[Bug 346691] Re: 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations
Richard Huddleston, do you have a "Intel Corporation 82801HBM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) SATA IDE Controller" (or another controller that uses the ata_piix kernel module)? If not, this bug is probably not the cause of your problems. -- 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 346691] Re: 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations
It seem like you've got a SATA controller using the ata_piix kernel module which which I believe common to all people suffering from this bug. My personal experience (and other people are reporting similar observations in earlier commens to this bug) is that upgrading to a mainline kernel of later version than the one shipped with jaunty will fix this issue. I am however not using RAID which could explain the difference. -- 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350408] Re: Apport segfault in libc-2.9.so causes Filesystem damage (even with ext3)
I think the output of lspci and lshw would be useful. I got filesystem corruption when I tried 9.04 and at least parts of the dmesg output you gave looks familiar. Could you try to remove apport (or does that break the system)? -- Apport segfault in libc-2.9.so causes Filesystem damage (even with ext3) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350408] Re: Apport segfault in libc-2.9.so causes Filesystem damage (even with ext3)
This bug could be related to this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/linux-2.6/+bug/209346 -- Apport segfault in libc-2.9.so causes Filesystem damage (even with ext3) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350408] Re: Apport segfault in libc-2.9.so causes Filesystem damage (even with ext3)
Also, it seem like Zillode and I have the same SATA-controller: 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801HBM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) SATA IDE Controller (rev 03) -- Apport segfault in libc-2.9.so causes Filesystem damage (even with ext3) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 346691] Re: jaunty kernel 2.6.28-11 kernel update renders the system un-usable.
Were there any changes in the ata_piix driver (the driver used by 82801HBM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) SATA IDE Controller which 5 of the people suffering from this bug have in their machines according to posted output from lshw) between 2.6.28.9 and 2.6.28.11? -- jaunty kernel 2.6.28-11 kernel update renders the system un-usable. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 346691] Re: jaunty kernel 2.6.28-11 kernel update renders the system un-usable.
If it is an error in the drivers (e.g. software), why should it show up in a hardware test? >From what information I've got it looks like something was broken in the >ata_piix kernel module between versions 2.6.28-9 and 2.6.28-11 and then >subsequently fixed (it could also be an error somewhere else that triggers >erroneous behaviour in the ata_piix driver). -- jaunty kernel 2.6.28-11 kernel update renders the system un-usable. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350408] Re: Apport segfault in libc-2.9.so causes Filesystem damage (even with ext3)
I don't think my hard-drive is failing since intrepid (reverted the second time my jaunty install went unbootable) is stable like a slab of concrete on bedrock (unless I try to run something using openGL) and I get no file-system corruption at all. I'll try jaunty final when I get the time and report back. -- Apport segfault in libc-2.9.so causes Filesystem damage (even with ext3) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 115112] Re: Missing man page
I also got a missing man page, I find it kind of weird that such an important application as firefox doesn't get a man page. -- Missing man page https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205420] Re: Partition Name showns wrongly in Places Menu/Nautilus
I too find this annoying, some people might find it useful however so making it optional would be my suggestion. -- Partition Name showns wrongly in Places Menu/Nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205420 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 287884] Re: gnome-brightness-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
I get a similar behaviour on my laptop with an intel x3100 graphics card and an intel chipset. Really annoying but the screen brightness adjustment keys work so I can use them instead. -- gnome-brightness-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270798] Re: lockups with default (hpet) clocksource on 2.6.27-2-generic 64-bit
I am also experiencing this bug. I have got an Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9300 (2.5 GHz). Other hardware on the system include an Intel GMA x3100 integrated graphics card and Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 4965 AGN. As for the dmesg, it does not always contain anything related to time keeping after a hangup have occured. Also, if I use clocksource=jiffies the system is rendered unusable (GDM doesn't start properly and it takes an awful lot of time to get into a virtual terminal) but that is probably a separate bug. -- lockups with default (hpet) clocksource on 2.6.27-2-generic 64-bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270798] Re: lockups with default (hpet) clocksource on 2.6.27-2-generic 64-bit
