[Bug 244429] Re: Hardy freezing randomly (Dell issue??)

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Here's the text of the kernel panic from my D630.  Please escalate, it
is in the iwl4965 code so it will be hitting a lot of machines.

-- rec --

** Attachment added: "kernel-panic.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16369967/kernel-panic.txt

-- 
Hardy freezing randomly (Dell issue??)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 244429] Re: Hardy freezing randomly (Dell issue??)

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Changed in: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None => linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24

-- 
Hardy freezing randomly (Dell issue??)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 244429] Re: Hardy freezing randomly (Dell issue??)

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Hmm, perhaps this bug report is too confusing.

This bug is a kernel oops from intel 4965AGN driver.

Probably started with the 2.6.24-19 kernels, kernel panic text caught
yesterday with 2.6.24-20 kernel.

Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1
Release:8.04

linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-20-generic:
  Installed: 2.6.24-20.29
  Candidate: 2.6.24-20.29
  Version table:
 *** 2.6.24-20.29 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-proposed/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

What I expected to happen is that the computer should continue to work.

What happens is that the computer locks up with caps- and scroll-lock
flashing.

There is no trace of this oops in the system logs.  The panic was
collected over a serial console connection.

I attach a complete console log from boot to oops, there is a message
from the iwl4965 driver immediately preceding the oops.

-- rec --

** Attachment added: "kernel-oops.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16408913/kernel-oops.txt

-- 
Hardy freezing randomly (Dell issue??)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 244429] Re: kernel oops: invalid opcode 0000

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16409074/lspci-vvnn.log

-- 
kernel oops: invalid opcode 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 244429] Re: kernel oops: invalid opcode 0000

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Summary changed:

- Hardy freezing randomly (Dell issue??)
+ kernel oops: invalid opcode 

** Description changed:

- I have posted a thread about random freezing of Hardy here: 
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=832383
- From what I read in the subsequent posts that it seems to happen on Dell 
hardware.
+ This bug report derives from discussion at
+ http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=832383
  
- I have searched existing bugs, but although several bugs are reported on 
random freezes none seem to be related.
- The closest -- IMHO -- is this bug: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/234093
- However that is focussed on an Intel graphics card, while I have a nVidia 
card in my laptop.
- Find below the result of: lspci | grep -i vga
- 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G72M [Quadro NVS 
110M/GeForce Go 7300] (rev a1)
+ The symptom is that laptops randomly lock up with caps-lock and scroll-
+ lock flashing and need to be hard rebooted, usually by leaning on the
+ power switch.
  
- Any advice on how to investigate the cause of this issue would be highly
- appreciated.
+ There are no messages in the logs.
+ 
+ A serial console to another machine reveals that the oops is coming from
+ the iwl4965 wireless driver.

** Tags added: kernel-oops

** Attachment added: "uname-a.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16409057/uname-a.log

-- 
kernel oops: invalid opcode 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 244429] Re: kernel oops: invalid opcode 0000

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "version.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16409063/version.log

-- 
kernel oops: invalid opcode 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 300213] [NEW] iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1241 iwl_tx_cmd_complete+0x274/0x290 [iwlcore]()

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

This is probably the Wireless-N vs iwlwifi bug from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-backports-
modules-2.6.24/+bug/244429 and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/275359 in a new
form.  It now just generates a kernel stack backtrace in
/var/log/messages (and other logs) but no longer crashes the system.

$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.10
Release:8.10

$ apt-cache policy linux
linux:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 2.6.27.8.12
  Version table:
 2.6.27.8.12 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-proposed/restricted Packages
 2.6.27.7.11 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/restricted Packages

ProblemType: KernelOops
Architecture: amd64
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: linux-image-2.6.27-8-generic 2.6.27-8.17
ProcCmdLine: User Name=UUID=7ad42a9a-c88e-43ac-a6f2-4c88a7070a17 ro quiet splash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.27-8.17-generic
SourcePackage: linux
Title: [263574.928227] [ cut here ]

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-kerneloops

-- 
iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1241 iwl_tx_cmd_complete+0x274/0x290 [iwlcore]()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300213
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 300213] Re: iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1241 iwl_tx_cmd_complete+0x274/0x290 [iwlcore]()

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19803656/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19803657/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19803658/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19803659/HalComputerInfo.txt

** Attachment added: "LsUsb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19803660/LsUsb.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19803661/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "OopsText.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19803662/OopsText.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuInfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19803663/ProcCpuInfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19803664/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19803665/ProcModules.txt

-- 
iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1241 iwl_tx_cmd_complete+0x274/0x290 [iwlcore]()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300213
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 244429] Re: kernel oops: invalid opcode 0000

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

There's a new bug for this problem filed against the Intrepid Ibex
kernel:

  Bug #275359 in linux (Ubuntu): "kernel BUG at
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!"

you should let them know of the additional hardware having the problem.

-- rec --

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Scott Armitage <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I am experiencing this same problem on a Lenovo Thinkpad T61:
>
> nVidia Quadro NVS140M
> Intel 4965 wireless (802.11N)
>
> I'm running the Intrepid Ibex beta:
>
> $ uname -r
> 2.6.27-7-generic
>
> --
> kernel oops: invalid opcode 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
kernel oops: invalid opcode 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 275359] [NEW] kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

kernel oops at random when running wireless.  Machine locks up with
flashing caps-lock.  No messages in /var/log.  Kernel oops collected by
serial console.

No known trigger other than running wireless, but the oops clearly
identifies the line in the iwlwifi sources where it happens and the oops
can be avoided by running a wired network connection.

This appears to be the same problem reported against hardy linux-
backports-modules in bug 244429
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-backports-
modules-2.6.24/+bug/244429) starting in July, which has never been
triaged or responded to by any developer.

lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu intrepid (development branch)
Release:8.10

apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.27-4-generic
linux-image-2.6.27-4-generic:
  Installed: 2.6.27-4.6
  Candidate: 2.6.27-4.6
  Version table:
 *** 2.6.27-4.6 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: kernel-oops

-- 
kernel BUG at 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275359
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 275359] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "uname-a.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18010790/uname-a.log

-- 
kernel BUG at 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275359
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 275359] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "version.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18010795/version.log

-- 
kernel BUG at 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275359
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 275359] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18010803/lspci-vvnn.log

** Tags added: kernel-oops

-- 
kernel BUG at 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275359
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 275359] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "kernel-oops-1.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18010866/kernel-oops-1.txt

-- 
kernel BUG at 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275359
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 275359] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18093015/dmesg.log

-- 
kernel BUG at 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275359
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 275359] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198 and subsequent panic

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

This bug doesn't turn up when searching for bugs in Intrepid Ibex, even
though it's filed against the Intrepid Ibex kernel.

-- 
kernel BUG at 
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1198 and 
subsequent panic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275359
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 244429] Re: kernel oops: invalid opcode 0000

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Could we please get some attention paid to this problem?

