[Bug 935038] Re: ball version 1.4.1+20111206-3 FTBFS on armhf in precise
** Changed in: ball (Ubuntu) Assignee: Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935038 Title: ball version 1.4.1+20111206-3 FTBFS on armhf in precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ball/+bug/935038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 935038] Re: ball version 1.4.1+20111206-3 FTBFS on armhf in precise
** Changed in: ball (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935038 Title: ball version 1.4.1+20111206-3 FTBFS on armhf in precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ball/+bug/935038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251844] Re: clhep: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2
** Changed in: clhep (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Confirmed ** Changed in: clhep (Ubuntu) Assignee: Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) => (unassigned) ** Tags added: patch patch-accepted-debian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251844 Title: clhep: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clhep/+bug/1251844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1302446] [NEW] accessodf FTBFS on i386
Public bug reported: Full build log: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accessodf/0.1-4/+build/5866883/+files /buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-i386.accessodf_0.1-4_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz Snippet: -compile-depend: -do-compile: [mkdir] Created dir: /build/buildd/accessodf-0.1/build/empty [javac] Compiling 33 source files to /build/buildd/accessodf-0.1/build/addon-classes [javac] warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with -source 1.5 [javac] /build/buildd/accessodf-0.1/addon/be/docarch/accessodf/ooo/UnoAwtUtils.java:116: error: method createMessageBox in interface XMessageBoxFactory cannot be applied to given types; [javac] XMessageBox box = messageBoxFactory.createMessageBox(parentWindowPeer, messageBoxRectangle, messageBoxType, messageBoxButtons, messageBoxTitle, message); [javac]^ [javac] required: XWindowPeer,MessageBoxType,int,String,String [javac] found: XWindowPeer,Rectangle,String,int,String,String [javac] reason: actual and formal argument lists differ in length [javac] Note: /build/buildd/accessodf-0.1/addon/be/docarch/accessodf/ooo/CentralRegistrationClass.java uses unchecked or unsafe operations. [javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details. [javac] 1 error [javac] 1 warning BUILD FAILED ** Affects: accessodf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ftbfs ** Tags added: ftbfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302446 Title: accessodf FTBFS on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accessodf/+bug/1302446/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1302446] Re: accessodf FTBFS on i386
** Changed in: accessodf (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302446 Title: accessodf FTBFS on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accessodf/+bug/1302446/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1302446] Re: accessodf FTBFS on i386
This one has already been fixed. How do I close this bug ? ** Changed in: accessodf (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: accessodf (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302446 Title: accessodf FTBFS on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accessodf/+bug/1302446/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1302446] Re: accessodf FTBFS on i386
** Changed in: accessodf (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed ** Changed in: accessodf (Ubuntu) Assignee: Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302446 Title: accessodf FTBFS on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accessodf/+bug/1302446/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1303405] [NEW] aolserver4-nspostgres FTBFS on trusty-proposed
Public bug reported: FTBFS on trusty-proposed with tcl8.5. Log snippet: CFLAGS="-Wall -g -Wl,--no-as-needed -O2" /usr/bin/make -f debian/Makefile.debian POSTGRES=PG_CONFIG PG_CONFIG=/usr/bin/pg_config ACS=1 make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/aolserver4-nspostgres-4.5+20110709' i686-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -Wl,--no-as-needed -O2 -DBIND_EMULATION -I/usr/include/postgresql -DFOR_ACS_USE -O2 -Wall -fPIC -g -O2 -fno-unit-at-a-time -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I/usr/include/aolserver4 -I/usr/include/tcl8.5 -DNO_CONST -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"tcl\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"tcl\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"8.5\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"tcl\ 8.5\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H=1 -DUSE_THREAD_ALLOC=1 -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DHAVE_PTHREAD_ATTR_SETSTACKSIZE=1 -DHAVE_PTHREAD_GETATTR_NP=1 -DGETATTRNP_NOT_DECLARED=1 -DTCL_THREADS=1 -DTCL_CFGVAL_ENCODING=\"iso8859-1\" -DMODULE_SCOPE=extern\ __attribute__\(\(__visibility__\(\"hidden\"\)\)\) -DTCL_SHLIB_EXT=\".so\" -DTCL_CFG_OPTIMIZED=1 -DTCL_CFG_DEBUG=1 -DTCL_TOMMATH=1 -DMP_PREC=4 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -DTCL_WIDE_INT_TYPE=long\ long -DHAVE_STRUCT_STAT64=1 -DHAVE_OPEN64=1 -DHAVE_LSEEK64=1 -DHAVE_TYPE_OFF64_T=1 -DHAVE_GETCWD=1 -DHAVE_OPENDIR=1 -DHAVE_STRTOL=1 -DHAVE_WAITPID=1 -DHAVE_GETADDRINFO=1 -DHAVE_GETPWUID_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETPWUID_R=1 -DHAVE_GETPWNAM_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETPWNAM_R=1 -DHAVE_GETGRGID_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETGRGID_R=1 -DHAVE_GETGRNAM_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETGRNAM_R=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R_6=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYADDR_R_8=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYADDR_R=1 -DUSE_TERMIOS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1 -DHAVE_GMTIME_R=1 -DHAVE_LOCALTIME_R=1 -DHAVE_MKTIME=1 -DHAVE_TM_GMTOFF=1 -DHAVE_TIMEZONE_VAR=1 -DHAVE_STRUCT_STAT_ST_BLOCKS=1 -DHAVE_STRUCT_STAT_ST_BLKSIZE=1 -DHAVE_BLKCNT_T=1 -DHAVE_INTPTR_T=1 -DHAVE_UINTPTR_T=1 -DHAVE_SIGNED_CHAR=1 -DHAVE_LANGINFO=1 -DHAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H=1 -DTCL_UNLOAD_DLLS=1 -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DTCL_CFG_OPTIMIZED=1 -DTCL_CFG_DEBUG=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_TIMEGM=1 -DHAVE_DRAND48=1 -DHAVE_RANDOM=1 -DHAVE_POLL=1 -DHAVE_GETADDRINFO=1 -DHAVE_GETNAMEINFO=1-c -o nspostgres.o nspostgres.c :0:0: warning: "PACKAGE_NAME" redefined [enabled by default] :0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition :0:0: warning: "PACKAGE_TARNAME" redefined [enabled by default] :0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition :0:0: warning: "PACKAGE_VERSION" redefined [enabled by default] :0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition :0:0: warning: "PACKAGE_STRING" redefined [enabled by default] :0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from /usr/include/aolserver4/ns.h:62:0, from nspostgres.h:34, from nspostgres.c:32: /usr/include/aolserver4/nsthread.h:129:17: fatal error: tcl.h: No such file or directory #include "tcl.h" ^ compilation terminated. make[1]: *** [nspostgres.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/aolserver4-nspostgres-4.5+20110709' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 Full buildlog: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aolserver4-nspostgres/4.5+20110709-1/+build/5436926/+files /buildlog_ubuntu- trusty-i386.aolserver4-nspostgres_4.5%2B20110709-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz ** Affects: aolserver4-nspostgres (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) Status: New ** Affects: aolserver4-nspostgres (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: ftbfs ** Changed in: aolserver4-nspostgres (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #743074 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=743074 ** Also affects: aolserver4-nspostgres (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=743074 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Description changed: - FTBFS on trusty-proposed with tcl8.6. Log snippet: + FTBFS on trusty-proposed with tcl8.5. Log snippet: - CFLAGS="-Wall -g -Wl,--no-as-needed -O2" /usr/bin/make -f debian/Makefile.debian POSTGRES=PG_CONFIG PG_CONFIG=/usr/bin/pg_config ACS=1 + CFLAGS="-Wall -g -Wl,--no-as-needed -O2" /usr/
[Bug 1303405] Re: aolserver4-nspostgres FTBFS on trusty-proposed
** Branch linked: lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/trusty/aolserver4-nspostgres/fix- for-1303405 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303405 Title: aolserver4-nspostgres FTBFS on trusty-proposed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aolserver4-nspostgres/+bug/1303405/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251844] Re: clhep: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2
Bug #713377 refers to another failing test. Changing to #713301, that refers to this same failing test. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #733301 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733301 ** Changed in: clhep (Debian) Status: Fix Released => Unknown ** Changed in: clhep (Debian) Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #713377 => Debian Bug tracker #733301 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251844 Title: clhep: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clhep/+bug/1251844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251844] Re: clhep: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2
** Changed in: clhep (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251844 Title: clhep: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clhep/+bug/1251844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251844] Re: clhep: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2
I have found a possible fix to this bug. Discussing it with upstream, and waiting for confirmation before proposing that fix here. Upstream bug: https://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/index.php?104289 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251844 Title: clhep: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clhep/+bug/1251844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 824673] Re: geoip ftbfs on all archs
Patch forwarded to Debian. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638395 Thanks. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #638395 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638395 ** Also affects: geoip (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638395 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/824673 Title: geoip ftbfs on all archs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geoip/+bug/824673/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 888970] Re: libnb-svnclientadapter-java version 6.7-0ubuntu1 failed to build with openjdk-7
** Changed in: libnb-svnclientadapter-java (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888970 Title: libnb-svnclientadapter-java version 6.7-0ubuntu1 failed to build with openjdk-7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnb-svnclientadapter-java/+bug/888970/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 888995] Re: remotetea version 1.0.7-2 failed to build with openjdk-7
** Changed in: remotetea (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888995 Title: remotetea version 1.0.7-2 failed to build with openjdk-7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remotetea/+bug/888995/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 935048] Re: checkstyle version 5.4-1 FTBFS on i386 in precise
Hi, I have built this package on a sbuild chroot for Quantal, and it was successful. Should this bug be closed? Should a no-change rebuild be proposed referencing in the debin changelog entry ? Best regards, Sebastian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935048 Title: checkstyle version 5.4-1 FTBFS on i386 in precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkstyle/+bug/935048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 888943] Re: jbossas4 version 4.2.3.GA-6 failed to build with openjdk-7