Further investigations and testing indicate that the boot-option noapic provides an usable workaround. I've had the affected computer running with that boot-option for several hours, leaving it unattended with programs that I usually had running when the lockup occured for quite a while (this would usually trigger a lockup) and so far it seems like it is gone. -- lockups with default (hpet) clocksource on 2.6.27-2-generic 64-bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270798] Re: lockups with default (hpet) clocksource on 2.6.27-2-generic 64-bit
zmzach, I've just got "noapic clocksource=hpet" appended to the other options. Unless my memory fails me nolapic would mess up things badly. Also, I am using a 64-bit version of ubuntu on a 64-bit processor, if you have got a 32-bit ubuntu and/or a 32-bit processor this bug may not apply to you. Mitchell, for me these lockups would happen at random with no correlation to the usage of openGL, nor does the original reporter say anything about openGL. On a sidenote, I think I may have observerd the same problem in 9.04 (I left a program install to run by itself while I went away to do something else and it seemed to have stopped when I got back while it should have been finished considering the time I had been away). -- lockups with default (hpet) clocksource on 2.6.27-2-generic 64-bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139210] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 crashes with Gutsy driver
I've got a similar problem with the ati driver on gusty (final release), it may be the same as you have. How does lock ups manifest themselves? Can you still move the mouse but it won't do anything or is it a downright freeze? If you've got some audio (like music) does it continue like normal or does it stop or start looping? -- ATI Radeon 9200 crashes with Gutsy driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139210] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 crashes with Gutsy driver
Michal Suchanek , does it depend on if you've got an AGP or PCI card? -- ATI Radeon 9200 crashes with Gutsy driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139210] Re: ATI Radeon 9200 crashes with Gutsy driver
I got it working by setting agp mode in the bios to 4 (8 did give worse performance with glxgears and crashed with tremulous), set the AGP apature size to 128 MB in the bios and added Option "AGPMode" "4" to xorg.conf and set. According to lspci I've got a "VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 AP [Radeon 9600]", it got 128 MiB of memory and was sold as a card with an ATi Radeon 9600 Pro chipset. -- ATI Radeon 9200 crashes with Gutsy driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444881] Re: [Karmic] Battery monitor applet doesn't show battery remaining time
@Dylan McCall: I believe there is a workaround for your problem that the computer will not shut down/suspend/hibernate as it should on low battery. You can set the gconf-option /apps/gnome-power- manager/general/use_time_for_policy to false (use gconf-editor or something) to have it use the percentage of remaining energy in the battery to determine when the battery is critically low. -- [Karmic] Battery monitor applet doesn't show battery remaining time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594344] [NEW] There is no option to ask the user about what to do with incomming files
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-bluetooth The default bluetooth front-ends in ubuntu (found in packages gnome-bluetooth and gnome-user-share) and are missing the option to allow the user to decide if files coming in via bluetooth should be accepted on a per-file basis. The behaviour I want is partially available by using the blueman bluetooth manager instead of the default one (you can not, as far as I have been able to determine, set it to do anything other than to ask on a per-file basis). gnome-user-share, which as far as I've been able to determine, is the default front-end for receiving files over bluetooth in ubuntu and only gives you the options of: a) receiving all files sent to you, b) receiving all files sent to you by paired devices, and c) not receiving any files at all. In my eyes none of these are a sensible default as a) is insecure since it let anyone in your proximity dump whatever they like on your computer, b) is more secure but it is a bit to much hassle to set up if you just want to transfer a few files and c) compleatly disables file-transfer via bluetooth. My proposed solution to the problem is adding the option to let the user choose if an incoming file-transfer should be allowed on a per file- transfer-basis. ** Affects: gnome-bluetooth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- There is no option to ask the user about what to do with incomming files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