People with totally generic hardware, Dell Latitudes, are abandoning
Ubuntu because it -- the latest long term support release -- crashes
when they attempt to use the wireless.

There's no sign that any Ubuntu developer has even read this bug report.

Why?  Did I fail to include some essential ingredient?

What more do you need than a kernel oops with a smoking gun pointing at
the iwl4695 driver in it?

-- 
kernel oops: invalid opcode 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 187417] Re: deskbar-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in _PyObject_GC_New()

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Has not happened in a long time.  I'd close it.

-- rec --

On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> could you try if that's still an issue in hardy?
>
> ** Changed in: deskbar-applet (Ubuntu)
>   Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> deskbar-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in _PyObject_GC_New()
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187417
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
deskbar-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in _PyObject_GC_New()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 253990] Re: kernel oops: kernel NULL pointer :iwl4965:iwl4965_exit+0x10/0x19

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "version.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16479543/version.log

-- 
kernel oops: kernel NULL pointer :iwl4965:iwl4965_exit+0x10/0x19
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 253990] Re: kernel oops: kernel NULL pointer :iwl4965:iwl4965_exit+0x10/0x19

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16479567/lspci-vvnn.log

-- 
kernel oops: kernel NULL pointer :iwl4965:iwl4965_exit+0x10/0x19
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 253990] Re: kernel oops: kernel NULL pointer :iwl4965:iwl4965_exit+0x10/0x19

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "uname-a.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16479540/uname-a.log

-- 
kernel oops: kernel NULL pointer :iwl4965:iwl4965_exit+0x10/0x19
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 253990] [NEW] kernel oops: kernel NULL pointer :iwl4965:iwl4965_exit+0x10/0x19

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

I am attempting to work around
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/244429 since no one is responding
to it and I can't put my computer onto wireless until it's fixed.

I downloaded http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Download compat-
wireless-2.6.24.tar.bz2 on 2008-07-30, unpacked it, built it, and
installed it.  When I type "make unload" to unload the buggy iwl4965
driver, the kernel generates the attached oops.

I expected the kernel to unload the driver so I could load the new
driver.

Description: Ubuntu 8.04.1
Release: 8.04

linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-20-generic:
  Installed: 2.6.24-20.29
  Candidate: 2.6.24-20.29
  Version table:
 *** 2.6.24-20.29 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-proposed/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: kernel-oops

-- 
kernel oops: kernel NULL pointer :iwl4965:iwl4965_exit+0x10/0x19
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 253990] Re: kernel oops: kernel NULL pointer :iwl4965:iwl4965_exit+0x10/0x19

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "kernel-oops-2.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16479516/kernel-oops-2.txt

-- 
kernel oops: kernel NULL pointer :iwl4965:iwl4965_exit+0x10/0x19
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 244429] Re: kernel oops: invalid opcode 0000

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

I have downloaded the 2008-07-30 release of compat-
wireless-2.6.24.tar.bz2 from http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Download,
unpacked, built, installed, and rebooted to bring up the new drivers.

The output of /sbin/modprobe -l iwl4965 confirms that the system found
the new drivers.

I get essentially the same oops from this version of the driver.  The
path name of the driver source in the attached oops has moved from:

/build/buildd/linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-2.6.24/debian/build/build-
generic/wireless/iwlwifi/iwlwifi/compatible/iwl-4965.c

in the previous oops to:

/build/buildd/linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-2.6.24/debian/build/build-
generic/compat-wireless-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-4965.c


** Attachment added: "kernel-oops-3.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16481703/kernel-oops-3.txt

-- 
kernel oops: invalid opcode 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 253990] Re: kernel oops: kernel NULL pointer :iwl4965:iwl4965_exit+0x10/0x19

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 251252 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251252

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 251252
   linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-20-generic causes kernel panic when unloading 
Intel Wireless driver

-- 
kernel oops: kernel NULL pointer :iwl4965:iwl4965_exit+0x10/0x19
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 244429] Re: kernel oops: invalid opcode 0000

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-20.21 did not fix this problem, even with
the 4965 microcode renamed it generates essentially the same oops.

** Attachment added: "kernel-oops-4.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16495703/kernel-oops-4.txt

-- 
kernel oops: invalid opcode 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 254232] [NEW] iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode firmware file req failed

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-20-generic

The latest release of linux-backports-modules (-2.6.24-20.21) installed
a wrongly named microcode file, it generates:

Aug  2 01:19:59 elf5 firmware_helper[6528]: main: error loading 
'/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode' for device 
'/devices/pci:00/:00:1c.1/:0c:00.0/firmware/:0c:00.0' with 
driver '(unknown)'
Aug  2 01:19:59 elf5 kernel: [   52.340140] iwl4965: iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode 
firmware file req failed: Reason -2
Aug  2 01:19:59 elf5 kernel: [   52.340262] iwl4965: Could not read microcode: 
-2
Aug  2 01:19:59 elf5 kernel: [   52.340483] ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 
:0c:00.0 disabled

In syslog and the driver fails to initialize.

The firmware files installed by linux-backports-modules-2 are named with
a -lbm infix:

$ dpkg-query -L linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-20-generic | grep ucode
/lib/firmware/2.6.24-20-generic/iwlwifi-4965-2-lbm.ucode
/lib/firmware/2.6.24-20-generic/iwlwifi-3945-1-lbm.ucode

-- rec --

** Affects: linux-backports-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-20-generic
  
- The latest release of linux-backports-modules installed a wrongly named
- microcode file, it generates:
+ The latest release of linux-backports-modules (-2.6.24-20.21) installed
+ a wrongly named microcode file, it generates:
  
  Aug  2 01:19:59 elf5 firmware_helper[6528]: main: error loading 
'/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode' for device 
'/devices/pci:00/:00:1c.1/:0c:00.0/firmware/:0c:00.0' with 
driver '(unknown)'
  Aug  2 01:19:59 elf5 kernel: [   52.340140] iwl4965: iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode 
firmware file req failed: Reason -2
  Aug  2 01:19:59 elf5 kernel: [   52.340262] iwl4965: Could not read 
microcode: -2
  Aug  2 01:19:59 elf5 kernel: [   52.340483] ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 
:0c:00.0 disabled
  
  In syslog and the driver fails to initialize.
  
  The firmware files installed by linux-backports-modules-2 are named with
  a -lbm infix:
  
  $ dpkg-query -L linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-20-generic | grep ucode
  /lib/firmware/2.6.24-20-generic/iwlwifi-4965-2-lbm.ucode
  /lib/firmware/2.6.24-20-generic/iwlwifi-3945-1-lbm.ucode
  
  -- rec --

-- 
iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode firmware file req failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254232
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 244429] Re: kernel oops: invalid opcode 0000

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Because there are iwl4965.ko modules installed for both linux-ubuntu-
modules and linux-backports-modules, I picked the wrong module.

