 python-uno (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 the update had been held back for the last 2 days, today it ent through. Installation worked ok with no error messages. However none of the openoffice paskages work - they start to start and nothing happens and I have to force quit. Apport doesn't start - obviously doesn't think there is an error. I tried to run from both the menu and from the terminal same issue, not sure how I could get it to produce an error report for you. I'm using 8.04 and I also have the openoffice 3 beta installed. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: proposed-pkg -- Openoffice update in proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236619] Re: Openoffice update in proposed
Yes apport is enabled, just won't work with this it seems. -- Openoffice update in proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236619] Re: Openoffice update in proposed
OK - I tried reinstalling and nothing changes. I've attached a shot of what it does. It's a bit of a mess as everything that happens on the desktop get's a 'picture' in the oowriter window. ** Attachment added: "Screenshot-Untitled1 - OpenOffice.org Writer .png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14899043/Screenshot-Untitled1%20-%20OpenOffice.org%20Writer%20.png -- Openoffice update in proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236619] Re: Openoffice update in proposed
Ok - if I run soffice from a terminal it opens and I can get to documnets and they open without problem; also opening a .doc from an e-mail causes write to start without any issue. If I make a new launcher for writer or calc etc - they fail to work. -- Openoffice update in proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236619] Re: Openoffice update in proposed
Fixed it here - but I'd still like to know what happened if anyone knows. Completley removed all openoffice 2.4 installed packages, renamed hidden openoffice folder in home and then reinstalled. All appears to be ok now. -- Openoffice update in proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 221196] Re: Cannot change keyboard layout on gnome-keyboard-properties
I have half this problem - I notice that the preview pane does not load, but shows the left-overs from the menu - this I get. However I have no problem actually setting the keyboard to uk for me. -- Cannot change keyboard layout on gnome-keyboard-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221196 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231202] Re: Installed system panel from svn - crash after add to panel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 147113 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147113 Sorry - let the automatic crash report do it's thing - I rebooted and all is fine -- Installed system panel from svn - crash after add to panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231202 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332170] Re: [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset
Thank you - all ok here now. -- [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 342346] Re: notify-osd 0.93-0ubuntu1 not working
Volume is affecting me too, other notifications are ok here Though I don't have battery/wireless/brightness so can't check them -- notify-osd 0.93-0ubuntu1 not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342346 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338501] Re: update-notifier should emit notification when updates are available
Same here ** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- update-notifier should emit notification when updates are available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338501 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325973] Re: "Starting File Manager" windows open uncontrollably
I have the same issue if I try to show trash on the desktop. -- "Starting File Manager" windows open uncontrollably https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332170] Re: [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222613] Re: X apps displayed on wrong screen when started from secondary
Hi - I found this while searching for the same issue - I had it working OK in Intrepid but now I'm running with Jaunty Alpha4 I have this same problem I have attached both files as requested, I am running a Nvidia 6200 ** Attachment added: "zrandr --verbose" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22587006/zrandr -- X apps displayed on wrong screen when started from secondary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222613] Re: X apps displayed on wrong screen when started from secondary
Could only attach the xrandr - here is Xorg.0.log ** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22587018/Xorg.0.log -- X apps displayed on wrong screen when started from secondary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332170] [NEW] Error appearing at boot
Public bug reported: With one of the updates I got 19/2/09 I started to get this error shortly (1.44 secs) after grub starts the boot cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset Rest of dmesg appears to be normal - but is available if necessary after booting, it is ok with the previous kernel With some help from others and using cpufreq-info I go this - attached terminal output. Processor should be working at 2.53GHz - appears to be 317MHz analyzing CPU 0: driver: p4-clockmod CPUs which need to switch frequency at the same time: 0 hardware limits: 317 MHz - 2.53 GHz available frequency steps: 317 MHz, 633 MHz, 950 MHz, 1.27 GHz, 1.58 GHz, 1.90 GHz, 2.22 GHz, 2.53 GHz available cpufreq governors: conservative, userspace, powersave, ondemand, performance current policy: frequency should be within 317 MHz and 2.53 GHz. The governor "ondemand" may decide which speed to use within this range. current CPU frequency is 317 MHz. cpufreq stats: 317 MHz:0.00%, 633 MHz:0.00%, 950 MHz:0.00%, 1.27 GHz:0.00%, 1.58 GHz:0.00%, 1.90 GHz:0.00%, 2.22 GHz:0.00%, 2.53 GHz:0.00% (115) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 MachineType: NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-image-2.6.28-7-generic 2.6.28-7.20 ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=f5e30d80-d2e5-4d9e-b359-887f2644403f ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-7.20-generic SourcePackage: linux ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Error appearing at boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332170] Re: Error appearing at boot