** Changed in: jbossas4 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888943 Title: jbossas4 version 4.2.3.GA-6 failed to build with openjdk-7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jbossas4/+bug/888943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 854155] Re: Conflicting Alt hotkeys in System monitor
Couldn't reproduce this myself on Ubuntu 12.04. Shall we close it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854155 Title: Conflicting Alt hotkeys in System monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/appmenu-gtk/+bug/854155/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 346856] Re: Bulgarian spell checking is not working at all!!!
Hi, I'm a newbie contributor, and I have a question about this bug: this seems to have been corrected in Ubuntu since version 3.0-12. What else needs to be done to close this bug? Thanks, and apologies as I'm sure this is such a newbie question. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346856 Title: Bulgarian spell checking is not working at all!!! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bgoffice/+bug/346856/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 359835] Re: Brasero gives confusing message ("No space left on resource") when device containing /tmp is full
According to what is stated in upstream bug, brasero handles /tmp use
differently now, which basically means that this bug report can be
resolved / closed.
Is this the right way to deal with this ? Shall we close this bug report
according to what upstream did ?
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359835
Title:
Brasero gives confusing message ("No space left on resource") when
device containing /tmp is full
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/brasero/+bug/359835/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 292611] Re: Never change window size because of the preview
According to what Pedro said on #3 comment, this has been fixed. Looking into the corresponding commit in upstream git repository, and comparing that fix with the current version, it seems that it is fixed in current version. Shall we close this bug ? Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292611 Title: Never change window size because of the preview To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/brasero/+bug/292611/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755956] Re: xoscope version 2.0-3.1 failed to build on i386
** Branch unlinked: lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/oneiric/xoscope/fix-for-755956 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755956 Title: xoscope version 2.0-3.1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xoscope/+bug/755956/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181372] Re: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version
Thanks Ilya! I'm sorry i haven't been able to reply to this sooner. Your remarks and corrections are very helpful to a newbie like me! Again, thanks for your work. Sebastian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181372 Title: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplinuxman/+bug/181372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181372] Re: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version
** Changed in: mplinuxman (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181372 Title: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplinuxman/+bug/181372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770853] Re: gtk-led-askpass version 0.10-2ubuntu1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
Patch forwarded Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633152 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #633152 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633152 ** Also affects: gtk-led-askpass (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633152 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770853 Title: gtk-led-askpass version 0.10-2ubuntu1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk-led-askpass/+bug/770853/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756030] Re: opendrim-lmp-battery version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
Can the status of this report changed to Fix Released? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756030 Title: opendrim-lmp-battery version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-battery/+bug/756030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756030] Re: opendrim-lmp-battery version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
I phrased my question horribly... I wanted to know if I am forgetting to do something to advance this bug to fixed, since the proposal I submitted was approved. Is it because it isn't merged although the proposal was approved? Sorry about the misunderstanding. Thanks, Matthias. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756030 Title: opendrim-lmp-battery version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-battery/+bug/756030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756030] Re: opendrim-lmp-battery version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
Andreas is right. I was talking about the proposal I make which has been approved this week. Since it was approved, I was asking what else has to be done to promote the bug status to a fixed one. Thanks Andreas and Matthias. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756030 Title: opendrim-lmp-battery version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-battery/+bug/756030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756030] Re: opendrim-lmp-battery version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
Seeing in detail my branch merge proposal, I see now that it's review is still active. I guess that is why this report is still "In Progress". Sorry for the noise, guys. May be it would have been better for ask this in #ubuntu-motu instead of adding the noise here. Again, I'm sorry.- Thanks for the help, though. Best regards. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756030 Title: opendrim-lmp-battery version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-battery/+bug/756030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770863] Re: libmpeg3 version 1.5.4-5 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