** Changed in: linux-backports-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 => linux-backports-modules-2.6.24

-- 
kernel oops: invalid opcode 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 244429] Re: kernel oops: invalid opcode 0000

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

This problem persists with the linux-backports-
modules-2.6.24-20.23-generic package released today.   I attach the
kernel oops generated when this release oopsed.

** Attachment added: "kernel-oops-5.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16537327/kernel-oops-5.txt

-- 
kernel oops: invalid opcode 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 244429] Re: kernel oops: invalid opcode 0000

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

This problem persists with linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-21 version
2.6.24-21.25, kernel oops attached.

The system ran over 48 hours with the new kernel, without the backports,
with the wireless active, and had not crashed.

With the backports installed, the system lasted less than 3.5 hours
before crashing.

** Attachment added: "kernel-oops-6.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16901504/kernel-oops-6.txt

-- 
kernel oops: invalid opcode 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 215454] Re: d-feet crashed with DBusException in __init__()

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

The problem cleared up not many updates after the report date.

-- rec --

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Daniel T Chen  wrote:
> Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10 or 9.04?
>
> ** Changed in: d-feet (Ubuntu)
>   Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> d-feet crashed with DBusException in __init__()
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215454
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
d-feet crashed with DBusException in __init__()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215454
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 336487] [NEW] firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in getenv()

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: firefox-3.0

Crashed while loading an applet, but successfully loaded the applet when
apport started firefox to report the bug.

This may be a duplicate of #321043, it has the same "title" but one
reportee says firefox is still running and another blames flash, neither
match my experience.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
DistroRelease: /usr/bin/lsb_release:81: DeprecationWarning: the sets module is 
deprecated   import sets Ubuntu 9.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.6/firefox
Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.6/firefox 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+filebug/xsa0xG3wRwB1ASXEcTuflqV9CGA?field.title=gimp-2.6+crashed+with+SIGSEGV+in+g_object_get%28%29
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: firefox-3.0
StacktraceTop:
 getenv () from /lib/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so
 exit () from /lib/libc.so.6
 __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
 ?? ()
Title: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in getenv()
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-8-generic x86_64
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout fuse lpadmin plugdev sambashare

** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-crash need-amd64-retrace

-- 
firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in getenv()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336487
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 336487] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in getenv()

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23277079/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23277080/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23277081/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23277082/ExtensionSummary.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23277083/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23277084/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: "Registers.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23277085/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23277086/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23277087/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: "pluginreg.dat.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23277088/pluginreg.dat.txt

** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23277089/profiles.ini.txt

-- 
firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in getenv()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336487
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 356019] [NEW] 30-keymap-lenovo.fdi patch for X200 Tablet

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: hal-info

A patch for

  /usr/share/hal/fdi/information/10freedesktop/30-keymap-lenovo.fdi

which adds a subsection for the x200 tablet and maps tablet bezel
buttons, function shift key, and menu key correctly.

Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch)
Release:9.04

hal-info:
  Installed: 20090324-0ubuntu1
  Candidate: 20090324-0ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 20090324-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

The original mappings activate gnome-screensaver for a button with a
circular arrow on it, have no atkbd mapping at all for the button with a
lock on it, and generate XF86Wakeup for both the Fn shift and the Menu
keys.

The patch also includes comments about some other key/button mapping
oddities.

** Affects: hal-info (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
30-keymap-lenovo.fdi patch for X200 Tablet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356019
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 356019] Re: 30-keymap-lenovo.fdi patch for X200 Tablet

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "30-keymap-lenovo.patch"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24852593/30-keymap-lenovo.patch

-- 
30-keymap-lenovo.fdi patch for X200 Tablet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356019
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 159026] Re: Lenovo Thinkpad x41 Tablet and X60 Tablet rotate events

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

I'm going to confirm this and add the Lenovo X200 Tablet to the machines
referenced by this bug.  These hotkey events have been available for
incorporation into acpi-support for years now, yet they still have to be
researched by users and added manually to make them work.

There are also two additional hotkey events emitted by the x200 tablet
which are mentioned above as unknown LID events.  These are:

/etc/acpi/events/thinkpad-remove-stylus:
--
# Stylus removed from holder
event=ibm/hotkey HKEY 0080 500c
action=/etc/acpi/thinkpad-remove-stylus.sh
--
/etc/acpi/events/thinkpad-replace-stylus
--
# Stylus replaced into holder
event=ibm/hotkey HKEY 0080 500b
action=/etc/acpi/thinkpad-replace-stylus.sh
--

Could we perhaps get some centralized location for dealing with these
tablet problems in ubuntu?  There are a lot of them, and the response
when filing bugs against the many different packages involved is
uninspiring.  This bug has been active since October 2007, a debdiff was
requested and provided over a year ago, but nothing has happened, the
problem remains unaddressed, generations of Thinkpad tablets have come
and gone and Ubuntu remains a do-it-yourself project for owners of these
laptops.

The screen rotation daemon issue discussed above is a bug that has no
package to be filed against.  To implement screen rotation you need to
catch the xrandr rotations, and the accelerometer clues, no matter what
source they originate from and generate tablet orientation and
configuration changes which effect the stylus/touch coordinate systems,
the pixel rendering, and the accelerometer orientation.  This needs to
be solved for all tablet and convertible computers.  I suspect that we
need a new /dev/input channel that collects and merges tablet
orientation/configuration information.

So, this is a bug in acpi-support, but also in hal-info, and also in a
non-existent package that takes care of making acpi-support and hal-info
do the right thing.

** Summary changed:

- Lenovo Thinkpad x41 Tablet and X60 Tablet rotate events
+ Lenovo Thinkpad x41 Tablet and X60 Tablet and X200 Tablet rotate events

** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
Lenovo Thinkpad x41 Tablet and X60 Tablet and X200 Tablet rotate events
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159026
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 358358] Re: "xsetwacom list dev" returns nothing on x61 and other tablet

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Same issue on a Thinkpad X200 Tablet.

** Summary changed:

- "xsetwacom list dev"  returns nothing on x61 tablet
+ "xsetwacom list dev"  returns nothing on x61 and other tablet

-- 
"xsetwacom list dev"  returns nothing on x61 and other tablet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 355340] Re: [FFe] Please allow a new version of wacom-tools

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

My problem with the wacom-tools-0.8.2.2 package with my x200 tablet has
been that it doesn't use the same names for stylus, eraser, and touch
devices so neither xsetwacom nor wacomcpl work at all.  As a
consequence, none of the screen rotation scripts work, and I cannot
interactively recalibrate my tablet when it drifts.