** Attachment added: "Unsaved Document 2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916086/Unsaved%20Document%202 ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916087/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916088/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916089/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916090/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916091/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916092/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916093/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916094/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916095/ProcModules.txt -- Error appearing at boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332170] Re: Error appearing at boot
Just checked through the files that ubuntu-bug -p linux created - the dmesg text doesn't show the error - that shows when I boot with the newer kernel I have added that as an attachment here ** Attachment added: "dmesg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916358/dmesg -- [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332170] Re: [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset
Ok so that was a bit of a d'oh moment - if I sudo cpufreq-selector -g performance Then it fairly obviously works ok :) I get current CPU frequency is 2.53 GHz. BUT on reboot it reverts to the ondemand performance Also not sure if this is of importance but grep -i nforce /boot/config-`uname -r` with the 2.6.28-7-generic gives me CONFIG_I2C_NFORCE2=m CONFIG_I2C_NFORCE2_S4985=m CONFIG_X86_CPUFREQ_NFORCE2=m with the 2.6.28-8-generic, I get CONFIG_I2C_NFORCE2=m CONFIG_I2C_NFORCE2_S4985=m CONFIG_X86_CPUFREQ_NFORCE2=y -- [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157206] Re: Evolution Address Book Error
I confirm it too - Ubuntu 7.10 up to date and 2.12.0 evolution -- Evolution Address Book Error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157206 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225362] Re: xsensor will not install and run correctly in Hardy final release
Same here, had to edit launcher to include path to modules config file /usr/bin/xsensors -c /etc/modules -- xsensor will not install and run correctly in Hardy final release https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207335] [NEW] quodlibet.py crashed with AttributeError in plugin_on_song_started()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 186323 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186323 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: quodlibet Hardy Beta - just installed Quod Libet, version quodlibet: Installed: 1.0-2 Candidate: 1.0-2 Version table: *** 1.0-2 0 Had just applied tray icon plugin and added library and go the QUodLibet has crashed dialogue ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Mar 26 20:16:17 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/share/quodlibet/quodlibet.py InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: quodlibet 1.0-2 PackageArchitecture: all ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/quodlibet ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/quodlibet'] SourcePackage: quodlibet Title: quodlibet.py crashed with AttributeError in plugin_on_song_started() Uname: Linux 2.6.24-12-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev video ** Affects: quodlibet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash -- quodlibet.py crashed with AttributeError in plugin_on_song_started() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207335] Re: quodlibet.py crashed with AttributeError in plugin_on_song_started()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 186323 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186323 ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12907615/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12907616/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12907617/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Traceback.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12907618/Traceback.txt -- quodlibet.py crashed with AttributeError in plugin_on_song_started() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117419] Re: Epiphany crashes on start
attached gdb-epiphany.txt ** Attachment added: "gdb-epiphany.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7859936/gdb-epiphany.txt -- Epiphany crashes on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117419] Epiphany crashes on start
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: epiphany-browser Version - 2.18.1-0ubuntu1 When I start Epiphany I get a crash box - this is under the impression Epiphnay unexpectedly stopped - recover or don't recover windows and tabs. To the best of my knowledge there was no unexpected stoping of the software. If I try to start through terminal I also get a Segmentation Fault (core dump). I have uninstalled and reinstalled through Synaptic, I have also done so in terminal with purge. I have removed the epiphany folder from /home/.gnome2. Regardless of how I have uninstalled or reinstalled I always get the same error. I have run a backtrace - I can't see a way to attach the txt file here - will add later ** Affects: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Epiphany crashes on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117419] Re: Epiphany crashes on start