Patch forwarded upstream: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=63 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #63 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=63 ** Also affects: libmpeg3 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=63 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770863 Title: libmpeg3 version 1.5.4-5 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmpeg3/+bug/770863/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756018] Re: osptoolkit version 3.4.2-1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: osptoolkit (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756018 Title: osptoolkit version 3.4.2-1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/osptoolkit/+bug/756018/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756018] Re: osptoolkit version 3.4.2-1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: osptoolkit (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756018 Title: osptoolkit version 3.4.2-1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/osptoolkit/+bug/756018/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755927] Re: r-cran-surveillance version 1.2-1-1 failed to build on i386
Patch forwarded to Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631141 Best Regards, Sebastián. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #631141 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631141 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755927 Title: r-cran-surveillance version 1.2-1-1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r-cran-surveillance/+bug/755927/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 766048] Re: couchdb version 1.0.1-0ubuntu14 failed to build on amd64
Seems to me like this bug was fixed in 1.0.1-0ubuntu15 related to this one (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/couchdb/+bug/758895) . When I test the last development version (1.0.1-0ubuntu17) doing an sbuild, it woks fine. Can this bug be closed ? Attached is sbuild corresponding to this version. ** Attachment added: "sbuild for i386 of couchdb" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/couchdb/+bug/766048/+attachment/2176604/+files/couchdb_1.0.1-0ubuntu17-i386-20110621-0046 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766048 Title: couchdb version 1.0.1-0ubuntu14 failed to build on amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/couchdb/+bug/766048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755923] Re: samdump2 version 1.1.1-1 failed to build on i386
Seems to me like this bug has been fixed at Debian (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556335), and then has been synced in Ubuntu. This is the last change: samdump2 (1.1.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Link with -lcrypto instead of -lssl. (Closes: #556335) * debian/rules: Use dh_prep instead of dh_clean -k. -- Ansgar Burchardt Sat, 04 Jun 2011 09:56:51 +0200 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #556335 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556335 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755923 Title: samdump2 version 1.1.1-1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samdump2/+bug/755923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770751] Re: gosmore version 0.0.0.20100711-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
Patch forwarded to Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631251 Regards. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #631251 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631251 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770751 Title: gosmore version 0.0.0.20100711-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gosmore/+bug/770751/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 798484] Re: Tracking bug for Firefox 5 transition in Natty
I have installed Firefox from natty-proposed on saturday and using it without any regression since that day. Best regards. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798484 Title: Tracking bug for Firefox 5 transition in Natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bindwood/+bug/798484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181372] Re: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version
I have corrected the problem I was having in building the package in gcc-4.6. Attached is a debdiff of the updated package. Please review theses changes and let me know anything that needs to be corrected for these to be ok. It is one of my first contributions and I need your comments in order to improve my packaging skills. Best regards, Sebastian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181372 Title: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplinuxman/+bug/181372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181372] Re: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version
** Patch added: "mplinuxman_1.5-0ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplinuxman/+bug/181372/+attachment/2165750/+files/mplinuxman_1.5-0ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181372 Title: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplinuxman/+bug/181372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755920] Re: modglue version 1.17-2 failed to build on i386
Hi, I have made a patch to correct this issue, and I am submitting it for your review. Please let me know if it's okay or what corrections need to be done. Thanks in advance, Sebastian. ** Patch added: "modglue_1.17-2ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modglue/+bug/755920/+attachment/2166814/+files/modglue_1.17-2ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755920 Title: modglue version 1.17-2 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modglue/+bug/755920/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755923] Re: samdump2 version 1.1.1-1 failed to build on i386