The problem is that the hotplug named my tablet inputs as:  'PnP Device
(WACf008)',  'PnP Device (WACf008) touch', and  'PnP Device (WACf008)
eraser'.  I found that out by running xinput, because 'xsetwacom list
dev' and wacomcpl both returned empty lists.

It turns out that I can fix those problems with a script that edits the
hal configuration before the xserver starts.  (If you run the script
after the xserver starts, then the settings won't take effect until you
logout and allow the xserver to restart.)

I write /etc/init.d/wacom and link it as /etc/rc{2,3,4,5}.d/S27wacom, so
it runs after hal and before gdm:

# find any wacom devices
for udi in `hal-find-by-property --key input.x11_driver --string wacom`
do
type=`hal-get-property --udi $udi --key input.x11_options.Type`
# rewrite the names that the Xserver will use
hal-set-property --udi $udi --key info.product --string $type
case $type in
stylus|eraser)
# map stylus button 2 to mouse button 3
hal-set-property --udi $udi --key input.x11_options.Button2 --string 3
;;
esac
done

So that works for renaming the input devices back to what wacomcpl and
xsetwacom expect them to be, so rotation and interactive calibration
work, and it also enables context menus off the stylus button.

Now, some of those things can be fixed by changing the fdi file or
changing the way that the Xserver interprets the information it gets
from hal.

But, as gali98 points out, there are some configurations that can't be
easily specified in the fdi file.  If I understand him correctly, I
could modify the fdi file to map the stylus button2 to button 3, but I
couldn't remap the eraser button in the fdi file because the eraser is a
sub-device.

So this gives us a place to put that sort of stuff until hal is taught
how to deal with these problems.

-- rec --

-- 
[FFe] Please allow a new version of wacom-tools
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355340
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 130559] Re: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) - no sound

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

I confirm that this bug still exists in 2.6.22-13 on a dell latitude
d630.

I also confirm that it can still be cured by getting ftp://ftp.alsa-
project.org/pub/driver/alsa-driver-1.0.15rc3.tar.bz2, unpacking, and
running configure && make && sudo make install.  (You will need to have
kernel headers and development packages installed.)

But there's a catch:  the ubuntu distribution is putting the snd-hda-
intel.ko module in /lib/modules/2.6.22-13-generic/ubuntu/media/snd-hda-
intel/snd-hda-intel.ko while the alsa-driver puts the module in
/lib/modules/2.6.22-13-generic/kernel/sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.ko, so
the "make install" installs the correct module but the old module is
still there.  So, the first reboot still fails and generates a large
number of symbol mismatch errors in kern.log.

Further to confuse the issue, when you copy the correct module over the
old module, or simply delete the old module, the module dependencies are
still referring to the old version of snd-hda-intel.ko, so the next
reboot still fails and reports that snd_hda_intel failed to load the
symbol snd_hwdep_new.  Go back and rerun the "sudo make install" to get
the right dependencies computed.

Better, remove the old version of snd-hda-intel.ko before you install
the recompiled alsa drivers and you should be good at the first reboot.

I did not need to specify any module options for snd_hda_intel to work.

-- rec --

-- 
 Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) - no sound
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130559
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 219669] [NEW] /etc/pulse/default.pa has hidden man page

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: pulseaudio

The man page for the pulseaudio config file /etc/pulse/default.pa is
installed in /usr/share/man/pa/man5/default.5.gz, which would make it
part of the Panamanian translation of the man pages, if there were one.

In any case, it makes it very hard to find with the usual documentation
commands.

Please move it to a more conventional place, I'm going to link it to
/usr/share/man/man5/pulse-default.5.gz so I can read it.

This in the rc1 of hardy heron.

Description:Ubuntu 8.04
Release:8.04

  Installed: 0.9.10-1ubuntu1
  Candidate: 0.9.10-1ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 0.9.10-1ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

-- rec --

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
/etc/pulse/default.pa has hidden man page
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219669
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 194187] Re: livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

I believe this bug is fixed.

I just tried a daily livecd build from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-
live/current/ (specifically http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current
/hardy-desktop-amd64.iso dated April 9 8:34AM) and my laptop comes right
up in its native resolution with no operator intervention at all.  I
haven't done an install yet, it was enough to see the splash screen and
get to the desktop at 1440x900.

Please try a daily livecd build and see what it does for you.

-- rec --

-- 
livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 215454] [NEW] d-feet crashed with DBusException in __init__()

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: d-feet

Several sub-process crashes just browsing the session bus, this first
one from looking at org.fredesktop.compiz

The user interface persists and continues to work through all these
crash reports.

I believe apport is attaching the necessary info, but it shouldn't take
long to collect your own.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Apr 10 18:32:20 2008
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/d-feet
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: d-feet 0.1.8-1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/d-feet
ProcEnviron:
 
PATH=/home/username/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/d-feet']
SourcePackage: d-feet
Title: d-feet crashed with DBusException in __init__()
Uname: Linux 2.6.24-15-generic x86_64
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev video

** Affects: d-feet (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-crash need-duplicate-check

-- 
d-feet crashed with DBusException in __init__()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215454
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 215454] Re: d-feet crashed with DBusException in __init__()

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13345510/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13345511/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13345512/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: "Traceback.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13345513/Traceback.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
d-feet crashed with DBusException in __init__()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215454
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 215466] [NEW] exaile.py crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: exaile

Apport reports this crash every time exaile is exited by closing its
window.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Thu Apr 10 18:59:17 2008
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/share/exaile/exaile.py
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: exaile 0.2.11.1-0ubuntu3
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcCmdline: python /usr/lib/exaile/exaile.py
ProcEnviron:
 
PATH=/home/username/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: exaile
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
 g_closure_invoke ()
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_signal_emit_valist ()
 g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: exaile.py crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
Uname: Linux 2.6.24-15-generic x86_64
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev video

** Affects: exaile (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-crash need-amd64-retrace

-- 
exaile.py crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215466
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 215466] Re: exaile.py crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13346064/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13346065/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13346066/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13346067/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13346069/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: "Registers.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13346070/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13346071/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13346072/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
exaile.py crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215466
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 183071] Re: package tomboy 0.9.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 134

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

I have installed the latest alpha of Hardy and tomboy was not a problem.

-- rec --

On Feb 15, 2008 6:29 PM, Greg Grossmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> This bug report is for an older version of tomboy in Hardy.  Is this
> still an issue for you now?
>
> --
> package tomboy 0.9.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
> post-installation script returned error exit status 134
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183071
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
package tomboy 0.9.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
post-installation script returned error exit status 134
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183071
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 196207] [NEW] package linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-10-rt None failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

This package has been unable to cleanly uninstall for for any Hardy
Alpha I've installed.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Feb 27 10:24:54 2008
Dependencies:
 
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ErrorMessage: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-10-rt None
PackageArchitecture: i386
SourcePackage: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24
Title: package linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-10-rt None failed to 
install/upgrade: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Uname: Linux 2.6.24-10-generic i686

** Affects: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package

-- 
package linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-10-rt None failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196207
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 196207] Re: package linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-10-rt None failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12261265/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

-- 
package linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-10-rt None failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196207
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 185677] Re: package mono-gac 1.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Thanks, but I'm not working on the bug, I just reported it.