Ok - did that new backtrace attached ** Attachment added: "gdb-epiphany.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7868426/gdb-epiphany.txt -- Epiphany crashes on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117419] Re: Epiphany crashes on start
You'll have to excuse my ignorance - but that means what is going to happen next? -- Epiphany crashes on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117419] Re: Epiphany crashes on start
There was a firefox update today. I uninstalled epiphany and epiphany-browser-dbgsym thne reinstalled and now epiphany is working again. -- Epiphany crashes on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
Another update today - still gettting this as it tries to install Setting up nfs-common (1:1.2.0-2ubuntu4) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init/rpc_pipefs.conf ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init/gssd.conf ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init/idmapd.conf ... statd start/running, process 21809 start: Job failed to start invoke-rc.d: initscript gssd, action "restart" failed. start: Job failed to start invoke-rc.d: initscript idmapd, action "restart" failed. -- package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
aah ok then - so at the moment still have to mount them myself after I get to the desktop - I assume that is not expected behaviour though. Thanks for reply :) -- package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
192.168.0.2:/mnt/data /mnt/data nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid 192.168.0.2:/mnt/media /mnt/media nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid 192.168.0.2:/mnt/music /mnt/music nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid 192.168.0.2:/mnt/10Gb /mnt/10Gb nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid 192.168.0.2:/mnt/12Gb /mnt/12Gb nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid -- package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
Ok I can do all of that tomorrow as I doubt if I will see any change - what would I need to file the bug against - linux, ubuntu? The bug system confuses me at the best of times as to what to file the bug against :) -- package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
ok - I will do that later and add the things you suggested above. Thanks for your help :) -- package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33204636/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33204637/XsessionErrors.txt -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445181] [NEW] mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta
Public bug reported: Asked to provide the following with this bug - your /etc/fstab contents (for reference) - any error messages you see at boot time about mounting when booting without the 'splash' option - the results of 'sudo killall -USR1 mountall && mount', run on your system after boot when the network is up but without having mounted the filesystems by hand - the output of 'sudo status statd' # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # Use 'blkid -o value -s UUID' to print the universally unique identifier # for a device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name # devices that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5). # # proc/proc procdefaults0 0 # / was on /dev/sdb1 during installation UUID=71cf49aa-1dd1-4617-a524-96d2d413cedd / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1 # /home was on /dev/sda3 during installation UUID=9636a7bc-a04e-49f8-b5ca-876c55e6b732 /home ext4defaults 0 2 # swap was on /dev/sda1 during installation UUID=8061c173-29bb-4de2-8d4e-f23593cfcdd0 noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto,exec,utf8 0 0 /dev/fd0/media/floppy0 autorw,user,noauto,exec,utf8 0 0 ##Media drives 192.168.0.2:/mnt/data /mnt/data nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid 192.168.0.2:/mnt/media /mnt/media nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid 192.168.0.2:/mnt/music /mnt/music nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid 192.168.0.2:/mnt/10Gb /mnt/10Gb nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid 192.168.0.2:/mnt/12Gb /mnt/12Gb nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid UUID=60de7a78-0878-40b4-8f2d-f4f1083cefbf /mnt/30Gb ext4 defaults 0 2 errors during boot read as mount.nfs : DNS resolution failed for 192.168.0.2 Name or service not known mountall: mount /mnt/data [748] terminated with status 32 mountal : Filesystem could not be mounted /mnt/data Get the same for each one sudo killall -USR1 mountall && mount [sudo] password for kevin: /dev/sdb1 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro) none on /proc type proc (rw) none on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) none on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw) none on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw) none on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw) udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755) none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=0620) none on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) none on /var/run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,mode=0755) none on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) none on /lib/init/rw type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,mode=0755) none on /dev/.bootchart/proc type proc (rw) /dev/sdb2 on /mnt/30Gb type ext4 (rw) /dev/sda3 on /home type ext4 (rw) 192.168.0.2:/mnt/media on /mnt/media type nfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.0.2) 192.168.0.2:/mnt/12Gb on /mnt/12Gb type nfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.0.2) 192.168.0.2:/mnt/music on /mnt/music type nfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.0.2) 192.168.0.2:/mnt/data on /mnt/data type nfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.0.2) 192.168.0.2:/mnt/10Gb on /mnt/10Gb type nfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,addr=192.168.0.2) binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) gvfs-fuse-daemon on /home/kevin/.gvfs type fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon (rw,nosuid,nodev,user=kevin) ke...