Hi. I have a question regarding this issue. I have downloaded and built it and seems to build ok. I attached the build log. The steps I took to do this is: 1) branch it from bzr: bzr branch lp:ubuntu/samdump2 2) build source package bzr bd -- -S -us -uc 3) Using pbuilder, I built it: sudo pbuilder build ../samdump2_1.1.1-1.1.dsc What am I doing wrong ? The line that throws the error is different in my build from the one in this bug report: - Bug report: /usr/bin/gcc -o samdump2 hive.o samdump2.o -Wall -g -O2 -lssl - My build: /usr/bin/gcc -o samdump2 hive.o samdump2.o -Wall -g -O2 -lcrypto Thanks and best regards. Sebastian. ** Attachment added: "pbuilder output.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samdump2/+bug/755923/+attachment/2167840/+files/pbuilder%20output.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755923 Title: samdump2 version 1.1.1-1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samdump2/+bug/755923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756140] Re: opendrim-lmp-physicalasset version 0.1.2-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-physicalasset (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-physicalasset (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756140 Title: opendrim-lmp-physicalasset version 0.1.2-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-physicalasset/+bug/756140/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756128] Re: opendrim-lmp-cpu version 1.1.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-cpu (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-cpu (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756128 Title: opendrim-lmp-cpu version 1.1.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-cpu/+bug/756128/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756110] Re: opendrim-lmp-ssh version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-ssh (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-ssh (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756110 Title: opendrim-lmp-ssh version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-ssh/+bug/756110/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756108] Re: opendrim-lmp-recordlog version 1.1.2-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-recordlog (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-recordlog (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756108 Title: opendrim-lmp-recordlog version 1.1.2-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-recordlog/+bug/756108/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756081] Re: opendrim-lmp-baseserver version 1.1.2-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-baseserver (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-baseserver (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756081 Title: opendrim-lmp-baseserver version 1.1.2-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-baseserver/+bug/756081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756067] Re: opendrim-lmp-ip version 1.1.2-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-ip (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-ip (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756067 Title: opendrim-lmp-ip version 1.1.2-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-ip/+bug/756067/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756050] Re: opendrim-lmp-pci version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-pci (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-pci (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756050 Title: opendrim-lmp-pci version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-pci/+bug/756050/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756047] Re: opendrim-lmp-bios version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-bios (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-bios (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756047 Title: opendrim-lmp-bios version 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-bios/+bug/756047/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756187] Re: opendrim-lmp-ethernetport version 1.1.2-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-ethernetport (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-ethernetport (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756187 Title: opendrim-lmp-ethernetport version 1.1.2-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-ethernetport/+bug/756187/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756185] Re: opendrim-lmp-os version 1.1.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-os (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-os (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756185 Title: opendrim-lmp-os version 1.1.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-os/+bug/756185/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756145] Re: opendrim-lmp-dns version 1.1.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-dns (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Changed in: opendrim-lmp-dns (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756145 Title: opendrim-lmp-dns version 1.1.0-0ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendrim-lmp-dns/+bug/756145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770853] Re: gtk-led-askpass version 0.10-2ubuntu1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
Of course. I will report that to Debian and link the bug report here. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770853 Title: gtk-led-askpass version 0.10-2ubuntu1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk-led-askpass/+bug/770853/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756155] Re: pornview version 0.2pre1-11ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: pornview (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756155 Title: pornview version 0.2pre1-11ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pornview/+bug/756155/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756155] Re: pornview version 0.2pre1-11ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: pornview (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756155 Title: pornview version 0.2pre1-11ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pornview/+bug/756155/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 749152] Re: gupnp-ui version 0.1.1-3 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: gupnp-ui (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749152 Title: gupnp-ui version 0.1.1-3 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gupnp-ui/+bug/749152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755937] Re: phaseshift version 0.40-13.2 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: phaseshift (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: phaseshift (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: In Progress => Confirmed ** Branch unlinked: lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/oneiric/phaseshift/fix- for-755937 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755937 Title: phaseshift version 0.40-13.2 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phaseshift/+bug/755937/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 749191] Re: ftgl version 2.1.3~rc5-3 failed to build on i386