And it seems that they have pretty well sorted it out, judging from
the number of 'this is a duplicate of that' messages I've been getting
about it.

-- rec --

On Jan 29, 2008 2:00 PM, edcrumly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgive my ignorance, but is there a log file, or a cli command that
> would be helpful to send to you? I also had the same result on i386
> based system before any changes were made to system right after
> install/upgrade of Alpha 3.
>
>
> --
> package mono-gac 1.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185677
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
package mono-gac 1.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185677
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 186084] [NEW] touchpoint device not configured

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg

Installing hardy alpha3 amd64 on a latitude D630.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release 
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu hardy (development branch)"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l xserver-xorg
[...]
ii  xserver-xorg   1:7.3+10ubuntu the X.Org X server

The generated /etc/X11/xorg.conf contains:

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Configured Mouse"
Driver  "mouse"
Option  "CorePointer"
Option  "Device""10 
xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/port doesn't exist"
Option  "Protocol"  "10 
xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/protocol doesn't exist"
Option  "ZAxisMapping"  "4 5"
EndSection

which disables the touchpoint device, which makes it very hard to use a
graphical user interface until you discover that the touchpad still
works.

The correct values for Device and Protocol are supplied from a Gutsy
install:

Option  "Device""/dev/input/mice"
Option  "Protocol"  "ImPS/2"

Probably need to be copied into a configuration database somewhere.

-- rec --

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
touchpoint device not configured
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186084
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 185677] Re: package mono-gac 1.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

My failure came doing a partial upgrade after installing hardy-
alpha3-amd64 alternate onto a Latitude D630.  There was a series of
failures through mono libraries culminating in fspot and tomboy.
/var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-term.log attached.

-- rec --

** Attachment added: "apt-term.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11571174/apt-term.log

-- 
package mono-gac 1.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185677
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 184681] Re: f-spot 0.1.4.1-4ubuntu2 failed to install or upgrade

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Happened on partial upgrade following clean install of Hardy alpha3
amd64 alternate on Latitude D630.  /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-term.log
attached to #185667 reporting mono-gac failure to install which was
first of a cascade of failures that ended with fspot.

-- rec --

-- 
f-spot 0.1.4.1-4ubuntu2  failed to install or upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184681
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 183071] Re: package tomboy 0.9.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 134

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

My failure came on partial upgrade after installing Hardy-alpha3 amd64
alternate on a Latitude D630.  /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-term.log
attached to #185667 about mono-gac failure to install, which was first
of a cascade of failures which ended with tomboy.

-- rec --

-- 
package tomboy 0.9.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
post-installation script returned error exit status 134
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183071
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 210927] [NEW] GThread-ERROR

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: synfigstudio

Running synfigstudio (package synfigstudio-0.61.07-1build1) in a console
generates the error:

GThread-ERROR **: GThread system may only be initialized once.
aborting...
Aborted (core dumped)

That is, the program crashes.  It also crashes if you run it from the
menu entry, but you get no messages.

Recompiling the current releases of synfigstudio (0.61.08 ), synfig
(0.61.08), and ETL (0.04.11) from sources (http://synfig.org/Download)
yields a working application.

This is true using the latest packages for Ubuntu 8.04, either 32 or 64
bit systems.  Most recently tested with a fresh Hardy Beta installation.

-- rec --

Linux elf5 2.6.24-12-generic #1 SMP Wed Mar 12 22:31:43 UTC 2008 x86_64
GNU/Linux

Description:Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
Release:8.04

** Affects: synfigstudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
GThread-ERROR
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210927
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 194187] [NEW] livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Attempting to install Hardy Alpha4 amd64 on Dell Latitude D630, NVIDIA
Quadro NVS 135M, 1440x900 screen.

If I allow the default "Start or install ubuntu" entry to run, with or
without specifying a VGA mode of 1440x900x32 using F4, I arrive at a
dialog titled "Ubuntu is running in low-graphics mode" which offers me a
choice of configuring, continuing, or rebooting.

If I reconfigure at this point, choosing the nv display driver and the
correct screen resolution, a test succeeds perfectly, but nothing
happens when I continue from the dialog.

Switching to VT1 and examining logs, I found that gdm had exited because
there was already a gdm running.  Ps axuw revealed two gdm processes
running at this point, one sleeping the other in state T.

Killing the existing gdm processes and running /etc/init.d/gdm start
brought up the desktop, but other parts of the system start had
apparently been skipped -- I couldn't get the NetworkManager deskbar
applet to respond.

I'll be happy to rerun this and retrieve any log information I can.

** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Low
 Status: New

-- 
livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 194187] Re: livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

The beta was set before the fix to the usplash was done, and I believe
the usplash bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147623) interfered
with the autodetect.

If there were a simple way to update the packages on the beta livecd
then I'd test this hypothesis, but apparently livecd's are built using
Gentoo.  So I'll wait for the developers to release rc1.

The work around is to do the install in safe graphics mode.  Then
after booting into the newly installed system and updating to most
recent packages you should get a prompt from System > Hardware Drivers
saying that there's a restricted driver for your hardware.  Enable the
nvidia driver and you should be all set.

Doing an install in low graphics used to be impossible, but the
installer has been made to use windows that fit on a lowres screen.

-- rec --

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Daniel Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am also unable to install Ubuntu 8.04 Beta AMD64 on the Dell Latitude
>  D630 because of this issue.  The i386 version of 8.04 Beta does not have
>  this issue and I can boot the live cd with ease.  My guess (with limited
>  knowledge) is that there are two problems here.
>
>  1.  The auto detection of the graphics card and LCD is failing, in this case 
> the laptop has a "nVidia Corporation Quadro NVS 135M"
>  2.  The live cd is not handling the "low graphics" dialog properly.
>
>  So I would guess that the graphics detection problem is due to the AMD64
>  version of the driver, and the live cd "low graphics" problem may well
>  occur in both i386 and AMD64 versions.  I will try and find a way of
>  forcing the "low res" dialog on the i386 version to prove that theory.
>
>
>
>  --
>  livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194187
>  You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>  of the bug.
>

-- 
livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 147623] Re: [amd64 + nvidia 8xxx] usplash shows nothing

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Me, too.

Dell Latitude D630, NVIDIA GPU Quadro NVS 135M, 1440x900 screen, amd64
Hardy Heron Alpha4 + updates to date.

The System > Administration > Screens and Graphics control currently has
no nvidia driver listed as available (but it's the one that's running
according to /var/log/Xorg.0.log) and doesn't list the correct screen
resolution as available either (though the log has that, too).