@kevin:~$sudo status statd statd start/running, process 849 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Oct 7 07:18:24 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu4 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.38-generic SourcePackage: nfs-utils Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic i686 ** Affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
All done - thanks https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/445181 -- package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta
some mount - but never all of the, this time the ones mounted are 192.168.0.2:/mnt/12Gb 13G 9.9G 1.6G 87% /mnt/12Gb 192.168.0.2:/mnt/10Gb 11G 8.8G 930M 91% /mnt/10Gb 192.168.0.2:/mnt/data 54G 52G 2.1G 97% /mnt/data 192.168.0.2:/mnt/music 126G 119G 6.0G 96% /mnt/music killall -USR1 mountall resulted in all being mounted as I want. Result of ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:17:13:80:ca inet addr:192.168.0.3 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::216:17ff:fe13:80ca/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:900 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:953 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:650065 (650.0 KB) TX bytes:144648 (144.6 KB) Interrupt:23 Base address:0xda00 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:70 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:70 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:5568 (5.5 KB) TX bytes:5568 (5.5 KB) Not really sure what you want from the "How is your primary network interface managed -" I did nothing other than install nfs-client, I certainly haven't edited any config files. This is my /etc/network/interfaces # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface auto eth0 #iface eth0 inet dhcp Any other information I would be delighted to provide, thanks for looking :) -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta
Attached is the log file. ** Attachment added: "mountall.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33446046/mountall.log -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta
I've had a couple of reboots since the updates earlier which included mountall and nfs-common and it appears that the partitions are all being mounted now by the time the desktop is up. I still get the error messages during boot however. -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta
nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu6 I updated yesterday - including this then rebooted to get the mountall log. Attached a new mountall.log ** Attachment added: "mountall1.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33478724/mountall1.log -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta
sigh - wish I had checked for updates before all of that nfs-common now nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu7 mountall2.log ** Attachment added: "mountall2.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33479291/mountall2.log -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta
thank you :) -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453876] Re: ubuntu 9.10 beta "grub loadin" stay for more than 30 secondes"
I looked again in my BIOS - I found an option to change the boot order, changed to the drive that grub and /boot are installed to and the delay is gone for me now. -- ubuntu 9.10 beta "grub loadin" stay for more than 30 secondes" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453876] Re: ubuntu 9.10 beta "grub loadin" stay for more than 30 secondes"
I have the same issue - though my Grub loading text lasts for approx 25s I removed the set quiet and quiet splash - nothing appears to be any different in any of the log files. That said I am not really sure which log file would show anything prior to the menu list being there and me being able to choose a kernel to boot from. As with the OP - once the menu list has appered and a kernel booted the boot doesn't appear to take any longer than normal. -- ubuntu 9.10 beta "grub loadin" stay for more than 30 secondes" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453876] Re: ubuntu 9.10 beta "grub loadin" stay for more than 30 secondes"
ok - that's cool - I was just checking that I was not missing something I should have seen. I did wonder originally if it was the bug/issue where grub and boot were on different partitions - since then I reinstalled grub to sdb - same drive as /boot and the rest of the install. Anyway - any ideas would be great :) Quite happy to do whatever needs to be done if it can help. -- ubuntu 9.10 beta "grub loadin" stay for more than 30 secondes" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 448828] Re: Volume mutes when below 22%
Same here using an Audigy card. ** Changed in: pavucontrol (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Volume mutes when below 22% https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448828 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453876] Re: ubuntu 9.10 beta "grub loadin" stay for more than 30 secondes"
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- ubuntu 9.10 beta "grub loadin" stay for more than 30 secondes" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