Hi, I like to point out that I haven't been able to reproduce this bug. I tried to build this package on sbuild and pbuilder, and it works fine for Natty and Oneiric. I attached one of the sbuild logs. ** Attachment added: "ftgl_2.1.3~rc5-3-i386-20110721-1613" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ftgl/+bug/749191/+attachment/2224624/+files/ftgl_2.1.3%7Erc5-3-i386-20110721-1613 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749191 Title: ftgl version 2.1.3~rc5-3 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ftgl/+bug/749191/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 814374] [NEW] gnet has outdated references to glib include dirs
Public bug reported: In the .pc file included in libgnet-dev are outdated references to glib include directories. As glib libraries have changed its location, these references are causing other packages to ftbfs. Rebuilding this package seems to fix this issue: Current cflags of this package are: $ pkg-config --cflags gnet-2.0 -pthread -I/usr/include/gnet-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnet-2.0/include/ -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include After rebuilding this package: $ pkg-config --cflags gnet-2.0 -pthread -I/usr/include/gnet-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnet-2.0/include/ -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include Please, I like to know, if I submit a branch proposal without changes, specifying that the proposal is only for doing the rebuild, is this the right way to fix this issue ? Thanks, if there is more evidence needed, or am I wrong about this, please let me know. ** Affects: gnet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814374 Title: gnet has outdated references to glib include dirs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnet/+bug/814374/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755930] Re: loqui version 0.4.4-1 failed to build on i386
Part of the problem with this bug has to do with outdated references in libgnet-dev to glib include dirs. A bug has been filed to solve this issue in gnet: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnet/+bug/814374 Besides that, there are some problems in this package regarding indirect linking issues that I'm looking into. Thanks, Sebastian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755930 Title: loqui version 0.4.4-1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/loqui/+bug/755930/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 814377] [NEW] Please clear dependency_libs entry from .la files
Public bug reported: To comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, packages which contain .la files which need to be stripped of the dependency_libs variable. Packages should *NOT* remove the .la file itself at this stage because other packages still expect to find the .la file and this would cause a FTBFS in that package. More information can be found here: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html A file has been filed on Debian and a patch has been submitted to fix this issue. ** Affects: vdk2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) Status: New ** Affects: vdk2 (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: vdk2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #633313 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633313 ** Also affects: vdk2 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633313 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814377 Title: Please clear dependency_libs entry from .la files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vdk2/+bug/814377/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 814399] [NEW] Please clear dependency_libs entry from .la files
Public bug reported: To comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, packages which contain .la files which need to be stripped of the dependency_libs variable. Packages should *NOT* remove the .la file itself at this stage because other packages still expect to find the .la file and this would cause a FTBFS in that package. More information can be found here: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html A bug has been filed on Debian and a patch has been submitted to fix this issue. ** Affects: vdkxdb2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814399 Title: Please clear dependency_libs entry from .la files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vdkxdb2/+bug/814399/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 814377] Re: Please clear dependency_libs entry from .la files
** Description changed: To comply with Policy 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, packages which contain .la files which need to be stripped of the dependency_libs variable. Packages should *NOT* remove the .la file itself at this stage because other packages still expect to find the .la file and this would cause a FTBFS in that package. More information can be found here: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html - A file has been filed on Debian and a patch has been submitted to fix + A bug has been filed on Debian and a patch has been submitted to fix this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814377 Title: Please clear dependency_libs entry from .la files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vdk2/+bug/814377/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756079] Re: vdkbuilder2 version 2.4.0-4.1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: vdkbuilder2 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756079 Title: vdkbuilder2 version 2.4.0-4.1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vdkbuilder2/+bug/756079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 749152] Re: gupnp-ui version 0.1.1-3 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: gupnp-ui (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749152 Title: gupnp-ui version 0.1.1-3 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gupnp-ui/+bug/749152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756079] Re: vdkbuilder2 version 2.4.0-4.1 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: vdkbuilder2 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756079 Title: vdkbuilder2 version 2.4.0-4.1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vdkbuilder2/+bug/756079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755934] Re: stereograph version 0.30a-6 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: stereograph (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) ** Changed in: stereograph (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755934 Title: stereograph version 0.30a-6 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stereograph/+bug/755934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755937] Re: phaseshift version 0.40-13.2 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: phaseshift (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: phaseshift (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755937 Title: phaseshift version 0.40-13.2 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phaseshift/+bug/755937/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755945] Re: setpwc version 1.2-3 failed to build on i386
** Changed in: setpwc (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: setpwc (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Carneiro (scarneiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755945 Title: setpwc version 1.2-3 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/setpwc/+bug/755945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755934] Re: stereograph version 0.30a-6 failed to build on i386
Thank you, Marc! Best regards. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755934 Title: stereograph version 0.30a-6 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stereograph/+bug/755934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756155] Re: pornview version 0.2pre1-11ubuntu1 failed to build on i386
Submitted to Debian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756155 Title: pornview version 0.2pre1-11ubuntu1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pornview/+bug/756155/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770855] Re: mplinuxman version 1.4-0ubuntu2 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
** Branch linked: lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/oneiric/mplinuxman/bug-770855 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770855 Title: mplinuxman version 1.4-0ubuntu2 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181372] Re: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version
Daniel, you are right about both comments. I have made a mistake when modifying the makefile for this package. Even though I have built the package, i did not check what the package installed. I will have to be much more careful in the future about testing packages, to avoid this huge errors. Let me make the necessary changes, and i will re-submit this patch. Thanks for your time and patience with this newbie :) Best regards, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181372 Title: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 663309] Re: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_text_iter_set_offset() when editing a GPX-file
Just a newbie question, looking at the upstream bug, it says that this issue is caused by a bug in gtksourceview, and not in this application. Shouldn't the bug report be submitted in the aforementioned library, instead of gedit ? Sorry if I am totally wrong, just trying to understand what the right way to proceed is in this case. Best regards. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663309 Title: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_text_iter_set_offset() when editing a GPX-file -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250540] Re: gedit cannot save to sftp location
Looking at the upstream bug, it appears that this is really a bug in package gvfs. Looking at the change made upstream on that package, and comparing with the package gvfs that was released with natty, it appears that this change has already been made. Beside that, I repeat the steps outlined to reproduce the bug, and gedit no longer have this problem, it allows me to save files in directories owned by root, and also when the owner of the file is another user. But should be done to close this bug? Can anyone confirm if it has been fixed. Best regards. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250540 Title: gedit cannot save to sftp location -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250540] Re: gedit cannot save to sftp location
** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250540 Title: gedit cannot save to sftp location -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181372] Re: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version
Hi, I don't know if anoyone is working on it. I made a package for version 1.5. Attached is the corresponding debdiff. Would you please indicate me if this package is correct, and in case this is correct, what has to be done to upload this package? Best regards. ** Patch added: "debdiff to 1.5 release" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplinuxman/+bug/181372/+attachment/2107986/+files/mplinuxman_1.5-0ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181372 Title: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770855] Re: mplinuxman version 1.4-0ubuntu2 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
** Branch unlinked: lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/oneiric/mplinuxman/bug-770855 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770855 Title: mplinuxman version 1.4-0ubuntu2 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181372] Re: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version
Hi, I have made the abovementioned changes to the package, and yet i am having problems buildind the package in oneiric under gcc-4.6. This issue is related to (LP: #770855). In the meantime, i have put together a PPA package for natty, that does build correctly. If anyone need to use it, i give you the ppa source: http://ppa.launchpad.net/scarneiro/ppa/ubuntu When i can solve the issue i am having, i will upload the patch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181372 Title: Please update mplinuxman to 1.5 version -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