-- rec --

-- 
[amd64 + nvidia 8xxx] usplash shows nothing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147623
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 147623] Re: [amd64 + nvidia 8xxx] usplash shows nothing

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Saïvann Carignan : Thank you for the mentoring.

I just checked this original problem out against the Hardy Alpha4 Livecd
and discovered something even more disturbing.

As above, this is a Dell Latitude D630, NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M (GeForce
8 series), 1440x900 screen, amd64 Hardy Alpha4.

If I allow the default "Start or Install Ubuntu" entry to run, I get a
blank screen followed by the "Ubuntu is running in low-graphics mode"
dialog.  This turns out to be a dead end on Alpha4 because gdm doesn't
get restarted properly after the dialog finishes.  So no matter how you
reconfigure and test, you get no further.

If I choose the "Start in Safe Graphics Mode" option, I get a blank
screen and then to the livecd desktop in 800x600 pixel resolution.  This
is a dead end for installing because the install windows are too tall,
unresizable, and their controls are off the bottom of the screen.

If I use F4 to choose my screen's resolution, and then choose "Start or
Install Ubuntu", I get a blank screen followed by the "Ubuntu is running
is low-graphics mode" dialog again.

If I use F4 to choose my screen's resolution, and use F6 to erase
"quiet" and "splash" from the boot options, then I get a less blank
screen (it's a lighter grey than the one the splash causes) followed by
a livecd desktop at 1440x900.

This is troubling because it shows that usplash doesn't just fail, its
failure is causing other things to fail as well.

-- 
[amd64 + nvidia 8xxx] usplash shows nothing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147623
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 147623] Re: [amd64 + nvidia 8xxx] usplash shows nothing

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

This bug is still present for me in Hardy Alpha5.

I avoid the problems at the Live CD boot prompt by:

  Typing F6 to access the boot options,
  Typing a space to make the options visible,
  Erasing the "splash" option,
  Typing a return to launch the boot.

-- 
[amd64 + nvidia 8xxx] usplash shows nothing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147623
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 184919] Re: [Hardy] Installer window too big on 800x600 screen.

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

This should be marked as a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/38442

-- 
[Hardy] Installer window too big on 800x600 screen.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 194124] Re: hardy alpha5 release page vs bug #147623

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

If it's a wiki I can edit myself, then it can't be a bug.  There should
be a  status.

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
hardy alpha5 release page vs bug #147623
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194124
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 194124] [NEW] hardy alpha5 release page vs bug #147623

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

The hardy alpha 5 release page:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardyHeron/Alpha5

lists the following caveat:

Video problems have been reported with the 64-bit (amd64) version of
Edubuntu desktop. As a workaround, users can manually specify a video
resolution at the boot menu. [WWW] https://launchpad.net/bugs/173130

It should perhaps also mention:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usplash/+bug/147623

which reports that amd64 livecd installs are unusable with Nvidia
GeForce 8xxx.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

-- 
hardy alpha5 release page vs bug #147623
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194124
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 173130] Re: hardy 64bit live cd GFX issues

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

I think this is a variant of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usplash/+bug/147623.

There are several mentions of unusable livecd installs there dating back
to feisty all involving nvidia 8xxx.

-- 
hardy 64bit live cd GFX issues
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173130
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 173130] Re: hardy 64bit live cd GFX issues

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Ah, I see.  They're listed in the attached Xorg.log.0 and lspci outputs.

In the first Xorg.log.0 you attached, the NV xserver says:

(--) Chipset Unknown NVIDIA chip found

and the chip detected by PCI probe:

(--) PCI:*(1:0:0) nVidia Corporation GeForce 7100 GS rev 161, Mem @
0xd000/24, 0xc000/28, 0xd100/24, BIOS @ 0xd200/17

isn't listed as supported by the NV server startup list.

The other two Nvidia chips you list:

01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation NV35 [GeForce FX 
5900] [10de:0331] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
05:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation GeForce 8400M GS 
[10de:0427] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])

are both listed as supported by the NV xserver.

I wonder if that affects the differences in behavior you're seeing?

I also wonder why you're not seeing the problems reported in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usplash/+bug/147623 with your
GeForce 8400M machine.

-- rec --

-- 
hardy 64bit live cd GFX issues
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173130
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 184919] Re: [Hardy] Installer window too big on 800x600 screen.

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Better, make the window resizable, or at least notice that it's larger
than the screen size.

-- 
[Hardy] Installer window too big on 800x600 screen.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 194187] Re: livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

This bug is still present in Hardy Alpha5.

Please specify what logs I can supply or anything else I can do.

-- 
livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 194187] Re: livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

I'm sorry, perhaps the point of my report got lost in the details.

The Hardy Alpha4 amd64 livecd fails to boot to the desktop and dumps the
user into limbo.

I expected the livecd to boot to the desktop or explain why it wasn't
possible.

In what sense is this "not a bug"?

I have no support question, I explain in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usplash/+bug/147623/comments/76
the contortions required to successfully boot Alpha4 on this hardware.

-- 
livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 194187] Re: livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

It happens using the CD reliably.

(I suspect the same thing has happened after install, because I have been
put into the low-graphics dialog since installing.  But I don't have a way
to reproducibly get to the low graphic mode configuration tool after
install.)

I've just finished verifying the exact same issue using the amd64 desktop
CDs for Gutsy, Hardy Alpha3, and Hardy Alpha4 and captured /var/log onto a
thumb drive for each of them.

In each case:

   I took the default boot path, "Start or install ubuntu".
   No splash was displayed.
   X started in low resolution presenting the "Ubuntu is running in
low-graphics mode".
   I configured to use the nv driver and the 1440x900 display.
   I tested the configuration successfully
   I then clicked the [OK] button on the config dialog.

The result was to drop me into a VT with the boot progress text displayed.
The last boot progress message displayed was:
---
* Running local boot scripts (/etc/rc.local) [OK]
---
At this point, the boot has aborted and I switched to VT1 and tar'ed
/var/log onto a thumb drive.

The last entries in /var/log/daemon.log from the Gutsy boot are:
---
Feb 22 17:50:10 ubuntu gdm[8683]: WARNING: gdm_slave_xioerror_handler: Fatal
X error - Restarting :0
Feb 22 17:50:14 ubuntu gdm[8829]: WARNING: gdm_slave_xioerror_handler: Fatal
X error - Restarting :0
Feb 22 17:50:18 ubuntu gdm[8843]: WARNING: gdm_slave_xioerror_handler: Fatal
X error - Restarting :0
Feb 22 17:50:18 ubuntu gdm[8682]: CRITICAL: gdm_config_value_get_bool:
assertion `value->type == GDM_CONFIG_VALUE_BOOL' failed
Feb 22 17:53:08 ubuntu gdm[8979]: WARNING: GDM already running. Aborting!
---
The last entries in from the Hardy Alpha4 boot are:
---
Feb 22 18:32:31 ubuntu gdm[8563]: CRITICAL: gdm_config_value_get_bool:
assertion `value->type == GDM_CONFIG_VALUE_BOOL' failed
Feb 22 18:33:38 ubuntu gdm[8846]: WARNING: GDM already running. Aborting!
---
The end of /var/log/gdm/:0.log from the Hardy Alpha4 boot is:
---
configure
 * Stopping GNOME Display Manager...     [ OK ]
 * Starting GNOME Display Manager...     [fail]

waiting for X server to shut down FreeFontPath: FPE
"/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc" refcount is 2, should be 1; fixing.
---

It turns out that "sudo /etc/init.d/gdm restart" is sufficient to fix things
at this point, the desktop comes up with the driver and resolution I
configured.

I can supply logs, or we can wait and see what Hardy Alpha5 produces.


On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> The ticket has been closed because your description is rather confusing
> and seems to describe different issues you had and workarounds rather a
> specific bug on the software. The revelant part there is that gdm is not
> restarted after using the xorg low graphic mode configuration tool
> right? Does that happen using the CD only or only after installation?
>
> --
> livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194187
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
livecd gdm failure after low-graphics dialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 428591] [NEW] locks up machine

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: flightgear

Using the current release of 9.10 and flightgear, this application locks
up my machine.  I click on the menu entry or run from a command line
shell, it opens a splash window, reports several stages of
initialization, starts an aircraft engine sound track, displays a menu
bar on the spash, and takes away the mouse cursor and all keyboard
response.  The sound track continues, the system load goes to maximum,
but I can't change virtual consoles or get any keyboard or ui
interaction to work at all.

I've tried this with both amd64 and i386 installs of Karmic Koala, same
result.

With quick fingers, one can open a flightgear menu before the machine
locks up with the menu displayed.

-- rec --

lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch)
Release:9.10
r...@elf11:~$ apt-cache policy flightgear
flightgear:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1.9.1-1ubuntu1
  Version table:
 1.9.1-1ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/universe Packages
r...@elf11:~$

** Affects: flightgear (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
locks up machine
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 426061] [NEW] linux-boot-prober

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: os-prober

update-grub2 reports:

r...@elf11:~# update-grub2
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-9-generic
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-9-generic
Found memtest86+ image: /boot/memtest86+.bin
Found Microsoft Windows XP Professional on /dev/sda1
Found Windows NT/2000/XP on /dev/sda2
Found Ubuntu 8.10 (8.10) on /dev/sda6
Found Ubuntu karmic (development branch) (9.10) on /dev/sda7
Found Ubuntu karmic (development branch) (9.10) on /dev/sda8
done

but grub.cfg fails to include boot records for /dev/sda6, /dev/sda7,
/dev/sda8.

Examining the log records generated by linux-boot-prober revealed that:

  linux-boot-prober /dev/sda6

reported:

  Sep  7 21:01:18 elf11 linux-boot-prober: Device '' does not exist;
skipping

I changed

  newns

to

  newns "$@"

which results in the device argument being passed correctly and the
correct records being generated in grub.cfg.

-- rec --

lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch)
Release:9.10
r...@elf11:~# apt-cache policy os-prober
os-prober:
  Installed: 1.31
  Candidate: 1.31
  Version table:
 *** 1.31 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: os-prober (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
linux-boot-prober
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426061
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 426061] Re: linux-boot-prober

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Attachment added: "one line 5 character patch to /usr/bin/linux-boot-prober"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31470093/linux-boot-prober.patch

-- 
linux-boot-prober
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426061
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 645351] Re: installing libusb-1.0 on x86_64 doesn't install the 32 bit library

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Thanks, I found it, too, eventually.   Sorry for the noise.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645351

Title:
  installing libusb-1.0 on x86_64 doesn't install the 32 bit library

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libusb-1.0/+bug/645351/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1013428] [NEW] package bandwidthd failed to uninstall cleanly: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 128

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Package is now trapped in residual configuration state.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: bandwidthd (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic 3.2.18
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu9
AptOrdering: bandwidthd: Purge
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Jun 14 14:34:22 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit 
status 128
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012)
SourcePackage: bandwidthd
Title: package bandwidthd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-removal script returned error exit status 128
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-13 (32 days ago)

** Affects: bandwidthd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013428

Title:
  package bandwidthd failed to uninstall cleanly: subprocess installed
  post-removal script returned error exit status 128

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bandwidthd/+bug/1013428/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1013428] Re: package bandwidthd failed to uninstall cleanly: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 128

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013428

Title:
  package bandwidthd failed to uninstall cleanly: subprocess installed
  post-removal script returned error exit status 128

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bandwidthd/+bug/1013428/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 645351] Re: installing libusb-1.0 on x86_64 doesn't install the 32 bit library

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Actually, it doesn't appear to install the 64 bit libraries, either.

In Synaptic, libusb-1.0 (version 2:1.0.8-4) is marked as installed, but
if you open the properties for the package to view the installed files,
you're told "The list of installed files is only available for installed
packages".

There's nothing that matches /usr/lib/libusb-1.0* installed.

I removed the cached package and reinstalled, a new package file was
downloaded, installed, same result.

Oddest package snafu I've ever seen.

Hmm, the package size is listed as 135 kb, but the download size is
listed as 28.9 kb, the cached package file is:

  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root28866 2011-07-27 06:09
libusb-1.0-0_2%3a1.0.8-4_amd64.deb

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645351

Title:
  installing libusb-1.0 on x86_64 doesn't install the 32 bit library

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libusb-1.0/+bug/645351/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 428591] Re: locks up machine

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Go ahead and toss it.

The problem was in the HID driver for the joystick.  I debugged the
problem, submitted a patch at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/618853, went
through the effort to build a second test kernel at the request of
https://launchpad.net/~jeremyfoshee, posted my results, he ignored it,
and marked it closed.

F**k you very much canonical, you can figure out your kernel bugs
without my volunteer assistance in the future.

-- rec --

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428591

Title:
  locks up machine

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 783685] [NEW] gnuradio-companion, grc, crashes on launch

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnuradio

grc on lucid works fine, on natty launch results in the following traceback:
--
rec@elf11:~/Projects/arftcl/gnuradio$ grc
<<< Welcome to GNU Radio Companion 3.2.2 >>>
Error: 'options'
>>> Failue
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/gui/MainWindow.py", line 
174, in new_page
flow_graph = self._platform.get_new_flow_graph()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/base/Platform.py", line 
149, in get_new_flow_graph
def get_new_flow_graph(self): return self.FlowGraph(self)
  File "", line 4, in __init__
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/base/FlowGraph.py", line 
37, in __init__
self.import_data()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/base/FlowGraph.py", line 
192, in import_data
self._options_block = self.get_parent().get_new_block(self, 'options')
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/base/Platform.py", line 
159, in get_new_block
def get_new_block(self, flow_graph, key): return self.Block(flow_graph, 
n=self._blocks_n[key])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/base/odict.py", line 34, 
in __getitem__
return self._data[key]
KeyError: 'options'
Error: 'options'
>>> Failue
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/gui/MainWindow.py", line 
174, in new_page
flow_graph = self._platform.get_new_flow_graph()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/base/Platform.py", line 
149, in get_new_flow_graph
def get_new_flow_graph(self): return self.FlowGraph(self)
  File "", line 4, in __init__
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/base/FlowGraph.py", line 
37, in __init__
self.import_data()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/base/FlowGraph.py", line 
192, in import_data
self._options_block = self.get_parent().get_new_block(self, 'options')
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/base/Platform.py", line 
159, in get_new_block
def get_new_block(self, flow_graph, key): return self.Block(flow_graph, 
n=self._blocks_n[key])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/base/odict.py", line 34, 
in __getitem__
return self._data[key]
KeyError: 'options'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/grc", line 53, in 
ActionHandler(args, Platform())
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/gui/ActionHandler.py", 
line 70, in __init__
self.handle_states(Actions.APPLICATION_INITIALIZE)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/gui/ActionHandler.py", 
line 332, in handle_states

Actions.get_action_from_name(Actions.ELEMENT_DELETE).set_sensitive(bool(self.get_flow_graph().get_selected_elements()))
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gnuradio/grc/gui/MainWindow.py", line 
281, in get_flow_graph
return self.get_page().get_flow_graph()
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_flow_graph'
--
rec@elf11:~/Projects/arftcl/gnuradio$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 11.04
Release:11.04
rec@elf11:~/Projects/arftcl/gnuradio$ apt-cache policy gnuradio-companion
gnuradio-companion:
  Installed: 3.2.2.dfsg-1ubuntu6
  Candidate: 3.2.2.dfsg-1ubuntu6
  Version table:
 *** 3.2.2.dfsg-1ubuntu6 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/universe amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: gnuradio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783685

Title:
  gnuradio-companion, grc, crashes on launch

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 618853] Re: missing usb hid quirk for CH Products Joystick

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Tested against linux-
image-2.6.36-999-generic_2.6.36-999.201009281108_amd64.deb and the bug
still exists.  Ie, the joystick is detected correctly but does not
produce any input events.


** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing

-- 
missing usb hid quirk for CH Products Joystick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 618853] [NEW] missing usb hid quirk for CH Products Joystick

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

The CH Products Flightstick Pro USB joystick is recognized by the
system, but produces no input events after the first batch of synthetic
events.  Research on the linux-usb mailing list found that several other
CH Products joysticks require a hid quirk to become fully functional.  I
adapted earlier quirk patches to this joystick, patched linux-
source-2.6.32, built a custom kernel with the basename linux-
image-2.6.32.15+drm33.5, and tested that the patches do enable this
joystick to work correctly.

The patch is attached.  It adds a new USB device id to the CH_PRODUCTS
group and then adds that device id to the list of CH_PRODUCTS joysticks
that require HID_QUIRK_NOGET.

I didn't explicitly set out to test against the upstream kernel, but
2.6.32.15+drm33.5 is the listed upstream kernel for the current Lucid
generic kernel that I have installed.

The joystick was tested with the flightgear flight simulator and the
jstest application from the joystick package.

-- rec --

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-24-generic 2.6.32-24.39
Regression: No
Reproducible: Yes
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.39-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21.
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices:
  List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  rec1537 F pulseaudio
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf262 irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Conexant CX20561 (Hermosa)'
   Components   : 'HDA:14f15051,17aa211b,0010'
   Controls  : 14
   Simple ctrls  : 7
Card29.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:29 'ThinkPadEC'/'ThinkPad Console Audio Control at EC reg 0x30, fw 
7WHT15WW-1.02'
   Mixer name   : 'ThinkPad EC 7WHT15WW-1.02'
   Components   : ''
   Controls  : 1
   Simple ctrls  : 1
Card29.Amixer.values:
 Simple mixer control 'Console',0
   Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined penum
   Playback channels: Mono
   Mono: Playback [on]
Date: Mon Aug 16 13:05:00 2010
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=bda90eee-fea7-4bf9-96fb-03e96dae8279
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429)
MachineType: LENOVO 7449F9U
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-24-generic 
root=UUID=03285702-45e1-49b6-b605-00b915752669 ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.34.1
SourcePackage: linux
dmi.bios.date: 09/24/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 7WET60WW (3.10 )
dmi.board.name: 7449F9U
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Not Available
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr7WET60WW(3.10):bd09/24/2009:svnLENOVO:pn7449F9U:pvrThinkPadX200Tablet:rvnLENOVO:rn7449F9U:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.name: 7449F9U
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X200 Tablet
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid needs-upstream-testing

-- 
missing usb hid quirk for CH Products Joystick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 618853] Re: missing usb hid quirk for CH Products Joystick

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

** Patch added: "flightstick.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494022/+files/flightstick.patch

** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494023/+files/AlsaDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494024/+files/AplayDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494025/+files/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494026/+files/Card0.Amixer.values.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494027/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494028/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494029/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494030/+files/IwConfig.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494031/+files/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494032/+files/Lsusb.txt

** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494033/+files/PciMultimedia.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494034/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494035/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494036/+files/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: "RfKill.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494037/+files/RfKill.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494038/+files/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494039/+files/UdevLog.txt

** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853/+attachment/1494040/+files/WifiSyslog.txt

-- 
missing usb hid quirk for CH Products Joystick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618853
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2111010] [NEW] Can't install '' It was impossible to install a required package. Please report this as a bug using 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core' in a terminal.

[Roger E Critchlow Jr]

Public bug reported:

Upgrade from 24.11 to 25.04 failed, I have no idea whether this is a new
bug or not.

The installer told me to report it.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.10
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:24.10.14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.11.0-25.25-generic 6.11.11
Uname: Linux 6.11.0-25-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.30.0-0ubuntu4.2
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CrashDB: ubuntu
CrashReports: 644:0:109:267:2025-05-15 07:15:13.065836766 -0600:2025-02-10 
12:12:50.744956870 -0700:/var/crash/kexec_cmd
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri May 16 05:59:38 2025
InstallationDate: Installed on 2025-01-30 (106 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.10 "Oracular Oriole" - Release amd64 (20241009.4)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=xterm-256color
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oracular on 2025-05-16 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade oracular third-party-packages 
wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2111010

Title:
  Can't install ''  It was impossible to install a required package.
  Please report this as a bug using 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-
  core' in a terminal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2111010/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs